
Who Is Julius Malema, the South African Politician in the White House Video?
Julius Malema, a South African politician, was not present for an Oval Office meeting on Wednesday between President Trump and President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa, but he loomed over the fraught encounter.
A video montage of his apartheid-era chants, which the White House played during the meeting, took center stage and set the tone for Mr. Trump's repeated accusations of racism and violence against white people in South Africa, who on the whole are much better off economically than the Black majority in the country.
Mr. Malema, 44, is the incendiary, leftist leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters party, which advocates for the redistribution of white-owned land to Black South Africans. The party, which he founded over a decade ago, won less than 10 percent of the vote in South Africa's 2024 election.
He responded on Wednesday to the White House meeting, saying in a statement on X: 'A group of older men meet in Washington to gossip about me. No significant amount of intelligence evidence has been produced about white genocide.'
Mr. Malema made headlines in 2023, when, during a rally, he chanted, 'Kill the Boer!' a rallying cry against Afrikaans-speaking farmers, who are the descendants of European settlers. The white Afrikaner ethnic minority created and led the nation's apartheid government.
The chant was popularized during the anti-apartheid movement in the 1990s, when Black South Africans were fighting a brutal and racist regime. Veterans and historians of the apartheid struggle say the song should not be taken as a literal call to violence, an assessment that a South African judge agreed with in a 2022 ruling. But the video of Mr. Malema was seized upon by right-wing commentators, including Elon Musk, the South African-born billionaire who left the country as a teenager, as evidence of violence against white people.
The song remains controversial within the country; many politicians and ordinary South Africans disavow it.
The African National Congress, the party that has governed South Africa since the end of apartheid and rose to acclaim on the shoulders of Nelson Mandela, distanced itself from the song in 2012, the same year Mr. Malema was expelled from the party.
Once a youth leader and shining star in the organization, Mr. Malema clashed with A.N.C. leaders and became a polarizing figure, calling for mines to be nationalized. He also sought to restyle the party, injecting Black nationalism into the explicitly nonracial organization. His positions and tone increased his popularity with disenfranchised youth, but party leaders worried his rhetoric would harm the country's economy and reputation.
While Mr. Malema was once an ardent supporter of former President Jacob G. Zuma, the two became locked in a political feud that saw Mr. Malema become one of the former A.N.C. leader's most vocal and persistent critics. Mr. Malema publicly criticized Mr. Zuma's spending practices, including the tens of millions of dollars of public money the former president spent on upgrading his private estate, ostensibly for security.
Mr. Malema created the Economic Freedom Fighters, which stands out for its military-style uniform of red berets and jackets, in 2013. His party had an outsize influence in South African politics because of his high profile. But it underperformed expectations in last year's election and has been weakened by the departure of key leaders over the past year.
Despite fashioning himself as a politician for the poor, Mr. Malema has drawn criticism for his lavish lifestyle, which has included fancy homes, cars and clothes. He has defended his luxurious taste by saying that he needs it to inspire the impoverished.
In 2012, Mr. Malema faced corruption charges related to his ties to a company that had been awarded a $4.1 million road construction contract. The charges were thrown out in 2015 because of excessive delays in the case.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Tariffs Prompt Largest-Ever Drop in UK Goods Exports to US
(Bloomberg) -- Britain's goods exports to the US fell in April by the largest amount for any month since records began in 1997 after President Donald Trump launched his global trade war. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? Goods shipments to the US including precious metals fell by £2 billion ($2.7 billion) from March, which the Office for National Statistics said was 'likely linked to the implementation of tariffs on goods imported to the United States.' It left sales to the US at £4.1 billion, the lowest since February 2022. Trump hit the UK with 10% tariffs on all goods on his April 2 'Liberation Day.' Imports of steel and aluminium, and cars and car parts were subject to a higher 25% tariff. There were decreases in exports of most commodities to the US in April, the ONS said. Exports of machinery and transport equipment decreased by £800 million because of a drop in car shipments. Chemical exports fell by £300 million. Imports from the US slid by £400 million to £4.7 billion. The UK struck a deal with the US on May 8 lowering car tariffs and removing them on aluminium and steel but the new regime has yet to be put in place. The total goods and services trade deficit with the rest of the world widened by £4.9 billion to £11.5 billion in the three months to April 2025. ONS Director of Economic Statistics Liz McKeown said: 'After increasing for each of the four preceding months, April saw the largest monthly fall on record in goods exports to the United States with decreases seen across most types of goods, following the recent introduction of tariffs.' New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Terry Moran Reveals What's Next After Donald Trump Slam Led To Exit From ABC News
Terry Moran has revealed what his work life will now look like after leaving ABC News. The network suspended Moran this weekend after he used social media to slam President Donald Trump and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller as 'world-class' haters. The network then announced it would not renew Moran's contract, which was due for renewal, saying his post was 'a clear violation' of its policies. On Wednesday, Moran said in a video that he shared on the Elon Musk-owned X, the social media platform formerly named Twitter: 'For almost 28 years I was a reporter and anchor for ABC News. And as you may have heard… I'm not there anymore.' Moran said he'll now ply his trade on Substack, the subscription-based email newsletter service. I was a reporter and anchor for ABC News. And as you may have heard … I'm not there I'm on Substack, that amazing space, and I can't wait to get into the important work that we all have to do. — Terry Moran 🇺🇸 (@TerryMoran) June 11, 2025 'I can't wait to get at it, to get at the important work that we all have to do in this time of such trouble for our country,' Moran said in the clip. 'I'm going to be reporting and interviewing and just sharing with you and hoping to hear from you as well,' continued Moran, who interviewed Trump in April. 'So, it'll be a few days, maybe a little bit longer, got to get some stuff sorted out, but can't wait to see you,' he added. As of early Thursday morning, Moran's newsletter had more than 7,700 subscribers. Critics Expose The Massive Constitutional Flaw In Trump's Latest Threat Maggie Haberman Sounds Alarm On How Trump Could Still Cling To Power After 2028 'Absolutely Despicable' Trump-Troops Rally Moment Sends Chill Down Critics' Spines
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Families arrested in LA Ice raids held in basements with little food or water, lawyers say
As federal agents rushed to arrest immigrants across Los Angeles, they confined detainees – including families with small children – in a stuffy office basement for days without sufficient food and water, according to immigration lawyers. One family with three children were held inside a Los Angeles-area administrative building for 48 hours after being arrested on Thursday immediately after an immigration court hearing, according to lawyers from the Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef), which is providing non-profit legal services in the region. The children, the youngest of whom is three years old, were provided a bag of chips, a box of animal crackers and a mini carton of milk as their sole rations for a day. Agents told the family they did not have any water to provide during the family's first day in detention; on the second day, all five were given a single bottle to share. The one fan in the room was pointed directly towards a guard, rather than towards the families in confinement, they told lawyers. 'Because it was primarily men held in these facilities, they didn't have separate quarters for families or for women,' said Yliana Johansen-Méndez, chief program officer at ImmDef. Clients explained that 'eventually they set up a makeshift tent in an outside area to house the women and children. But clearly, there were no beds, no showers.' They have since been transferred to a 'family detention' center in Dilley, Texas, a large-scale holding facility retrofitted to hold children with their parents that was reopened under the Trump administration. Lawyers, who had been largely blocked from communicating with immigrants arrested amid the ramped-up raids in LA, said family members were able to recount the ordeal only after they were moved out of state. The harrowing details are the first to emerge about the conditions that people are being held in following the immigration raids targeting LA-area businesses and neighborhoods. To quell the widespread protests that followed, Donald Trump sent in military troops despite opposition from California leaders. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has said that it arrested 118 immigrants on Friday and over the weekend. Others were arrested at immigration offices and courthouses in the days prior. ImmDef and other local advocacy groups had compiled a separate list of more than 80 people who were apprehended – though many of them still do not appear in the agency's online databases of detainees. Many of the people arrested were jailed ad hoc, in LA-area courthouses and administrative offices. Over the past several days, attorneys have taken shifts waiting outside federal immigration offices, attempting to speak to the immigrants, but federal agents and national guard troops have largely blocked lawyers and family members from visiting with those who were arrested, citing safety concerns amid widespread protests in the city. On Tuesday, the immigration court in downtown Los Angles had been shut down – and blocked off. DHS did not immediately respond to multiple Guardian queries about where it was holding people arrested in LA, and whether local offices had been given instruction to prepare supplies and facilities to hold immigrants prior to the large-scale raids in the region. Legal aid groups were also largely denied access to immigrants who were transferred to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) processing center and detention center in Adelanto, in the high desert east of LA. 'Ice's excuse was, they're still processing all the new people,' said Johansen-Méndez. Over the weekend and on Monday, her colleagues were only permitted to visit with a handful of clients at the Adelanto detention center, even though they had called ahead to confirm that at least 40 people referred to the organization had been sent there. Several people have already been deported. Luis Angel Reyes Savalza, a deportation defense attorney supporting the affected families in LA, said at least one person who was bused to Mexico almost immediately after his arrest was not provided any paperwork or opportunity to contest his deportation. At least two others who were arrested at LA-area carwashes were deported to Tijuana, according to Flor Melendrez, executive director of the Clean Carwash Worker Center. Another person was told by agents to sign a paper if he wanted to visit an attorney, Johansen-Méndez said – but believes he was tricked into signing some sort of voluntary departure paperwork. 'Within hours, he was across the border to Mexico,' she said. Meanwhile, the family members of workers arrested at a clothing factory in downtown LA, in the parking lot at a Home Depot in the suburb of Paramount, and at a carwash in Culver City were desperately seeking answers about their loved ones' whereabouts. Landi, whose husband was arrested on Friday while he worked a shift at the Ambiance Apparel warehouse, said he had reported to work that day as normal. 'We never imagined he will be kidnapped by immigration,' she said at a news conference on Monday, outside the business's gates. The Guardian is not using her surname to protect her family's privacy and safety. 'The day he was kidnapped, my family went to request information about his abduction, but Ice told us he wasn't at the center,' she said. 'However, after much effort and struggle from our lawyer, Ice simply confirmed that he was there.' Families were not allowed to bring their loved ones jackets or medications, lawyers said. Those who were able to confer with attorneys reported that as holding facilities in the city became crowded with immigrants, families were rushed out to detention centers in California's high desert or in Texas. Agents confiscated belongings and provided little food or water, explaining to immigrants that the facilities had not prepared for the influx of detainees. Conditions in Adelanto were deteriorating as well, lawyers said. One of ImmDef's clients reported that meals were provided late, blankets and clothing were scarce, and some people were sleeping on the floor of a day-use recreational room as beds filled up. One client said he witnessed an older man's health dramatically decline after being denied medication for three days. On Sunday, Democratic US representatives Gilbert R Cisneros Jr, Judy Chu and Derek Tran said they were blocked from entering Adelanto. DHS did not respond to a query asking why lawyers and lawmakers have been denied access. With limited access to immigrants in detention, attorneys are also scrambling to understand the scope of the raids, and the extent to which the Department of Homeland Security has violated immigrants' rights. Related: US immigration officials raid California farms as Trump ramps up conflict One of the more unusual aspects of the large-scale militarized raids that began last week was that agents from Ice were joined by Customs and Border Protection officers, who are empowered to conduct warrantless stops – but only within 100 miles (160km) of the US border. Johansen-Méndez believes that the government has justified their presence in Los Angeles – which is more than 100 miles from the US-Mexico border – because the city touches the Pacific Ocean, which the administration could be considering as a 'border'. 'They're counting the entire coastline as a port of entry,' said Johansen-Méndez. 'It felt almost like an urban legend that it could be done. But at this point, it's just they're everywhere, literally.' Lawyers from ImmDef and other legal aid and advocacy groups have also been trying to piece together testimonies to better understand how and why immigration agents chose to sweep certain businesses and neighborhoods, and what justifications officers provided when stopping and apprehending people. 'How do they decide who they're going to ask for their papers and arrest, other than racially profiling?' Johansen-Méndez said. 'Did they just ask everyone in the room for their papers or just some people? Did they skip certain people that didn't fit the profile? We can't get that information because we can't talk to everyone.'