
SNP may delay landfill ban to stop rubbish being sent south
The SNP could delay a ban on landfill in Scotland to prevent up to 100 truckloads of rubbish a day being moved to England.
John Swinney said it was 'not acceptable for a large amount of waste to be transported' south of the Border when the ban comes into force at the end of this year.
The First Minister said 'several options' were being explored to avoid this in discussions with local authorities and waste management firms.
Pressed directly, he refused to rule out a further delay to the ban, which was originally scheduled to come into force in 2021.
It emerged earlier this week that the SNP's ban on 'black bag' waste being buried in landfill is expected to lead to 600,000 tons of rubbish being transported to England in the first year.
Industry experts warned that this was the equivalent of 80 to 100 trucks of waste per day being moved south of the Border. Scotland does not have enough incinerators to handle the rubbish.
BBC Scotland's Disclosure programme reported that councils and commercial waste companies have been approaching rubbish handling operators in England to negotiate 'bridging contracts'.
However, most incinerators have very little spare capacity, meaning much of Scotland's excess waste is expected to be landfilled in England.
Among the rubbish barred from landfill in Scotland will be non-recyclable black bag municipal waste, wood, textiles, paper and food. Some inert material, such as ash from incinerators and building rubble, will still be allowed at landfill sites.
Mr Swinney told First Minister's Questions: 'I do not think that it is acceptable for a large amount of waste to be transported from Scotland to England. The landfill ban will be a significant step in reducing methane emissions in Scotland.
'Methane is a greenhouse gas that is around 28 times more potent in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period. Preparations have already been made for the ban coming into force and the vast majority of councils have solutions in place.'
He added: 'We are working closely with the waste sector and exploring several options to ensure that we are reducing any environmental impacts as much as possible.'
Earlier this week, SNP ministers ruled out a further delay to the ban but Mr Swinney failed to repeat this when asked directly.
He said 'options' were being 'explored' with councils and waste management firms to avoid the 'scenarios' of waste being moved to England.
Asked a second time if the landfill ban could be delayed, he said: 'We're looking at steps that could be taken to make sure that we avoid the situation.'
Maurice Golden, a Tory MSP, said the SNP Government's 2013 recycling targets 'remain unmet' and pointed out that the ban would mean £75 million of landfill tax revenue going to the UK Treasury instead of the Scottish Government.
He told MSPs that the ban would also result in tens of millions of pounds in costs to small and medium-sized businesses, adding: 'It's the ultimate farce.'
Liam McArthur, a Liberal Democrat MSP, challenged Mr Swinney: 'How would the Scottish Government respond if hundreds of truckloads of waste from England were dumped in Scotland daily?'
The Scottish Government originally planned to impose a ban on sending biodegradable waste to landfill from January 2021 but the deadline was pushed back five years after industry leaders warned the country was not ready.
A lack of waste treatment capacity at the time prompted warnings that a million tons would have to be disposed outside of Scotland, with the majority of it simply shifted across the border to England.
This prompted a rush to build more incinerators but SNP ministers decided to curtail the number of developments over concerns there would be overcapacity. There are currently eight operating in Scotland.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
World Bank urges 'radical' debt transparency for developing countries
LONDON, June 20 (Reuters) - The World Bank is urging "radical" debt transparency for developing countries and their lenders to stave off future crises, it said in a report released on Friday. The Bank wants to broaden the depth and detail of what sovereign countries disclose regarding new loans, as more of them enter complex, off-budget borrowing deals due to global market turmoil. "When hidden debt surfaces, financing dries up and terms worsen," World Bank senior managing director Axel van Trotsenburg said in a statement, adding: "Radical debt transparency, which makes timely and reliable information accessible, is fundamental to break the cycle." The Bank wants countries to make legal and regulatory reforms that mandate transparency when signing new loan contracts and to share more granular debt data. It also wants more regular audits, the public release of debt restructuring terms, and for creditors to open their loan and guarantee books. It is calling for better tools for international financial institutions to detect misreporting. The World Bank and other multilateral banks have been pressing for years to improve lending transparency. The proportion of low-income countries reporting some debt data is now above 75%, up from below 60% in 2020. But only 25% of them disclose loan-level information. As financing costs spike due to trade wars and geopolitical risk, more countries are using arrangements such as central bank swaps and collateralized transactions that complicate reporting. Senegal has used private debt placements as it negotiates with the International Monetary Fund over misreporting of its previous debts, and Cameroon and Gabon have also used what are known as "off-screen" deals. Angola recently had to pay a $200-million margin call after a rout in its bond prices. In Nigeria, the central bank disclosed in early 2023 that billions of U.S. dollars of its foreign exchange reserves were tied up in complex financial contracts negotiated by the previous leadership. The Bank said broader loan coverage and deeper loan-by-loan disclosures would enable the international community to fully assess public debt exposure.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Film-maker Adam Curtis on why this moment feels so weird
Adam Curtis is a journalist who delves deep into the BBC archive to make films about the ideas and feelings that define our times. In his latest series of films, Shifty, Curtis charts how Margaret Thatcher and her government transformed Britain by transferring power to the world of finance and by promoting a radical individualism. In conversation with Michael Safi, Curtis discusses the way his films try to capture what an idea feels like, how the ideas of the 1980s have led us to feelings of powerlessness and melancholy, and how new ideas are the key to a different future. Support the Guardian today:


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Post Office Capture scandal: Sir Alan Bates calls for those responsible for wrongful convictions to be 'brought to account'
Why you can trust Sky News Sir Alan Bates has called for those responsible for the wrongful convictions of sub postmasters in the Capture IT scandal to be "brought to account". It comes after Sky News unearthed a report showing Post Office lawyers knew of faults in the software nearly three decades ago. The documents, found in a garage by a retired computer expert, describe the Capture system as "an accident waiting to happen". 11:28 Sir Alan said the Sky News investigation showed "yet another failure of government oversight; another failure of the Post Office board to ensure [the] Post Office recruited senior people competent of bringing in IT systems" and management that was "out of touch with what was going on within its organisation". The unearthed Capture report was commissioned by the defence team for sub postmistress Patricia Owen and served on the Post Office in 1998 at her trial. It described the software as "quite capable of producing absurd gibberish" and concluded "reasonable doubt" existed as to "whether any criminal offence" had taken place. Ms Owen was found guilty of stealing from her branch and given a suspended prison sentence. She died in 2003 and her family had always believed the computer expert, who was due to give evidence on the report, "never turned up". Adrian Montagu reached out after seeing a Sky News report earlier this year and said he was actually stood down by the defending barrister with "no reason given". The barrister said he had no recollection of the case. Victims and their lawyers hope the newly found "damning" expert report, which may never have been seen by a jury, could help overturn Capture convictions. 1:49 'These people have to be brought to account' Sir Alan, the leading campaigner for victims of the Horizon Post Office scandal, said while "no programme is bug free, why [was the] Post Office allowed to transfer the financial risk from these bugs on to a third party ie the sub postmaster, and why did its lawyers continue with prosecutions seemingly knowing of these system bugs?" He continued: "Whether it was incompetence or corporate malice, these people have to be brought to account for their actions, be it for Capture or Horizon." More than 100 victims have come forward More than 100 victims, including those who were not convicted but who were affected by the faulty software, have so far come forward. Capture was used in 2,500 branches between 1992 and 1999, just before Horizon was introduced - which saw hundreds wrongfully convicted. The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the body responsible for investigating potential miscarriages of justice, is currently looking at a number of Capture convictions. A CCRC spokesperson told Sky News: "We have received applications regarding 29 convictions which pre-date Horizon. 25 of these applications are being actively investigated by case review managers, and two more recent applications are in the preparatory stage and will be assigned to case review managers before the end of June. "We have issued notices under s.17 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995 to Post Office Ltd requiring them to produce all material relating to the applications received. "To date, POL have provided some material in relation to 17 of the cases and confirmed that they hold no material in relation to another 5. The CCRC is awaiting a response from POL in relation to 6 cases." A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade said: "Postmasters negatively affected by Capture endured immeasurable suffering. We continue to listen to those who have been sharing their stories on the Capture system, and have taken their thoughts on board when designing the Capture Redress Scheme."