Mexico's first judicial elections stir controversy and confusion among voters
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico is holding its first ever judicial elections on Sunday, stirring controversy and sowing confusion among voters still struggling to understand a process set to transform the country's court system.
Mexico's ruling party, Morena, overhauled the court system late last year, fueling protests and criticism that the reform is an attempt by those in power to seize on their political popularity to gain control of the branch of government until now out of their reach.
'It's an effort to control the court system, which has been a sort of thorn in the side" of those in power, said Laurence Patin, director of the legal organization Juicio Justo in Mexico. 'But it's a counter-balance, which exists in every healthy democracy.'
Now, instead of judges being appointed on a system of merit and experience, Mexican voters will choose between some 7,700 candidates vying for more than 2,600 judicial positions.
Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum and party allies have said the elections are a way to purge the court system of corruption in a country that has long faced high levels of impunity. Critics say the vote could damage democracy and open the judicial system up further to organized crime and other corrupt actors hoping to get a grip on power.
That process has only grown more chaotic in the run-up to the vote.
Civil society organizations like Defensorxs have raised red flags about a range of candidates running for election, including lawyers who represented some of Mexico's most feared cartel leaders and local officials who were forced to resign from their positions due to corruption scandals.
Also among those putting themselves forward are ex-convicts imprisoned for years for drug-trafficking to the United States and a slate of candidates with ties to a religious group whose spiritual leader is behind bars in California after pleading guilty to sexually abusing minors.
At the same time, voters have been plagued by confusion over a voting process that Patin warned has been hastily thrown together. Voters often have to choose from sometimes more than a hundred candidates who are not permitted to clearly voice their party affiliation or carry out widespread campaigning.
As a result, many Mexicans say they're going into the vote blind. Mexico's electoral authority has investigated voter guides being handed out across the country, in what critics say is a blatant move by political parties to stack the vote in their favor.
'Political parties weren't just going to sit with their arms crossed,' Patin said.
Miguel Garcia, a 78-year-old former construction worker, stood in front of the country's Supreme Court on Friday peering at a set of posters, voter guides with the faces and numbers of candidates.
He was fiercely scribbling down their names on a small scrap of paper and said that he had traveled across Mexico City to try to inform himself ahead of the vote, but he couldn't find any information other than outside the courthouse.
'In the neighborhood where I live, there's no information for us," he said. 'I'm confused, because they're telling us to go out and vote but we don't know who to vote for.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Arrests made, guns seized after 5 musicians found dead near U.S. border
Three suspects in the kidnapping and murder of Mexican musicians in Tamaulipas state along the Texas border were arrested during a series of raids, officials said on Monday. The five members of local band Fugitivo had been hired for a weekend performance in the crime-wracked northeastern city of Reynosa, but arrived to find a vacant lot. Their bodies were found several days later after their families reported receiving ransom demands. "An operation was carried out on three properties" in Reynosa, the public security office said in a statement, adding that the three suspects had been arrested there. Investigators said the musicians had been kidnapped on May 25 while driving to a private event. Nine alleged cartel members were arrested last week, with authorities announcing another sting on Monday. Prosecutors said the nine people arrested last week were believed to be part of a faction of the Gulf Cartel, which has strong presence in the city, but they did not indicate if the three new suspects arrested had the same links. During the newest operation, weapons, weapons cartridges, cocaine and methamphetamines were also seized, the ministry added. Reynosa is a Mexican border city adjacent to the United States and has been plagued by escalating violence since 2017 due to internal disputes among groups vying for control of drug trafficking, human smuggling and fuel theft. The U.S. State Department has revoked visas of a number of Mexican musicians for playing music that it says glorifies cartel violence. Last week, the popular Mexican regional music band Grupo Firme announced that it was canceling a performance in a music festival in California after the United States government suspended the musicians' visas. In April, the U.S. State Department revoked the visas of members of the band Los Alegres del Barranco after they projected the face of a drug cartel boss onto a large screen during a performance. Musicians targeted in Mexico Mexican regional music, which encapsulates a wide range of styles including corridos and cumbia, has in recent years gained a spotlight as it's entered a sort of international musical renaissance. Young artists sometimes pay homage to leaders of drug cartels, often portrayed as Robin Hood-type figures. It was not immediately clear if Fugitivo played such songs or if the artists were simply victims of rampant cartel violence that has eclipsed the city. Mexican musicians have previously been targeted by criminal groups that pay them to compose and perform songs that glorify the exploits of their leaders. Such performers often live in close proximity to their drug lord patrons, and can at times get caught up in gang turf battles. "Narcocorridos" are a controversial sub-genre of music in Mexico, and the songs have caught the attention of President Claudia Sheinbaum, who recently launched a music contest "for peace and against addictions," seeking to counter the popularity of the music among young people in Mexico and the United States. Several regions in the country have banned "narcocorridos," sparking a recent riot during a concert after a singer refused to perform some of his most popular songs. In January this year, a small plane was reported to have dropped pamphlets on a northwestern city threatening around 20 music artists and influencers for alleged dealings with a warring faction of the Sinaloa drug cartel. In 2018, armed men kidnapped two members of the musical group "Los Norteños de Río Bravo," whose bodies were later found on the federal highway connecting Reynosa to Río Bravo, Tamaulipas. In 2013, 17 musicians from the group Kombo Kolombia were executed by alleged cartel members in the northeastern state of Nuevo Leon, allegedly because of links to a rival gang. The Associated Press contributed to this report. January 6 defendant refuses Trump's pardon The wonderfully weird world of artist Luigi Serafini Everything we know about the Boulder attack on Israeli hostage march
Washington Post
6 hours ago
- Washington Post
Mexico's ruling party expands its power in massive judicial election
MEXICO CITY — Mexico's ruling party appears to have gained firm control of the country's Supreme Court, according to the early results of a judicial election that analysts predict will weaken the checks and balances in the young democracy. The leftist Morena party already dominates Mexico's government, holding the presidency and a majority in Congress. Now, it stands to have far greater influence in the third branch of government, the judiciary. With 86 percent of the vote counted, it appeared that every single judge on the new, nine-member Supreme Court had featured on lists of recommended candidates distributed to voters by the ruling party. In addition to the Supreme Court, voters on Sunday chose more than 2,600 other federal and state magistrates, in what amounted to the world's largest judicial election. Opponents said the election was the latest in a number of steps that have weakened democracy in Mexico, including the abolition of autonomous agencies such as the freedom-of-information institute. If judges have to appeal to voters to reach the bench, critics say, they won't have the same freedom to issue unpopular rulings. And, they could be forced to kowtow to politicians and local power brokers — including drug traffickers. 'This signifies the end of the independence of the judicial branch,' Diego Valadés, a former Supreme Court justice, said in an interview. Diplomats and legal experts said the election could darken the investment climate in Mexico, since businesspeople can no longer look to the courts to uphold the law impartially. President Claudia Sheinbaum portrayed it differently. She noted that the judiciary had long been plagued by corruption and nepotism, and said it was best to 'let the people decide' who should preside over the courts. 'Mexico is the most democratic country in the world,' she said after the election on Sunday. The election was the brainchild of former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, a left-leaning populist who founded the Morena party. Like President Donald Trump, he railed at court decisions that blocked his initiatives. Before leaving office last year, López Obrador proposed a radical overhaul of the judiciary, which was subsequently approved under Sheinbaum. While the election was billed as a democratic exercise, many Mexicans said they were confused by the unwieldy process, in which they had to select dozens of judges from multiple ballots with hundreds of names. Only 13 percent of eligible voters turned out. Many of those who did were mobilized by political parties. The parties handed out folded lists of recommendations known as 'accordions.' Voters were permitted to take them into booths. The top nine vote-getters for the Supreme Court were all included in the Morena 'accordion.' They include three women who served on the nation's top court in recent years and usually backed López Obrador's decisions, his former legal counselor, and lawyers who worked closely with Morena political figures at the state level, according to the preliminary results. The top vote-getter was Hugo Aguilar Ortiz, an attorney from the government's National Institute of Indigenous Peoples, who once represented the Zapatista rebels who launched an uprising in 1994. 'This wasn't a free election, but a takeover of the judicial institutions' by Morena, said José Ramón Cossío, a former Supreme Court justice and — along with Valadés — a prominent critic of the former president. Results of the elections for other federal and state-level judges are expected in coming days. Candidates were mostly screened and nominated by the legislative and executive branches, in a process criticized as rushed and superficial. Among those who made it onto the ballot were a man who served six years in a Texas jail for drug possession and an attorney who once represented Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, the Sinaloa cartel drug lord. Requirements for candidates were minimal compared with the previous civil-service-style system, in which most judges were promoted based on experience and exams. (The Supreme Court was different. Justices were traditionally selected by the Senate from a list submitted by the Mexican president.) Hundreds of career magistrates chose not to run in this year's election, and many prominent critics boycotted the vote. Some said they feared the election results would take Mexico back to the last century, when the Institutional Revolutionary Party held the presidency for 71 years straight and controlled most of the government. Mexico isn't the only country where judges are popularly elected. In the United States, numerous states have the practice, but it doesn't apply to federal judges, who are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Many legal experts agreed that Mexico's justice system was overdue for change. Impunity and corruption are rampant. But some analysts said the election wouldn't solve those problems. 'Only those who have money, power or influence can fully engage with our twisted system of justice,' wrote Ana Laura Magaloni, a legal scholar, in the daily Reforma newspaper. 'Nonetheless, I find it incomprehensible and painful that none of these problems of poor design and functioning of the system are corrected by the judicial reform. In fact, some will get significantly worse.' Valentina Muñoz Castillo contributed to this report.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mexico steps into unknown with world's first popular election of all judges: ‘A blind date with democracy'
On a heat-dazed afternoon in Culiacán, the capital of Mexico's Sinaloa state, a speaker by the cathedral was droning through an advert for the judicial elections on loop when a plume of smoke appeared in the sky. A flicker of agitation ran through the plaza. After months of cartel conflict, Sinaloa is on edge. Yet on 1 June, it and the rest of Mexico will start to elect every judge in the country, from local magistrates to supreme court justices, by popular vote. It is a world-first democratic experiment, but one that has prompted warnings of low turnout, a political power grab and infiltration by organised crime. The reform is the most radical move made by the governing Morena party and its allies since they won a congressional supermajority last year allowing them to change the constitution at will. Few disagree that Mexico's judicial system needs change. Justice is inaccessible to many, corruption is commonplace and impunity is rampant. Related: 'An atmosphere of terror': the bloody rise of Mexico's top cartel Morena claims its reform will address these issues by making the judiciary more responsive to popular opinion. But critics say it will bulldoze the separation of powers, and that by throwing the doors open to less qualified candidates whose campaigns may be backed by opaque interests – including organised crime groups – it could aggravate the very problems it seeks to solve. Delia Quiroa, a well-known advocate for Mexico's disappeared, is no fan of the reform. But she admits it has given her a chance to become a federal judge she would not otherwise have had. It is just the latest unexpected turn in a life that was shattered the moment her brother, Roberto, was disappeared on 10 March 2014. Though born in Culiacán, Quiroa moved to the border state of Tamaulipas when she was a child. She had been studying to become an engineer, but as the years stretched on with no sign of her brother, she retrained as a lawyer to force the authorities into action. Threats from criminal groups eventually displaced her family to Mexico City. Then last year they moved back to Sinaloa, which for years had been relatively calm owing to the dominance of the eponymous cartel. 'People used to say that the narcos in Sinaloa left the public out of [their fights],' Quiroa said, with a rueful smile. 'Then this conflict began.' In July 2024, Ismael 'El Mayo' Zambada, who founded the Sinaloa cartel with Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, was detained by US authorities along with one of Guzmán's sons after a small plane touched down in Texas. El Mayo accused El Chapo's son of betraying and delivering him to US authorities. Now a faction led by El Mayo's son is waging war against another led by the two sons of El Chapo who remain free in Mexico. As the conflict enters a ninth month, it has left well over 2,000 dead or disappeared. Related: Mother's Day brings only grief for those seeking Mexico's disappeared And it has made the judicial elections even more complicated. 'The violence has hit the campaign,' said Quiroa. 'You can't always find people in the streets.' The city's central market was Quiroa's target for the day. Friends and family came along, handing out pamphlets with her logo: a spade and a gavel crossed over the scales of justice. 'I try to explain that I have no political or economic interest in this,' said Quiroa. 'That the only thing I want is a change in this country.' But as Quiroa bounced between market stalls, people's responses did nothing to dispel fears of an uninformed vote come 1 June. Unlike in other elections, parties cannot support candidates, nor can candidates openly profess a partisan affiliation, even if they clearly have one. Radio and TV spots are also banned, meaning largely unknown candidates are limited to handing out flyers and posting on social media. Then there is the sheer number of candidates. Voters will be faced with at least six ballot papers, some with dozens of names on them but little else. 'It looks like an exam,' sighed Quiroa. Even an enthusiastic supporter of the reform – a butcher behind a pile of cow hooves, who celebrated the election as a chance for 'the people to stop the robbery' – could not name a candidate. Others were sceptical, if not cynical. 'I'm not going to vote for candidates I don't know,' said one shoe shiner, who was reading a dog-eared biography of the 19th-century president Benito Juárez. 'Just like I won't eat a meal if I don't know what's in it. It's common sense.' According to the president of the National Electoral Institute, voter turnout is expected to be less than 20%. Even though Morena is not allowed to back candidates, many assume the ruling party will use its unrivalled capacity to mobilise voters to help its preferred candidates – particularly for the supreme court, which has often acted as a check on Morena's executive power, and a new disciplinary tribune, which will keep judges in line. Related: Land of no return: the Mexican city torn apart by cartel kidnappings 'Morena wants to hoard all the power,' said the shoe shiner. 'They don't want to leave a crumb for anyone else.' But other interests, including organised crime, may also seize the opportunity. Defensorxs, a civil society organisation, has identified various 'highly risky' candidates, including a lawyer who was counsel to El Chapo and a former state prosecutor in Michoacán accused of alleged involvement in the murder of two journalists. 'I don't think people have managed to find out who the candidates are and what each kind of position actually does,' said Marlene León Fontes of Iniciativa Sinaloa, a civil society organisation. 'People will vote on the basis of personal connections or political parties. 'It's a blind date with democracy,' she said. If Quiroa emerges a judge, she says she will be an 'iron fist' against corrupt and negligent authorities – not least when it comes to searching for the more than 120,000 people registered as disappeared, and identifying the 72,000 bodies in Mexico's morgues. 'It was the feeling of being tortured by the authorities who should be protecting me that made me put myself forward as a candidate,' said Quiroa. Yet as far as Quiroa knows, she is the only candidate to have emerged from the many thousands searching for their relatives. 'I'd have liked there to be more – and more victims of all kinds who are lawyers and human rights defenders,' said Quiroa. 'But many people said they didn't want to be part of the destruction of the judicial system.' Quiroa shares their anxiety. 'This is an experiment,' she said. 'And we don't know how it's going to go.'
