Ex-watchdog chair warns of loss of public trust over business appointments
Lord Pickles, who until April chaired the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), told MPs he is concerned that a lack of focus on cases which do not fall under the committee's remit because they involve less senior roles could lead to a major scandal.
Acoba's work involves independently advising the Government, former ministers, senior civil servants and other crown servants on the rules around taking employment after leaving their jobs.
Echoing previous criticisms of the current rules, Lord Pickles described them as 'dead in the water, next to useless, pointless and in need of reform' during an appearance before the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee.
He added: '(Acoba) only deals with top civil servants and less senior officials are the responsibility of the board at different government departments.
'That is the area that I'm most concerned about. I was concerned when I went in and I thought the last government were extraordinarily lucky not to have a scandal operating.
'The churn in the civil service is around 40,000 a year… it is of that magnitude.
'It would not be unreasonable to look at those people who had responsibility for procurement, for awarding contracts, and if you designated those posts and put them through a similar process.'
When pressed further on the issue, he added: 'If there was to say one thing that I would really like (the committee) to pursue it is that, because it will blow and given the confidence that the public has in politicians and the system, I think it might well be fatal.'
Lord Pickles repeated concerns about the focus on ex-ministers rather than Whitehall officials, some of whom he said are reluctant to engage fully with a process designed to maintain transparency.
The Advisory Committee on Business Appointments provides guidance to former ministers and senior civil servants who are taking jobs in the private sector PA)
He added: 'I think it is really important to understand that everybody concentrates on the ex-ministers because they've heard of them.
'But the real action is taking place among civil servants and there has become, I think, a degree of entitlement that is deeply worrying – both at Acoba level and below.
'There is a kind of a cohort effect taking place, in which the existing cohort looks after the exiting cohort in the assumption that that new cohort will look after them.'
He also questioned the ethos of some politicians and senior civil servants over their commitment to the seven Nolan Principles of behaviour in public life, adding 'everybody believes in the seven principles of public life until it applies to them'.
Lord Pickles said: 'If you look at the number of problems that we've had over the past five years, it can be neatly summed up in that people say: 'You know, the rules aren't for me because I am completely impeccable.'
'So far as the seven principles are concerned, the runt of the litter, the one that everybody ignores – the one that actually should be the most important – is leadership.
'I think those who engaged in public life in terms of moving towards propriety, they should set an example.
'In the recent years, I have been threatened with judicial review. I have been threatened with various lawyers and the like.
'If you are looking to take in lawyers, if you are trying to sort … you've entirely missed the point of the government business rules.'
Lord Pickles said the advisory process should be adjusted to focus on cases with the highest level of risk rather than applications in all circumstances.
He added: 'The business rules should be changed to just remove the flotsam and jetsam out of the system altogether and go to a kind of exemption regime and move it much more on a risk basis so you can really focus in on the exact risk and can be much more transparent with the public.'
Labour's manifesto pledged to establish a new ethics and integrity commission, with an independent chair, to 'ensure probity in Government'.
Lord Pickles said there is limited time for the Government to establish the commission through legislation, with delays for proposed amendments likely.
He added: 'I have got no objection whatsoever to it being put on a statutory basis.
'I'm just worried that the practicality is the Machiavellian nature of this building will conspire to ensure that it doesn't matter.'
Isabel Doverty, who was an independent member of the committee since 2021, has been appointed as Acoba's interim chair until December 31 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
South Korea's new president invites citizens to nominate his ministers
has launched a 'public referral system' to involve citizens directly in the selection of high-level government officials. Between 10 and 16 June, members of the public can submit nominations for cabinet ministers, vice-ministers, and heads of state institutions via the personnel management ministry's website, president Lee Jae Myung's social media accounts or by email. The initiative, open to any South Korean aged 14 and above, is part of Mr Lee's effort to promote 'popular sovereignty' and more participatory governance, the newly elected president's spokesperson said. Citizens can even nominate themselves by submitting forms requiring details like the candidate's name, field of expertise, contact information, and reason for recommendation. 'True democracy begins when citizens exercise their sovereignty, get involved and make a change,' Mr Lee said in a Facebook post on 10 June. Mr Lee's office will compile submissions into the National Human Resources Database and then begin an internal vetting process to create a shortlist, without public involvement at this stage. According to spokesperson Kang Yu Jung, the screening will involve the presidential secretary for civil service discipline and incorporate an 'open' review component. The initiative fulfils a key campaign pledge by Mr Lee to enhance grassroots engagement in governance. He revealed earlier that a plan to livestream questions at presidential press briefings had come from a citizen's suggestion on social media. Mr Lee, meanwhile, nominated six new vice ministers for finance, foreign and industry on 10 June outside of the public recommendation system. Vice ministerial appointments don't require confirmation hearings by the National Assembly, according to The Korea Herald. 'We promise to restore the administration that suffered a rupture after the insurrection in a speedy manner,' Ms Kang said, referring to ousted president Yoon Suk Yeol 's failed bid to declare martial law last December. 'We will create a government capable of overcoming global protectionism.' Kim Min Seok, Mr Lee's nominee for prime minister, defended the referral system as a 'very natural process in that democracy is in the process of expanding'. Mr Lee is currently working with ministers appointed by Mr Yeol, who was impeached by the National Assembly for declaring martial law and subsequently removed from office by the constitutional court. The presidential office announced that public access to Cheong Wa Dae, the historic Blue House compound in central Seoul, would be partially restricted from 16 to 31 July and fully closed beginning in August. The closure is part of preparations to relocate the presidential office back to Cheong Wa Dae, reversing Mr Yoon's 2022 decision to move it to Yongsan. Public tours of the site will resume once Mr Lee's administration completes the transition, local media reported.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired
A major US government website supporting public education on climate science looks likely to be shuttered after almost all of its staff were fired, the Guardian has learned. the gateway website for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa)'s Climate Program Office, will imminently no longer publish new content, according to multiple former staff responsible for the site's content whose contracts were recently terminated. 'The entire content production staff at (including me) were let go from our government contract on 31 May,' said a former government contractor who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. 'We were told that our positions within the contract were being eliminated.' Rebecca Lindsey, the website's former program manager, who was fired in February as part of the government's purge of probationary employees, described a months-long situation within Noaa where political appointees and career staff argued over the fate of the website. 'I had gotten a stellar performance review, gotten a bonus, gotten a raise. I was performing very well. And then I was part of that group who got the form letter saying, 'Your knowledge, skills, and abilities are no longer of use to Noaa' – or something to that effect.' Lindsey said she had been worried that might be a target of the new administration soon after the election, but when a large Noaa contract was up for renewal at the end of May, her former boss told her that a demand came 'from above' to rewrite parts of the contract to remove the team's funding. 'It was a very deliberate, targeted attack,' said Lindsey. Lindsey said the content for was created and maintained by a contracted staff of about 10, with additional contributions from Noaa scientists, and its editorial content was specifically designed to be politically neutral, and faithful to the current state of the sciences. All of those staff have now been dismissed, she said. 'We operated exactly how you would want an independent, nonpartisan communications group to operate,' said Lindsey, and noted that is housed within the science division of Noaa, not its public affairs division. 'It does seem to be part of this sort of slow and quiet way of trying to keep science agencies from providing information to the American public about climate.' Noaa has been contacted for comment. It's unclear whether the website will remain visible to the public. The site was housed within the Communication, Education, and Engagement Division of Noaa, which describes itself as 'the largest team in the federal government dedicated to climate communication, education, and engagement'. The website receives hundreds of thousands of visits per month and is one of the most popular sources of information about climate science on the internet. The fired staff believe the changes to were targeted by political appointees within the Trump administration and specifically aimed at restricting public-facing climate information. 'It's targeted, I think it's clear,' said Tom Di Liberto, a former Noaa spokesperson who was also fired from his position earlier this year. 'They only fired a handful of people, and it just so happened to be the entire content team for I mean, that's a clear signal.' The purge spared two web developers, which Di Liberto says is a concerning sign. The contractor said: 'My bigger worry, long-term, is I would hate to see it turn into a propaganda website for this administration, because that's not at all what it was.' The contractor said that while there will still be some pre-written, scheduled content posted on the site this month, there are no plans for further new content: 'After that, we have no idea what will happen to the website.' Lindsey said she also fears a 'sinister possibility' that the administration may co-opt to publish its own anti-science content. Lindsey said the administration could now 'provide a content team from the Heartland Institute, leveraging our audience, our brand, our millions of people that we reach on social media every month. That's the worst-case scenario.' ' is one heck of a URL. If you wanted to basically keep the website alive to do something with later, this is what you would do if you're the [Trump] administration,' said Di Liberto. 'It's clear that the administration does not accept climate science, so it's certainly concerning.' The cuts also mean that there is now also no one left to run social media accounts, which have hundreds of thousands of followers. Since staff in charge of did a lot of pushback on misinformation, their absence may help anti-science information flourish there more readily. 'We were an extremely well-trusted source for climate information, misinformation and disinformation because we actually, legitimately would answer misinformation questions,' said the contractor. 'We'd answer reader emails and try to combat disinformation on social media. 'We get attacked on social media by people who don't believe in climate change, and that's increased over the last six months or so as well.' The shutdown comes amid broader cuts to science funding across the government, including 'significant reductions to education, grants, research, and climate-related programs within Noaa', as stated in the 2026 'passback' budget Congress is currently deliberating. 'It seems like if they can't get rid of all the research, what they can do is make it impossible for anyone to know about it,' said Di Liberto. The contractor said they worry that what may have begun as a heavy-handed attempt by administration officials to limit public knowledge of human-caused climate change will have broader impacts on public education on the cyclical drivers of weather – as well as the results of publicly funded research conducted by Noaa scientists. 'To me, climate is more broad than just climate change. It's also climate patterns like El Niño and La Niña. Halting factual climate information is a disservice to the public. Hiding the impacts of climate change won't stop it from happening, it will just make us far less prepared when it does.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India's granaries overflow as rice stocks hit record, wheat surges
MUMBAI, June 11 (Reuters) - India's rice stocks in government warehouses rose 18% from a year ago to a record high for the start of June, while wheat stocks have hit their highest level in four years on higher procurement from farmers, official data showed on Wednesday. Record rice stocks will help the world's biggest exporter increase shipments, while an improvement in wheat inventories will help the federal government tame any price spikes later this year by increasing open market sales. State reserves of rice, including unmilled paddy, totalled a record 59.5 million metric tons as of June 1, far exceeding the government's target of 13.5 million tons for July 1. Wheat stocks stood at 36.9 million tons on June 1, well above the government's target of 27.6 million tons, the data showed. "Rice stocks have piled up way too much. The government really needs to bring them down before the next buying season kicks off in October," said a New Delhi-based dealer at a global trading firm. India, which accounts for around 40% of global rice exports, removed the last of its export curbs on the grain in March 2025, with the initial restrictions having been imposed in 2022. Wheat stocks have risen to a comfortable position mainly because of higher procurement, which will help New Delhi sell more wheat to bulk consumers during the lean supply season, said a Mumbai-based dealer. The government has so far brought 30 million tons of wheat from farmers, the most in four years, according to data compiled by Food Corporation of India (FCI). Disappointing harvests in the past three years and lower purchases by the FCI had pushed up prices of the staple grain and raised expectations that India may be forced to import wheat for the first time in seven years. But the buildup in stocks this year means the country should be able to meet domestic demand without imports.
