logo
These Americans are done with Trump. So they're leaving America

These Americans are done with Trump. So they're leaving America

CNN2 days ago

Kevin and Jessica Cellura had just 48 hours in December to make an enormous family decision.
The couple, who both work as teachers, had to decide if they should take a job offer to teach in Morocco and leave Asheville, North Carolina, with their two youngest children.
But the Celluras say their decision was made easier by the presidential election results just weeks earlier.
'We will get away from the chaos … I feel like the America as we knew it growing up is slipping away pretty fast,' Jessica Cellura told CNN.
The Celluras are part of a growing stampede of Americans moving or making serious efforts to move abroad — or to obtain the citizenship rights that would allow them to do so.
Tax lawyers and immigration advisers told CNN they have seen an uptick in requests from Americans seeking help with navigating the complex web of guidelines needed to relocate since Donald Trump's election win.
Jessica, 40, and Kevin, 52, told CNN they are unaffiliated voters. They cast their ballots for Democrat Kamala Harris in last year's presidential election, though Kevin voted Republican in the 1990s.
Their problems with the second Trump administration go well beyond the usual policy tussles and fierce disputes.
'I feel like the government that we have is not based in reality. It is based in propaganda,' said Kevin Cellura, citing the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the US Capitol inspired by Trump's repeated, false claims that former President Joe Biden had rigged the preceding presidential election.
Trump's reascension provided the 'spark' the couple needed to fulfill a long-standing desire to move overseas, Kevin said. They are set to teach at a school in Morocco's capital Rabat that follows the American model of education. They have one-way plane tickets on August 10.
Official data from the United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada show a surge in the numbers of Americans applying to become citizens in recent months.
More than 1,900 applied for a British passport during the first quarter of 2025, the most since the UK's Home Office began keeping records in 2004. In Ireland, too, around 4,700 people residing in the United States applied for Irish citizenship based on their ancestry during the same period, according to the country's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade — the highest quarterly figure in a decade.
It is impossible to know the personal stories behind thousands of data points, and the extent to which politics has played a role — if at all. Very often, people can only apply for citizenship after several years living in a country.
Dina Modi, an immigration casework supervisor at Immigration Advice Service, a British firm providing legal assistance to people hoping to move to and from the UK, said her clients rarely relocate over a single reason like politics. She partly attributes the recent rush of Americans seeking British passports to changes in UK tax and immigration laws.
A chunk of people simply need options, according to Modi. They have no concrete plans to move but want the ability to do so quickly. Other immigration advisers have witnessed the same impulse, telling CNN that some Americans view dual citizenship as a sort of insurance against what they perceive to be a deteriorating political landscape at home.
The Celluras, though, are not hesitating to leave. 'I'm not going to be a sitting duck. I'm going to figure out our exit strategy,' Jessica recalls thinking after November's votes were tallied.
Before the build-up to the election, David Lesperance reckons he received a maximum of two inquiries per week from Americans wanting to relocate. Now, the head of Lesperance & Associates, a tax and immigration advisory firm, he fields as many as five per day.
'(The) people who seek me out tend to be the people who feel they're targets,' he said, noting that his clients tended to be wealthy, with the means to move abroad.
In the days following Trump's January executive order restricting gender-affirming medical care for young people, Lesperance said he received seven inquiries from parents with a trans child. For these families, he said, America represents a 'political wildfire zone,' and 'they can smell the smoke more than the average white heterosexual male with a MAGA hat on.'
Melvin Warshaw, an international tax lawyer who sometimes works with Lesperance, said he has also received more inquiries from members of the LGBTQ+ community since the election. Another cadre of his clients are those who worry that America is 'fast approaching an oligarchy or an autocracy.'
Fundamentally, both groups believe 'their rights are being deprived if they continue to live in the US,' according to Warshaw.
Comedian Rosie O'Donnell offers one high-profile example. O'Donnell, who has traded public jibes with Trump for almost two decades, decamped to Ireland in January with her non-binary child, and is seeking citizenship based on her ancestry.
'When it is safe for all citizens to have equal rights there in America, that's when we will consider coming back,' she explained in a March posting on TikTok.
Erik Lindsay did not leave America because of Trump per se, but he found that he could no longer stand the country's deep political divisions.
The 50-year-old screenwriter and novelist said the coronavirus pandemic provided the 'catalyst' for his move from Manhattan Beach, California, to Italy in 2020 — a time in America he likened to an 'ideological civil war' where people dying 'had become politicized.'
But Lindsay's desire to relocate to his great-grandparents' birthplace — and where he thus had a claim to citizenship — had been percolating since Trump's first election in 2016 when he felt his friend group fracturing over politics.
Lindsay has never voted for Trump, but he remembers the vitriolic reaction he received after posting a message on his Instagram account soon after the 2016 election imploring his anti-Trump friends to stay calm and take the long view of American history. 'It just got venomous,' he said.
Lindsay recently became an Italian citizen — though only just before the rules changed. Italy, like Britain, has started to tighten rules on who can claim passports and visas. In May, Rome enacted a law removing the route to citizenship through great-grandparents.
Lindsay was lucky with his timing. Now, he can choose to live in Italy, or between Italy and America, at a whim. But life feels lighter in Italy.
'To have any nuance in a conversation with anybody regarding politics that's an American is impossible,' Lindsay said. 'You can do it here.'
Sam Hudson and Hanna Ziady contributed reporting.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs travel ban on nationals from 12 countries, restrictions on 7 more
Trump signs travel ban on nationals from 12 countries, restrictions on 7 more

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Trump signs travel ban on nationals from 12 countries, restrictions on 7 more

President Trump on Wednesday signed a proclamation barring travelers and immigrants from a dozen countries and restricting the entry of nationals of another seven nations, citing concerns about national security. Mr. Trump's proclamation fully bans the entry of foreigners from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. With certain exemptions, Mr. Trump's order bans citizens of those countries seeking to come to the U.S. permanently as legal immigrants, as well as temporary visa holders, like tourists. The president also partially suspended the entry of travelers and immigrants from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. That part of his proclamation applies to all prospective immigrants from these countries with visas to settle in the U.S. permanently and certain temporary visa holders. The ban is set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on Monday, June 9. Mr. Trump said the sweeping entry restrictions were necessary to address concerns related to terrorism in the countries listed in the order, inadequate vetting of the affected nationals and the lack of cooperation on deportations among some of the nations. "President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm. These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information. President Trump will always act in the best of interest of the American people and their safety," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told CBS News. Mr. Trump's decree contains certain exemptions, including for U.S. permanent residents, Afghans who assisted American forces and have special visas, diplomats, athletes and dual nationals with a passport from a country not listed in his proclamation. The announcement of the ban follows an attack Sunday in Boulder, Colorado, on marchers raising attention for Israelis taken hostage by Hamas. The suspect was identified by U.S. officials as an Egyptian national who had overstayed his tourist visa. In a video statement released by the White House Wednesday night, Mr. Trump said the Boulder attack "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don't want them." He said the list could be revised if countries make material improvements, and new countries could be added as threats emerge. Mr. Trump's actions echo a series of travel bans issued during his first administration that initially targeted predominantly Muslim countries. Like those orders, his latest proclamation could be subject to lawsuits. In the first month of his first term, January 2017, Mr. Trump signed a travel ban restricting the entry of most citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The move triggered widespread outcry, chaos at airports and legal challenges from advocates who argued the ban was discriminatory. In March 2017, Mr. Trump removed Iraq from the list and added Chad, Venezuela and North Korea. In 2020, he expanded the ban, adding immigration restrictions for nationals of Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Myanmar and Kyrgyzstan. Chad was later removed from the list. The third version of Mr. Trump's first-term ban was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in the summer of 2018, with the conservative justices citing the president's broad authority to restrict the entry of foreigners on national security grounds. The Biden administration scrapped that ban after it took office.

Analysis: With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot
Analysis: With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Analysis: With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot

A telling moment early in President Donald Trump's second term foreshadowed how the administration is often now operating. Appearing at a Cabinet meeting in late February, Elon Musk said the Department of Government Efficiency had 'accidentally canceled' Ebola prevention programs. 'We will make mistakes. We won't be perfect. But when we make a mistake, we'll fix it very quickly,' Musk said. 'So we restored the Ebola prevention immediately. And there was no interruption.' It wasn't the first time Musk – who has since left the government – had acknowledged he and his team would make mistakes. But it was especially striking given the subject matter. Ebola prevention is literally a matter of life and death, but Musk mentioned it off-hand as if it were just some anecdote about DOGE's growing pains. (Musk's claim that there was 'no interruption' has also been called into question.) In the months since, though, that attitude has become emblematic of the Trump administration's approach to the country's business. Over and over again, it has employed shoot-first mentality with its public pronouncements and actions. Sometimes, that has meant it shot itself in the foot. And sometimes it has wound up contradicting itself. Four examples in recent days drive this home. One of them involves Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Last week, Noem claimed on X that an undocumented immigrant had 'threatened to assassinate President Trump.' The Department of Homeland Security even put out a news release naming the man. Except the claim quickly fell apart. CNN's Whitney Wild and Holmes Lybrand soon reported that authorities believed the immigrant had been set up – and that they had been investigating that possibility even before Noem's social media post. Now Wisconsin state prosecutors have charged another man, who they say admitted to orchestrating the ruse. And a DHS official conceded Wednesday that the man whom Noem and DHS accused is no longer under investigation for the purported threat. (A judge earlier in the day had delayed immigration proceedings.) Despite extensive coverage, neither Noem's post nor the DHS news release were removed or retracted as of Wednesday. Another example Wednesday involved a Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico returning to the US, his legal team told CNN – in what appears to be the first instance of the administration bringing back a migrant as a result of a judge's order. The situation stems from the administration's hasty deportation efforts, which have led to questions about whether the wrong people were deported. In at least three cases, judges have ruled that's exactly what happened, including two in which the migrants were sent to a brutal El Salvador prison. The administration has resisted returning the latter two migrants. A third example involves a somewhat similar case to the Noem example. Interim US attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba last month announced charges against Newark Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka for his actions at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility. Habba said Baraka had 'committed trespass' and 'has willingly chosen to disregard the law. That will not stand in this state. He has been taken into custody. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.' But Habba later announced the charges against Baraka would be dropped 'for the sake of moving forward,' while announcing new charges against a Democratic congresswoman from the Garden State. A magistrate judge issued a strong rebuke, calling the original charge against Baraka a 'a worrisome misstep by your office' and suggested Habba might have been motivated by 'political agendas.' 'An arrest, particularly of a public figure, is not a preliminary investigative tool,' the judge said, calling it 'a severe action, carrying significant reputational and personal consequences.' And Baraka, who's running in next week's gubernatorial primary, is now seizing on that alleged damage to his reputation. On Tuesday he filed suit against Habba, accusing her of false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation. The other recent example regards the Covid-19 vaccine. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week made a major announcement. He said – also on X – that 'the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule.' But just two days later, when the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance, the vaccine was not, in fact, removed from the childhood schedule. It instead was listed under a slightly different designation – recommended based on 'shared clinical decision-making.' In other words, children would still be able to get the shot after consulting with a health care provider. HHS claimed this was not a contradiction, and said on X that the vaccine 'is not recommended for healthy children.' But on the CDC's website, the vaccine is still coded as a 'Recommended vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making.' These are only the most recent examples of statements and actions that have struggled with age: The DOGE effort has involved laying off or firing lots of people, some of whom the administration then sought to rehire because they needed them, and some of whom courts have instructed the administration to keep or rehire because of legal questions. Trump and a number of top administration officials last month leapt to accuse former FBI Director James Comey of threatening to assassinate Trump by posting an Instagram image of shells that spelled out '86 47.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Comey should be jailed. Despite the rhetoric, there is little sign of impending charges against Comey. Comey said he doesn't expect to be charged. And even if Comey had been referring to assassination – which it's not at all clear he was – it's quite possible that speech was First Amendment-protected. Trump has justified his rapid deportations of Venezuelan migrants by arguing that they are members of a gang, Tren de Aragua, that is acting 'directly and at the direction … of the [Nicolás] Maduro regime in Venezuela.' But The New York Times has reported that a US intelligence report undermined that claim. And plenty of reporting suggests the administration has worked to obscure that fact. (ODNI declined to comment to the Times.) Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed he didn't share 'war plans' while discussing strikes in Yemen on the unclassified Signal app with other top administration officials – right before The Atlantic published the texts showing detailed plans for the strikes. The White House offered a lengthy series of conflicting signals about whether it viewed Trump's tariffs as a negotiating tool, before ultimately pushing for a bunch of deals. So what does this all reveal? Some of it is just a reflection of a president with a demonstrated disregard for the truth (see: 30,000-plus false and misleading statements in his first term) and rhetorical consistency. Under Trump's bare-knuckle brand of politics, you can say pretty much anything or level any wild accusation and then, when that doesn't pan out, you just move on to the next provocation. It also seems to be a reflection of the kinds of people he's picked to lead the government. Many of these people don't have anywhere near the kinds of experience of those who usually hold their positions; among their chief qualifications was loyalty to Trump and willingness to do his bidding. But also, these are people whose credibility matters, and their words have consequences. Law enforcement generally isn't supposed to accuse people of things it doesn't intend to prove in court, because those people can be impugned by the mere allegations. It's quite likely that people who would consider the Covid-19 vaccine for their children are confused by the conflicting signals from HHS. Statements about tariff plans – and their staying power – have real-world impacts when it comes to long-term planning for American businesses. If you're a business, do you actually try to move manufacturing to the United States (assuming the tariffs will stay) or just wait things out (hoping they go away)? And talking about massaging US intelligence to fit a political narrative is, as recent history makes clear, an extremely fraught enterprise. But all indications are that this fast-and-loose style is going nowhere.

Analysis: With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot
Analysis: With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Analysis: With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot

A telling moment early in President Donald Trump's second term foreshadowed how the administration is often now operating. Appearing at a Cabinet meeting in late February, Elon Musk said the Department of Government Efficiency had 'accidentally canceled' Ebola prevention programs. 'We will make mistakes. We won't be perfect. But when we make a mistake, we'll fix it very quickly,' Musk said. 'So we restored the Ebola prevention immediately. And there was no interruption.' It wasn't the first time Musk – who has since left the government – had acknowledged he and his team would make mistakes. But it was especially striking given the subject matter. Ebola prevention is literally a matter of life and death, but Musk mentioned it off-hand as if it were just some anecdote about DOGE's growing pains. (Musk's claim that there was 'no interruption' has also been called into question.) In the months since, though, that attitude has become emblematic of the Trump administration's approach to the country's business. Over and over again, it has employed shoot-first mentality with its public pronouncements and actions. Sometimes, that has meant it shot itself in the foot. And sometimes it has wound up contradicting itself. Four examples in recent days drive this home. One of them involves Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Last week, Noem claimed on X that an undocumented immigrant had 'threatened to assassinate President Trump.' The Department of Homeland Security even put out a news release naming the man. Except the claim quickly fell apart. CNN's Whitney Wild and Holmes Lybrand soon reported that authorities believed the immigrant had been set up – and that they had been investigating that possibility even before Noem's social media post. Now Wisconsin state prosecutors have charged another man, who they say admitted to orchestrating the ruse. And a DHS official conceded Wednesday that the man whom Noem and DHS accused is no longer under investigation for the purported threat. (A judge earlier in the day had delayed immigration proceedings.) Despite extensive coverage, neither Noem's post nor the DHS news release were removed or retracted as of Wednesday. Another example Wednesday involved a Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico returning to the US, his legal team told CNN – in what appears to be the first instance of the administration bringing back a migrant as a result of a judge's order. The situation stems from the administration's hasty deportation efforts, which have led to questions about whether the wrong people were deported. In at least three cases, judges have ruled that's exactly what happened, including two in which the migrants were sent to a brutal El Salvador prison. The administration has resisted returning the latter two migrants. A third example involves a somewhat similar case to the Noem example. Interim US attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba last month announced charges against Newark Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka for his actions at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility. Habba said Baraka had 'committed trespass' and 'has willingly chosen to disregard the law. That will not stand in this state. He has been taken into custody. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.' But Habba later announced the charges against Baraka would be dropped 'for the sake of moving forward,' while announcing new charges against a Democratic congresswoman from the Garden State. A magistrate judge issued a strong rebuke, calling the original charge against Baraka a 'a worrisome misstep by your office' and suggested Habba might have been motivated by 'political agendas.' 'An arrest, particularly of a public figure, is not a preliminary investigative tool,' the judge said, calling it 'a severe action, carrying significant reputational and personal consequences.' And Baraka, who's running in next week's gubernatorial primary, is now seizing on that alleged damage to his reputation. On Tuesday he filed suit against Habba, accusing her of false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation. The other recent example regards the Covid-19 vaccine. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week made a major announcement. He said – also on X – that 'the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule.' But just two days later, when the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance, the vaccine was not, in fact, removed from the childhood schedule. It instead was listed under a slightly different designation – recommended based on 'shared clinical decision-making.' In other words, children would still be able to get the shot after consulting with a health care provider. HHS claimed this was not a contradiction, and said on X that the vaccine 'is not recommended for healthy children.' But on the CDC's website, the vaccine is still coded as a 'Recommended vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making.' These are only the most recent examples of statements and actions that have struggled with age: The DOGE effort has involved laying off or firing lots of people, some of whom the administration then sought to rehire because they needed them, and some of whom courts have instructed the administration to keep or rehire because of legal questions. Trump and a number of top administration officials last month leapt to accuse former FBI Director James Comey of threatening to assassinate Trump by posting an Instagram image of shells that spelled out '86 47.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Comey should be jailed. Despite the rhetoric, there is little sign of impending charges against Comey. Comey said he doesn't expect to be charged. And even if Comey had been referring to assassination – which it's not at all clear he was – it's quite possible that speech was First Amendment-protected. Trump has justified his rapid deportations of Venezuelan migrants by arguing that they are members of a gang, Tren de Aragua, that is acting 'directly and at the direction … of the [Nicolás] Maduro regime in Venezuela.' But The New York Times has reported that a US intelligence report undermined that claim. And plenty of reporting suggests the administration has worked to obscure that fact. (ODNI declined to comment to the Times.) Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed he didn't share 'war plans' while discussing strikes in Yemen on the unclassified Signal app with other top administration officials – right before The Atlantic published the texts showing detailed plans for the strikes. The White House offered a lengthy series of conflicting signals about whether it viewed Trump's tariffs as a negotiating tool, before ultimately pushing for a bunch of deals. So what does this all reveal? Some of it is just a reflection of a president with a demonstrated disregard for the truth (see: 30,000-plus false and misleading statements in his first term) and rhetorical consistency. Under Trump's bare-knuckle brand of politics, you can say pretty much anything or level any wild accusation and then, when that doesn't pan out, you just move on to the next provocation. It also seems to be a reflection of the kinds of people he's picked to lead the government. Many of these people don't have anywhere near the kinds of experience of those who usually hold their positions; among their chief qualifications was loyalty to Trump and willingness to do his bidding. But also, these are people whose credibility matters, and their words have consequences. Law enforcement generally isn't supposed to accuse people of things it doesn't intend to prove in court, because those people can be impugned by the mere allegations. It's quite likely that people who would consider the Covid-19 vaccine for their children are confused by the conflicting signals from HHS. Statements about tariff plans – and their staying power – have real-world impacts when it comes to long-term planning for American businesses. If you're a business, do you actually try to move manufacturing to the United States (assuming the tariffs will stay) or just wait things out (hoping they go away)? And talking about massaging US intelligence to fit a political narrative is, as recent history makes clear, an extremely fraught enterprise. But all indications are that this fast-and-loose style is going nowhere.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store