
Make superheroes great again: Superman can fly, but still can't escape the algorithm
In 1938, Superman leapt onto the pages of Action Comics #1 in red trunks and righteous fury. He stopped locomotives, lifted green Buicks over his head - and he stood for something. Now, in 2025, Superman is back in cinemas next month in James Gunn's eponymous movie with a new actor (David Corenswet).But this time around, Superman's biggest villain isn't Lex Luthor, or General Zod. It's the feed. The Man of Steel's up against TikTok thirst traps, AI-generated Keanu Reeves romcoms, and 11-sec clips of pandas falling off slides. Somewhere in between doomscrolling and watching a makeup tutorial that turns into a philosophy lecture, a trailer for the new Superman movie dropped this week. We nod. We move on.
Superheroes aren't just competing for attention. They're auditioning for it. Superheroes are now metadata. The industry doesn't ask: what does this hero mean right now? It asks: how many quadrants can we hit? Is there synergy with the gaming division? Will this trend on social media?And that's how we end up with content that's been audience-tested within an inch of its soul. Every scene exists so it can be screen-grabbed. Every emotion is framed with just enough room for a reaction video. Look, everyone likes a surprise. A good plot twist, a clever reference, even a cheeky cameo. But Easter eggs used to be exactly that - eggs. Now they're the whole omelette.It's no longer enough to tell a story. You have to tease 10 others. A throwaway line about 'the multiverse collapsing' gets picked apart in 300 Reddit threads. Half the audience is watching the movie. The other half is watching for clues. Yes, fans love decoding things. But when every film is a trailer for another film, it stops being storytelling and starts being strategy.The golden age of superhero films wasn't 'golden' because they were bigger. It was because they were grounded. Arguably, most of them were all franchise films. Batman was already on his 6th outing, Iron Man kicked off a whole cinematic universe. And Spider-Man had a cereal deal before the trailer dropped. But, back then, the films still knew how to stay grounded.The Dark Knight wasn't juggling timelines. Iron Man was just trying not to get blown up in a cave. Even Spider-Man 2 (yes, the Tobey Maguire one) spent a good 20 mins exploring the emotional fallout of missing rent. Now we get shared universes, cross-promotional world-building, and plotlines with all the narrative weight of a dry PowerPoint transition. The foundation has cracked. It's all scaffolding now.If you strip away the X-ray vision and the flying, Superman is a guy trying to figure out how to do the right thing in a complicated world. He's an alien who's spent his entire life trying to be more human. That's not just good material - it's timeless. The problem is, we've stopped treating it like it is.Every reboot wants to 'modernise' Superman. Update the costume. Grayscale the colour palette. Make him question everything. Give him a brooding backstory, and a long stare into the rain. We don't need more reinvention. We need recollection. Superman doesn't need to be made edgier. He needs to be made clear.It's worth asking: why does a lo-fi 15-sec video of someone making butter chicken from scratch get more love than a $200 mn superhero film? Because one feels like it means something. The other feels like it means something else is coming in 2027.There was a time when superheroes weren't trying to be viral. They weren't teasing spinoffs. They weren't selling NFTs. They were about values, sure. But they were also weird. They were unpredictable. They were occasionally absurd. A kid bitten by a radioactive spider? A man with a magic hammer? A guy who literally talks to fish? And, yet, it worked.Because the stories were honest. Not perfect, not polished, not algorithm-proof. Just honest.Imagine this: the new Superman film ends. And that's it. No setup for Superman: Epoch. No holographic tease of Brainiac. No slow pan to a glowing green rock in a government bunker. Just the story. Fully told. Curtains down. People might walk out of the theatre... satisfied. When was the last time that happened?Superheroes won't be great again because of better CGI, or cleverer scripts, or tighter multiverse logic. They'll be great again when we stop trying to turn them into streaming architecture. Give us stories. Not strategies. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com.) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Warren Buffett-fan Pabrai is betting big on Edelweiss' Rashesh Shah. Will it pay off?
Coal on one hand and green on the other; this company balances both
Yet another battle over neem; this time it's a startup vs. Procter & Gamble
Move over tariffs, China wields rare earths in an economic war of a different kind
Is Zomato under siege? Quick commerce may be the next telecom
9 stocks from different segments of financial services sector with an upside potential of up to 37%
Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 32% in 1 year
Is an oil shock on its way? 14 stocks to watch carefully if the Iran-Israel conflict leads to a sustained rise in crude oil prices

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Fortnite June 14 server downtime and maintenance schedule
Image via Epic Games. Are Fortnite servers down now? Let's explore all the possibilities. There has been a lot going on in this highly popular battle royale title. As the Chapter 6 Season 3 just kicked in, Fortnite has embraced the superhero theme. With the arrival of Superman and Robin in the season battle pass, the theme is now making more sense. Not only that, this Epic Games title has also collaborated with FOX Studios to bring some of the most iconic dads in the game, who are indeed superheroes, to celebrate Fathers' Day tomorrow. Amidst all these, many players have complained about a server outage in Fortnite. Fortnite servers experienced major outage On June 13, 2025, around 7 PM EDT, many players reported that the Fortnite servers were facing a huge outage. This outage mainly revolved around matchmaking and login issues while trying to play a match in the game. There were even pop-up messages stating 'this is the End' which literally devastated the fans about the fate of the game. The outage report mainly came after the contestants of an ongoing tournament named Duo Console Cash Cup faced severe issues while entering into the match. This tournament is actually one of Fortnite's officially sponsored tournaments, so this sudden server outage is pretty concerning. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Our one of a kind Patented Cold Water Extraction Process Superior Ginseng Undo This event offers a hefty price pool and is very significant as far as tournament rankings are concerned for the professional Esports players. The official Twitter account of Fortnite Status also acknowledged the issue and revealed that many Fortnite features like Item Shop, Voice Chat, and many more were affected by this outage. However, around 12 PM EDT on June 13, the same Twitter account confirmed that matchmaking and login issues in the game have been resolved and the developers would continue to monitor stability of the game. As of writing this article now, on June 14, there have been no persisting issues regarding Fortnite servers whatsoever as all the in-game services are operational. Kudos to Epic Games for bringing a quick fix to these severe issues, keeping in mind weekend is around the corner. Read More: How to get Bob Belcher in Fortnite?


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
The Accountant 2 movie review: Ben Affleck, Jon Bernthal starrer is an oddball bromance dressed up as a thriller
Every once in a while, Hollywood returns to a property that probably didn't need a sequel but gets one anyway because, well, why not? The Accountant 2 is one such. The 2016 original was a strange cocktail: part crime thriller, part character study of an autistic accountant with a very particular set of skills, and part action film where mathematics and murder intersected in ways viewers didn't expect. It wasn't perfect, but it had its moments. This time around, director Gavin O'Connor leans even more into the bizarre tone, producing a film that is alarmingly weird, occasionally funny, frequently entertaining, and almost entirely pointless. The Accountant 2 doesn't pretend to have a burning narrative reason to exist. The plot, if you can call it that, is a loose collection of events strung together by a single thread. Christian Wolff (Ben Affleck) returns, this time embroiled in a vague murder mystery that somehow snowballs into a conspiracy involving human trafficking, corruption, and some good old-fashioned beatdowns. It sounds compelling on paper, but only until you realise that none of it really matters. The plot isn't so much driven as it is dragged along by the need to give Christian and his estranged brother Braxton (Jon Bernthal) something to do between action scenes. Unlike the first film, which, for all its quirks, had a coherent through-line of trauma, intelligence, and moral ambiguity, this sequel feels like it was reverse-engineered from a few cool action beats and brotherly banter. The rest is filler. The highlight of the film, by far, is the chemistry between Affleck and Bernthal. Their brotherly banter, punches – verbal and physical – and occasional heartfelt moments elevate the film from a forgettable thriller to mildly memorable buddy movie. Every time Affleck's cold, emotionally-muted Christian clashes with Bernthal's boisterous, impulsive Braxton, you find yourself hooting and chuckling. It's the kind of dynamic that feels like it belongs more in a Shane Black film (a la The Nice Guys or Kiss Kiss Bang Bang) than in a tense thriller about accounting and assassination. Every time the story begins to build a sense of dread or tension, it gets sidetracked by a sudden joke or an oddly wholesome exchange. This derails the mood, like finding a TikTok dance break in the middle of Prisoners. You might find yourself laughing at moments you were never meant to. And that's the strange magic of this sequel – it wants to be serious, but it's so caught up in entertaining you, it forgets to tell a story that goes anywhere. To its credit, The Accountant 2 still knows how to stage a fight. The action is clean, crisp, and competently executed. If you came purely for Affleck breaking arms with dead-eyed precision, you won't leave disappointed. But even the action lacks a sense of urgency. It feels like it's happening because the movie feels obligated to keep the energy up – not because the stakes demand it. The first Accountant toyed with the idea of neurodivergence and weaponised intelligence, and while it wasn't a flawless representation, it offered something unique. This time, Christian's condition feels more like a plot device than a character trait. There's no real development, no emotional evolution – just another excuse for Affleck to monologue about prime numbers in between interactions. If this film were a spreadsheet, it would be labelled 'Sequel: Just Because.' It's better than the first in terms of scale and some emotional beats, but that's like saying a slightly burnt toast is better than completely charred – you're still left chewing on something dry. There's no real point to this continuation. No thematic weight. No personal journey. Christian isn't grappling with anything new. The mission doesn't challenge him. Even the resolution feels perfunctory, like the writers knew they had to wrap it up somewhere and figured, 'eh, this'll do.' It's not bad enough to hate. It's just not good enough to matter. Is The Accountant 2 enjoyable? Yes, in the way a lazy Sunday watch on Prime Video is enjoyable. You'll chuckle at some lines, nod at some action sequences, and forget most of it by dinner. It's a perfectly fine distraction — a popcorn entertainer that occasionally mistakes quirk for quality. But special? No. Thought-provoking? Hardly. Necessary? Not even remotely. In a world where action-thrillers are sharpening their edges, this feels like something from a different time, when simply putting a gun in the hands of a famous actor was enough to justify a movie. Maybe in 2010, this would've wowed. In 2025, it feels quaint. And yet, despite all that, I wouldn't mind seeing these brothers again. Maybe in a better script. Or a completely different genre. Something where their accidental comedy is the point, not the detour. The Accountant 2 The Accountant 2 Cast – Ben Affleck, Jon Bernthal, Cynthia Addai-Robinson, J.K. Simmons, Allison Robertson The Accountant 2 Director – Gavin O'Connor The Accountant 2 Rating – 2.5/5


News18
6 hours ago
- News18
Is Japan In Danger? Tourism Takes A Hit After July 5 Manga ‘Prediction'
Last Updated: The manga, titled The Future I Saw, claimed that a major disaster would hit Japan on July 5. Japan is experiencing a noticeable decline in holiday bookings from parts of Asia, and many believe an unlikely source, a 25-year-old manga, is behind it. Tourists from countries like South Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong are reportedly cancelling or postponing trips due to fears sparked by a prediction in the comic. According to The Guardian, the manga, titled The Future I Saw, was created by Ryo Tatsuki and first released in 1999. It became popular again after people noticed it had mentioned a 'great disaster" in March 2011, which is the same month Japan faced a deadly earthquake and tsunami. A new edition of the book came out in 2021. In it, Tatsuki claimed that another major disaster would hit Japan on July 5, 2025. This claim led to a flood of posts warning people to stay away from Japan. There is no scientific proof behind the claims spreading online, but many are taking Tatsuki's words seriously because March 2011 saw a horrific disaster which killed over 18,000 people and caused the triple meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Japan's public broadcaster NHK reported that over 1,400 YouTube videos have been made about the manga's predictions. Together, they have been viewed more than 100 million times. Some videos go as far as predicting volcanic eruptions and meteor strikes. NHK also said that the updated manga has sold nearly 1 million copies. Bloomberg Intelligence, using travel data from ForwardKeys, reported that flight bookings to Japan from Hong Kong dropped by 50 per cent compared to last year. For travel dates in late June and early July, the drop was as much as 83 per cent. A travel agency in Hong Kong said bookings during the April-May spring holidays were also down by half compared to last year. Greater Bay Airlines, which usually sees strong demand during cherry blossom season and Easter, was surprised by the low numbers. 'We expected around 80% of the seats to be taken, but actual reservations came to only 40%," said Hiroki Ito, general manager of the airline's Japan office, in an interview with a Japanese daily, as quoted by The Guardian. Other airlines, including Hong Kong Airlines, have also cut flights to Japan. Local officials are now stepping in to stop the panic. Yoshihiro Murai, the governor of Miyagi, one of the worst-hit regions during the 2011 disaster, urged people not to believe in the unfounded story, which has started to affect local tourism. Japan lies in an earthquake-prone area known as the Pacific 'Ring of Fire." Experts agree that while the risk of a big earthquake is real, no one can predict exactly when or where it will happen. In April, a government report warned that a quake in the Nankai Trough could kill nearly 3,00,000 people and destroy millions of buildings. It also said there is an 80 per cent chance of such a disaster happening in the next 30 years. Despite the growing panic, Tatsuki herself has asked readers not to take her predictions too seriously. In a recent interview with a Japanese daily, she also urged people to listen to the opinions of experts.