
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro vs. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (global models)
You're shopping for a mid-range phone in the €200–€300 range, and the Redmi Note 14 series clearly offers solid value. The problem? The lineup is packed with confusingly similar models -some even limited to 4G.
We can also understand how comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Global) and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Global) may be a tough choice. The price gap is minimal, and their spec sheets are nearly identical.
We're here to help you figure out whether spending an extra €50-€60 for the Plus version is actually worth it - or if the standard Pro meets your needs just fine. Table of Contents: Design
Display
Battery Life
Charging
Speaker Test
Performance
Cameras
Verdict
For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor's assessment in the following text. Size comparison
The Redmi Note 14 Pro and the Pro+ have very similar dimensions, with the latter having a slightly thicker and heavier chassis, probably due to the difference in materials. If not vegan leather, the Plus model gives you a glass back instead of plastic.
But for the most part, you won't feel a difference and it's no surprise. They both feature the same 6.67-inch display. In any case, you will get a more premium build with the Plus. Display comparison
The two Redmis feature the exact same display panels. We didn't find any difference in our measurements as well. Both devices boost to around 1,200 nits of max brightness. Battery life
The two handsets offer similar battery life, which is expected given the shared hardware - identical displays and identical 5,110 mAh cells. The only difference is the chipset, and the Dimensity 7300 Ultra inside the Redmi Note 14 Pro seems to be the slightly more efficient one. The Non-Plus Pro model edges out the Pro+ in the call, web and video tests, gaining an extra hour of Active Use Score. Charging speed
The charging rate is perhaps the most notable distinction between the two Redmis. The Pro+ offers blazing fast 120W charging, completing a full charging cycle within 21 minutes.
The non-Plus replenishes only around half of its battery's charge in that time, and it takes more than an hour to complete a full charge. Speaker test
There's no detectable difference in the loudspeaker's tuning and volume with our contenders. You get decent speakers with "Good" volume with either phone. Performance
Naturally, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ runs on the more powerful chipset, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the non-Plus settles for a Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC. Both chipsets fall into the mid-range segment. But while the Snapdragon is the more powerful of the two, the Dimensity silicon is apparently more effective, judging by the Redmi Note 14 Pro's battery endurance.
Memory configurations are absolutely identical. Both phones start at 8GB/256GB and go up to 12GB/512GB. In either case, the storage chips are UFS 2.2, and there's no microSD card slot. Benchmark performance
In terms of raw performance, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro by 11% in CPU-bound benchmark tests and by merely 9% in combined workloads like AnTuTu 10. However, according to the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark test, which is primarily GPU-intensive, the Plus variant outperforms the standard Pro by about 24%, which is a significant gap. So for the gamers out there, the Pro+ might be the better option. Camera comparison
The two Redmis share identical camera hardware featuring a solid 200MP main camera, aided by an 8MP ultrawide unit and a 2MP macro shooter. The selfie camera uses a 20MP sensor.
Should there be any notable difference in image quality or rendering style, it's likely due to the ISP. That's the only difference in this equation. Image quality
As expected, the two devices deliver similar camera quality. There's no meaningful difference in terms of sharpness, clarity and detail. However, there's a small difference in rendering. For instance, the non-Plus produces warmer and potentially more likable images. The color temperature seems more accurate with warmer hues, whereas the Pro+ tends to render the scenes colder.
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x
Additionally, the non-Plus offers a wider dynamic range and handles highlights better. That's not always the case with the ultrawide cameras, though, where the two phones trade blows. Sometimes the Pro+ gets the exposure right, sometimes the non-Plus.
It's trickier in low-light scenarios, though. The non-Plus model produces nicer ultrawide photos with better sharpness, detail and dynamic range. This applies to the 2x and 4x zoom modes. However, as far as the 1x Photo mode is concerned, the Pro+ outputs cleaner, sharper images with more natural shadows and more balanced highlights.
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x
The two phones produce identical selfies, but the non-Plus offers an ever so slightly wider dynamic range.
Selfies: Redmi Note 14 Pro • Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Video quality
Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length, so it's easier to compare to one another.
The non-Plus offers nicer videos with more accurate exposure and cleaner overall footage. The ultrawide video on the non-Plus has considerably better detail, both day and night.
Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x
Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x Verdict
Despite the fact that the Pro+ is marketed as a higher-tier phone with more premium features, it's not necessarily the better phone for most users. The Redmi Note 14 Pro and the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ share similar hardware, like display, battery capacity and cameras, but the non-Plus comes out on top in many categories, even though it's the cheaper of the two.
For instance, the standard Pro offers slightly longer battery life and overall better camera experience (with a few exceptions). It also matches the Plus in the display and loudspeaker department.
The Pro+, on the other hand, compensates the slightly lower battery endurance with blazing-fast charging, flagship-level even. The handset also posts higher GPU benchmark scores and offers a more premium build (if you go for the glass back version).
But for the most part, these phones are very close siblings, as the name implies, so at the end of the day, you will be paying an extra €50 for the faster charging and small performance gain and it's up to you to decide what those features are worth to you.
The largely identical user experience.
The slightly longer battery life.
The slightly better camera experience.
The lower price tag.
The more powerful chipset.
The faster charging.
The more premium build.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Google Pixel 9a vs. Pixel 9
With the Google Pixel 9a having launched a few months ago and the Google Pixel 9 hitting shelves nearly a year back, a common dilemma arises—should you opt for the newer mid-range model or stick with last year's flagship? It's a valid question, especially given their similar pricing and shared DNA. In Europe, the Pixel 9 costs about €100 more than the 9a, while in the US, the gap widens to $150. On paper, the two phones have a lot in common—identical displays, matching chipsets, and comparable camera setups. But look a little closer, and a few key differences emerge. For some, they may not be dealbreakers. For others, however, the added features of the Pixel 9 could justify the extra cost. So let's take a closer look. Table of Contents: Design Display Battery Life Charging Speaker Test Performance Cameras Verdict For starters, you can compare the complete spec sheets or directly continue with our editor's assessment in the following text. Size comparison Google Pixel 9a Google Pixel 9 Despite the two Pixels sharing the same screen diagonal, the 9a has noticeably bigger dimensions, but lower weight. There are several reasons for that. Firstly, the Pixel 9 is more compact as it has thinner bezels around the screen. The 9a has absurdly thick bezels, even for a budget phone in 2025. That makes the 9a taller and wider. It's also slightly thicker, which might be due to the larger battery. As for the weight difference, we attribute that to the choice of materials. The Pixel 9 features Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front and back held by an aluminum frame, while the 9a's build features an unnamed Gorilla Glass sheet on the front and a plastic back, which is lighter. All in all, the Pixel 9 is the better choice given the slimmer bezels, the nicer build materials and the more compact dimensions. Display comparison Google Pixel 9a Google Pixel 9 On paper, the two devices should have the exact same displays with the same performance. Both are 6.3-inch OLEDs with the same advertised maximum brightness. However, according to our tests, the Pixel 9a has slightly lower maximum brightness (around 1,900 nits) than the Pixel 9 (a little over 2,200 nits). Both phones reach levels of max brightness rarely seen in the industry, but the difference between the two could be seen as a hint that the phones use different panels. Other than that, there's no feature disparity between the two - both phones support the same basic HDR10+ video standard and up to 120Hz refresh rate. Battery life The two handsets share the same chipset and the same display, but the Pixel 9a has the advantage of a larger 5,100 mAh battery, as opposed to the 4,700 mAh-powered vanilla Pixel 9. However, it looks like the larger battery does not translate into real battery life benefits. The Pixel 9 scores marginally better on almost all tests, pushing the Active Use Score slightly higher than the 9a's. We can only guess what the reason might be and as we note in our Pixel 9a review, it may very well be a more power hungry display panel. Charging speed Google Pixel 9a 5100 mAh Google Pixel 9 4700 mAh In theory, the Pixel 9 should only be slightly faster to charge than the Pixel 9a, given the small difference in the charging rate - 23W vs. 27W in favor of the regular 9. However, that did not turn out entirely true in our real-life testing. The Pixel 9 indeed charged just slightly faster in the first 15 to 30 minutes of the charging cycle, but it completed a full charge in 85 minutes, while the Pixel 9a took 101 minutes. Notably, the Pixel 9 features faster wireless charging too - 15W (with Pixel stand, otherwise 12W) instead of the 9a's 7.5W charging power. Speaker test Regarding speakers, we can easily say that the Pixel 9a is the clear winner here. Sure, the Pixel 9 speakers are louder, but the 9a's tuning is much nicer. The bass is more prominent, the tracks don't sound tinny like the Pixel 9, and the overall sound is much warmer and fuller. Performance Both handsets rely on the same in-house Google Tensor G4 SoC that debuted with the Pixel 9 series last year. Even though the 9a is more affordable, it still rocks the same "flagship" chipset. Google Pixel 9a Google Pixel 9 Memory configurations are similar, but not identical. Both handsets offer only 128GB or 256GB storage, but the vanilla Pixel 9 gives you 12GB RAM, while the 9a settles for 8GB. Benchmark performance Google Pixel 9a Google Pixel 9 As expected, there's no difference in performance. The small differences you see in the benchmark results are well within the statistical error. Camera comparison The camera hardware is perhaps the main difference between the two handsets. The more affordable Pixel 9a settles for a smaller 48MP main sensor and a 13MP ultrawide camera, while the standard Pixel 9 boasts a physically much larger 50MP main sensor and a larger 48MP ultrawide unit too. The selfie hardware is also different. The 9a gets a 13MP shooter, while the Pixel 9 offers a 10.5MP camera, which has the same sensor size as the 13MP selfie on the 9a. Image quality At first glance, the two ultrawide cameras capture near-identical photos, but if you look closely enough, you will notice that the 48MP ultrawide unit on the Pixel 9 renders close objects much sharper. That's due to the autofocus capability. Objects in the distance are rendered similarly, though. Pixel 9a: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x Pixel 9: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x Once again, the Pixel 9's main camera offers more pleasant rendering with slightly punchier colors and a tad sharper objects. You can spot a bigger difference in the 2x zoom mode, where the bigger sensor shows a clear advantage. The gap widens as the light drops. The Pixel 9's ultrawide and main cameras produce cleaner and sharper images with wider dynamic range. The differences for most will likely be negligible, but it's worth noting. Pixel 9a: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x Pixel 9: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x We found no meaningful difference between the selfie cameras. Both are excellent. Selfies: Pixel 9a • Pixel 9 Video quality Below we have a few frame grabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length, so it's easier to compare to one another. The daylight videos from the two Pixels seem almost identical. The Pixel 9's main camera video is just ever so slightly sharper and more detailed. The difference is negligible, though. Pixel 9a 4K screengrabs: 0.6x • 1x • 0.6x • 1x Pixel 9 4K screengrabs: 0.6x • 1x • 0.6x • 1x The nighttime videos from the Pixel 9 are sharper, somewhat cleaner and considerably brighter. Verdict Naturally, the Pixel 9 is on top in most aspects. It offers a nicer camera experience, a brighter display, a more premium design, and marginally better battery life and charging. Perhaps the price difference will make sense for most people, especially customers in Europe, where the gap is only €100. Conversely, if you don't mind the thick bezels, the Pixel 9a delivers mostly the same user experience. The display is still one of the brightest in town, performance is on par, and the camera hardware isn't that far behind. The stereo speakers are even better on the 9a. So, if you consider yourself a casual everyday user, then save a few bucks and go for the Pixel 9a. The lower price. The better speakers. The identical user experience. The faster charging speed and better battery life. The slightly brighter display. The better camera performance at night and the added versatility of AF on the ultrawide.


GSM Arena
8 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Deals: Xiaomi 15 and 15 Ultra prices fall to new low, plus some more affordable offers
The pricing of Xiaomi's 15-series has reached a new low, offering a choice between a relatively compact flagship and an all-out camera phone. We know that many don't consider the Xiaomi 15 to be 'small' with its 6.36' display and 71.2mm width. Still, it's one of the smaller Snapdragon 8 Elite flagships and, unlike say a Galaxy S25, it has triple 50MP cameras on the back. This includes a main with a large 1/1.31' sensor, a 2.6x/60mm telephoto and a 115° ultra-wide. The phone runs on a 5,240mAh battery with fast charging (90W wired, 50W wireless) and gets great battery life. The display is a 12-bit LTPO panel, by the way. The phone launched with Android 15 and will receive 4 OS updates. Xiaomi 15 €300 off Read our review 12/512GB - €800 at Amazon DE The Xiaomi 15 Ultra has a chunky camera island and the hardware there is several steps above the 15. For example, the main has a 1'-type sensor. The tele lens is bumped up to 3x/60mm and there's also a 200MP 4.3x/100mm periscope on board. The battery for the global market isn't that large at 5,410mAh. Here's how the Xiaomi 15 Ultra compares with the Galaxy S25 Ultra. Xiaomi 15 Ultra €250 off Read our review 16/512GB - €1,250 at Amazon DE If you don't have the budget for a flagship, the Redmi Note 14 Pro is pretty affordable. It comes with a 200MP camera that does solid 2x in-sensor zoom. There's no dedicated telephoto lens and the ultra-wide module has only an 8MP sensor. The 6.67' 1220p+ 12-bit OLED display with Dolby Vision is great and is paired with a good set of stereo speakers. The 5,110mAh battery is a bit slower to charge than we would have liked and the battery life is good but not amazing. For around the same amount of cash you can have the Nothing Phone (3a) instead – this one does have a telephoto module, a 50MP camera with a 2x/50mm lens. This is in addition to the 50MP main and 8MP ultra wide. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 is a bit faster than the Dimensity 7300 Ultra inside the Redmi and the 5,000mAh battery lasts a bit longer. The 6.77" 120Hz OLED display lacks Dolby Vision, though. Also, the phone is rated IP64 compared to IP68. Nothing Phone (3a) €50 off Read our review 8/128GB - €280 at Amazon DE Also in this price range is the Honor 200. It's an older model from 2024, but features an even faster Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chip. It has a 50MP tele camera of its own with a 2.5x lens, plus a 50MP 1/1.56' main and a 12MP ultra wide. The display is a 6.7' 120Hz OLED panel and there is a 5,200mAh battery with 100W fast charging inside. Honor 200 €50 off Read our review 12/512GB - €300 at Amazon DE The Motorola Moto G56 ends its pre-order period this Sunday. It pairs an entry-level Dimensity 7060 5G chipset with a 6.72' 120Hz IPS LCD with 1080p+ resolution. The phone is rated IP68/IP69. The camera setup features a 50MP main (a small 1/1.95' sensor) and 8MP ultra-wide, plus a 32MP selfie camera. Both a microSD slot and a 3.5mm headphone jack can be found on board. Motorola Moto G56 8/256GB - €250 at Amazon DE Still on pre-order (until Tuesday) and in a very different category is the new RedMagic 10S Pro. This phone features the overclocked version of the Snapdragon 8 Elite with an active cooling fan – it's one of the best-performing phones out there, but the fan doesn't do much. You get a flat, rectangular 6.85' 144Hz OLED display with an under display camera. Also, there are two shoulder triggers that can be mapped into games. The battery is a massive 7,050mAh cell with 80W charging. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.


GSM Arena
11 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Weekly poll results: the Realme GT 7 is great if you can get it at a discount, GT 7T not so much
The Realme GT 7 and GT 7T may have been announced together, but last week's poll suggests that they will go on very different paths in life. The GT 7 is proving to be quite popular, even if the MSRP is high, while the GT 7T has failed to convince most people that it is a good pick. Starting on a positive note, the Realme GT 7 saw a third of the votes go in its favor and a third saying that it's a good phone, but it's pricey. However, that isn't necessarily the case – we saw people in the comments saying that they got great deals on the phone. So if MSRP turned you away, have another look at what your local retailers are offering. The Dimensity 9400e was one of the GT 7 features that got a lot of praise. Great battery life is another big plus. The telephoto camera, even with its short 2x lens, was also a highlight. The Realme GT 7T was not received nearly so well – actually, with only 15% of the vote going in its favor, it wasn't received well at all. The major issue seems to be the price as it puts a phone in a segment with strong competition. There's only €100/₹5,000 between the GT 7T and the GT 7 and the hardware downgrade is quite significant. The Dimensity 8400 is not a great fit for this phone – it's a very capable mid-range chip, but you can get phones near-flagship chips for this price (or lower). And that includes the Realme GT 6, though its relatively short OS update window might keep people away. Realme GT 7 5G Realme GT 7T 5G