logo
Rochester Public Schools says Minnesota law remains the 'controlling authority' as federal pressure grows

Rochester Public Schools says Minnesota law remains the 'controlling authority' as federal pressure grows

Yahoo25-02-2025

Feb. 25—ROCHESTER — Despite strongly-worded directives from the federal government that schools need to strip policies related to diversity, equity and inclusion, Rochester Public Schools has indicated it will be following Minnesota law for the time being.
On Feb. 14, the U.S. Department of Education issued a "Dear Colleague" letter, saying that schools could lose federal funding if they continue to make any decisions based on race. On the surface, that would seem to have significant implications for RPS, but the district has indicated that the process is not as simple as the federal administration issuing such a document.
"A 'Dear Colleague letter,' which this is, doesn't have the force of law," RPS Superintendent Kent Pekel said. "There are very clear processes for review and appeal of a federal effort to repeal funding."
The letter referenced both higher education, as well as K-12 schools. It gave schools 14 days to realign their policies and explained that schools that fail to comply with federal civil rights law may "face potential loss of federal funding." It also encouraged readers to report any violations.
The letter went on to say that federal law prohibits using race in "decisions pertaining to admission, hiring, promotion, compensation, financial aid, scholarships, prizes, administrative support, discipline, housing, graduation ceremonies and all other aspects of student, academic, and campus life."
"Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced disciminatory policies and practices," the letter reads in part. "Proponents of these discriminatory practices have attempted to further justify them — particularly during the last four years — under the banner of 'diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), smuggling racial stereotypes and explicit race-consciousness into everyday training, programming and discipline."
The letter from the U.S. Department of Education comes on the heels of multiple executive orders pertaining to education. On Jan. 29, President Donald Trump signed an executive order called "ending radical indoctrination in K-12 schooling." On Feb. 5, he signed another executive order called "keeping men out of women's sports."
Last year, the organization Parents Defending Education filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education, claiming that Rochester Public Schools was violating the Civil Rights Act, as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution by offering some resource opportunities only to people of color.
RPS also has procedures for supporting transgender and gender-expansive students, which allows athletes to compete "in a manner consistent with their gender identity and in compliance with the applicable regulations of the Minnesota State High School League."
The U.S. Department of Education has since launched an investigation into the Minnesota State High School League.
Nonetheless, Pekel emphasized that the district is in line with Minnesota law.
"The Minnesota Human Rights Act remains the controlling authority on a lot of these issues," Pekel said. "That remains, our legal counsel has said, the most relevant standard for a lot of these issues. ... We are following that. And if the law changes, we will adhere to the law."
Like RPS itself, the Minnesota Department of Education has not announced any major changes in the wake of the federal orders.
"We are closely monitoring how developments in federal policies might impact Minnesota students, educators, schools and libraries," said Sam Snuggerud, director of communications for the Minnesota Department of Education. "We have also advised school districts to follow accounting best practices and consider increasing the frequency of their federal draws."
One thing schools are changing about their policies is in regard to Title IX, which is a federal law that prohibits sex discrimination. According to the U.S. Department of Education, a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky "vacated the entirety of the 2024 Title IX Rule nationwide." Because of that, schools are reverting to an older version of their Title IX policies that don't include specific references to sexual orientation or gender identity.
Byron Public Schools changed its policies on Feb. 4. Pekel said the Rochester School Board will be changing its policy to reflect the change in the near future as well.
"We're not freelancing," Pekel said. "We're following the law."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chris Hayes: Trump's 'secret police': Masked agents' sweeping immigration raids raise concern
Chris Hayes: Trump's 'secret police': Masked agents' sweeping immigration raids raise concern

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chris Hayes: Trump's 'secret police': Masked agents' sweeping immigration raids raise concern

This is an adapted excerpt from the June 5 episode of 'All In with Chris Hayes.' The term 'secret police' invokes a kind of haunting specter. When we see representations of it in movies or history, we immediately identify it with a certain kind of regime: One that tramples people's liberty with no accountability. We associate it with authoritarian governments and dictatorships like the former Soviet Union, where people, usually armed, could wield the authority of the state but were, themselves, totally unaccountable in the same way. Whatever issues there are with American policing — and there are many — at least our police officers have names on their uniforms and badge numbers. But now, in the era of immigration under Donald Trump, one cannot help but notice that in clip after clip, interaction after interaction, the people enforcing the president's policies have all the qualities that one would associate with the concept of 'secret police.' In videos, these individuals are usually masked and either wearing plain clothes or irregular uniforms. They won't give their names or say what agency they're with. Watching it feels wrong, weird, alien and menacing. It does not feel like these law enforcement officials are subject to the authority of a democratic government. It's so striking, in scene after scene, to see regular people asking masked agents, 'Who are you?' and 'What are you doing?' and not receiving an answer. That's what we saw play out in one of the first videos of this kind to be made public: The arrest of Columbia student and lawful resident Mahmoud Khalil. In that video, you can see plainclothes officers apprehending Khalil in the lobby of his building. The officers pointedly refused to identify themselves or what agency they were with. 'We don't give our name,' one man said, after handcuffing and detaining a legal resident of the United States. Not long after that, we got video of the arrest of Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was snatched off the street by masked agents and led away in handcuffs. In New Bedford, Massachusetts, there was the chilling scene from last month in which masked agents broke a car window and forcibly removed a man they say was in the country illegally. Just last weekend, in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, masked agents detained an apparently undocumented gardener at his place of work. In San Diego that same weekend, residents tried to hold back what appeared to be militarized agents who were reportedly executing an immigration raid on local businesses. We've also got allegations of all kinds of lies, manipulation and subterfuge. Eyewitnesses in Tucson, Arizona, allege agents posed as city utility workers as part of an arrest attempt. There have been reports of agents performing wellness checks on children, which critics say is a trap for immigration enforcement. All this feels like something distinct from the normal forms of policing and law enforcement that we're used to. As the writer M. Gessen, who was born in the then-Soviet Union, put it in a column for The New York Times: 'The United States has become a secret-police state. Trust me, I've seen it before.' 'The citizens of such a state live with a feeling of being constantly watched. They live with a sense of random danger,' Gessen wrote. 'Anyone — a passer-by, the man behind you in line at the deli, the woman who lives down the hall, your building's super, your own student, your child's teacher — can be a plainclothes agent or a self-appointed enforcer.' This administration is treating people as if they have no rights, as if they can be rounded up at whim without any due process. That is the legal theory of the Trump administration. It believes that immigrants in this country don't have rights, even though that's very clearly not true. The Constitution is clear on this, and precedent is clear on this: Immigrants have due process rights. But the Trump administration seems to believe the state can do whatever it wants to people. According to Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, the agents in these videos are wearing masks for their own safety. 'They wear a mask because they're trying to protect themselves and their families,' Homan said on Fox News. 'Agents are getting doxed every day, their pictures and phone numbers being put on telephone poles. These leftists are following and filming when they go home from work at night.' In a statement to NBC News about these recent immigration crackdowns, Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said, 'Under Secretary Noem, we are delivering on President Trump's and the American people's mandate to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens and make America safe.' This article was originally published on

Kilmar Abrego Garcia heads back to US after wrongful deportation to El Salvador
Kilmar Abrego Garcia heads back to US after wrongful deportation to El Salvador

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kilmar Abrego Garcia heads back to US after wrongful deportation to El Salvador

An illegal migrant who was mistakenly deported from the US to El Salvador's notorious mega prison is on his way back to the US to face charges. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, 29, who entered the US illegally, was one of hundreds deported by Donald Trump. He will face criminal charges for allegedly transporting undocumented migrants within the US, ABC reported. The US Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' Mr Abrego Garcia's return after he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador in March. The White House initially refused, insisting Mr Abrego Garcia is a member of the notorious South American gang MS-13, allegations his wife and lawyer have denied. Mr Abrego Garcia remained imprisoned in the notorious Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo in El Salvador. Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador, said he lacked the power to return Mr Abrego Garcia, saying it would be 'preposterous' to 'smuggle a terrorist into the United States'. Mr Abrego Garcia's case dominated the news agenda in the US for a time and was seized upon by Democrats, who held it up as evidence of the cruelty of Mr Trump's mass deportation programme. In turn, Republicans claimed it proved that Democrats cared more about the welfare of an alleged gang member than the safety of the US people. Mr Abrego Garcia's wife Jennifer Vasquez has campaigned for his release, despite allegations he had previously beaten her and was once detained as part of a murder investigation. Police documents made public by Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, alleged Mr Abrego Garcia had a rank and street name with the brutal gang MS-13. He also allegedly beat Ms Vasquez in 2021, prompting her to get a restraining order against him and describe him as 'violent' in a handwritten statement. Ms Vasquez, who has since described her husband as an 'excellent father', previously told law enforcement he punched her, scratched her and ripped off her shirt. In an exclusive interview with The Telegraph in April, Gustavo Villatoro, El Salvador's justice and security minister, said there was 'no proof' Mr Abrego Garcia was a member of MS-13. Mr Villatoro also suggested it was possible El Salvador could facilitate the return of Mr Abrego Garcia 'in the future' should Donald Trump request it, contrary to claims made by Mr Bukele. Ms Bondi said a grand jury had found 'Abrego Garcia had played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring', prompting an arrest warrant to be sent to El Salvador. 'They found this was his full time job, not a contractor. He was a smuggler of humans and children and women.' Mr Abrego Garcia 'abused undocumented alien females', according to co-conspirators who were under his control while transporting them throughout our country, Ms Bondi claimed. He is alleged to have trafficked firearms and narcotics throughout America on multiple occasions, the grand jury found. A co-conspirator also alleged that Mr Garcia solicited nude photographs and videos of a minor and played a role in the murder of a rival gang member. 'It is very dangerous, and they [MS-13] are living throughout our country. but no more because they are being arrested, they are being prosecuted and being convicted and deported, when appropriate,' Ms Bondi added. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said: 'Abrego Garcia is an illegal alien terrorist, gang member, and human trafficker who has spent his entire life abusing innocent people, especially women and the most vulnerable. 'Abrego Garcia will now return to the United States to answer for his crimes and meet the full force of American justice. 'The Democrat lawmakers, namely Democrat Senator Chris Van Hollen, and every single so-called 'journalist' who defended this illegal criminal abuser must immediately apologise to Garcia's victims. 'The Trump administration will continue to hold criminals accountable to the fullest extent of the.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin
Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin

Bloomberg

time20 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin

Eric Trump signaled that the tension between the competing factions of Donald Trump's crypto empire has cooled and the family's World Liberty Financial will buy a 'substantial' amount of the memecoin at the center of the dispute. The president's son said in a post on X on Friday that the company responsible for the Trump memecoin isn't moving forward with a digital-wallet offering that has caused a fissure with World Liberty Financial, the crypto company owned in part by the Trump family.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store