JK Rowling tells Boy George 'I've never handcuffed a man to a wall and beaten him with a chain' as she mentions his assault conviction in last salvo in trans row
A trans rights row between JK Rowling and Boy George escalated yesterday as the author mentioned the singer's conviction for beating a male escort with a chain.
A heated exchange ignited on X after the 63-year-old popstar dubbed the Harry Potter author a 'rich bored bully'.
In a lengthy takedown, Rowling accused the Culture Club star of sneering at 'unenlightened plebs' and quipped: 'I've never been given 15 months for handcuffing a man to a wall and beating him with a chain.'
George, whose real name is George O'Dowd, served four months out of a 15-month jail sentence in 2009 after being found guilty of assault and the false imprisonment of male escort Auden Carlsen.
He later said he was prosecuted on his own evidence after he told the police he handcuffed Carlsen.
The Karma Chameleon hitmaker tearfully apologised in 2017 when he appeared on Piers Morgan 's Life Stories and described it as a 'psychotic episode'.
'I stopped him from leaving my apartment,' he sighed. 'It's terrible what I did, and I'm ashamed and sorry for what I did. It was wrong.'
This morning George hit back at Rowling in another dig by suggesting she was a muggle - a character in the Harry Potter series who lacks any magical ability.
Rowling yesterday pointed out she had spent many years in poverty which is 'why I understand the importance of single-sex spaces for women'.
'You yourself have been convicted of violent assault,' she said. 'The overwhelming number of people who commit crimes of violence are male, just like you.
'That's why I don't want to see men identifying into women's prison cells or any of the spaces mentioned above. Not all men are violent or predatory, but enough are to make safeguarding necessary.'
The war of words between Rowing and George started in April and saw the author blast the Culture Club singer after he said that she could not tell the difference between a transgender woman and a biological man.
George has expressed support for transgender people online, in line with other stars such as Tilda Swinton and Pedro Pascal, who recently branded Rowling a 'heinous loser' on Instagram.
Responding to a tweet suggesting that Pascal - an outspoken supporter of trans rights - was a misogynist, the singer wrote: 'Stop this nonsense that if you don't agree with @jk_rowling you hate women. She hates men. This is where this truth lies.
'She cannot differentiate between a 'trans' woman and a biological male. Which is weird with her imagination?'
But Rowling - who now tweets almost daily about what she has called 'sex-based rights' - fired back with an eye-rolling emoji and the retort: 'I do not hate men.'
She wrote: 'I'm married to a man, George. I do not hate men.
'I simply live in reality where men - however they identify - commit 98 per cent of sexual assaults, and 88 per cent of victims are female.
'Trans-identified men are no less likely than other kinds of men to pose a risk to women or girls.'
She did not elaborate on how many of those committing sexual assaults were thought to be trans.
She then added: 'Accusing me of hating men because I don't think trans women should be given access to all women-only spaces does rather suggest that... you're well aware that these are, in fact, men.'
Rowling has been vocal on the subject of trans people for several years; in 2018, a spokesperson explained that her 'like' of a tweet calling trans women 'men in dresses' had been a 'middle-aged moment'.
And following the Supreme Court judgment on April 17, Rowling has consistently referred to transgender women as being 'men'.
The ruling, on an appeal brought by campaign group For Women Scotland, concluded that the legal definition of a woman was that of a biological female, when interpreting the Equality Act.
It has led to the Equality and Human Rights Commission overhauling its rules on single-sex spaces - meaning that even trans people with gender recognition certificates (GRC) are still considered to be their biological birth sex.
MPs have pointed out that the judgment will likely lead to discrimination against those who do not appear traditionally male or female.
Dawn Butler, Labour MP for Brent East, told Parliament on last Tuesday: 'I do not know whether anyone else in the House has butch lesbian friends and has been with them when they have been told to get out of women's toilets, but I have.
'It is not pleasant; it is not nice.'
And the ruling likely means that transgender men - who are considered biologically female - will be required to use women's toilets, even if they appear male and have, for example, a beard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
The ‘end of history' was the source of our ills
All the best scenes in Shifty, Adam Curtis's new documentary about Britain in the late 20th-century, concern the Millennium Dome. With skilfully spliced footage of its gaping interiors and weirdly looming riverside bulk, the dome is transformed into an almost gothic symbol of fin de siècle spiritual vacuousness. A planning committee decides that it is to have a 'spirit zone', but nobody can decide what religions should be represented there. In a drab conference room a man with an uninspiring powerpoint enthuses that the phrase 'HOW SHALL I LIVE?' should be projected onto a blank wall instead. Isn't that a bit 'banal', wonders Simon Jenkins. He is quickly shouted down. You don't have to buy all of Curtis's arguments — was Margaret Thatcher really the sole author of modern hyperindividualism? — to appreciate his refreshingly eerie and desolate portrait of that much-mythologised period, the 'end of history'. To many today, the late 1990s and early 2000s are a lost Edwardian summer of stability and peace. The endless trend pieces about 'Nineties nostalgia' are more than mere fluff. The undying popularity of Friends, Harry Potter and Bridget Jones among those not alive to see them first time round, and the lucrative resurrections of Oasis and Pulp, represent something real. For people my age and younger, the vanished era of post-Cold War tranquillity is as psychologically significant as the Second World War was to some baby boomers; it is the same painful sense of having just missed a glorious cresting wave in the tide of history. But rather than envying the heroism of our fathers, we covet their low house prices and political stability. To many Gen Zers (almost half of whom tell pollsters they wish TikTok didn't exist) the last years before iPhones have an archaic charm. Apparently banal clips of Noughties life acquire viral currency as artefacts of an innocent time before digital corruptions — the latest TikTok phenomenon is footage of the band MGMT performing dorkily at Yale to a conspicuously non-smartphone waving audience. According to the popular story, a series of earthquakes shook us out of paradise: 9/11, the 2008 crash, social media, mass migration. But as Curtis shows, our unhappy age is a natural evolution of, not an aberration from the 1990s. History doesn't rupture, it mutates. The myth of the blissful end of history is just as bogus as the myth of the long Edwardian summer (in the years before the First World War, readers will recall, Britain was on the brink of civil war over the question of Home Rule for Ireland). The seeds of our present discontent were already germinating in that lost Eden at the end of history. The world Curtis portrays in Shifty is quite spookily familiar. The sleazy politicians of John Major's decaying government (the Starmer administration fleetingly strikes the viewer as almost attractive) have lost both public trust and the capacity to direct events. In the furious eyes of miners filing grimly out of shuttered pits in County Durham you glimpse the first sparks of the populist conflagration soon to engulf western democracies (and, perhaps, a foreshadowing of the AI-driven white collar deindustrialisation to come). Above it all, the unaccountable barons of high finance perch in their glittering silver towers. Off screen in America, political polarisation was already carving ideological rifts down Thanksgiving tables. Newt Gingrich had long since resolved that politics was a 'war for power' and embarked on his attritional battles over the budget with Bill Clinton. The scandal over Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky and the Republicans' subsequent impeachment campaign split the country with almost Trump-era vitriol. In elite universities a movement known as 'political correctness' was campaigning to jettison pale stale writers from the canon, prompting one of the great public intellectuals of the age, Robert Hughes, to warn against the politicisation of art and a burgeoning cult of 'victimhood'. There were no smartphones, true. But the advent of 24-hour news represented a media revolution nearly as important. One of the most effectively jarring moments in Curtis's series juxtaposes the hectic, adrenalised tone of 1990s TV news with a clip showing the staid formality of the BBC in the 1960s. The contrast is almost as stark as that which divides Newsnight from TikTok. By the 1990s, television was fragmenting into an infinity of cable news channels. Anybody who has read Neil Postman's polemic Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985) knows that his criticisms of TV — its inanity, its lack of deep context, its weird juxtapositions of the trivial and the serious — precisely anticipate the smartphone. Screens were already isolating us in the 1990s. Curtis supplies tragicomic footage of an elderly couple sitting side by side in morose silence, hypnotised by a documentary about turtles. Membership of clubs and churches declined, and television was rated the most popular leisure activity. The five hours a day the average person dedicated to TV in 1990 seems restrained compared with the virtually constant smartphone use that characterises many modern lives, but it's also hard to argue that it represents the quasi-Amish technological continence of Gen Z mythology. Though the romanticisation of the 1990s is not exactly baseless — I would rather live in an age before inflated house prices and the automation of the written word — it is overdone. The crises of the present age have helped expose a cultural and spiritual hollowness that was already evident at the turn of the millennium. Perhaps a country that chose to celebrate itself by constructing a huge and vacant white space was always going to end up in trouble
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Grooming gangs victim says Wales needs own inquiry
A survivor of child sexual exploitation has repeated her call for a Wales-specific inquiry into the woman, who goes by the pseudonym Emily Vaughn, had her experiences shared in the Senedd earlier this year by the Welsh Conservatives as they pushed Welsh ministers to instigate an inquiry the UK government's decision to launch one covering Wales and England, she said Wales needed to "wake up" to the fact that abuse did not stop at Senedd voted against Tory calls for a Wales-specific inquiry in January, but unanimously supported a Plaid Cymru amendment that Welsh ministers should consider one and also carry out an audit of cases with police. The prime minister announced an inquiry to cover Wales and England on the weekend, following a report from Baroness Louise Casey, who led an audit into abuse and report was published on Monday alongside a statement in the Commons from Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. Ms Vaughn, who is now in her 30s, said she was first groomed at the age of 11 and abused from the age of said she was trafficked to Telford, Blackpool and within Wales, and was raped a statement, she said: "It is time for Wales to wake up to the truth that grooming, sexual exploitation and organised abuse do not stop at regional borders."Survivors in Wales have long been silenced, overlooked, or forced to seek justice through systems not built with their experiences in mind."While inquiries have been launched in England and other parts of the UK, the specific cultural, institutional, and social factors unique to Wales have yet to be properly investigated or addressed."There needs to be an independent public inquiry into grooming gangs and systemic sexual exploitation in Wales." Ms Vaughn later clarified that there should be a Wales-specific inquiry which should: "look at children trafficked into Wales and around Wales for both sexual and criminal exploitation".Senedd Conservative leader Darren Millar said on Monday that he welcomed the UK government's inquiry, but it was long overdue and it vindicated people such as Ms Vaughn. A freedom of information request made by BBC Wales in March revealed Welsh police forces had identified no current widespread issues with grooming Welsh government said on Monday it welcomed the new inquiry and would: "consider its recommendations in full to inform our actions"."Our ten-year Strategy for Preventing and Responding to Child Sexual Abuse is due out for public consultation shortly," it added. "There are four strands to the strategy which are prevention, protection, supporting children and young people and their families, and supporting adult survivors."
Times
37 minutes ago
- Times
‘Whitehall tried to block Rotherham grooming scandal exposé'
Whitehall officials attempted to convince Michael Gove to go to court to stop The Times from exposing the Rotherham grooming scandal, Dominic Cummings has said. Gove, then the education secretary and who is now Lord Gove, is said to have been asked by officials to help Rotherham council stop the publication of a story about the sexual abuse and trafficking of children in the town in 2011. Cummings, who worked as an adviser to Gove during his tenure in the education department, told Sky News that officials wanted 'a total cover-up and were on the side of the council'. He said they contacted him after the council was approached by Andrew Norfolk, then the chief reporter of The Times. He said: 'Officials came to me in the Department of Education and said: 'There's this Times journalist who wants to write the story about these gangs. The local authority wants to judicially review it and stop The Times publishing the story'. 'So I went to Michael Gove and said: 'This council is trying to actually stop this and they're going to use judicial review. You should tell the council that far from siding with the council to stop The Times you will write to the judge and hand over a whole bunch of documents and actually blow up the council's JR [judicial review].'' Cummings added: 'Some officials wanted a total cover-up and were on the side of the council… They wanted to help the local council do the cover-up and stop The Times' reporting, but other officials, including in the DfE private office, said this is completely outrageous and we should blow it up. Gove did, the judicial review got blown up, Norfolk's stories ran.' • In June 2012 The Times revealed that an official report into the way care agencies dealt with a murdered girl concealed key information about adults suspected of grooming and using her for sex from the age of 12. Laura Wilson, 17, was repeatedly stabbed then thrown into a South Yorkshire canal in 2010, six years after concerns were raised that she was at risk of being sexually exploited by men. A safeguarding board redacted information identifying Laura as one of several girls in Rotherham who were suspected of falling victim to sexual abuse by Asian men. Also kept hidden were details of care professionals' involvement with Laura from the age of 11 to 15, including meetings that discussed concerns about child sexual exploitation. The board's application for a High Court injunction to gag The Times was dropped after Gove accused the board of withholding 'relevant and important material'. Laura, identified in the report as 'Child S', was murdered in Rotherham by Ashtiaq Asghar, 17. Ishaq Hussain, 21, a married man who impregnated her a month after her 16th birthday, was found not guilty of murder. The report, published by Rotherham's safeguarding children board, found that 15 agencies had had dealings with Laura. It identified 'numerous missed opportunities' to protect a vulnerable child who became 'almost invisible' to some care professionals. Redactions were made to 61 of the report's 144 pages, ostensibly to protect 'the privacy and welfare' of the dead girl's baby. Hidden from view was the fact that Laura 'was mentioned' during a 2009 police inquiry that led to the conviction of five British Pakistanis, aged from 20 to 30, for sex offences against three girls aged 13 to 16. A spokesman for Rotherham council said: 'There were clear failings at that time in Rotherham in relation to child sexual exploitation as fully covered in the reports by Alexis Jay and Louise Casey. 'Since then, Rotherham council's children's services have been transformed and as Baroness Casey reports Rotherham today is a completely different council . We will never again be complacent and we will continue to pursue the highest standards of protection and support for our children and young people.' A government spokesman said: 'The grooming scandal is one of the most appalling failures in our country's history and this government is taking the action needed for vulnerable people who were let down time and time again. That includes setting up a new national inquiry that will end the blame shifting apathy towards victims and a nationwide police operation to target predators to ensure we are tackling this vile crime while supporting survivors.'
