Don't blame the system, just offer more to voters
Shane Wright makes a valid point (' Politicians take note: Australians can't stand sore losers ', May 23), that those who whine about our fair preferential voting system are those who feel their preferred candidate might not hold the endearment of the majority of people in their electorate. Not only is the system a better reflection of the overall wishes of each community, but, in seats like Bradfield, it makes for exciting suspense. Donald Hawes, Peel
Well said, Shane Wright. Many 'sore losers' believe preferential voting was to blame. What nonsense. The electorate had its say and it clearly endorsed Labor's policies and voted accordingly. Our democracy may not be perfect but it's certainly fair and it has stood the test of time. The losers should look beyond the voting system and offer voters better alternatives if they, once again, wish to be winners. Denis Suttling, Newport Beach
Australia's voting system ensures a full democracy. To tamper with preferential voting in anger would be a Trumpian disregard for the election results. A Menzies conservative coalition would respect and protect the institution. The elements of our democracy are extremely fragile when they are at the whim of political self-interest. We must stridently protect democratic integrity. The depth of choice in preferential voting reflects the depth of Australian culture. Anne Eagar, Epping
The reason for the truckload of sour grapes and conspiracy theories being dumped post-election is that there's a strong born-to-rule sense among conservatives that they are 'the natural party of government'. It is this entitled failure of humility, breeding complacency and hubris that will keep them from government. No one is entitled to govern; it must be earned by banishing stubbornly outdated policies and actually listening to voters. Accept that Labor won in a landslide and move on. Alison Stewart, Riverview
Thank you, Shane Wright, Australians don't like sore losers. Preferential voting has worked in this country for more than 100 years. Politicians and their supporters who question its value for achieving the best results only need look in the mirror for someone to blame. When you're out of touch, it is usually reflected in the results. Reflect on that. Geoff Nilon, Mascot
Of course, winners are grinners. Losing is part of life. Some of us 'can't accept that voters didn't see the world through their prism'. The losers in Australia are the slow action on climate change, victims of domestic violence and the homeless. We hope policies will improve life for them and the environment. When playing sport or cheering for your team, winning is joyful and you are on a high. Losing, you shrug your shoulders, learn a little and try better next time. Bea Hodgson, Gerringong
I was not very surprised that after the reversals of the federal election, the Liberal and National Party Coalition agreement has broken down. Such things are historically predictable. For example, the leaders of the famous Burke and Wills expedition, finding themselves lost in the uncharted wilderness and with irretrievable but unexplainable differences, also decided that it would be better for their parties to split up and go their own ways. Now how did that end? Garry Dalrymple, Earlwood
Ley the lone adult
After taking his bat and going home, David Littleproud has come back with his bat and he has asked if he can still play (' Heat on Littleproud after Coalition U-turn ', May 23). Just like a spoilt child, who used to be pampered, for him, by Peter Dutton, he tried to stamp his feet but only got sore feet. Sussan Ley looks like the only adult in the room. How can this rabble have ever expected to be our next government? I think Ley should take her time and follow her instincts that the Liberals need to reform and be a centralist party. That is its only future. It's time to jettison the Nationals dinosaur unless they agree to reformation too. Don't hold your breath. Rowan Godwin, Rozelle
It made me laugh reading that David Littleproud was planning to shift people from the Nationals' 'front bench to their back bench'. Were they going to call themselves the opposition to the opposition, or opposition lite? Bridget McKenzie's coyness on ABC TV's 7.30; the party's continued obstruction to climate mitigation and decarbonisation in the face of constant 'unprecedented' extreme weather events; and its constant U-turns have left them with very little to be proud of. Alan Marel, North Curl Curl
David Littleproud needs to live up to his name and swallow his personal pride and return the Coalition to at least the semblance of an effective opposition. A government is only as good as an opposition that is able to keep it on its toes. As two separate parties, the Nats and the Libs have little hope. Genevieve Milton, Dulwich Hill
Can it be that the Labor Party is about to have its early Christmas present removed ? Whatever the outcome of the next round of 'will we join them, will we leave them?', the question of coalition unity has been trashed and no amount of reassurance from them will eliminate the feeling that what they are presenting is a facade. Lyn Savage, Coogee
Based on media reports this week, David Littleproud has little to be proud of. In stark contrast are the glowing remarks by Sussan Ley's colleagues of what a wonderful and remarkable woman she is. A role model for young women, no less, and with an amazing background. Which reminded me of her remarkable, but far less impressive, conduct as Scott Morrison's environment minister. In the Federal Court, her lawyers downed a group of teenagers and a nun to assert that the government owed no duty of care to them or their futures. With the decision her way, she approved another coal mine and took no responsibility for addressing the catastrophe that is facing us with rapid climate change. When travelling to the people, to listen to them, to have multiple conversations with them, care must be taken to avoid intermingling expenses for public service with private interests. Howard Charles, Annandale
If the Coalition is sort of back on, and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price did not get the deputy job in the Liberal Party, will she jump back to the Nationals? She might be after David Littleproud's job. Neville Turbit, Russell Lea
I read that one of the non-negotiables for the National Party is a guarantee for phone and internet access in the bush. A case of 'Farmer Wants a Wi-Fi', perhaps? Graham Fazio, Cootamundra
Stop posing and act
While the Nationals argue with the Liberals, the Mid North Coast of NSW is flooded and there have been some deaths (Letters, May 23). Why isn't Littleproud on the ground with all the Nationals voted in around that area instead of 'posing' on TV and carrying on with the Liberals? Get out there and support the unfortunate people who voted for your party. Ken Pares, Forster
Waiting at the station
Could your correspondent (Letters, May 23) please describe a train, and do they still have steam engines? I have been waiting on the planned Narrabeen Station platform since premier Robert Askin promised a rail line to the northern beaches in the 1960s. I have been expecting my train to come for 55-plus years, but some ungrateful commuters whinge about a few hours. Gavin Williamson, Narrabeen
Jaundiced view of terrific terrace
Sydney often claims to be a multicultural international city, except apparently when it comes to paint (' Council sees red over yellow paint ', May 23). This authority that councils everywhere have given themselves to direct what colour a property may be painted is patently big brother authoritarianism. Let the colour, vibrancy and light shine, and allow an owner to paint their property as they see fit. Matthew Boylan, Leichhardt
With so much bleak news, and bleak weather, how Grinch-like is Woollahra Council to put the kybosh on Michael Fegent's attempt to let a little sunshine into our lives by painting his restaurant such a cheerful yellow. And, incidentally, highlighting all that building's lovely heritage features. Anne Ring, Coogee
I am shocked at council's decision to disallow bright yellow on one of our best restaurants. I used to live in Avalon, a stone's throw from where Sali Herman, a well-respected Australian artist who brought Paddington to the notice of the masses with his paintings of the suburb's wonderful terraces of many colours. As we socialised with the Hermans, I now have a collection of his Christmas cards displaying his works. I am willing to provide these to council's heritage officers to demonstrate that bright colours, including yellow, have always been a historical part of Paddington heritage. Perhaps the only colour that should be allowed is the current fad of soot black, harking back to the burning of coal and coke in the times when Paddo was considered a slum. Robert Hosking, Paddington
Woollahra Council would go berserk if they dropped in on the island of Burano in the Venetian lagoon, where the brightly coloured houses are a major tourist attraction. Joan Brown, Orange
The picture of the Five Ways terrace painted vibrant yellow that so offends Woollahra Council shows it bracketed by two drab terraces, which are apparently the council's preferred standard. Allen Greer, Sydney
How jolly that terrace looks in its bright yellow skin. One would hope others would get the idea and move from so-called 'good taste', aka dreary conformism, to a fun and lively look. What a bunch of negative Nigels and Nancys the council is. Let councils focus on things such as high-rise overshadowing, green spaces, traffic management, parking and the public amenity. Tom Mangan, Woy Woy Bay
Hardly enhancing
The 'enhanced' games are not only unfair to clean athletes, but they attract publicity that is likely to encourage copycat behaviour (' Pioneering? No, it's cheating and it's dangerous ', May 23). This news is devastating. 'Roid rage is common and does increase violence against women as it's generally the insecure blokes who use intramuscular testosterone and now peptides. These same men then lose it under stress, so the partner wears the anger. Between artificial intelligence and modern psychedelic experimentation, the young folk will have their hands full. Or will these prove advantageous? It seems like too much for immature brains. Ashley Berry, Wollongong
Concerns for enhanced athletes such as James Magnussen are well founded, even under medical supervision. But the real concerns are for our young and middle-aged men, in particular, without medical supervision, who train daily while taking products to enhance their performance. As a mother, I can remind my adult children of my concerns, but fail in making any difference. Janice Creenaune, Austinmer
Dear James (Magnussen), having a hit of heroin or smoking a joint may make me 'the happiest I've been in seven years', but it still doesn't make it good for my health. Nick Walker, Springwood
Fitz: I couldn't agree more. The likening of James Magnussen's steroid-fuelled ventures to that of OnlyFans is chilling. Sad, sordid unreality in action. What kind of society have we become? Judy Finch, Taree
To counter the Enhanced Games, could we also have a Lazy and Fat Games? Instead of training and taking drugs, you would have to prove you have done no training for a minimum of one year, have a really bad diet, drink a lot of beer and be at least 20 per cent overweight. Mark Anderson, Coogee
Dumping to dumping
The amount of rain and the speed and height of the NSW Mid North Coast and Hunter floods are terrifying and hard to imagine (' More rain on way amid flood disaster ', May 23), especially when there is a record drought down south. As the chief executive of Natural Hazards Research Australia, Andrew Gissing, said: 'A warmer atmosphere holds more water, leading to a greater likelihood of intense flood-causing downpours' and people are in 'a constant state of disaster recovery under climate change'. Recent ocean temperature maps show that unseasonably warm waters off the coast of NSW point to the problem. As David Attenborough said at the end of his latest film, Ocean, 'If we save the sea, we save the planet'. It's unfair that ordinary people through no fault of their own are suffering like this. It's time to stop dumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and eventually the oceans. The big polluters should be paying for the damage they cause via a carbon levy, as Ross Garnaut and Rod Sims have suggested. The Labor government has the mandate to act. Ray Peck, Hawthorn (Vic)
It is moments like these days of rain that make you realise how out-of-touch with equality we have become. The homeless are living tough with no fault of their own, while others can purchase a house costing millions. It is a sad, sorry place we have arrived at. Zuzu Burford, Heathcote
While bouquets are being given, and rightfully so, for the many fantastic efforts and contributions in relation to this week's NSW flood disaster, let's throw a few brickbats at our enabling state legislators. The latter are seemingly steadfast in failing to ensure our state has fit-for-purpose planning and environment laws for new housing developments that would seek to minimise risk to life and limb. With apologies to the late Professor Julius Sumner Miller, why is that so? Col Shephard, Yamba
The wrong stuff
If it's rejection you want (Letters, May 23), try publishing poetry. Keith Russell, Mayfield West
Postscript
So, the election has been and gone, the results are almost in, the corflutes have been struck, the Liberal Party has sobbed in fury and found a new leader, what could be left? Funny that you should ask. This week, the Coalition suddenly de-coalesced, leaving both sides composing their stiff upper lips and being terribly brave about an unfortunate situation.
The letters writers, if no one else, enjoyed this hugely. Many thought this was a wonderful opportunity for the Liberals to renew, reform and repower, to cast off the chains of the Nationals and move to a future without that annoying assumption of being the natural party of government. However, no one could see anything good for the Nationals. Without the Liberals, are they just going to wander in their rural wilderness until they disappear, or join another party for strength?
In the middle of this was the great Sydney train breakdown, after a live wire fell onto a train on Tuesday, causing waves of disaster to flow out through almost the whole system. The echoes sloshed on for the rest of the week, in the pouring rain, and the people taking hours to get home were not happy. Neither were ride-share drivers after the biggest company put a cap on push pricing.
The letter writers were not finished with the Nationals, however. As the floodwaters rose on the Mid North Coast, writers were pointing out that a party that does not accept climate change is on a hiding to nothing. Then breaking news came that the parties may come back together again, after all. This caused more laughter and mockery.
The lighter side of the week was discussion about Anthony Albanese's hat, worn to the Pope's inauguration, much of which was held outside in the rapidly warming Roman spring. Opinions were sharply divided, though strongly in favour of the titfer as being both sensible and appropriate (and, anyway, you should have seen what the clergy were wearing!). The few naysayers thought it was cringeworthy. Sometimes, it seems, you can win an election but not every heart and mind.
Harriet Veitch, Acting letters editor

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
NT cattlemen dealt blow in compensation push over Gillard government live export ban after judge shoots down $600 million claim
Northern Territory cattlemen have been dealt a blow in their bid for compensation over the Gillard government's decision to ban live cattle exports in 2011. The federal court has ruled the government is only liable for the loss of income suffered in one year, not three years as sought by the cattlemen. Former Labor agriculture minister Joe Ludwig announced the ban on June 7, 2011. It was lifted on July 6 the same year, but cattlemen argued the impact of the decision lasted far longer as the relationship between Australia and Indonesia soured. The ban followed an investigation by Animals Australia and Four Corners into the treatment of cattle in Indonesian abattoirs, that prompted large protest rallies in Melbourne and Sydney. The cattlemen launched a class action over the decision arguing it had cost them up to $600 million across the supply chain. In 2020, Federal Court justice Steven Rares ruled in favour of the lead applicant, the Brett Cattle Company. Justice Rares found Senator Ludwig had acted recklessly when he implemented the ban, as he awarded the company $2.94 million in damages. For the past five years, the cattlemen and the federal government have been locked in legal argument about how much compensation should be paid to the other members of the class action. The government made an offer of $215 million to settle the case, saying the ban had only affected the export of about 88,000 head of cattle in 2011. The cattlemen rejected the offer, arguing the ban impacted the number of cattle Indonesia would except from 2011 until 2013 as they sought up to $600 million in compensation. But late on Thursday, Justice Thomas Thawley ruled the quota of cattle accepted by Indonesia had only been impacted in 2011. He said a drop in the quota in 2012 and 2013 was due to the Indonesian government's policy to pursue greater self-sufficiency in its beef market, not because of the fallout from the Australian government's 2011 ban. His decision means the amount of compensation awarded is likely to be closer to the government's $215 million offer, than the $600 million the cattlemen had sought. Justice Thawley placed a 48-hour embargo on the publication of the full reasons for his decision. In a statement NT Cattlemen's Association chief executive officer Romy Carey acknowledged the court's decision. 'While the judgment marks a significant milestone in a legal battle that has spanned more than a decade, we are still working through the detail and assessing its full implications both for the families directly affected and the wider cattle industry,' she said. 'At the request of the Commonwealth, the Federal Court has placed the reasons for judgment under a 48-hour embargo. 'Accordingly, we have not yet been provided with access to the full decision and will refrain from further comment until we are in a position to respond responsibly and with the complete facts before us.'

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
'An Important lesson': Tasmanian no confidence motion highlights ‘damage' that occurs when Labor and Greens align, MP claims
The decision to back a no confidence motion in Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff highlights the 'damage' that occurs when Labor gets together with the Greens, a federal MP has claimed. Tasmania is preparing to head to its second election in just 14 months after a narrow majority of MPs voted to support a no confidence motion in Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff. Labor's no confidence motion passed the Tasmanian lower house on a vote of 18 to 17 after Speaker Michelle O'Byrne – a Labor MP – broke with parliamentary convention to support the motion. Premier Rockliff has slammed the 'recklessness' of the motion and is asking the state's Lieutenant-Governor to call an election (Tasmanian Governor Barbara Barker is currently out of the state). Speaking to Sky News Australia on Thursday, federal Liberal MP Zoe McKenzie said the events in Tasmania were an 'important lesson' for the rest of the country. 'I think the message that the rest of the country should take is this is what happens when Labor gets together with the Greens,' she said 'We're seeing what's happening in Canberra at the moment in relation to the taxing of superannuation… now we've seen what damage they can do in Tasmania, and that's an important lesson for everyone to take away from today.' Ms McKenzie said an election was the last thing Tasmanians need. 'They've just come off the back of a federal election, and they only had their own state election 14 months ago,' she said. 'Elections are expensive, they are distracting, they are divisive, (and this comes) at a time exactly when the Tasmanian people need certainty, need strong measures to address cost of living.' The no confidence motion, put forward by Labor leader Dean Winter, was also backed by the five Greens MPs, as well as independents Craig Garland and Kristie Johnston, and Jacqui Lambie Network MP Andrew Jenner. Joining the Liberals in opposing the motion were independent David O'Byrne, as well as ex-Lambie Network turned independent MPs Rebekah Pentland and Miriam Beswick. Explaining her decision to back the motion, Speaker O'Byrne acknowledged there is a longstanding Westminster parliamentary convention that the speaker should use their casting vote to maintain the status quo, which would mean voting down the motion. However in an emotional speech, Ms O'Byrne said there was a tradition of speakers breaking the parliamentary convention, and that as a Labor MP she could not be expected to vote in favour of a Liberal government. "I am a member of the Labor Party. When I was elected to this position, it was made clear to this house and the public that despite no longer attending the caucus and strategy meetings of the Labor Party, that I would always vote with them,' she said. "No one in this chamber could realistically expect me to provide confidence to a Liberal government.' 'If I was not in the chair and the government had held this position, the vote would be won on the floor… the die is cast and the state is on the inexorable path to another early election.' Premier Rockliff described the events as a 'sad day' yet accepted the parliament's decision. 'In my personal opinion, this is a very sad day for Tasmania, it is a sad day as well because I put a lot on the line for this parliament,' Mr Rockliff lamented. 'It wasn't easy to get a 35-seat parliament over the line, but I believed it was the right thing to do. And I still believe it was the right thing to do. The embattled premier also took aim at the state's Labor leader for proposing the motion. 'The Leader of the Opposition has not only diminished this parliament, himself, his party. You might get rid of me today, but I'll tell you what, they are coming for you as well because you will always be known as a wrecker,' he said. 'I will also advise that if Mr Winter cannot command a majority in the place, most reluctantly, we must go to an election.' This seems all but certain since the Labor leader has ruled out an offer to form a minority government with the Greens.


The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
'Sad day' as state faces fourth election in seven years
Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk. Tasmanians are set to return to the polls with Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirming he will seek an election after losing a no-confidence motion. The Liberal leader's grip on power was lost after a marathon two-day debate in parliament finished on Thursday afternoon. The motion brought by Opposition Leader Dean Winter passed by the barest margin, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting a deciding vote. With Governor Barbara Baker absent, Mr Rockliff spoke with her lieutenant, Christopher Shanahan, before announcing he would reconvene parliament on Tuesday to pass an emergency funding bill for public servants' wages. "It's at that point, when the bills go through both houses of parliament, that I will seek an audience with Her Excellency, the Governor of Tasmania, to call an election," he told reporters outside Government House. "But my most highest priority right now is to ensure that we continue to fund our essential services that all Tasmanians need, deserve and care about." In a speech following the vote, an emotional Mr Rockliff said it was a "sad day". "What we have in this parliament, as I've said over the course of the last 14 months, is an eclectic mix of people from all backgrounds, which is how parliament should be, in actual fact," he told the House of Assembly. "And I wanted it to work. I believed in it and I actually still do. "We've got most of our agenda through simply because of our negotiations between each other. And that's why I'm so disappointed, if not broken-hearted, frankly." Mr Winter brought the no-confidence motion following the Liberal minority government's budget, winning the support of the Greens and three crossbenchers for an 18-17 vote. Liberal MPs yelled out "weak" as the house divided for the vote. Mr Rockliff, premier since 2022, conceded the numbers were against him but vowed to "fight to his last breath" and not resign. He said Tasmania did not want and could not afford its fourth state election in seven years. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power. I have a lot more fight in me," he said. "The only job Mr Winter is interested in is mine. And I am not going anywhere." Mr Winter, opposition leader since Labor's loss in 2024, said Tasmanians wanted to see the end of Mr Rockliff and the Liberals, who have governed under three different premiers since 2014. The 40-year-old brought the no-confidence motion following last week's budget, which forecasted deficits through the forward estimates and a debt blowout beyond $10 billion. "We are ready for an election," he said, flanked by his caucus outside a substation in Mt Wellington's foothills, a site chosen to press home arguments against privatisation. "We will not stand by and let this premier wreck our budget and sell the assets that Tasmanians have built." During the debate, Labor also lashed Mr Rockliff for delays and cost blowouts to the delivery of two new Bass Strait ferries. Mr Rockliff called the motion "a selfish grab for power" but Mr Winter pushed back against claims of an opportunistic powerplay "The premier did confidence and supply agreements with the crossbench when he became premier ... and it was up to him to hold those agreements together," he said. "He couldn't do it. Those agreements have fallen apart." Tasmania went to the polls just 15 months ago in an election which returned the Liberals to power in minority with just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house. Some crossbenchers and the Greens have gripes with a new $945 million stadium in Hobart, a condition of the Tasmania Devils entering the AFL in 2028. Labor supports the team and a stadium, a position it reiterated on Wednesday in writing to the AFL. But the Devils fear an early election would delay the stadium project and put the club's licence at risk.