logo
Top Texas Democrats ponder the state's future at forum amid questions about what's next for their party

Top Texas Democrats ponder the state's future at forum amid questions about what's next for their party

Yahoo2 days ago

SAN ANTONIO — Hundreds of people packed into a music hall Friday night to ask three big Texas Democrats questions about concerns ranging from local housing struggles to the effects of President Donald Trump's immigration and economic policies rippling through the state's second-most populous city.
The town hall was the latest stop in a listening tour for former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke, the El Pasoan whose political future was called into question after losing three statewide elections in four years following a meteoric rise during which he almost unseated U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Houston, in 2018.
On Friday night, O'Rourke was joined by state Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin, and U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-San Antonio — whose names have each been floated for potential statewide contests.
The elected officials introduced themselves with speeches that mixed biographical details with assurances that Texas Democrats fight for all Texans, regardless of who they have voted for in the past, and that there is hope on the horizon.
'We're going to vote our way out of this in 2026,' Castro told the crowd at Stable Hall. 'We have seen tougher people than Donald Trump and we have prevailed. We will prevail again.'
Seated in front with the trio was state Rep. Vikki Goodwin, an Austin Democrat who has announced a bid for lieutenant governor, and former Democratic San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg. Both, as well as a local county commissioner, joined the platform at the front of the room for the portion of the night when the elected officials took questions from the audience.
In his remarks, O'Rourke pitched legalizing undocumented persons who arrived in the country as children, often called dreamers, and their parents; expanding health care for all; and better lives for educators.
'What if we had a Democratic Party that actually fought for these things?' O'Rourke asked.
The three Democrats held the town hall amid reports that it was unclear whether they would each campaign for different statewide seats or compete against each other in a primary for one post.
The Dallas Morning News this week reported that they had met — along with former U.S. Rep. Colin Allred, who unsuccessfully ran for U.S. Senate last year — to hash out a possible lineup. But all are 'steadfastly' interested in running for Senate, per the report.
As of Friday, none had officially entered any race. On Friday night, they downplayed the suggestion they were rivals, saying their priority is changing the politics of Texas.
The strategy of presenting to voters a team of candidates with high name recognition is not entirely new. Texas Democrats tried it in 2002 when a slate of candidates for governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general and U.S. Senate failed to secure any victory.
While midterm elections typically bode poorly for the party of the sitting president, that year's midterms handed Democrats wide losses in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack, during which Republican President George W. Bush benefited from a strong approval rating that flowed down the ballot. In Texas, Republicans won the state House for the first time since Reconstruction.
Trump, and Republicans, may not have the same upper hand this time. A statewide poll released this week found approval of Trump's performance in net-negative terrain among Texans, although Republicans in the state remain largely loyal to Trump, according to the poll from the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin.
Democrats seeking a statewide win in Texas will still face a steep uphill battle. No Democrat has won statewide office since 1994. And last year's presidential election complicated narratives about voters, especially the state's growing Latino population that the Democratic party had long banked on for clawing back power from Republicans' tight grip.
Trump earned 55% of the Latino voting bloc in Texas after years of Republicans losing it by double digits. Along the U.S.-Mexico border, Trump won 14 of 18 counties — including Starr County, which is 97% Latino and had not been carried by a Republican for 128 years.
Rafael Lopez, a 76-year-old Vietnam War veteran, thinks the Democratic party needs to better engage those voters, especially the younger ones. At the rally Friday, he noted his own involvement in politics: He had not protested his whole life until a few weeks ago when he joined a demonstration against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Since then, he has also gotten involved with the party at the local level, he said.
'When you get to my age, you start to notice things and you notice that things are not going right,' Lopez said. 'We have to lean on the young people.'
Few Texas Democrats have animated voters of all ages like two of the people who shared the stage Friday night: O'Rourke and Talarico, a seminarian and former public school teacher whose speeches against socially conservative proposals like book bans have often gone viral on social media.
Alee Briggs, a 28-year-old from San Antonio who volunteered on O'Rourke's 2018 Senate campaign, is one of many viewers of Talarico's TikTok videos — and wanted to see him in person.
Meanwhile, her friend, Brittany Watson, who attended after an invitation from Briggs, said she was first introduced to Talarico on Friday. She was 'really super impressed.'
'Someone like that to me really embodies what we should be about as a society and the people who should be running the country,' Watson said.
Briggs echoed the sentiment: 'He's really refreshing in the rise of Christian extremism. He's using his religion for good and inclusivity. … If he wanted to run for the Senate seat or anything like that, I would definitely support him.'
As the guests who secured seats inside the venue began asking questions, a line of people stood outside hoping to get in.
Among them was Debora Noble, a 65-year-old from New Braunfels who said she did not identify with any political party. She was drawn to the event because she said she has been following O'Rourke since he was on the El Paso City Council in the 2000s and wanted to hear what he had to say.
In particular, Noble said she was worried about cuts to veterans' benefits. The U.S. Army vet of 30 years pointed to a veteran's recent death by suicide in the parking lot of a San Antonio veteran's hospital.
'It's become very difficult for the veterans to get care,' Noble said. 'I just vote for whoever I think is gonna do better for me and my family.'
In front of Noble in line stood Robin Pritchard of Austin. The 21-year-old has witnessed those needs for mental health resources following federal cuts as a volunteer with a crisis hotline.
'It's been constant, constant calls, constant texts — like hundreds of people in a queue where there used to be maybe 50,' Pritchard said.
Inside the venue, the crowd roared at the suggestion of toppling statewide Republicans and booed at the mention of the Trump administration's actions, like masked immigration officers without badges arresting undocumented people across the country.
After the rally, O'Rourke, Talarico and Castro stepped outside to take photos. Near the front of the growing line were those who were unable to get into the event, including Pritchard and Noble.
Disclosure: University of Texas at Austin has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer.
Get tickets.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Embattled San Francisco Zoo CEO refuses to step down
Embattled San Francisco Zoo CEO refuses to step down

CBS News

time26 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Embattled San Francisco Zoo CEO refuses to step down

Mayor Daniel Lurie has joined a growing chorus of voices calling for new leadership at the San Francisco Zoo, citing stability concerns at the cherished city institution. "I am confident that stable, permanent leadership will strengthen the zoo and our city's ability to welcome pandas, and the zoo board's decision to identify a new COO and develop a plan to name a new CEO represents real steps in the right direction," Lurie said in a statement released Friday. However, Zoo CEO Tanya Peterson has made it clear she has no intention of resigning. "She has always said that she would resign if it was in the best interest of the zoo," said zoo spokesperson Sam Singer. "But no one has asked her to resign, nor has she offered her resignation. She's plowing full speed ahead to try to bring the giant pandas to San Francisco." The debate over leadership comes amid tensions between zoo management and employees. The union representing many zoo workers recently passed a vote of "no confidence" in Peterson's leadership, citing concerns about safety conditions for visitors, staff, and animals. Critics have pointed directly to Peterson, who has served as CEO for 17 years, as a central figure in the zoo's problems. Some members of the zoo board have reportedly made attempts to remove her, but so far, those efforts have failed. And those board members resigned. Officially, only the board has the authority to remove Peterson. "She's got the skin of an elephant. This doesn't bother her at all. It's like water off her back. She's going to keep doing what's right for the kids and families in San Francisco," Singer added. On Sunday, at the city's Pride celebration, Mayor Lurie declined to answer specific questions about efforts to oust Peterson, saying only, "We're going to talk to the zoo board in the coming days. More to come on that one." Meanwhile, many zoo visitors remain unaware of the political turmoil behind the scenes. "The zoo is always the same and always fun," said Drew Bernier, a father of two young children who makes monthly visits with his family from San Bruno. "We love the zoo. We've got a guest pass. We have the kiddos, one and a half and three and a half [years old]." Bernier said their experiences at the zoo have been consistently positive. "I've never felt not safe at the zoo," he said. "You wouldn't know that there's anything outside that's creating tension." Despite the calls for change, the zoo continues its efforts to grow and improve. Most recently, it hired Cassandra Costello as its new Chief Operating Officer. Peterson is reportedly focused on one of her marquee projects: bringing a pair of giant pandas from China to San Francisco next year.

Senate debates Trump's "big, beautiful bill" ahead of Monday votes
Senate debates Trump's "big, beautiful bill" ahead of Monday votes

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate debates Trump's "big, beautiful bill" ahead of Monday votes

Washington — The Senate is debating President Trump's massive tax bill Sunday ahead of Monday's session when the chamber will effort to pass the centerpiece legislation of Mr. Trump's second term agenda. The House narrowly passed the bill last month, and Senate Republicans have since been working to put their mark on the legislation, treading carefully so as not to throw off the delicate balance in the lower chamber. The House will need to approve the Senate's changes to the bill before it can head to the president's desk for his signature. And lawmakers are moving quickly, with a self-imposed July 4 deadline to get the measure signed. The Senate has been working through the weekend as the GOP nears a final sprint on the legislation ahead of the deadline. Known as "One Big, Beautiful Bill," the legislation includes increased spending for border security, defense and energy production, which are offset in part by cuts to healthcare and nutrition programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimated Sunday that the legislation would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the next decade. Senate Republicans voted to advance the legislation late Saturday, with all but two Republicans voting in favor following hours of delay as the GOP worked to iron out last-minute details and dispel concern among holdouts. The vote on the motion to proceed stayed open for more than three hours as holdouts sought assurances from GOP leaders and even some tweaks were made to the bill before Republicans ultimately received enough votes to move forward. Senate Democrats further delayed the legislation's path forward by forcing the bill to be read in its entirety, starting late Saturday. After nearly 16 hours, the Senate clerks concluded their reading of the bill on the floor, starting the clock on debate. Each side now has 10 hours for debate, of which Democrats are expected to use all of their time to rail against the legislation. Senate Republicans have been pursuing the legislation through the budget reconciliation process, which allows the party in the majority to move ahead without support from across the aisle. With only a simple majority required to advance the legislation, rather than the 60-votes needed to move forward with most legislation, Senate Democrats have few mechanisms to combat the bill's progress. Following debate, the Senate is set to begin a "vote-a-rama," in which senators could offer an unlimited number of amendments and force the chamber to cast vote after vote. That process was originally expected to begin in the early morning hours on Monday, but Senate leadership said late Sunday that once debate concludes, the Senate would not reconvene until 9 a.m. ET Monday. Democrats are expected to use the opportunity to put their GOP colleagues on the record on a number of controversial issues ahead of the midterm elections. With a 53-seat majority, Senate GOP leaders can only afford to lose support from three Republicans — which would still require a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance. And although a number of senators who had expressed opposition to the measure ultimately decided to advance it Saturday, how they will vote on the measure in a final vote remains unclear. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Saturday that "it's time to get this legislation across the finish line," adding that "53 members will never agree on every detail of legislation." But he urged that Republicans are "united in our commitment to what we're doing in this bill." Vance was on hand to break a possible tie vote Saturday, though his vote ultimately wasn't needed. Still, the vice president met with GOP holdouts in the majority leader's office Saturday as the White House has put pressure on lawmakers to get the bill across the finish line. Meanwhile, Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, warned Sunday that the legislation would be a "political albatross" for Republicans, while suggesting that the bill could even lose support among the GOP, saying "it's not over until it's over." "I think many of my Republican friends know they're walking the plank on this, and we'll see if those who've expressed quiet consternation will actually have the courage of their conviction," Warner said Sunday on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." Video shows Arizona police rescuing baby left alone for days Meet the history buffs spending years studying to become Gettysburg Battlefield guides Saving money vs. saving lives

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store