Belfast hotel launches ‘once-in-a-lifetime' £1,000 cocktail
A Belfast hotel has launched a £1,000 cocktail which it described as a 'once-in-a-lifetime experience'.
The pricey tipple at the Merchant Hotel has been described as a 'masterpiece of Irish whiskey'.
The Belfast city centre hotel earned the Guinness Book of Records title for the world's most expensive cocktail in 2007 with its £750 Mai Tai.
However, that was overtaken in 2013 by a cocktail which was sold for £8,583 in Melbourne, Australia.
The Merchant Hotel launched its new cocktail menu on Wednesday, including a collection crafted with rare whiskeys by Midleton, Macallan and Michter's, which start at £785 and go up to £1,000.
The most expensive, the Midleton Foret de Troncais (£1,000), is described as 'a masterpiece of Irish whiskey, aged in rare French Troncais oak casks and delivering elegant notes of honey, toasted almonds and delicate spice' served with Antica Formula and Dubonnet.
The menu, consisting of drinks which start from £14.99, was created by a team led by the Merchant Bar's general manager, Aaron Dugan and cocktail bar manager Emily Doherty.
Mr Dugan said: 'We are proud to bring our unique collaboration with three icons of whiskey to life with The Rare & Refined Collection.
'These exceptional drinks have been crafted to create once-in-a-lifetime experiences to be savoured. The lucky few that get to try these drinks will get to relish something truly special.
'And, for those that find the price tag too rich, we have also created an exceptional collection of 21 cocktails, inspired by timeless classics, but with a unique Merchant twist. Named according to their flavour profile, the menu has been designed to help customers match their preferred flavour profiles to their choices. There truly is something to suit every taste.'
The cocktail bar at The Merchant has been described as one of the most decorated in the UK and Ireland, and is the first and only bar in Northern Ireland to be awarded the coveted 2 Pin status by the Pinnacle Guide.
The Merchant will officially receive its 2 Pin award later this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What's behind Keir Starmer's decision to back nuclear power?
Keir Starmer has committed the UK to its first significant stake in a new nuclear power plant since the 1980s. The decision to invest almost £18bn of taxpayer money into the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk was welcomed by Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, as the beginning of a 'golden age' of nuclear investment that would be critical to the government's net zero goals. The government said on Tuesday it would commit £14.2bn to the project, including the £2.7bn it earmarked for Sizewell C in the autumn budget. It has already committed £3.6bn to Sizewell over the past two years. Britain's nuclear renaissance will also include spending about £2.5bn of taxpayer money building some of Europe's first small modular reactors (SMR), after the government gave the green light to plans for Rolls-Royce to build three in the UK by the early 2030s. For critics, the technology's high costs and lengthy construction time have always eclipsed the benefits of abundant low-carbon electricity, given Hinkley Point C's current price tag of up to £35bn and its repeated delays. There are also persistent concerns over the safety of nuclear reactors, and the disposal of nuclear waste. But questions over whether countries can meet the growing demand for electricity without fossil fuels, and avoid blackouts, mean many governments now believe nuclear represents a price worth paying. Megawatt for megawatt, nuclear power is far more expensive than most renewable energy technologies. But, unlike wind and solar farms, nuclear reactors do not need investment in battery backup technologies to provide a steady, reliable source of low-carbon power. The guaranteed electricity price offered to Hinkley Point C was initially £92 per megawatt-hour but this will fall to £89.50/MWh with the go-ahead for Sizwell C, under the terms of the government's contract with French state-owned EDF. By contrast, the guaranteed price for offshore windfarms that were successful in last year's subsidy auction was just under £59 per megawatt-hour. 'The upfront cost [of nuclear] is undoubtedly high,' said Dr Iain Staffell, an associate professor at Imperial College London. '£14bn could fund around 10 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind versus just 3.2 GW of nuclear. But, these reactors will run day and night, especially valuable when the wind is not blowing.' Prof Mark Wenman, also at Imperial College London, added that the costs needed to be balanced against the fact that these reactors 'will produce low-carbon electricity for 80 or possibly 100 years, 24/7, providing around a 10th of the current UK electricity needs'. 'Once paid for, nuclear reactors produce the cheapest electricity of any kind, so this investment should be seen as future-proofing the UK electricity system,' Wenman said. Experts believe that powering a country on 100% renewable energy is technically possible. But there is clear evidence that grid systems running predominantly on wind and solar power can be more expensive in the long run, and could be at higher risk of blackouts. This is because renewable energy cannot help to keep the electrical frequency of the grid stable at around 50Hz in the same way that the spinning turbines of power plants have done in the past, by creating inertia. The answer, according to the government's National Energy System Operator (Neso), is to encourage renewables to become the backbone of the energy system while keeping alternatives such as nuclear, biomass and gas to provide backup for when renewable resources are low and grid stability is needed. The government's independent climate advisers agree. The Climate Change Committee recommends that the UK's nuclear capacity doubles by 2050 because while it is 'relatively expensive on a levelised cost basis' it can provide 'valuable zero-carbon generation at scale'. Britain risks losing the benefits offered by nuclear plants by shutting its ageing nuclear reactors faster than it can build new ones – leaving a gap in the UK's supplies of low-carbon electricity at a time when demand for clean energy is growing. The UK's five existing nuclear power reactors generated 14% of the country's electricity last year, down from the industry's late-1990s peak, when 18 nuclear reactors provided more than a quarter of Britain's power. Four of these plants are due to close before the end of the decade, even with plans to extend their lifetimes, while only one nuclear power plant is under construction. Hinkley Point C in Somerset was originally due to begin generating electricity by 2017 but it has been delayed until the early 2030s. Driving Britain's nuclear renaissance is the tech industry's appetite for nuclear power. Starmer unveiled plans for a once-in-a-generation nuclear expansion earlier this year alongside an open invitation to tech companies such as Google, Meta and Amazon to invest in AI datacentres in Britain, which could be powered by small modular reactors. This is because the world's biggest tech companies are investing in extending the life of nuclear plants and building small modular reactors to help meet the enormous power demands of their datacentres. This growing demand is expected to accelerate with the adoption of artificial intelligence. Earlier this month Meta struck a deal to keep one nuclear reactor of a US utility company in Illinois operating for an extra 20 years, to help supply the company's datacentres with low-carbon power. It follows a similar deal from Google to supply its datacentres with nuclear power from half a dozen small reactors built by a California utility company. Microsoft has paid for the restart of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant, the site of the most serious nuclear accident and radiation leak in US history. 'They are very keen to get the datacentres in and they're very alive to the fact that the power is a big issue,' Starmer said.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Mistral debuts its first reasoning models
French AI startup Mistral is launching its first reasoning models, aiming to rival new offerings from OpenAI, DeepSeek and others, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Reasoning models aim to boost accuracy by using more computing power at inference time, a trend gaining steam amid diminishing returns from building ever-larger language models. Driving the news: Mistral is releasing two versions of its new Magistral family of reasoning models. The first, Magistral Small, is a 24-billion-parameter model that is being released under an open-source license. Magistral Medium is more powerful, but proprietary and currently available only in preview mode. Mistral says the new models are designed for a range of real-world tasks in areas including law, finance, health care, and engineering. The proprietary version, Mistral says, is capable of 1,000 tokens per second, outpacing the performance of rivals. Between the lines: Unlike many models that reason primarily in English, Mistral's can "think" in the query's native language, a potentially more efficient approach. The big picture: Based in France, Mistral has benefited from both its embrace of open source as well as the fact that it offers an alternative to the large American and Chinese tech companies. Just 15 months after launching its first paid products, Mistral has racked up over $100 million in contracted sales, according to a source familiar with its finances. What they're saying: Anjney Midha from a16z, who led the company's Series A funding round and sits on its board, said that Mistral's focus on open source is its key selling point, even more than its unique geography. Midha noted that while big shifts in technology tend to be initially led by proprietary efforts, businesses quickly gravitate toward the advantages of open source.
Buzz Feed
3 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Ed Sheeran Uses Budget Airlines Instead Of Private Jets
Ed Sheeran may be one of the world's biggest artists and have an estimated net worth of $350 million, but he has admitted that he is not a fan of private jets, and would rather use budget airlines instead. And before you think that the 34-year-old star is flying commercial in a bid to save cash, Ed's reasoning is much more noble: he cares about the environment. Ed opened during his recent appearance on The Louis Theroux Podcast, where he revealed he recently flew home from a European show on a plane full of fans who had attended the gig. It all started when Louis brought up an old news story about Ed inadvertently getting caught up with a group of young men on their way back from a 'lads' trip,' with the host asking: 'How are you with public transport? You probably wouldn't…' But before Louis could finish his sentence, Ed interjected: 'Love it.'When Louis mentioned the past report, Ed said: 'Oh yeah, that was 10 years ago. That was bad. I was flying back on a Sunday night with all the lads who'd just been on a lads' trip. That was bad.'Pressed on why it was a bad experience, the singer continued: 'I was on my own, so this was pre-security. I was on my own, I was on a hangover, as well… I was working on, like, two hours sleep. I was planning on crashing out on the plane, and then, suddenly, there was, like, 50 lads all very excited." 'There was one recently, though, my wife works in sustainability, so we try and fly completely normally as much as possible,' Ed went on. 'We were flying back on RyanAir, I think, from a gig in Italy that I was doing last year, but all my fans who'd been at the gig were flying back on the same flight.' For reference, RyanAir is an Irish ultra-low-cost airline that offers return flights across Europe for less than $50, and has no separate class cabins.'Stop it,' Louis exclaimed in response. 'Aren't you private jet all the way?''No,' Ed replied. 'I'll do it very, very rarely, and only if it's work; if I'm doing a thing in Germany and I have to be in LA the next day.''You don't have a private jet?' Louis asked in disbelief, and when Ed confirmed that he doesn't because he prefers trains, Louis exclaimed: 'You could afford one!' 'Yeah, but it's not really about that,' Ed explained. 'I like the environment. I like trees. I don't know, I find it hard to justify. I'm not saying, like… No one's perfect. I have [used a private jet], when we are doing intense promo trips, there'll be the odd time. But I'm very much: 'We do trains,' or I'm flying to Mexico tomorrow on BA [British Airways] kind of thing.' 'But you said Ryanair, that's all one class, isn't it?' Louis then asked, and Ed said that it was before sharing an anecdote about how awkward flying in economy class can be for him — especially when he is with his and wife Cherry's two children, 4-year-old Lyra and 3-year-old Jupiter. 'I had my kids, and one of them had fallen asleep on me and pissed on me, and this person came up and was like: 'Can I have a selfie, mate?'' Ed recalled. 'And I was like: 'Probably not… probably not the time.'' Needless to say, Ed's comments are super refreshing at a time when other celebs are attracting criticism for their excessive private jet use, including so-called 'climate criminal' Kylie Jenner, and his bestie Taylor Swift. Let me know your thoughts in the comments below!
