logo
Thai lawyers' council to investigate alleged killing by soldiers

Thai lawyers' council to investigate alleged killing by soldiers

An influential lawyers' association in Thailand said Thursday it is launching an investigation into the alleged killing of a Myanmar man by Thai soldiers last year, a move it says could lead to lawsuits against any officers involved.
The Lawyers Council of Thailand, which accredits the country's attorneys, announced the probe after accepting a formal complaint about the case from Fortify Rights, an international advocacy group that previously carried out an investigation into the case.
In a report published last year, Fortify Rights alleged that three unidentified soldiers brutally beat Aung Ko Ko to death with bamboo rods in Baan Tai village, near the Myanmar border, on January 12, 2024, after disputing his membership in a security patrol team made up of local civilians.
The courts never charged any soldiers in the case, but convicted another civilian and Myanmar national, Sirachuch, who goes by one name, with manslaughter in September. Fortify Rights claims Sirachuch is being used as a scapegoat. Sirachuch has said he saw the soldiers attack Aung Ko Ko.
'After the Lawyers Council has taken the complaint, we will then investigate the nature and circumstances of the death of Aung Ko Ko. After that, we will take appropriate legal action,' Council President Wichien Chubthaisong told a press conference in Bangkok announcing the move.
'We will set up a subcommittee to conduct a fact-finding operation, hoping this will lead to the consideration of legal aid services and ensure that justice prevails for the family of Aung Ko Ko,' he added.
'Everyone has the right to have their human rights protected and respected under the law. Citizens in general should not be punished arbitrarily,' the chairman said.
Afterward, Wichien told VOA the evidence that Fortify Rights has gathered implicating the army appeared credible and that the council could pursue civil or criminal charges against any soldiers it identifies as suspects.
'With credible evidence and a strong case, I think what we can continue to do is to prosecute other people involved in this case,' he said.
Neither the Royal Thai Armed Forces nor the Royal Thai Police, which investigated Aung Ko Ko's death last year and filed the charges that led to Sirachuch's conviction, replied to VOA's requests for comment.
Fortify Rights says the army has denied any responsibility for Aung Ko Ko's death, both to local media and a House of Representatives committee hearing, claiming he was tortured on the Myanmar side of the border before his body was dumped on Thai soil.
The rights group denies the army's claim and says it undermines the authorities' case against Sirachuch, which rests on Thailand having jurisdiction over an attack by Sirachuch on Aung Ko Ko in Thailand.
Sirachuch, who is now serving a prison sentence of three years and four months, confessed to striking Aung Ko Ko once on the back and twice on the shins.
Fortify Rights, though, says that falls well short of manslaughter. It says the post-mortem report by the hospital that examined Aung Ko Ko's body states he died of 'head injuries caused by physical assault,' and that three eyewitnesses to the attack, Sirachuch included, claim it was the soldiers who beat Aung Ko Ko on the head.
'This is a grave miscarriage of justice at multiple levels and we are very heartened to see Thai leaders like Dr. Wichien willing to take a closer look at this case,' Fortify Rights CEO Matthew Smith said at Thursday's press conference.
Afterward, Smith said his group pursued the council's help because of its influence and connections with Thai authorities, especially its links to the Department of Special Investigation, or DSI. The department is a special Ministry of Justice unit that investigates some of the country's highest profile and sensitive cases, including those that may involve public corruption and abuse of power. Wichien is on the department's board of special cases, which guides its work and is chaired by Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra.
'So, the fact that the Lawyers Council is willing to take a closer look at this case, we hope, is one important step closer to DSI also doing a formal investigation,' Smith told VOA.
'This is the type of situation where DSI can get involved and actually uncover the truth and ensure actual justice takes place,' he added. 'In some ways, DSI can unravel coverups, and DSI has the skills and ability and the influence and power to ensure justice in these really difficult cases.'
In its report on Aung Ko Ko's death, Fortify Rights says it interviewed 23 people during its investigation, including witnesses, acquaintances and relatives, and spoke with local police. It says he had been living in Thailand for many years and was a well-known member of the community's civilian security team, known locally as Chor Ror Bor, which is trained and organized by Thai authorities.
The report says the soldiers who detained Aung Ko Ko the day he died, and who later beat him, disputed his membership in the team, even after other members arrived to vouch for him. After the attack, it adds, Aung Ko Ko, badly bruised and bloodied, was being helped to the Myanmar border by other locals, on orders from the soldiers, when he collapsed and died of his wounds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

VOA Kurdish: Debate grows over proposal to shorten fasting hours during Ramadan
VOA Kurdish: Debate grows over proposal to shorten fasting hours during Ramadan

Voice of America

time15-03-2025

  • Voice of America

VOA Kurdish: Debate grows over proposal to shorten fasting hours during Ramadan

The Saudi crown prince plans to discuss reducing the hours of fasting for Muslims during Ramadan. However, the Kurdistan Regional Government Fatwa Committee says it is not right to follow political decisions on fasting. On the other hand, the former director of the Ministry of Religious Affairs told VOA that if Saudi Arabia makes such a decision, others should consider following it, because Saudi Arabia is still seen as the center of important religious decisions. Click here for the full story in Kurdish.

Author says ban on her book reflects Taliban's repression of women
Author says ban on her book reflects Taliban's repression of women

Voice of America

time14-03-2025

  • Voice of America

Author says ban on her book reflects Taliban's repression of women

When Naveeda Khoshbo published her book of political analysis in 2019, she received widespread praise and recognition. For many, "it was the first time that they were reading a book written by a young woman," she said. So, when she received a text message from a friend and fellow journalist in November 2024, telling her the Taliban had banned her book, she was shocked. Khoshbo, 33, said she can't figure out why the book, "Siyasi Jaj" or "Political Analysis," was banned, saying "it did not address any sensitive topics." Published by the Peace Publish Center in Kabul, her book covers political events and processes from 2001 to 2019. But last year it was included in a list circulated on social media of more than 400 books banned by the Taliban. The list covers a range of topics: democracy, the arts, literature, poetry, history, religion, governance, rights and freedoms. The Taliban's deputy minister for the Ministry of Information and Culture, Zia-ul Haq Haqmal, told media his department had identified 400 books deemed "against Afghanistan's national interest and Islamic values." 'Hostility is directed at women' Khoshbo believes her book also was banned because it was written by a woman. She is now based in London. "I believe their hostility is directed at women, and for them, the books written by women are the first to be targeted, regardless of their content," she said. About a dozen titles in the book ban are by women, or they were translated by women. Other titles include the book by Nobel laureate Malala Yousafzai, "I am Malala: The Story of the Girl Who Stood Up for Education." The Taliban, who seized power in August 2021, have imposed strict measures against women in Afghanistan, barring them from education, work, long-distance travel and participating in public life. Afghan writer Nazeer Ahmad Sahaar told VOA the Taliban jettison anything they see as contrary to their ideology. "Anything that is against the Taliban's political and religious beliefs and narrative is banned under the Taliban," said Sahaar. The author has written more than a dozen books. One of those, "Waziristan: The Last Stand" is also on the list of banned publications. Sahaar sees the book ban as part of a larger crackdown on "women, the press and freedom of expression." Sahaar said the ban on books, though, is of little surprise. "It was evident that they would impose restrictions in many areas," he said. Alongside the book ban and restrictions imposed on women, the Taliban return has led to restrictions on freedom of expression. Media outlets work under rules that are not always clear about what can and cannot be covered, and in some cases must submit coverage for review before publication. The Taliban also imposed restrictions on printing books. An owner of a printing press in the eastern province of Nangarhar, who requested anonymity for fear of reprisal, told VOA that the provincial Directorate of Information and Culture instructed publishers not to print anything without prior permission. "In a meeting with publishers, the Taliban officials said that 'if you are publishing any book, you must first obtain permission from the directorate,'" said the business owner. The owner said that businesses are struggling under the Taliban, but there is an increased demand for books, particularly ones that are banned. "The Taliban's restrictions have sparked social and cultural resistance," he said, with people seeking ways to oppose the limitations, including by reading prohibited books. 'It reflects the fear' Abdul Ghafoor Lewal, an Afghan writer and former diplomat, told VOA the Taliban's actions reveal fear of any opposition. "It reflects the fear authoritarian regimes have of freedom of expression, books and knowledge," said Lewal. Khoshbo said the Taliban's ban would not stop her and other women from writing and participating in social and political life. "The Taliban can't suppress our voices by "banning books," said Khoshbo, but "women can't be erased from society and politics."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store