Nurse who called transgender paedophile ‘Mr' is suspended after investigation
An NHS nurse who called a transgender paedophile 'Mr' has been suspended.
Jennifer Melle, 40, was previously investigated and disciplined by St Helier Hospital in Carshalton, London, after refusing to refer to a child sex offender patient as a woman.
Following widespread coverage of her case in the media, she was suspended this week and accused of breaching the patient's confidentiality.
After a five-minute meeting with a manager, she was ordered to collect her belongings and escorted out of the hospital in tears.
'I am devastated to have been suspended simply for whistleblowing,' Ms Melle said. 'As a dedicated Christian nurse, I am experiencing relentless institutional abuse, harassment, bullying, and racial discrimination.'Ever since I expressed my Christian beliefs under extreme pressure, I have been a marked woman.
'Despite being the one placed at risk, I am the one being punished. I have been made to feel like a criminal.'
Last year, the patient, known only as Patient X, arrived from a men's prison at Ms Melle's ward to receive treatment for a urinary problem.During the evening shift, a colleague told Ms Melle, the senior nurse on staff, that the patient wanted to self-discharge and a doctor was called for guidance.Ms Melle spoke with the doctor on the phone outside the patient's room, during which Ms Melle referred to the patient as 'mister' and 'he'.She said she was discussing a catheter, for a male person, which needed to be removed, adding: 'This was a real-life medical scenario that required accurate terminology to avoid any doubt between medical professionals.'Overhearing Ms Melle, the patient who was born a man but identified as a woman, took issue with the male pronoun and title.The nurse replied that she was 'sorry I cannot refer to you as 'her' or 'she', as it's against my faith and Christian values, but I can call you by your name'.The patient began to verbally abuse the nurse, saying: 'Imagine if I called you n-----? How about I call you n-----? Yes, black n-----.'The patient also lunged at her despite being restrained and threatened to make a complaint, she said.
However, it was Ms Melle who was investigated and disciplined by the hospital in October, with a final warning and a referral to the Nursing and Midwifery Council NMC).
She is now filing a legal claim, supported by Christian Legal Centre, against the Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals Trust for harassment, discrimination and human rights breaches.
It is understood that she will remain on full pay following her suspension.
Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said her treatment was 'completely crazy'. Mrs Badenoch added: 'She has my full support. It's time the Government pulls its finger out and intervenes to make it clear no one should be punished at work for stating biological reality to paedophiles.'
A spokesman for Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust said: 'We expect all members of staff to follow professional standards such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council's code of conduct – this includes maintaining confidentiality for any patients in their care at all times.
'There is no excuse for racially abusing our staff, and we're sorry that Ms Melle had this experience, and we're investigating her complaints.
'As proceedings are still ongoing, it wouldn't be right for us to comment further.'
NMC guidance says: 'As a nurse, midwife or nursing associate, you owe a duty of confidentiality to all those who are receiving care. This includes making sure that they are informed about their care and that information about them is shared appropriately'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Refinery29
3 hours ago
- Refinery29
I Was Raised By Religious Parents — & It Complicated My Relationship With Healthcare
There's a free HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine that prevents 90 to 100 per cent of infections and related cervical cancers. Sounds great, right? Not according to my mother. When I was a teenager, the HPV vaccine was offered at my high school for free. It was simple: get a permission slip signed by your parents, and you'd receive a jab alongside your besties. I was raised in a very religious family, so it shouldn't come as a surprise that my Christian mother put her foot down when it came to getting this particular vaccine. You see, HPV is transmitted via oral, vaginal or anal sex with an infected partner. While my father was open to me getting the vaccine, she was adamant that I wouldn't be having sex until I was in a monogamous marriage, so the thought was ridiculous to entertain. It's actually best to get the HPV vaccine before you become sexually active, so the logic was all out the window on this one. Besides, what if it wasn't my choice to have sex? Wouldn't having the vaccine regardless of intent be the safest course of action? Sex was a taboo topic in our household, due to a combination of conservative Chinese culture and religion. This was likely a driving factor in why I wasn't given a chance to discuss the repercussions of my mother's decision, something I didn't understand until years later. The idea that religion should be intertwined with healthcare is complicated at best, and dangerous at worst. You only need to look at the abortion bans in the US to see how religious beliefs can put lives at risk. Researchers Amanda Jean Stevenson, Leslie Root and Jane Menken found that an abortion ban across all US states would cause an increase of maternal deaths per year by 24 per cent. Sadly, it didn't take long for this to become a reality once Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022. The state of Georgia deemed a dilation and curettage (D&C) a felony in 2024 with minimal exceptions. That same year, Amber Nicole Thurman was in dire need of a D&C after she took abortion pills and her body failed to expel her fetal tissue. She passed away after doctors waited 20 hours before deciding to operate, a death experts have now deemed as 'preventable'. Dr. Archana Koirala, NSW Infectious Diseases Specialist, says the HPV vaccine 'should be given to all adolescents, boys and girls' and is best administered before first sexual intercourse. '[The] HPV vaccine prevents cervical cancer — mainly through the prevention of HPV 16 and 18 — [and] modelling studies have shown that if high vaccine coverage and screening is maintained, cervical cancer could be eliminated as a health problem in Australia by 2028,' she explains. Associate Professor Annika Antonsson, a virologist with QIMR Berghofer in Brisbane, adds that 'the vast majority of sexually active Australians will be exposed to HPV during their lifetime'. 'While most clear the infection naturally, four to five per cent will develop persistent infections that can lead to various cancers, including cervical, anal, and throat cancers. The HPV vaccine prevents about 90 per cent of these cancers,' she says. My mother was probably coming from the angle that people in monogamous relationships — including marriage — are at a lower risk of getting HPV. Antonsson says this idea of 'abstinence as a reason to not get the HPV vaccine' is both 'risky' and 'leaves people vulnerable to exposure'. 'While HPV is primarily transmitted through sexual contact, including oral sex and deep kissing, life circumstances can change, and not all future exposures are predictable,' she explains. 'The vaccine is a safe, effective way to protect against future cancer risk, regardless of your current sexual activity or intentions.' Now, here's where it gets messy. I couldn't just go to my doctor and discuss my options because my father was my General Practitioner (GP), and my mother was also a practising GP. I've had a strange relationship with healthcare all my life, because if I were sick or needed medicine, he would provide check-ups at home and write me scripts. I had no safe space to go to discuss healthcare worries, concerns or even discuss birth control options. If I had found myself needing an abortion, I would have needed to locate a Family Planning clinic in secret and ask for advice. I later found out that my best friend, who also has two GPs for parents, was registered with her own GP from a young age so that she could have control over her medical choices and body. Unlike her, my view of healthcare was so intertwined with religion and my family, that I avoided getting a GP even after I'd moved out of home. Without experiencing a trust-based relationship with a consistent doctor outside of my family, I didn't realise I was missing out on control over my healthcare. And since religion contributed to my distorted view of sex and sexual health, I didn't feel comfortable approaching those topics with any medical professionals for years. As a young and naive 20-something, the way I dealt with recurrent UTIs was poor. Instead of signing up for a doctor who would have access to my medical history and be able to work with me, I'd pop into a walk-in clinic on the way to work. These GPs didn't know I had my first UTI at the age of four, that it ran in my family… or anything about me. As I moved around the world, my pattern of visiting random walk-in clinics continued. I've got a massive gap in my medical history, and I wouldn't be able to tell you what medications I took for a decade or how often I took them. When I turned 30, I finally signed up for my own GP. As much as we love to tout the idea that Australia has a free healthcare system, it's not as accessible as it should be, especially when you rely on bulk billing, have no access to transport, housing insecurity or a number of other issues. I acknowledge my privilege when it comes to many of these common obstacles — my biggest roadblock was my reliance on family, and finding the courage to develop trust with a complete stranger when it came to sexual health. But, as silly as it sounds, having a regular GP has changed my life. I'd been struggling with pain levels due to having a chronic illness from the age of 17, and while I was able to control some elements, my GP introduced me to the idea of preventative options. Through my doctor, I was able to access a neurologist, dermatologist and therapist — probably about a decade after I needed them. I've been given access to new medication that has saved me from a lifetime of pain, and I have a trusted health professional who goes out of her way to research the latest developments when it comes to my chronic health condition. It's strange for it to have taken me this long, but I'm so glad I got here in the end.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
I used our honeymoon fund to pay for my husband's funeral after he died unexpectedly
Laura Burr had only been married for six months when she held her husband's hand as he died from an undiagnosed heart condition. Now, the 31-year-old from Oxfordshire is campaigning for health MOTs to be offered from the age of 30 – something she believes could have saved his life. Currently, free NHS checks are only offered to people aged 40 and over, but Laura says that's too late for many. "If Ed had been tested earlier, even a basic blood pressure or cholesterol check might have given us a warning," she says. Laura, from Banbury, married her "funny, kind, and chaotic" soulmate Edward in April 2024 in a small ceremony surrounded by loved ones. But, just 186 days later she was holding his hand as doctors turned off his life support machine. Edward Burr, a 32-year-old primary school teacher, began experiencing flu-like symptoms the day after their wedding. Initially, it seemed like a bad cold. "He was getting hot and cold sweats, and couldn't sleep,' Laura recalls. 'We thought he just needed rest and vitamin C." Within weeks, Ed was struggling to breathe. A trip to A&E led to a diagnosis of pneumonia and heart failure – two serious conditions doctors struggled to treat at the same time. "We were told he'd be easier to treat if it was just one or the other," Laura says. "But because he had both, it was more complicated. They didn't know which was causing the most damage." Ed spent seven weeks in hospital before being discharged with strict monitoring instructions. After a brief return home, he was readmitted and fitted with a biventricular assist device (BIVAD) to help his heart pump blood. He was placed on the transplant list – but he never made it to surgery. If Ed had received a health MOT at 30, even if it didn't save him, I might have had more time with him In early October, Laura sensed something wasn't right. "The chaplain came to bless him like he always did, but that time I just broke down sobbing," she says. Just hours later, she got a call to say Ed had taken a turn for the worse. "They told us his BIVAD machine was failing and they couldn't keep him going. I played his favourite music and my sister read him a poem," Laura says. "And then, I held his hand as he died." Instead of spending their honeymoon fund on a trip to Disneyland the couple had dreamed of, Laura says she used it to pay for his funeral. Now, Laura is campaigning for change. She's calling for NHS health checks (currently only offered to people aged 40 and over) to be made available from age 30 – a move she believes could save lives. "If Ed had received a health MOT at 30, even if it didn't save him, I might have had more time with him," she says. "At his funeral, I kept thinking: how did we get here? We were newlyweds. We should've been arguing over dinner plans, not saying goodbye." Laura has teamed up with friend Gabriella Evans, who also lost her husband, Tom, 34, to an undiagnosed heart condition. Together, they are campaigning for earlier, routine health screenings including blood pressure and cholesterol checks. The pair released The Podcast That Shouldn't Exist earlier this month. In the first episode, Laura told how she walked down the aisle at the wedding and the funeral to the same music, from her husband's favourite film series Lord Of The Rings. "People in their 30s think they're too young for this stuff," Laura says. "But I'm living proof that you're not." The check is a free check-up of your overall health and sees everyone aged over 40 assessed for their risk of developing a heart or circulatory condition such as heart disease, kidney disease, type 2 diabetes or stroke in the next 10 years. Everyone aged 40-74 who does not have a pre-existing condition should be offered the NHS Health Check at least once every five years. If you have any of the following pre-existing conditions, the NHS says you're not eligible as you should be seen more frequently: heart disease chronic kidney disease diabetes high blood pressure (hypertension) atrial fibrillation transient ischaemic attack inherited high cholesterol (familial hypercholesterolemia) heart failure peripheral arterial disease stroke currently being prescribed statins to lower cholesterol Each year, around 20% of people eligible for one of these checks are invited to come forward, with a view to reach the entire eligible population in a five-year cycle. Additional reporting by SWNS Read more about heart health: 4 possible benefits of alcohol as champagne may lower risk of sudden cardiac arrest (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read) What to know about common heart defect as Emma Willis undergoes surgery (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read) People's heart health in the UK declining rapidly in 'worrying trend (PA Media, 3-min read)
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Council tax bills set to rise at fastest rate for two decades, economist warns
Council tax bills are set to rise at their fastest rate for two decades in the wake of Rachel Reeves' spending review, according to the head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Paul Johnson said that local government in England did 'perhaps a little bit better than it might have expected' out of the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday, but the 'sting in the tail' is the assumption that 'council tax bills will rise by 5% a year' as part of the funding. The core spending power of councils is set to increase by 2.6% a year from next year, and 'if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most almost certainly will – council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05', Mr Johnson said on Thursday. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves said that ministers will not be 'going above' the 5% annual increases in council tax. She told ITV: 'The previous government increased council tax by 5% a year, and we have stuck to that. We won't be going above that. 'That is the council tax policy that we inherited from the previous government, and that we will be continuing.' The biggest winner from Wednesday's statement was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms. Ruth Curtice, the chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, has said that Britain is turning into a 'National Health State'. Overnight, the think tank said Ms Reeves' announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ms Curtice said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although Mr Johnson warned on Wednesday the money may not be enough. In his snap reaction to the review, Mr Johnson said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.'
