logo
UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return

UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return

The deal, agreed last month after long-running negotiations, returns sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius, but will see the UK lease back a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands.
But a panel of experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council said retaining the base and continuing to bar Chagossians from Diego Garcia 'appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return'.
The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the joint UK-US base and have not been allowed to return.
Although the UK-Mauritius deal includes a £40 million trust fund for the benefit of the Chagossians, the UN experts expressed concern that this would not provide an 'effective remedy' for the islanders.
They also criticised an apparent lack of consultation of the islanders prior to the deal, saying: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.'
The experts added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.'
Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'do the right thing (and) stop this'.
She said: 'We have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people.
'Now even the United Nations is saying the very same.
'Labour has completely ignored this community from the get-go, and failed to consult with them at every step of the way.
'It is why I have introduced a Bill in Parliament that would block the (agreement) and force the Government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans.'
The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius.
As well as the fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms.
The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities.
The agreement has also been backed by the United States.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anglesey and Celtic freeports job hopes 'downgraded'
Anglesey and Celtic freeports job hopes 'downgraded'

Western Telegraph

time34 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Anglesey and Celtic freeports job hopes 'downgraded'

Plaid Cymru's Luke Fletcher criticised the pace of change at the Anglesey freeport as well as the Celtic freeport based around Port Talbot and Pembrokeshire. Mr Fletcher said people were promised transformative economic benefits, tens of thousands of jobs, billions in investment and a green revolution – "but years on, we are still waiting". "That's a fact, that's a reality," the shadow economy secretary warned. "Now, if freeports are meant to be a cornerstone of our economic strategy, then we need to actually understand exactly what we're getting and, right now, there's a huge lack of clarity and credibility." Freeports, originally a Conservative UK Government policy, offer tax breaks in an effort to boost business. Mr Fletcher said an initial promise of 20,000 jobs by 2030 was revised down to 17,000 on the Welsh Government's website, a decrease of 15 per cent. He added that the Celtic freeport was downgraded by 31per cent from a promise of 16,000 jobs to nearer 11,000 today. "All we've seen from the Celtic freeport so far are strategies, frameworks and meetings: no clear delivery, no major employment, no visible change," he said. Rebecca Evans, Wales' economy secretary, told Senedd members it remains early days with "an awful lot" of work going on behind the scenes and the freeports only open for business for a matter of months. Samuel Kurtz, the Conservatives' shadow secretary, welcomed the Celtic and Anglesey freeports but raised concerns about sites in England such as Teesside being further along. He also hailed "significant" progress at Wales' two investment zones – based on advanced manufacturing in Wrexham and Flintshire, and semiconductors in Newport and Cardiff. In her statement, Ms Evans said the Welsh Government has agreed full business cases for both freeports and the final agreement with UK ministers was close to completion.

Mixed Reaction to UK Government Spending Review
Mixed Reaction to UK Government Spending Review

Business News Wales

time34 minutes ago

  • Business News Wales

Mixed Reaction to UK Government Spending Review

Business leaders have given a mixed reaction to the UK Government Spending Review, which included Welsh rail investment worth at least £445 million . The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) said it was 'not the business-focused day' small businesses had hoped for, whilst calling on the Welsh Government to use local growth funding announced in the Spending Review to boost the business support system. The CBI described the Spending Review as a 'downpayment on hardwiring the growth mission into government priorities', adding that the 'litmus test now will be following through on delivery in partnership with industry at pace'. The UK Government said the rail investment announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves would invest in both North and South Wales, adding that it would fix level crossings, build new stations, and upgrade existing lines. It said the rail upgrades would specifically link centres of advanced manufacturing excellence in North Wales and improve connections between Cardiff and Bristol. Monmouthshire County Council said it was 'delighted' with the rail announcement, adding that its communities 'have continued to live with the impacts of congestion on the M4 with no viable public transport alternatives'. It said the upgrades to the South Wales Mainline will increase train service frequency and the provision of five new railway stations – including Magor Walkway, which it said was a testament to the tireless work of the MAGOR group (Magor Action Group on Rail). Mary Ann Brocklesby, leader of Monmouthshire County Council, said: 'This is a hugely welcome investment that recognises the urgent need to upgrade our transport network here in Wales. Magor Walkway Station is a project with strong community backing from local councillors, residents, and campaign groups. I'll continue working with all partners to make sure Monmouthshire sees the benefit of this long-overdue rail project.' The Welsh Government will receive the largest settlement in real terms since devolution in 1999, the UK Government said, with an average settlement of £22.4 billion per year. Secretary of State for Wales Jo Stevens said: 'This UK Government is investing in Wales' future and driving economic growth across the country. 'We promised we would deal with the historical under-investment in Wales' rail network and the funding announced today in this Spending Review shows we are delivering on that pledge. 'Along with a record financial settlement for Welsh Government to improve public services, £118 million more to help keep coal tips safe and investment in growing industries like aerospace, we are backing Wales' potential and delivering for working people.' The Chancellor also announced that the British Business Bank's total financial capacity will be increased to £25.6 billion, which will enable a two-thirds increase in investments to around £2.5 billion each year. The British Business Bank said this investment is expected to crowd in tens of billions of pounds of private capital. Louis Taylor, CEO, British Business Bank, said: 'We welcome today's announcement by the Government, which is a strong endorsement of the British Business Bank's 10-year track record, market access and capabilities, including our position as the largest investor in UK venture and venture growth capital funds and the most active late-stage investor in UK life sciences and deeptech. 'To deliver the Government's growth mission it is critical that our most promising entrepreneurs can access the finance they need to grow their businesses, no matter what their background or where they are located.' Tina McKenzie, Policy Chair of the FSB, said: 'Small businesses will be wondering when they will feel the benefits of today's Spending Review. It was not the business-focused day they had hoped for. 'As spending allocations were announced, decisions over how that money would support small businesses were not included. Increased Statutory Sick Pay came without help for small businesses to afford it; extra money for housing and defence came without a commitment to include small firms in the supply chain; new energy efficiency funding for households came without equivalent help for small business premises. 'The one major bright spot for small firms today was the significant increase in resources to the British Business Bank, which FSB campaigned for in advance of today's statement and which we welcome. This should see far more finance flowing to local businesses up and down the country. 'With headline departmental funding allocated, the challenge now passes to each and every government department to be strategic with their spending over the next three years – using every taxpayer pound to get the most value, stimulate the economy, and spread jobs and growth. SMEs should get a far greater share of public contracts, and big businesses which treat their smaller suppliers poorly should be banned from winning them. 'Small business confidence is already languishing at levels comparable to the energy bills crisis, while job numbers in small businesses are falling fast, so bold, concerted action is needed. You can't grow the economy and tax revenues without growing small businesses. 'Small firms were not the focus today, but the second half of 2025 now becomes a crunch period for SME-focused growth reforms. Ministers must buckle down on this over the summer and through to the autumn, putting small businesses at the heart of the Industrial, Trade and Small Business Strategies. This includes addressing business rates, Employment Allowance expansion and Statutory Sick Pay in the autumn Budget, and proper legislative reform in the King's Speech. 'The benefits will only come if the Government takes these challenges seriously through to the autumn.' John Hurst, FSB Wales Chair, said: 'Small businesses in Wales continue to face relentless pressure from rising employment costs, ongoing changes to employment legislation, and sustained high energy bills. 'The Welsh Government must now actively back our small businesses by using the local growth funding announced in the Spending Review to boost our business support system, fostering a dynamic ecosystem that encourages entrepreneurship and empowers Welsh business owners to innovate, invest, and grow.' Russell Greenslade, Director, CBI, Wales, said: 'Today's Spending Review signals a downpayment on hardwiring the growth mission into government priorities. Against a challenging backdrop, the choice to prioritise investment in clean energy, R&D, as well as delivering a much-needed boost to transport in Wales, and infrastructure, is the smart play that will raise the long-term ceiling of the economy. The litmus test now will be following through on delivery in partnership with industry at pace. That must be underpinned by a comprehensive strategy for driving investment in adult skills and addressing high energy costs, which were missing from today's announcement. 'The Chancellor's announcement made clear that Wales has the industries of tomorrow. From solar power to battery technology, net zero and renewables to semiconductors helping to power AI. The additional budget increase was modest, but this is understandable given the difficult economic context. 'R&D investments by the government will hopefully see projects from our key sectors make the impossible possible. We would have liked to have seen a more adaptive growth and skills fund geared to minimise apprentices leaving early due to high living costs. Overall, there were positive announcements in the Spending Review. It is now up to local firms and government to enter the bidding processes they are so good at and win that funding for Wales. 'CBI Wales looks forward to working closely with the Welsh Government on the welcomed allocation of additional funding from the UK Government. Our goal is to help reduce the high burden of costs currently facing our businesses in Wales. By doing so, we aim to unlock growth and create more jobs across the country – ensuring the Welsh economy remains resilient and competitive for the future.' Ann Watson, CEO of Skills Charity Enginuity, which promotes skills in the engineering and manufacturing sectors, broadly welcomed the Spending Review. She said: 'Today's Spending Review sends a welcome signal of government support for the UK's priority industrial sectors, with significant investment announced for clean energy, defence and transport. This increase in capital investment will help create demand across the UK's industrial supply chains, providing SMEs with a confidence boost to realise the Government's ambitious economic and decarbonisation goals. With fiscal parameters now in place, the crucial next step is a comprehensive Industrial Strategy that provides clarity, detail and meaningful policies to set a concrete vision for the future of UK industry. 'Enginuity is also pleased to see the Chancellor acknowledge that achieving growth requires investment in skills, with an injection of £1.2 billion of additional investment per year by 2028-29 into the skills system. Its impact will depend on allocation and execution and will no doubt hinge on further details due to be announced in the forthcoming post-16 strategy.' The Tidal Range Alliance (TRA) warned of a 'glaring blindspot' in the UK Government's high-level energy ambitions. It said that while the focus on future energy investment was welcome, it believes there is a 'major lack of risk evaluation, mitigation, and no credible contingency planning'. Robin Peters, Tidal Range Development Lead for the TRA, said: 'The strategy is bold but is dangerously exposed. The focus and future investment in low carbon technologies is to be applauded, but hydrogen fired generation, carbon capture and new nuclear are all high-risk in terms of technology readiness, supply chains, and delivery timelines. 'That risk is being pushed into the market, without the Government retaining control or providing a credible Plan B. 'Tidal Range technology is the Plan B and should be in the mix now. It is a civil infrastructure technology with predictable output, low-risk delivery, and decades of successful generation from existing schemes in France and South Korea. 'Why it has been omitted from the Government's strategic investment plans is not only baffling but a major energy cause for concern.'

‘It feels good to say I'm Irish': How second passports grant readers post-Brexit travel freedom
‘It feels good to say I'm Irish': How second passports grant readers post-Brexit travel freedom

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘It feels good to say I'm Irish': How second passports grant readers post-Brexit travel freedom

As Brits grapple with the post-Brexit reality of restricted EU access, many Independent readers have been sharing why they've pursued second citizenship – and how it's reshaped their identity, freedom, and sense of belonging. Jessica Furseth's article struck a chord with those determined to reclaim their right to freedom of movement through ancestral ties, even if it meant wrestling with red tape. Her piece captured the reality of a growing trend: UK-born citizens pursuing second passports not for novelty, but necessity, reestablishing the rights they feel were stripped away by Brexit. Our readers described frantic searches through family records, cross-border paperwork marathons, and bittersweet awakenings to long-dormant heritage. Irish citizenship was the most popular route, but many also explored their Polish, German and Italian heritage. While a few wrestled with feelings of imposter syndrome, most said the outcome was worth it – not just for smoother holidays or easier work permits, but to feel connected to Europe again. The overarching view was that Brexit took something personal – and that this wave of passport reclamation isn't just administrative – it's emotional: about agency, identity, and quietly defying the walls that went up. Here's what you had to say: Jus sanguinis Husband asserted his right to Italian citizenship on the basis of jus sanguinis, or bloodline, unbroken through his mother's family. Took about two weeks after getting a codicil on his birth certificate, as a result of which my daughter has done the same (found herself frozen out of jobs otherwise) and my son should have got around to it, having studied in Italy for six years. I will be applying on the grounds of marriage, only slightly more complicated. All of this became an issue solely because of Brexit, and I'm so annoyed that the doors have been slammed in the faces of Britons who valued EU membership. Wonderful to still have my European citizenship As someone who, years after his hair became grey, became truly interested in his Irish heritage, I can only say it's wonderful to still have my European citizenship. I can see my daughter in Holland as I please – no 90 days nonsense. I can cross any Schengen border as a true European citizen. This, as we go, for example, as a family to the Christmas fair in Oldenburg (Germany). But as we pass Mr Farage and his German-speaking family doing their Christmas shopping in Germany too, it's good to know that more people have found this loophole! Brad It feels good to say I'm Irish I can relate to Tom Harrison. My father told me many years ago that I could claim Irish citizenship because his father was Irish, but I never saw the need. But post-Brexit, I wanted to remain an EU citizen, so I went for it, and it's a much simpler task now with the advent of the internet. Despite visiting family and friends and having many holidays in Ireland over the years, I do feel a bit of a fraud. That said, I am immensely grateful to the Irish government for allowing it. I sometimes feel a little uncomfortable telling people that I'm British, but it feels good to be able to say that I'm Irish. Bionicpants Travel is what the EU is about These people are pro-EU for the right reasons: the freedom to travel, work and live all over Europe. That is what the EU is about, the Ever Closer Union. You may notice, they don't mention the nice side effects, like frictionless trade, no additional roaming, or certain subsidies. They embrace the Euro and the Schengen area. Should the UK want to join, they have to embrace the principles of the Ever Closer Union as well. It helps if you focus on what that means, instead of repeating the economic benefits. As said, those are just nice side effects. Orval Can we please have Harry Kane, Declan Rice and Grealish back? As an Irish person, it's very satisfying to hear these stories of people with Irish heritage benefiting from getting an Irish passport. Can we please have Harry Kane, Declan Rice and Grealish back as a sign of appreciation? All very pleasant chaps too from what I can see. AnonyMousse Fast lane My mother is an immigrant from an EU country, and I got an EU passport about three years ago, as a result. Interestingly, I went to Spain recently, and when spotted with my EU passport getting off a flight from Britain, they ushered me and my friend (with her British passport) through EU passport control. She went via the EU fast lane because she was with me. Prenst Switch nationality mid-flight After having lived in the UK for 18 years, Brexit made it necessary for me to apply for naturalisation as a British citizen. When I now travel to my native Germany, I have to leave the UK on my British passport and arrive in Frankfurt on my German passport. As per German law, I have to use my German ID to enter/leave Germany. I could, of course, enter any other EU country on my British passport, but this would mean queuing and getting an entry stamp and then an exit stamp. When returning to the UK, I then 'switch' nationality again in mid-flight from being a German in the EU to being a Brit in the UK. On one occasion, I flew from Tenerife to London... as a German from Tenerife to Madrid and as Brit from Madrid to London. Baldrick's Plan Legal technicalities My mother is a French citizen, as is all her side of the family, with French government certificates back to the 14th century, but I am refused citizenship (despite also living and paying taxes in France for eight years). Reason: a legal technicality called desuetude. You may want to do some research before handing over a few grand to the lawyers! Frankx33 You can't complain about being considered a foreigner Britain's approach to the EU always was a "what can I get in return" one... called it cakeism. What matters is being in the slow lane, no longer being able to live and work, etc. Britain would have loved to retain all EU perks without committing. You can't complain about being considered as a foreigner while being one and expecting the same rights as EU citizens.... Europeancitizen I don't know what I would have done with just a UK passport Got my precious Irish passport a couple of years ago, thanks to my grandfather, who was born in Ireland. This has allowed me to move from Italy back to France following retirement without any issues. I don't know what I would have done with just a UK passport, as there is no mechanism for UK passport holders to move from one EU place of residence to another. Farage, Johnson, Gove, etc, should be imprisoned for the lies they told. I cannot believe that Farage is still so popular, says a lot for the intelligence of a good percentage of the UK population. Very sad. YaketyYak Keep the family in one piece with my Irish passport My father was born in Ireland in 1916. I was born in England in 1944. He was an RAF pilot. I ended up marrying a German and lived happily in Solingen (which my father's squadron bombed!) until that swine Farage stirred up his sleazy chauvinism. Thanks to my father, I was able to keep the family in one piece with my Irish passport. I am immensely grateful. And to the Germans, too, who have made me very welcome Kenhubert Heartening It is heartening to read the stories of the people who have been able to reclaim the EU citizenship stripped from them by the disgusting and mendacious Brexiteers, who have yet to apologise to the rest of us for stripping us of our rights. Sturluson Not just the young It's not just young people. Us older folk are also going for dual passports after Brexit cut off our travel freedom. My Irish grandfather has now continued to be very useful after his death! JustMeHere Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day's top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click 'log in' or 'register' in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store