Single-use vapes to be banned from tomorrow as full details set out
Ministers said the move will help end 'an avalanche of rubbish flooding the nation's streets', as well as tackling a worrying rise in vapes found in school playgrounds.
Single-use vapes will be banned from the shelves of all shops from tomorrow.
The new crackdown will make it illegal to sell disposable vapes at corner shops and supermarkets from June 1. Ministers said the move will help end 'an avalanche of rubbish flooding the nation's streets', as well as tackling a worrying rise in vapes found in school playgrounds.
New on-the-spot £200 fines will be introduced for any rogue traders breaking the rules. Those who show a 'blatant disregard' for the ban and reoffend face being slapped with an unlimited fine or jail time.
The Department for Environment said non-refillable and non-rechargeable vapes are typically being thrown away with general waste in black bins or littered rather than recycled.
READ MORE: Disposable vape ban sparks stockpiling frenzy among a quarter of users
It said even when disposable vapes are recycled, the process is 'notoriously arduous, slow and costly', with waste industry workers required to take them apart by hand. Their batteries also present a fire risk to recycling facilities and can leak harmful chemicals into the environment.
Separate legislation to restrict vapes being deliberately advertised to kids is currently passing through Parliament. The Tobacco and Vapes Bill, introduced by the Department of Health, will end the use of brightly coloured packaging and vape flavours that appeal to children - such as bubble gum, gummy bear and cotton candy.
The legislation will also aim to make Britain smokefree by preventing anyone born on or after January 1, 2009 from ever being able to legally buy tobacco products.
New data from charity Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) shows the number of vapers in Britain who mainly use single-use devices fell from 30% in 2024 to 24% in 2025, while the use of disposables by 18 to 24-year-olds vapers fell from 52% in 2024 to 40% in 2025.
Caroline Cerny, ASH's deputy chief executive, said: 'It's promising to see that many people switched away from disposable vapes to re-usable products well ahead of the ban. This new law is a step towards reducing vaping among children, while ensuring products are available to support people to quit smoking.'
Sarah Sleet, chief executive at Asthma + Lung UK, said: 'With their pocket money prices, and child-friendly marketing and flavour options making them more accessible, disposables have fuelled the worrying rise in the number of children vaping. But the ban on sales is only the first step. Vaping should only be used as a tool to help someone quit smoking.'
Libby Peake, senior fellow and head of resources at Green Alliance, said: 'Single use vapes should never have been allowed on the market. They've been a blight on our countryside, wasted resources needed for important uses like EV (electric vehicles) batteries and caused scores of fires at waste sites.'
Association of Convenience Stores chief executive James Lowman said: 'Convenience retailers have been preparing for the disposables ban for several months, adapting their ranges and training colleagues on the products that they can sell."
Circular Economy Minister Mary Creagh said: 'For too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine. That ends today. The Government calls time on these nasty devices.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.
North Wales Chronicle
2 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Llinos Medi MP presses Government on Gaza healthcare system
Ms Medi, of Plaid Cymru, has also signed a cross-party letter calling for an inquiry into the UK's involvement in Israel's military assault in Gaza. At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday (June 4), Keir Starmer labelled matters in Gaza "appalling and intolerable", and reiterated calls for a ceasefire. Speaking in Parliament on Wednesday, Ms Medi said: 'We can all see that a genocide is happening in Gaza. It is time the Government called this for what it is. 'We are witnessing the systematic dismantling of Gaza's healthcare system, with Israel recently destroying the only kidney dialysis facility in northern Gaza. 'What is the Government doing to prevent Gaza's healthcare system from being decimated further and to re-establish hospitals and lifesaving medical services?' In response to Ms Medi's comments, the minister for the Middle East, Hamish Falconer, said: 'While the blockade remains in place, there is very little that any outside partner can do to try and ensure proper health services in Gaza. 'I will not mislead the house by suggesting otherwise. 'The aid that has come in from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is far too little and far too geographically concentrated to be able to provide the kind of provision that Gazans are entitled to and that they should have, and is a clear necessity under International Humanitarian Law.'
Daily Record
3 days ago
- Daily Record
Mum welcomes Body scanning machine pilot which may reduce need for invasive procedures in death probes
Campaigner Ann Stark has been calling for overhaul of the post-mortem system in Scotland after her son Richard had tissue samples removed against her will. A MUM whose son had a post-mortem examination without her consent has welcomed a pilot of body-scanning machines which may reduce the need for the invasive procedures. Ann Stark has been calling for overhaul of the post-mortem system in Scotland after her son Richard had tissue samples removed against her will. She and husband Gerry want CT scanners and keyhole surgery used as often as possible. Last month, Scottish prosecutors travelled to England to study post-mortem body scanning machines. The Crown Office last week approved a pilot on the use of CT scanning in instructed post-mortems. Ann, from Bothwell, Lanarkshire, said: 'We are pleased to see the pilot project has started in Scotland. "But there are concerns that pathologists will still perform invasive post-mortems when it may not be necessary, in order to collect samples. 'We will never forgive all involved in Richard's case. "Is it still worth butchering a loved one for the sake of a worthless death certificate?' Richard, 25, an accountant, suffered a seizure and died at home in 2019. Ann told police officers she didn't want a full invasive examination. Three weeks later she learned that a full autopsy had taken place with tissue samples taken. She petitioned the Scottish Parliament in a bid for the rules to be changed so post-mortems can only be carried out with permission of the next of kin. Holyrood's public petitions committee is considering the call for a review of legislation. Procurator Fiscal Andy Shanks said: 'We recognise it can be distressing to know that a post-mortem is required, and the Procurator Fiscal only ever instructs one where it is necessary to establish the cause of death.' Scottish Labour Health spokesperson Jackie Baillie said 'This is positive step forward that could help reduce trauma for bereaved families, but this is the start of a journey rather than the end. 'The SNP must watch this pilot closely and ensure its findings are acted on swiftly.'
