Microsoft says everyone will be a boss in the future
Microsoft has good news for anyone with corner office ambitions. In the future we're all going to be bosses – of AI employees.
The tech company is predicting the rise of a new kind of business, called a 'frontier firm', where ultimately a human worker directs autonomous artificial intelligence agents to carry out tasks.
Everyone, according to Microsoft, will become an agent boss.
'As agents increasingly join the workforce, we'll see the rise of the agent boss: someone who builds, delegates to and manages agents to amplify their impact and take control of their career in the age of AI,' wrote Jared Spataro, a Microsoft executive, in a blog post this week. 'From the boardroom to the frontline, every worker will need to think like the CEO of an agent-powered startup.'
Microsoft, a major backer of ChatGPT developer OpenAI, expects every organisation to be on their way to becoming a frontier firm within the next five years. It said these entities will be 'markedly different' from those we know today and will be structured around what Microsoft calls 'on-demand intelligence'.
'These companies scale rapidly, operate with agility, and generate value faster,' the company said in its annual Work Trend Index report.
It expects the emergence of the AI boss class to take place over three phases: first, every employee will have an AI assistant; then AI agents will join teams as 'digital colleagues' taking on specific tasks; and finally humans will set directions for these agents, who go off on 'business processes and workflows' with their bosses 'checking in as needed'.
Microsoft said AI's impact on knowledge work – a catch-all term for a range of professions from scientists to academics and lawyers – will go the same way as software development, by evolving from coding assistance to agents carrying out tasks.
Using the example of a worker's role in a supply chain, Microsoft said agents could handle end-to-end logistics while humans guide the system and manage relationships with suppliers.
Microsoft has been pushing AI's deployment in the workplace through autonomous AI agents, or tools that can carry out tasks without human intervention. Last year it announced that early adopters of Microsoft's Copilot Studio product, which deploys bots, included the blue-chip consulting firm McKinsey, which is using agents to carry out tasks such as scheduling meetings with prospective clients.
AI's impact on the modern workforce is one of the key economic and policy challenges produced by the technology's rapid advance. While Microsoft says AI will remove 'drudge' work and increase productivity – a measure of economic effectiveness – experts also believe it could result in widespread job losses.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
This year, the UK government-backed International AI Safety report said 'many people could lose their current jobs' if AI agents become highly capable.
The International Monetary Fund has estimated 60% of jobs in advanced economies such as the US and UK are exposed to AI and half of these jobs may be negatively affected as a result.
The Tony Blair Institute, which supports widespread introduction of AI across the private and public sectors, has said AI could displace up to 3m private sector jobs in the UK. However, job losses will ultimately number in the low hundreds of thousands because the technology will also produce new jobs, the institute estimates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
As a former Xbox 360 owner I don't understand Xbox today - Reader's Feature
A reader looks back on the Xbox 360 era and is frustrated at how things have evolved since then, with ROG Xbox Ally and the move towards multiformat releases. I though the Xbox Games Showcase on Sunday was pretty good. Like Sony's State of Play, it was mostly third party games but there was some interesting stuff there and I think overall the vibe was better than from Sony. I liked the look of High On Life 2, There Are No Ghosts At The Grand, and Cronos: The New Dawn the best but there was a lot of potentially cool games – I'd include Keeper, because it looked interestingly weird, but I don't feel Double Fine are ever very good at gameplay. The biggest news out of the event was the new portable with the terrible name: Asus ROG Xbox Ally. I bet you can just imagine some parent asking that for that at shop at Christmas, to buy their kid? Not that that would ever happen because the thing's going to be stupidly expensive. It seemed like a distraction, a small experiment at best, and I didn't really pay much attention to it, especially as I already have a Steam Deck. But then today I read that Microsoft has cancelled its plans for their next gen portable and that actually this ridiculously named non-Xbox device may end up being the future of gaming for Microsoft. I've always preferred Xbox as my console as choice, probably because I was always a PC gamer before that. Although now I look back at things I have to admit that I only got the Xbox One out of brand loyalty and I wouldn't have if I'd been thinking about it more clearly. By that point I was in too deep and so I bought the Xbox Series X/S out of muscle memory more than anything, wasn't I proven to be a chump? What frustrates me most about Xbox at the moment is how indecisive it seems. I almost didn't watch the Xbox Games Showcase because I knew I'd have to see Phil Spencer, or one of his goons, grinning into the camera, as if nothing is wrong. And, of course, that's exactly what he did, 'hinting' about the return of Halo, as if everyone was going to be pumping the air to hear about that. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. News flash, Phil: no one cares. You've run that series into the ground, like all the other Xbox exclusives, to the point where they just feel old fashioned and tired. Old school fans don't care and newer ones definitely don't. It may sell okay at first on PlayStation 5, but only out of curiosity and as a kind of celebration that Sony has finally defeated Microsoft. To all extents and purposes, Xbox is now third party. The only thing that makes them not is that they still make their own console hardware but how long is that going to last? The ROG Ally is made by Asus and if Microsoft don't make a handheld are they really going to put out a home console instead? That's going to cost a lot of money in R&D and marketing and everything else, and I don't know who could argue that it's got a chance of selling more than the Xbox Series X/S. Phil Spencer has been talking about making a handheld for years and yet suddenly it's not going to happen? Is there anything that is set in stone? I even heard people talking about them going back to having exclusives with the next generation, if it seemed like things were working out. I loved my Xbox 360, it's still my favourite console of all time – the perfect balance between modern and retro games – but its golden era is a long time ago now, well over a decade. Xbox at the time was the new kid on the block, full of new ideas and daring to what Sony wouldn't or couldn't. When was the last time Xbox did anything like that? Game Pass probably, and that hasn't worked out at all well. More Trending Nothing has, ever since that disastrous Xbox One reveal, and I just don't understand how a company with basically infinite resources, and which already owns half the games industry, can be such a hopeless mess. I'm just sticking with PC from now and in the future, I'm going to pretend the Xbox 360 was my one and only console. By reader Cramersauce The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro. You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@ or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email. MORE: The 5 worst mistakes of the Nintendo Switch 2 launch (and why it doesn't matter) - Reader's Feature MORE: Nintendo Switch 2: does it deserve the hate? - Reader's Feature MORE: I've had the Nintendo Switch 2 for one day and I'm not impressed – Reader's Feature
Finextra
4 hours ago
- Finextra
Why the Smartest Fintechs Are Scaling with AI Agents – Not Headcount: By David Weinstein
For the better part of a decade, fintech growth has followed a familiar trajectory: secure funding, hire aggressively, and scale fast in pursuit of market traction. It worked. High-performing teams, ambitious roadmaps, and well-capitalised burn rates became the standard operating model for any startup with global aspirations. But that playbook is starting to look outdated. Today's most forward-thinking fintechs are flipping the script. Instead of scaling with people or piecemeal software, today's most advanced fintechs are scaling with context-aware AI infrastructure, enabling autonomous agents to operate with memory, relevance, and the ability to adapt across time. In other words, the smartest fintechs aren't just hiring more people, they're designing for a world of leverage. From Chatbots to Autonomous Operators To be clear, this isn't about adding another chatbot to the support queue or slapping GPT on top of a FAQ. The new generation of AI agents are far more capable. These aren't just reactive tools dropped into workflows - they're embedded, active participants in how work gets done. They're not replacing human judgment, but taking over the repetitive execution that bogs it down. By operating within a structured, evolving knowledge graph, these agents access the right context, perform tasks across systems, and maintain continuity over time so that human operators can stay focused on what matters: discernment, creativity, and strategic direction. Imagine an agent that scans customer interactions across CRM, support, and marketing tools, then identifies churn risks and recommends retention strategies - autonomously. Or a compliance agent that tracks regulatory changes, audits internal data for alignment, and generates draft reports ready for human review. Or a trading operations agent that adjusts portfolio models based on real-time market signals, without needing constant human input. These agents aren't sitting in isolation. They're embedded into workflows, triggering cross-functional processes and reducing the friction that typically builds up between tools, teams, and data. And because they can run 24/7 without fatigue or context switching, they give small teams the operational capacity of much larger ones - without the organisational drag. Asymmetrical Leverage in Action The real unlock here is asymmetry. Traditional scaling is linear: more people, more output. Agent-first scaling is exponential: more intelligence per task, more value per person. For founders and operators, this is a fundamental shift in how work gets done. Take a UK-based neobank that recently rolled out an internal agent stack to manage financial operations. Instead of adding headcount to reconcile transactions, generate audit trails, and update internal dashboards, they deployed agents to handle these tasks end-to-end. As a result, a finance team of three now operates like a team of ten - not because they're working longer hours, but because the agents are doing the coordination, tracking, and formatting in the background. Or consider a US-based lending platform where customer service agents used to toggle between five tools to resolve one query. Now, an agent sits between those tools, compiles a customer's profile in seconds, drafts the reply, and even pre-fills CRM updates. One team member can now do what previously took three - and they can focus on building relationships, not piecing together data. This isn't just about cutting costs or doing more with less. It's about restoring human attention to where it matters most: judgment, creativity, strategic insight. By eliminating the constant cognitive drain of fragmented systems and shallow coordination work, agent-based infrastructure gives teams space to think, explore, and act with clarity. Why Now? The Tech Has Caught Up If this sounds too good to be true, it would've been - even 18 months ago. But recent advances in large language models, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and agent frameworks have changed the game. It's now possible to build AI agents that navigate APIs, evolve through feedback, and reason across a live context map - not as brittle automations, but as strategic actors. Crucially, these aren't brittle rule-based bots that break when the environment changes. The new wave of agents are adaptable. They don't just follow instructions - they understand objectives. That makes them suitable for high-change, high-ambiguity environments like fintech, where requirements shift, tools evolve, and edge cases are the norm. And because many startups are already operating in cloud-native environments with modern APIs and loosely coupled services, they're perfectly positioned to adopt agent-based infrastructure. In fact, it's often easier for an early-stage fintech to build an agent-powered back office than it is for a traditional player to untangle their legacy systems. Rethinking Operational Architecture For founders, COOs, and Chiefs of Staff, the implication is clear: if you're still building operational capacity by adding headcount, you're likely leaving leverage on the table. The question is no longer how many people do we need? - it's what do we want to automate, augment, or offload entirely? That starts with a mindset shift. Designing operations around agents means rethinking your company as an AI-native system. That means codifying your data into structured semantic graphs, enabling cross-agent collaboration, and building feedback loops where agents not only automate but adapt, reflect, and grow - just like a human team would, but faster. It also means building in feedback loops. The best agent-first teams treat their AI systems like new hires: onboard them, train them, review their output, and let them improve over time. This isn't 'set and forget' automation. It's collaborative infrastructure that evolves alongside the business. The reward? An operational stack that scales without ballooning costs or headcount. A company that can punch above its weight in terms of execution. And a team that spends more time solving problems and less time chasing updates or managing handoffs. The Next Fintech Success Stories We're already seeing the early signs of this shift. The most operationally intelligent fintechs - often the ones that look surprisingly lean from the outside - are quietly using agents to do the work of entire departments. They don't brag about it in pitch decks. They don't need to. Their advantage shows up in faster execution, cleaner operations, and happier teams. This doesn't mean people are obsolete. Far from it. But the role of humans in fintech is changing. It's no longer about scaling output through hiring. It's about designing systems that multiply the value of every person you do hire. That's the essence of leverage. And in a sector where margins are tight, competition is fierce, and compliance is non-negotiable, it could be the difference between treading water and building a category-defining business. Conclusion: Build the System, Not Just the Team In fintech, growth has historically been a headcount game. But that era is ending. The companies that succeed over the next five years won't be the ones with the biggest teams - they'll be the ones with the smartest infrastructure. Autonomous agents offer a new path: one where adaptability scales faster than bureaucracy, and intelligence compounds faster than payroll. So if you're building a fintech startup in 2025, ask yourself: are you hiring for leverage - or designing for it? Because the smartest teams aren't growing by the dozen. They're growing by the agent.
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Amazon to invest $13 billion in Australia's data center infrastructure
June 14 (Reuters) - Amazon will invest 20 billion Australian dollars ($12.97 billion) from 2025 to 2029 to expand, operate and maintain its data center infrastructure in Australia, aiming to bolster the nation's artificial intelligence capabilities, the company said in a blog post on Saturday. ($1 = 1.5418 Australian dollars)
