
Great Lakes basins may have formed millions of years ago from activity deep in the Earth — long before glaciers, study finds
As an ice sheet thousands of feet thick began its final crawling retreat from North America to the Arctic toward the end of the last glacial period some 10,000 years ago, it left behind the planet's largest freshwater system. At least that's what scientists have long believed about the formation of the Great Lakes.
But a recent study suggests that the timeline actually stretches further back — beyond the evolution of early humans and past the age of dinosaurs — to 200 to 300 million years ago when a hot spot, or plume of hot material, from underneath Earth's crust created a low point that the glaciers would finish carving out and filling with water much later.
'Most of upper North America was covered by glaciation. But why, in this particular area, (are there) these Great Lakes?' said Aibing Li, a seismologist at the University of Houston who co-authored the study, which was published in the scientific journal Geophysical Research Letters in December. 'We'll see this surface feature, and we usually just consider that's just some very shallow process. It could have, actually, some deeper source, a deeper origin. It's not just like, randomly, on the surface, you have something special. Anything that happened in that area must have some reason.'
The continents, as they are today, didn't exist all those hundreds of millions of years ago until the supercontinent Pangaea broke. As North America shifted away, the site of the modern-day Great Lakes passed over the Cape Verde hot spot, Li found.
When ocean hot spots interact with the planet's surface, it usually results in volcano chains like in Hawaii. But when these hot spots are located within a continent, the impact is more difficult for scientists to detect through the rigid, thick outermost layer of Earth.
So, Li wasn't really expecting to find what she did. As they used a model to study seismic movements in the country's northeast, her team noticed that earthquake waves under the crust there traveled at different velocities, horizontally and vertically.
'We actually were puzzled, at the beginning, with what we saw,' she said.
Upon closer inspection, they realized the plate movements indicated that the hot spot — now under an African island nation of the same name located in the central Atlantic Ocean — had sat for a long time right below what would later become the eastern part of the lakes, specifically lakes Huron, Erie and Ontario.
Li explained that as hot, buoyant material from a hot spot plume rises under a continent, it finds resistance from the thick outer layer.
'It'll lift, push upward,' Li said. 'It tries to escape.'
Since the last major ice age started 2.7 million years ago and until it ended about 12,000 years ago, the Laurentide Ice Sheet in North America expanded and melted between several millennia of cold and warm periods. This allowed the glacier to finish shaping the massive bodies of water.
Maureen Long, a seismologist and professor of Earth and planetary sciences at Yale University, said the study contributes to scientific discussion about how natural geographical features can be affected by processes deep below.
'It is a hypothesis that still needs to be tested, but it really does illuminate the connection between what happens in the deep Earth and what we see at the surface,' Long said. 'And whether or not this particular hypothesis turns out to be right, that connection … is very real, so this is a really important line of research.'
Long, an expert in mantle dynamics in the northeast United States, also believes like Li that there has to be a reason for the Great Lakes to be located where they are.
'(It's) very simple physics. If you fill something with water, the water is going to go to the low point,' Long said. 'The more recent glaciation formed the actual lakes and filled them — that part is relatively well understood. The part that we're still puzzling over is, why was there sort of this low point there in the first place that then got carved out by the glaciers?'
We don't know what's at the bottom of the Great Lakes. Climate change demands we find out.
While Li plans to soon find out if lakes Michigan and Superior could've also been created in the same way as their eastern counterparts, she hopes the study encourages more scientific research into the formation of inland water bodies besides the Great Lakes.
'When you have a new idea, it's not easy (for it) to be accepted,' Li said. 'But I think this can stimulate some more discussions. And science always evolves.'
Long said the study illustrates the concept of geologic time, which humans don't often think of as they go about their day-to-day lives on timescales of minutes and hours.
'The features that we see, mountains or lakes or rivers, those features get shaped over millions to tens of millions to hundreds of millions to billions of years. It's amazing to think about,' Long said. 'The Earth is 4.6 billion years old — that's a lot of time. And we see a snapshot of what the Earth is today, but over that long history and that long timescale, a lot has changed.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Ocean currents can generate electricity – and our study shows Africa's seas have some of the strongest
The world's oceans cover more than 70% of Earth's surface. They're filled with currents, some much stronger than the fastest flowing large rivers. These currents can be harnessed as clean, marine renewable energy. Marine energy is much more predictable and reliable than many other forms of renewable energy because unlike sun and wind, which regularly do not produce electricity, ocean currents never stop moving around the planet. New research has found that the eastern and south-eastern coasts of Africa have currents that put them among the world's top potential locations for ocean energy production. Researchers Mahsan Sadoughipour, James VanZwieten, Yufei Tang and Gabriel Alsenas explain what is needed to bring renewable marine energy into African countries' electricity mix. Ocean currents contain kinetic energy that can be converted to electrical power using turbines. This is similar to offshore wind farms, or wind turbines positioned in the ocean, that convert wind to electricity. The difference is that converting ocean currents to energy means the turbines would float on the surface or just under the surface of the ocean. The electricity they generate can be brought to shore using power cables under the sea (as is currently done with wind turbines in the sea). It could also be used to generate hydrogen offshore which could be transported and used as fuel. This would eliminate the need for subsea cables. We looked at 30 years of water velocity data – measurements of how fast the water moves (currents). We got the data from drifting buoys in the ocean. These devices are fitted with meteorological and oceanographic sensors that have been sent into the ocean. There are 1,250 of these buoys floating around the world's oceans today. They are designed to follow the water circulation in oceans so that they can constantly measure the speed and direction of ocean currents. They aren't blown around by the wind. They transmit information about ocean currents via satellite so that it can be made publicly available and used by scientists. We looked at 43 million measurements of ocean current speed and direction at specific locations and times over 30 years. From this, we were able to calculate the amount of energy stored in every metre squared of the ocean. This is known as energy density. This is a foundational step in determining the potential of ocean currents for generating clean and renewable energy. Our research is the first time this information has ever been generated. Prototypes have been developed and tested at sea from as far back as 1985. But there are no ocean current turbines feeding power to electrical grids at present. This delay between testing the prototypes and getting turbines up and running has happened because of the technical challenges in setting up these systems in deep water offshore environments. Developers have recently made new advances, however, improving the undersea cables and the microcomputers used in ocean current energy systems, and enhancing the design of the turbine blades. There have also been advances in developing stronger anchors for these systems. Read more: The new and advanced systems are being developed and tested in the waters off Florida (US), North Carolina (US), Japan and Taiwan. Engineers in South Africa and Mexico are also investigating the potential of ocean current turbine systems. We've identified high energy areas in the waters off Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania and Madagascar. They have some of the most energy dense currents on Earth, higher than the standard for wind energy resource to be classified as 'excellent'. These are potential sites for ocean energy production. An area in the ocean off the coast of South Africa also has potential. For example, we found areas with power densities ranging from 500 to 2,500 watts per square metre over an area around 800km by 30km off South Africa and around 2,000km by 30km off Somalia, Kenya and Tanzania. To put this into perspective, the average small household in South Africa uses on average about 730 watts of power. Therefore, every metre squared in the ocean that generates power could provide enough power for one small South African household. Read more: More research is needed, however. This is because we haven't been measuring the currents in the Indian Ocean as long as we have for other oceans. For example, Pacific Ocean currents have been measured since 1979 but the Indian Ocean currents have only been measured since 1994. Also, most of these high-energy areas are located in relatively deep water (over 1,000 metres deep). This could make it challenging to install ocean current turbines. On the positive side, these areas are relatively close to shore. There are also areas off South Africa, Somalia, Kenya and Madagascar where strong ocean current energy densities are found in waters as shallow as 100 metres. There is a good chance that relatively shallow and nearshore locations such as these will be the first places where ocean current based electricity will be generated off Africa. Scientists all over the world are conducting research into how to use the oceans' waves, tides and currents to generate energy. So, what's needed is for the projects to be developed. Usually, this starts with a project developer, community or electric company setting up a business to attract investment to get the project started. Then more technical work will be needed. This includes measuring the ocean currents closely to select the precise locations for the turbines, and figuring out how to connect the turbines to shore. The project developer then needs to bring everything together. Each project will cost a different amount, depending on how big it is and what technology is needs. Finding the start-up funds could be a challenge. The other stumbling block is that the technologies to harness ocean currents are not commercially viable yet. But they are developing fast. Ocean current energy is a compelling prospect for African countries in times of climate change. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: James H. VanZwieten Jr., Florida Atlantic University; Gabriel Alsenas, Florida Atlantic University; Mahsan Sadoughipour, Florida Atlantic University, and Yufei Tang, Florida Atlantic University Read more: Climate change is disrupting ocean currents. We're using satellites and ships to understand how Six areas where action must focus to rescue this planet The untapped power of ocean winds – why New Zealand is looking offshore for future renewable energy James H. VanZwieten Jr. receives funding from the US National Science Foundation and US Department of Energy. Gabriel Alsenas receives funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, State of Florida, and marine energy sector partners. Florida Atlantic University's Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center is a member of the U.S. National Hydropower Association Marine Energy Council, the U.S.-based industry association for marine renewables. Mahsan Sadoughipour receives funding from DOE. Yufei Tang does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's what you need to know: Sahara dust is making its way to East Texas
TYLER, Texas (KETK) — Every year around this time, the Sahara Desert in Africa experiences peak emissions that sends dust particles across the Atlantic Ocean, causing air quality changes in East Texas. Here's what we know about this phenomenon and how it could effect East Texans. Dust from Sahara brings hazy skies to East Texas Although allergy season is wrapping up, East Texans could still experience higher dust levels from the annual Sahara air layer that is heading this way. Its unknown exactly how much dust East Texans should anticipate, but they will likely see changes in visibility and air quality. KETK sat down with Professor and Center Director for Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Amarillo Brent Auvermann Ph.D. to talk about this environmental occurrence. 'It really is more of a general haze, things will change colors, sunlight will look different. the sun itself may look more red,' Auvermann said. 'At various times of the day, the clouds will be dingier in all likelihood and visibility will be somewhat reduced, depends on the intensity of the event. It is likely that air monitors that are monitoring air pollution at the ground level in East Texas will pick something up this time around,' Auvermann said. According to Google Maps, Texas and the Sahara Dessert are separated by over 7,000 miles of Atlantic Ocean water, which prompts people to question exactly how all this dust could travel that far without settling in the ocean. Babysitter's Club returning to Harrison County later this month Auvermann said these dust particles in the Sahara are small enough to rise high into the air through convection and travel long distances. Once some of these particles reach humid air, they can absorb water which makes them become heavier and settle in more humid areas like East Texas. 'They might absorb water from the atmosphere in response to changes in relative humidity,' Auvermann said. 'So as it gets more humid, they might absorb more water, that makes the particle larger, probably makes it settle out faster.' The dust particles travel toward East Texas because of a natural steering current that causes the wind to blow west from the African coast all the way to eastern parts of the United States depending on latitude. One question that might be on the minds of East Texans is how will this dust effect residents and the environment. TRAFFIC ALERT: Road closures in Henderson County due to flooding Auvermann said it is believed that this dust event has been happening for arounds thousands of years leaving him to suspect that ecosystems have become somewhat used to its effects. As for humans, Auvermann recommends that those with respiratory or other allergy driven issues talk to a doctor about treatment. People who do not suffer from respiratory issues should also stay cautious of this dust event as it could effect anyone. 'Is it possible that somebody that had never been triggered to asthma might be triggered to something like this? Its possible and so again people will always want to be in touch with medical professionals,' Auvermann said. Flooded road, fallen trees in Smith County following severe weather East Texans can expect to see some changes in the air quality index this month and Auvermann suspects these changes will last anywhere from a couple days to almost a week. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
How A Rare Mutation Exposed Weaknesses In Sperm Donation Oversight
A recent case in Europe has reignited debate over the regulation of sperm donation after a man unknowingly carrying a rare, cancer-causing genetic mutation fathered at least 67 children across eight countries. Ten of these children have been diagnosed with cancer, including leukemia, brain tumors and lymphomas. The case demonstrates how advances in reproductive medicine can outpace regulatory safeguards. It highlights the urgent need for robust genetic screening and thoughtful policy in reproductive medicine—a theme explored in greater depth in the new book, Destiny's Child No Longer: Rewriting the Genetic Future. The donor's sperm carried a mutation that causes Li-Fraumeni syndrome or LFS, one of the most severe inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Individuals with the syndrome face a dramatically increased risk of developing a wide range of cancers, often at a young age, and may develop multiple cancers over their lifetime. The lifetime cancer risk for carriers is estimated at up to 90% by age 60, with about half developing cancer before age 40. The donor himself is healthy, and the mutation was not known to be cancer-causing at the time of his donations between 2008 and 2015. The issue came to light when two families, each with children diagnosed with cancer, independently contacted their fertility clinics. Genetic analysis linked the cases to the same donor. This prompted a more exhaustive investigation. Of the 67 children identified as having been conceived with the donor's sperm, 23 were found to carry the mutation. Children who inherit the mutation not only face a high risk of early-onset cancers but also have a 50% chance of passing the mutation to their own children. Ten of the children have developed cancer to date. The affected families now face lifelong medical surveillance for their children. The required medical procedures include regular whole-body MRI scans and specialist evaluations. The burden of this ongoing surveillance, uncertainty, and potential medical intervention is considerable. Still, while stressful, these protocols have been shown to improve outcomes by enabling the early detection of tumors. This case highlights a critical gap: the absence of internationally agreed-upon limits on the number of children conceived from a single donor. Some countries impose strict limits, such as a maximum of 10 children per donor. Others, including the United States, have no binding regulations. An absence of limits placed on children by donors can result in sibling groups that may number in the dozens or even hundreds. In Europe, regulations are inconsistent, with limits varying and enforcement complicated by cross-border reproductive care. Experts have long warned that having many siblings can pose psychological risks. These include the risk of unintentional inbreeding and the challenge of tracing family connections when health issues arise. This case shows how much harder it gets when a rare genetic disorder is involved, making it difficult to inform and support all affected families spread across different countries. While sperm banks routinely screen donors for common genetic diseases and conduct thorough medical and family history reviews, rare mutations like the one implicated here often escape detection. Whole-genome sequencing of all donors is not currently standard practice due to the high cost and the limited ability to interpret the clinical significance of many rare variants. The case has prompted renewed calls from geneticists, clinicians and ethics councils for the establishment of international standards that limit the number of children per donor and improve cross-border coordination in donor tracking and notification. There is also growing advocacy for enhanced genetic counseling and support for donor-conceived individuals and their families. This incident underscores the need for limits on the number of children each donor can have. Such limits can help reduce the risk of spreading rare genetic disorders and enhance communication in the event of a medical issue. Enhanced cross-border collaboration among fertility clinics, sperm banks and health authorities is also necessary to ensure timely notification and assistance when genetic risks are identified. Centralized registries could enable real-time tracking of donors. Denmark's model, which limits donors to 12 children across six families, offers a framework for regional coordination. There is also a need for enhanced genetic screening protocols, potentially incorporating more advanced sequencing techniques for donors while balancing considerations of cost, privacy and interpretive challenges. Cost-effective genetic screening in sperm banks is increasingly achievable through targeted approaches and technological innovation. Rather than relying solely on whole-genome sequencing, which remains expensive for routine use, many banks now employ tiered genetic panels that prioritize high-penetrance genes known to cause severe conditions. This focused strategy can reduce testing costs by 60% to 80% compared to broader, less targeted screening. Collaborative databases that enable sperm banks to share mutation libraries and screening results help reduce redundant testing, resulting in a 30% reduction in per-donor screening costs. Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning are also contributing to this effort. These technologies can identify donors who are at a higher risk of carrying undetected mutations, lowering false-negative rates by up to 40% and enhancing overall efficiency. Public-private partnerships, such as those modeled after the National Institutes of Health's All of Us program, could further subsidize advanced screening, making comprehensive genetic assessments more accessible without significantly increasing costs. As technology and data-sharing practices advance, these combined measures offer a practical approach to enhancing donor screening while maintaining affordability for both clinics and recipients. As reproductive technology continues to advance and global mobility increases, this case serves as a cautionary tale regarding the unintended consequences that can arise when regulation and oversight fail to keep pace with scientific advances. The challenge now lies in ensuring that the promise of assisted reproduction is matched by a commitment to the safety and well-being of all involved—donors, recipient families and, primarily, the children themselves.