Korean War soldier from Colorado identified after 74 years
(TRINIDAD, Colo.) — The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced on Wednesday, April 23, that a U.S. Army Sergeant from Colorado who was killed during the Korean War has been accounted for.
U.S. Army Sgt. Orace J. Mestas, 22, from Trinidad, was accounted for on Jan. 31, 2024. Mestas' family recently received their full briefing on his identification, and additional details about Mestas' life have now been released.
In 1951, Mestas was a member of Company I, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, 24th Infantry Division, and was reported missing in action near Chip'o-ri, North Korea, after his unit's position was attacked on April 25. According to DPAA, his remains could not be recovered due to intense fighting in the area, and on January 16, 1956, the U.S. Army determined him to be nonrecoverable.
From May to June 1951, members of the 565th Quartermaster Graves Registration Company located and recovered four sets of remains from FSC-472-F battle space. Mestas could not be positively identified from the four remains, and was interred at the United Nations' temporary military base cemetery in Tanggok and was later transported to CIU-Kokura for potential identification.
In 1955, remains Unknown X-1381 were reexamined but not identified. The remains were buried as unknown in the National Memorial Cemtery of the Pacific in Honolulu. In 2019, DPAA personnel disinterred Unknown X-1381 and sent the remains for analysis.
DPAA scientists used dental and anthropological analysis, as well as chest radiograph and other circumstantial evidence to identify Mestas. Scientists from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System used mitochondrial DNA analysis.
Mestas' name is recorded on the Courts of the Missing at the Punchbowl, along with the others who are still missing from the Korean War. A rosette will be placed next to his name to indicate he has been accounted for.
Mestas will be buried in Trinidad in June 2025.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
38 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ukraine's F-16 Took Down Russian Fighter Jet in 'Historic First': Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An F-16 fighter jet given to Ukraine reportedly shot down an advanced Russian plane thanks to the assistance of a Swedish reconnaissance aircraft. German newspaper Bild said the Russian Sukhoi Su-35 jet had been downed in the northeast of the country in an operation it described as a "historic first." Earlier, Ukraine's Air Force had said Saturday it had downed a Su-35 in Russia's Kursk Oblast, although it gave no further details. The details of the incident reported by Bild and Ukrainian social media users have not been independently verified. Newsweek reached out to the Russian and Ukrainian defense ministries for comment. This image from May 26, 2025, shows an F16 fighter jet leaving Volkel Air Base on its way to be handed over to Ukraine. This image from May 26, 2025, shows an F16 fighter jet leaving Volkel Air Base on its way to be handed over to Ukraine. ROBINWhy It Matters The fourth-generation F-16s arrived in Ukraine to much fanfare after the Biden administration finally allowed Kyiv's allies to provide them in a move that was hoped to change the battlefield calculus. If confirmed, the operation in which an F-16 worked with a Swedish reconnaissance plane to down a Russian fighter would highlight a new level in Ukraine's aviation capabilities. What To Know During a fight on Saturday in the northeastern Sumy region, Ukraine's Air Force used its fighter jets to bomb Russian positions inside the country and in Russia's nearby Kursk region, Bild reported. The outlet said Russia sent a high-tech Sukhoi Su-35 "air superiority fighter" into battle to down the Ukrainian fighter jets, but the Russian pilot "flew into an ambush." Ukraine had deployed a Swedish Saab 340 AEW&C (Early Warning and Control) reconnaissance aircraft, which had been discreetly tracking the Russian jet from hundreds of miles away. The location of yesterday's shoot down of a Russian Su-35 by a Ukrainian F-16 was fairly deep into Russian territory. We must credit the skill and bravery here. — Kyiv Insider (@KyivInsider) June 8, 2025 When it was close enough, the Ukrainian F-16 pilot used the necessary data to fire an AIM-120 missile at the Su-35, a 4.5 generation jet nicknamed the "Super Flanker." The Russian plane crashed about 10 miles inside Russia, near the city of Korenevo in the Kursk Oblast. However, the pilot ejected to safety, according to Bild and the Ukrainian Telegram channel Stugna. The Oryx website, which tracks equipment losses in the war, posted a still image dated Saturday of the destroyed Su-35, the first loss of such an aircraft since February 2. As of Monday, Russia had lost eight of the aircraft, according to Oryx. What People Are Saying Military analyst Jake Broe, on X (formerly Twitter): "Russia lost another Su-35. Theory is that Ukraine now has operational their Swedish SAAB AEW&C planes with their F-16 fleet. This capability took years to fight for and obtain for Ukraine. Bravo everyone!" Kyiv Insider, on X: "The location of yesterday's shoot down of a Russian Su-35 by a Ukrainian F-16 was fairly deep into Russian territory. We must credit the skill and bravery here." Former Ukrainian Internal Affairs adviser Anton Gerashchenko, on X: "It is reported that for the first time in history, an F-16 has shot down a Russian Su-35 ' to Ukrainian Allies for providing us with the tools!" The Ukraine Fights Telegram channel: "This is a historic moment, but now we have to camouflage the SAAB as carefully as possible." What Happens Next Experts have hailed the incident as a breakthrough in Ukrainian air capabilities, and pro-Ukrainian voices on social media have praised the possibilities that Kyiv can neutralize Russian aviation and missile systems.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles spit on and burn American flag
Protesters in Los Angeles were filmed burning and spitting on American flags as they chanted anti-Trump slogans over the weekend. Footage from the incident shows a circle of dozens of people, many wearing masks, surrounding an American flag burning on the ground. Several of the individuals then spit on the flag or sprayed flammable liquid to continue the blaze before a second flag was added to the fire. A number of the protesters held high the flags of South American countries like Mexico as the U.S. flag burned on the ground. They also chanted "F-Trump." The footage from this weekend's riots also shows officers with the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department moving in to disperse the crowds, shooting flash bangs as they went. California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz The Los Angeles Police Department declared an "unlawful assembly" Sunday night as protesters failed to disperse in the downtown area. Read On The Fox News App "Agitators have splintered into and through out the Downtown Area," the LAPD's Central Division wrote on X. "Residents, businesses and visitors to the Downtown Area should be alert and report any criminal activity. Officers are responding to several different locations to disperse crowds." "An UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY has been declared for the Downtown Los Angeles area," the department added. Trump Bans Travel To Us From Several Countries To Block 'Dangerous Foreign Actors' Protesters marched into the L.A. Live area, an entertainment complex in the heart of downtown Los Angeles that sits adjacent to Arena and the Los Angeles Convention Center, and were blocking lanes on Figueroa and 11th streets, police said. President Donald Trump sent in the National Guard this weekend after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were reportedly attacked on the streets of L.A. as they conducted raids to catch and deport illegal immigrants. Seeing that neither California Gov. Gavin Newsom nor L.A. Mayor Karen Bass were moving aggressively enough to stop the attacks, Trump signed a presidential memorandum to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to "address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," the White House said in a statement. Newsom objected immediately even as the riots spiraled. "I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command," Newsom wrote on X on Sunday alongside his letter to President Trump. "We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty – inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed." Fox News' Louis Casiano contributed to this article source: Anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles spit on and burn American flag
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Bring in the troops!': Trump raises the stakes as ICE tactics spark protests in L.A.
For those concerned about Donald Trump and his authoritarian-style agenda, the last few days have been, at a minimum, unsettling. On the East Coast, for example, military vehicles, including tanks, are getting into position to roll down the streets of the nation's capital, for a June 14 military parade to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army — which also happens to coincide with Donald Trump's birthday. And then, of course, there's the West Coast. As The Associated Press summarized: Tensions in Los Angeles escalated Sunday as thousands of protesters took to the streets in response to President Donald Trump's extraordinary deployment of the National Guard, blocking off a major freeway and setting self-driving cars on fire as law enforcement used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. In recent months, federal officials, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, have engaged in overly aggressive and legally dubious tactics while executing the White House's deportation agenda, sparking a predictable public backlash. As NBC News reported, it was against this backdrop that ICE officers on Friday carried out raids in three locations across the city, where dozens of people were taken into custody. California Gov. Gavin Newsom condemned the raids, calling them 'chaotic federal sweeps' that aimed to fill an 'arbitrary arrest quota,' and protests soon followed. It was the next day when Trump announced that he was calling up 2,000 National Guard troops to quell the protests, ignoring the objections of the state's Democratic governor. As The New York Times reported, 'Governors almost always control the deployment of National Guard troops in their states,' and this marked 'the first time since 1965 that a president has activated a state's National Guard force without a request from that state's governor.' (Sixty years ago, it was Lyndon B. Johnson who sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators.) Last year, while serving as South Dakota's Republican governor, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that if Joe Biden tried to federalize National Guard troops, it would constitute a 'direct attack on states' rights' and spark a 'war' between Washington and GOP-led state governments. Over the weekend, however, Noem took the opposite position. Around the same time, by way of his social media platform, Trump proceeded to celebrate the 'great job' National Guard troops did in Los Angeles before the troops actually arrived, which was bizarre but consistent with the incumbent president's general approach to reality. For his part, Newsom — whom Trump keeps describing as 'Newscum' because the president has the temperament of an ill-tempered tween — accused Trump of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' The California Democrat added, 'These are the acts of a dictator, not a president.' After Tom Homan, the administration's 'border czar,' raised the prospect of arresting state and local elected officials, Newsom effectively dared Homan to try. There's no reason to believe that conditions will improve quickly. The governor has formally asked Trump to pull Guard troops, an appeal that will likely be ignored. In the meantime, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has suggested he's prepared to deploy U.S. Marines onto American streets — a point that was echoed by U.S. Northern Command. Asked whether Americans might soon see active-duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles, House Speaker Mike Johnson told ABC News that he doesn't believe such a step would be 'heavy-handed.' Soon after, the president told reporters that he's meeting with U.S. military leaders, and after publishing a statement about Los Angeles having been 'invaded and occupied,' there was renewed speculation about whether the Republican might be preparing to invoke the Insurrection Act. Indeed, Trump also wrote that he was directing Noem, Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi, 'to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' Shortly after midnight, on Monday morning, Trump also wrote online, 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' He similarly told reporters that he expects to have U.S. troops 'everywhere.' In his latest New York Times column, David French concluded, 'It's too early to declare a constitutional crisis, and in any case, debating the label we attach to any new event can distract us from focusing fully on the event itself. But each new day brings us fresh evidence of a deeply troubling trend: America is no longer a stable country, and it is growing less stable by the day.' A few weeks before Election Day 2024, as he referred to Americans he disagreed with as 'scum,' then-candidate Trump talked about the possible deployment of the National Guard or the U.S. military on American soil to be used against those he labeled 'the enemy from within.' At the time, it led many to wonder whether Trump, if returned to power, might be willing to use — or in this case, abuse — military resources to stifle dissent. Republicans characterized such concerns as hysterical and paranoid. Eight months later, those fears are suddenly relevant anew. This is a developing story. Check back for updates. This article was originally published on