logo
Indianapolis charter schools and parents look for help busing students

Indianapolis charter schools and parents look for help busing students

Yahoo14-03-2025

Students at the Invent Learning Hub charter school in Indianapolis board buses the school pays for at the end of the school day. (Patrick O'Donnell/The 74)
Shawanda Tyson loves the Paramount charter schools in Indianapolis where she sends her young son.
There's just one big drawback for Tyson in this city where more than half of students attend charters — transportation.
Like most other states, Indiana doesn't require or pay for buses to bring charter students to classes, which advocates are pushing for as Indiana continues its aggressive support of charter and private schools.
The lack of busing is such a hot button issue that one Indiana charter network advertises on billboards that they offer student transportation. And one Indianapolis charter school director called the lack of busing 'an equity issue.'
Though some Indianapolis charter schools dig into their budgets to pay as much as $1 million a year for buses, most, like Paramount, don't want to sacrifice academics for transportation. That leaves parents like Tyson to fend for themselves, often making logistically complicated arrangements such as carpooling with other families or relatives.
Tyson usually drops her son, 9, off with an aunt early each morning who then brings him and other kids to Paramount. 'It's a major issue,' said Tyson. 'Parents like me have to reach out to other parents to get help.'
Tyson and her aunt have developed 'a system' to get their kids to school. 'Some days I'm off work and I do the pick-up,' she said, ' but it gets hard.'
Transportation has long been a pressure point in Indiana and nationally for charter and voucher schools, with backers arguing students have to be able to get to a school for it to be a real choice.
School districts often balk at paying to take students to schools they view as competition. Practically, district and charter school schedules don't always align, creating conflicts around drop off and pickup times.
In Indiana, some Republican state legislators want an overhaul of school transportation and have proposed combining busing for district, charter and private school students into a single system in Indianapolis and four other cities.
The education pro-charter advocacy group ExcelInEd rates Indiana as one of 20 states with 'limited' transportation for charter and private school students. Neighboring states such as Illinois and Ohio, are rated as 'fair' to charter students by offering similar busing as district students.
A busing bill has been on hold, however, while the state is embroiled in a battle over the broader issue of how it pays for charter schools.
The Indianapolis Public Schools board has pushed back, calling for a moratorium on adding new charter schools and maintaining local control. Board members and residents object to state plans to take money from the district and give it to charters, saying it would force them to close 20 schools.
The bill drawing district complaints, Senate Bill 518, would shift some local property taxes from school districts to charters. It passed the Senate last month after heated debate.
Backers say sharing taxes is needed to close a funding gap between districts and charter schools — a gap of $8,000 in Indianapolis with the district spending $18,500 and charters $10,600. Critics say districts will have to close schools and cut programs if they lose money.
If passed, the tax-sharing bill could give charters enough money to afford buses for students. That's one reason parents like Ada Remus, whose son attends Edison School of the Arts, an unusual independent school in Indianapolis, supports the tax-sharing, even as the Indianapolis Public Schools district opposes it.
'Even when great schools exist, they often lack transportation, leaving families like mine on the far east side without access,' Remus told the Indianapolis Public Schools board last week. 'If funding were more equitable, more families, including mine, would have access to better schools without worrying about how to get there.'
Other Indianapolis parents and teachers blasted state officials for threatening to take money away from the district and raised concerns over what might be cut.
'Everyone in this room, commissioners or not, must realize that for the foreseeable future, the state will be run by rural and suburban Republicans with neither interest in nor affection for the city of Indianapolis,' city resident Guthrie Beyer told the board.
Indiana bill to shift more dollars from traditional publics to charter schools earns Senate approval
Alecia Ostler, executive director of the Invent Learning Hub charter school, said she decided to pay for buses when the school launched six years ago to make sure transportation didn't prevent families from enrolling. She now pays nearly $200,000 a year for three buses that transport 60 percent of her students.
'This is inner-city, so quite honestly, there are just some situations where families are like,' I don't feel comfortable with my child having to walk there',' Ostler said. 'But then we have some families that don't have transportation, so they really lean on that bus. They're not going to be able to get them here without that.'
'Transportation is an equity issue,' she added. 'There needs to be consideration given to the needs of families.'
A small group of charter or independent schools avoid those expenses by partnering with the Indianapolis Public Schools as part of its unique Innovation Schools network — in which the district shares a mix of busing, school buildings and technology support with 30 schools that would typically be shunned as competitors.
District officials estimate they spend about $12 million a year to provide transportation for 17 of the 30 Innovation Schools. Those include KIPP Indy charter schools that boast of having 'Transportation Available' on billboards promoting them.
'It's core and essential to our model,' said Andy Seibert, KIPP Indy's executive director.
Advocates are still holding out hope for a common transportation system that would drastically change school busing in the city. State Rep. Bob Behning, chairman of the House education committee, has proposed creating a central authority to oversee transportation for students of district, charter and private schools.
Indianapolis Public Schools officials object to how Behning's proposal would put busing under a new panel mostly appointed by state officials. District officials oppose the state's Republican supermajority picking a panel overseeing the city's largely minority and Democratic residents.
'The question really needs to be debated by the community instead of as a piece of legislation that comes down the pipeline,' said IPS Deputy Superintendent Andrew Strope. 'It kind of takes away the power of the people through an elected board.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate
Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Newsweek

time41 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump called for troops to enter Los Angeles amid rioting in the Californian city that stemmed from protests against immigration enforcement. The Republican president is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to L.A. to quell the intense violence, despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Monday morning. This is a developing story. Updates to follow.

‘60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be ‘very damaging'
‘60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be ‘very damaging'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

‘60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be ‘very damaging'

'60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley spoke out about President Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS and its parent company on Saturday, arguing that a settlement would be 'very damaging.' 'Well, it'd be very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies,' Pelley said during a conversation with CNN's Anderson Cooper on Saturday, who asked how harmful a settlement and potential apology would be to the network. Trump filed a lawsuit against Paramount Global, CBS News' parent company, over a '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris in October 2024. Fox News Digital confirmed that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the president's legal team is also demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. Cooper, who is also a correspondent on '60 Minutes,' also asked Pelley about former show producer Bill Owens resigning from the program in April. 'Bill's decision to resign may not have been much of a decision for him because he was always the first person to defend the independence of '60 minutes.' Bill didn't work for Paramount. Bill worked for our viewers, and he felt very keenly about that. And so I'm not sure Bill had any choice, once the corporation began to meddle in Bill's decisions about the editorial content, or just place pressure in that area, Bill felt that he didn't have the independence that honest journalism requires,' Pelley said. 4 Scott Pelley warned that a settlement between President Trump and CBS would be 'very damaging.' 4 President Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to Fox News Digital. AP Pelley also said he wished he had the public backing of CBS News, but added that his work was still making it onto the program. 'You really wish the company was behind you 100%, right? You really wish the top echelons of the company would come out publicly and say '60 Minutes', for example, is a crown jewel of American journalism, and we stand behind it 100%. I haven't heard that. On the other hand, my work is getting on the air, and I have not had anyone outside '60 Minutes' put their thumb on the scale and say, 'you can't say that. You should say this. You have to edit the story in this way. You should interview this person.' None of that has happened. So while I would like to have that public backing, maybe the more important thing is the work is still getting on the air,' Pelley said. 4 The Federal Communications Commission accused '60 Minutes' of heavily editing an interview with Kamala Harris in 2024. 60 Minutes / CBS 4 Former show producer Bill Owens resigned from the program in April. The '60 Minutes' correspondent recently went viral for calling out Trump during a commencement address. 'In this moment, this moment, this morning, our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack,' Pelley said during his commencement speech at Wake Forest University. 'And insidious fear is reaching through our schools, our businesses, our homes and into our private thoughts, the fear to speak in America. If our government is, in Lincoln's phrase, 'Of the people, by the people, for the people,' then why are we afraid to speak?' Pelley addressed the remarks during the CNN interview and told Cooper that he felt 'strongly' it needed to be said. 'I don't refer to him or the president or the White House or the administration. But I was talking about actions that have been taken by the government over these last many months. But, there was a little bit of hysteria among some about this speech, and I simply ask you, what does it say about our country when there's hysteria about a speech that's about freedom of speech?' the CBS correspondent added.

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says
BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard Group, and the asset management arm of State Street (STT) are headed to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, Josh Sisco and Silla Brush of Bloomberg reports. Lawyers from the companies are set to urge a federal judge to dismiss the case. The suit claims the firm have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared. Confident Investing Starts Here:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store