logo
Oklahoma Proposes Teaching 2020 Election ‘Discrepancies' in U.S. History

Oklahoma Proposes Teaching 2020 Election ‘Discrepancies' in U.S. History

New York Times14-03-2025

High school students in Oklahoma would be asked to identify 'discrepancies' in the 2020 election as part of U.S. history classes, according to new social studies standards recently approved by the Oklahoma Board of Education.
The proposed standards seem to echo President Trump's false claims about his 2020 defeat. They ask students to examine factors such as 'the sudden halting of ballot-counting in select cities in key battleground states' and 'the security risks of mail-in balloting.'
They now head to the state's Republican-controlled Legislature, which could take up the issue before its term ends in late May, or punt the issue to the governor's desk.
The standards, supported by the state's hard-charging Republican superintendent, have already received pushback, including from Gov. Kevin Stitt, also a Republican, whose office characterized the changes as a 'distraction.' A spokeswoman said the governor had not yet seen the standards in full and it was not clear if he would support them.
The additions related to the 2020 election are among several changes that injected a strong conservative viewpoint to the state's portrayal of modern American politics and Mr. Trump.
Mr. Trump repeatedly denied the results of the 2020 election, a view that has been widely embraced by some Republicans, despite a lack of evidence.
An earlier version of the new standards — which were released for public comment in December — simply asked students to examine 'issues related to the election of 2020 and its outcome.' The new changes were made after the public comment period and quietly approved by the Board of Education last month. They were first reported by NonDoc, a nonprofit news outlet in Oklahoma.
The state superintendent, Ryan Walters, said that the standards were not meant to 'support or negate a specific outcome' and that 'a well-rounded student should be able to make their own conclusions using publicly available data and details.'
In a statement, he said, 'We believe in giving the next generation the ability to think for themselves rather than accepting radical positions on the election outcome as it is reported by the media.'
Mr. Walters, a former history teacher and Trump ally, has emerged as a combative culture warrior in education and national politics. His push to put Bibles in every Oklahoma classroom is being battled in court, and he was briefly floated as a candidate for U.S. secretary of education, before Mr. Trump nominated the former pro-wrestling executive Linda McMahon.
But within his own state, Mr. Walters has clashed with members of his party, including Governor Stitt, who was once an ally. Most recently, the two went head-to-head over Mr. Walters's plan to collect the citizenship status of public school children, which Governor Stitt vowed to fight.
Amid his feud with Mr. Walters, and after new national test scores showed Oklahoma remaining near the bottom in reading and math, Mr. Stitt last month replaced half of the state's Board of Education. The board is made up of five governor appointees and Mr. Walters, who was elected. At least one of the new members said he had not been informed of the changes to the social studies standards, which were approved two weeks after the new members joined.
A spokeswoman for the governor, Abegail Cave, said the governor's priority was transforming Oklahoma into 'the best state for education.'
'He thinks a lot of what has happened over the past few months and past few years has been more of a distraction,' Ms. Cave said. The new social studies standards, she said, 'follow the pattern of being a distraction.'
Standards for academic subject areas are rewritten every six years in Oklahoma under state law. They include lengthy outlines on what public schools are expected to teach and what students should know at different grade levels.
For example, U.S. history students in Oklahoma learn about the civil rights movement, including key court cases, tactics such as the Montgomery bus boycott and violent responses to the movement, including the Birmingham church bombing and the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
The changes centered on more recent history. In examining significant events during Mr. Trump's first term, an earlier version of the standards had asked students to 'explain the responses to and impact of the death of George Floyd, including the Black Lives Matter movement.'
In the latest version, that standard was removed.
Another change involved the origin of the Covid-19 pandemic. Students would be asked to identify the source of the pandemic as coming from a Chinese lab. That theory has long been hotly debated, but is embraced by Republicans and increasingly favored by C.I.A. officials.
The earlier version was less pointed: 'Evaluate federal and private response to the Covid epidemic, as well as its lasting impact on global health and American society.'
Mr. Walters said the various changes 'give students the best opportunity to learn about history without leftist activists indoctrinating kids.'
His office did not respond to questions about why the edits were made after the period of public review.
State Representative John Waldron, a former social studies teacher who is now vice chair of the House Democratic caucus, said he would oppose the changes and accused Mr. Walters of subverting the typical process to insert his own political beliefs.
'The state superintendent campaigned to end indoctrination in our schools, but what he is doing instead with these new standards is promoting his own brand of indoctrination,' Mr. Waldron said in an interview.
The edits also made more subtle changes to a unit on 'the challenges and accomplishments' of Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s administration.
They removed bullet points on the country's economic recovery in the aftermath of the pandemic and on a signature $1 trillion infrastructure bill.
Remaining were bullet points on the 'the United States-Mexico border crisis' and Mr. Biden's foreign policies on issues like the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Takeaways from AP's investigation of US death benefits program for public safety officers
Takeaways from AP's investigation of US death benefits program for public safety officers

San Francisco Chronicle​

time13 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Takeaways from AP's investigation of US death benefits program for public safety officers

A federal program that provides benefits to families of police officers and firefighters who die and become disabled on duty is rapidly growing while facing criticism for increasing delays in deciding claims. Congress created the Public Safety Officers' Benefits program in 1976 to guarantee that the spouses and children of officers who put their lives on the line would receive financial support. But repeated expansions in eligibility approved by Congress, including three passed in the last five years, have made the program more popular and complex to administer. Critics say the program fails some families by taking too long to grant or deny benefits and making inconsistent rulings. An Associated Press analysis found that hundreds of families are waiting years to learn whether they qualify for payments, and more are ultimately being denied. For one widow, payment came just as she'd given up hope New Jersey widow Sharline Volcy learned this month that she'd been awarded the benefits, more than 3 1/2 years after her husband, Ronald Donat, died while training at the Gwinnett County Police Academy in Georgia. Volcy said she was grateful for the aid, which will provide some financial security and help pay for her two daughters to go to college. But she said the long wait was stressful, when she was told time and again the claim remained under review and ultimately saw her inquiries ignored. 'They told me they didn't know how long it would take because they don't have a deadline. That's the hardest thing to hear,' she said. 'I felt defeated.' She said lawyers didn't want to take the case, and a plea for help to her congressperson went nowhere. She said she'd given up hope and was lucky she had a job as an airport gate agent in the meantime. The benefits program isn't meeting its timeframe goal Volcy's experience isn't unique, and some cases take longer. As of late April, more than 120 claims by surviving relatives or disabled first responders have been awaiting initial determinations or rulings on their appeals for more than five years, according AP's findings. About a dozen have waited over a decade for an answer. The program has a goal of making determinations within one year but has not taken steps to track its progress, according to a recent Government Accountability Office report. But roughly three in 10 cases have not met that timeframe in recent years. As of late late April, 900 claims had been pending longer than one year. That includes claims from nearly every state. Republican lawmakers have introduced a bill to require the program to make determinations within 270 days. The denial rate for benefits is up, too Over the last year, the denial rate has increased, with roughly one in three death and disability claims getting rejected. Applicants can appeal to a hearing officer and then the director if they choose, but that isn't common. Many say they can't afford attorneys or want to get on with their lives. Justice Department officials, who oversee the program, say they're making complicated decisions about whether cases meet legal criteria. 'Death and disability claims involving complex medical and causation issues, voluminous evidence and conflicting medical opinions, take longer to determine, as do claims in various stages of appeal,' they said in a statement. Claims have doubled in recent years The program started as a simple $50,000 payout for the families of officers who were fatally shot on duty or died as a result of other violence or dangers. But Congress expanded the program in 1990 to cover some first responders who were disabled on duty, which made some determinations harder to reach. A 1998 law added educational benefits for the spouses and children of those deceased and disabled officers. Since 2020, Congress has passed three laws making many other types of deaths and disabilities eligible, including deaths related to COVID-19, deaths and injuries of those working rescue and cleanup operations after the September 2001 attacks, and responders who committed suicide under certain circumstances. Annual claims have more than doubled in the last five years, from 500 in 2019 to roughly 1,200 today. Critics say a key partnership creates a conflict of interest While many applicants have criticized the increasing delays, the leading group that represents the relatives of officers who die on duty has been silent. Critics say that's because the group, Concerns of Police Survivors, has a financial incentive not to criticize the program, which has awarded it tens of millions of dollars in grant funding in recent decades. The Missouri-based nonprofit recently received a new $6 million grant from the program to for its work with deceased officers' relatives, including counseling, hosting memorial events, educating agencies about the program and assisting with claims. The group's founder and retired executive director, Suzie Sawyer, said she was warned many years ago that fighting too hard for claimants could jeopardize its grant funding. But current spokesperson Sara Slone said advocacy isn't the group's mission and that it works 'hand in hand' with PSOB to assist applicants and provide education about benefits. One widow's fight has been remarkable, supporters say Lisa Afolayan's husband died after a training exercise at the Border Patrol academy more than 16 years ago, but she's still fighting the program for benefits. An autopsy found that Nate Afolayan died from heat illness after completing a 1.5-mile test run in 88 degree heat, at a high altitude in the New Mexico desert. The program had awarded benefits to families after similar training deaths, dating back to an officer who died at an academy in 1988. But its independent investigation blamed Nate's death on sickle cell trait, a genetic condition that's usually benign but has been linked to rare exertion-related deaths in police, military and sports training. The program denied Lisa's claim and her subsequent appeals, arguing the death wasn't the result of heat along and didn't qualify. The program stood by its denial in 2024, even after a federal appeals court said it may have failed to adequately consider the weather's role and violated a law barring discrimination on the basis of genetic information.

'No Kings' demonstrators to gather across Greater Cincinnati in opposition to Trump
'No Kings' demonstrators to gather across Greater Cincinnati in opposition to Trump

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'No Kings' demonstrators to gather across Greater Cincinnati in opposition to Trump

A string of protests is planned throughout Greater Cincinnati as part of a nationwide movement opposed to President Donald Trump and his administration. The June 14 "No Kings" protests, organized by activist group Indivisible and its partners, are described as a "nationwide day of defiance." Events are slated to take place in nearly 2,000 communities across the nation to oppose what organizers describe as "corrupt, authoritarian politics." Numerous protests are scheduled to take place in the afternoon locally throughout Greater Cincinnati, including: Cincinnati – University Pavilion (University of Cincinnati): 2618 University Circle, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219. Union Township – Veterans Memorial Park: 906 Clough Pike, 45245. Loveland – Loveland Elementary School: 600 Loveland-Madeira Road, Loveland, Ohio 45140. Mason – Intersection of Mason Montgomery Road and Tylersville Road, 45040. West Chester Township – Intersection of Tylersville Road and Cox Lane, 45069. Hamilton – Intersection of South Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard and High Street, 45011. Middletown – Towne Mall: 3461 Towne Blvd., 45005. Oxford – Uptown Park: intersection of Main Street and High Street, 45056. Falling on Flag Day and Trump's birthday, the day of protest is intended to help counter Trump's planned Washington, D.C. military parade. It also coincides with large-scale protests in Los Angeles, which erupted in response to Trump's immigration policy. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is carrying out a directive from Trump to find immigrants living in the United States without legal status. The aggressive crackdown has fueled anger and protests in Los Angeles and across the country, which have led to hundreds of arrests amid occasional violent clashes, vandalism and looting. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on June 8 outside the Butler County Jail to protest the arrest of 19-year-old Honduran immigrant Emerson Colindres, who was detained by ICE agents on June 4 during a routine check-in with immigration officials at the agency's office in Blue Ash. The Enquirer will have reporters covering the protests and will update this story. USA TODAY contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: 'No Kings' protests on June 14 to counter Trump, military parade in DC

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store