logo
Tribune files lawsuit against CTA for failing to turn over documents related to 2023 Yellow Line crash, among other FOIA requests

Tribune files lawsuit against CTA for failing to turn over documents related to 2023 Yellow Line crash, among other FOIA requests

Chicago Tribune28-02-2025

The Chicago Tribune is suing the Chicago Transit Authority for allegedly violating the Freedom of Information Act after the transit agency failed to turn over records related to the 2023 Yellow Line crash, among other requests.
The lawsuit, filed Friday in Cook County Circuit Court, cites six FOIA requests made by Tribune reporter Sarah Freishtat over 14 months in which the CTA did not respond promptly, fully or at all.
'The CTA has engaged in a pattern of violating FOIA, requesting extensions of time in response to the Tribune's proper FOIA requests, then failing to produce the requested records, which reflects a complete disregard of its obligation to provide public records,' the lawsuit states.
A CTA spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
The first of the six FOIA requests was made Dec. 22, 2023, seeking correspondence between the CTA and federal and state transportation agencies after the Yellow Line crash, which happened one month earlier.
In the November 2023 incident, a Yellow Line train, also known as the Skokie Swift, hit a snowplow on the tracks while approaching the Howard station in Chicago, injuring two dozen passengers and causing $8.7 million in damage.
Under the state's Freedom of Information Act, public agencies have up to 10 days to comply with or deny an information request. They may also ask for additional time to compile and provide complex records.
The CTA took until July 2024 — nearly seven months later — to come up with a 'partial response' to the Yellow Line request, providing communication records related to the National Transportation Safety Board and the Federal Transit Administration. However, Freishtat never received promised information regarding the CTA's communications with the Illinois Department of Transportation, according to the lawsuit.
In addition, the CTA has failed to fully comply with subsequent FOIA requests, including overtime spending, use of CTA vehicles by agency officials, and personnel records of employees involved in the Yellow Line crash. The most recent request was submitted Jan. 13 seeking all severance payments made to CTA President Dorval Carter, who announced he was stepping down at the end of January. The request was extended to Jan. 28, but the CTA has yet to provide the information, according to the lawsuit.
This is the fifth lawsuit brought against the CTA in the last year for failure to comply with its FOIA obligations, including one by the Chicago Sun-Times.
In recent years, the Tribune has prevailed in several lawsuits against the city of Chicago and the Chicago Police Department for failing to comply with FOIA requests made by reporters.
The lawsuit against the CTA is seeking to compel the transit agency to promptly produce all requested non-exempt records, without charging processing fees, as well as awarding the Tribune attorneys' fees and costs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chicago protesters march against Trump's immigration crackdown as demonstrations pop up across the country
Chicago protesters march against Trump's immigration crackdown as demonstrations pop up across the country

Chicago Tribune

time8 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Chicago protesters march against Trump's immigration crackdown as demonstrations pop up across the country

A mostly calm demonstration by thousands who marched through Chicago's Loop in protest of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown briefly snarled Tuesday evening traffic as crowds surged into downtown streets and DuSable Lake Shore Drive. Marchers briefly blocked honking traffic on several main arteries, including DuSable Lake Shore, as they walked among stopped cars and buses. At least one CTA bus could be seen with anti-CPD, anti-ICE graffiti. Police helicopters hovered overhead as marchers wove between vehicles. Police detained two people at the intersection of South State and East Monroe Streets as protesters yelled in the intersection. As officers detained people and cars waited in traffic, a woman told to drive west on Monroe had a brief, shouted exchange with an officer. After making a noise of apparent frustration, she drove across the intersection down a street filled with marchers. People screamed and scattered. A few moments later, an officer knelt in front of a woman seated on the sidewalk, holding a little girl in her lap, shaking her head. No one appeared to be injured. It was unclear whether police made any arrests. Protests that sprang up in Los Angeles over immigration enforcement raids and prompted President Donald Trump to mobilize National Guard troops and Marines have begun to spread across the country, with more planned into the weekend. From Seattle to Austin and Washington, D.C., marchers have chanted slogans, carried signs against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and snarled traffic through downtown avenues and outside federal offices. While many were peaceful, some have resulted in clashes with law enforcement as officers made arrests and used chemical irritants to disperse crowds. In Illinois, Gov. J.B. Pritzker has been a loud opponent of Trump's enforcement campaign. And Chicago has long been a 'sanctuary city' that prohibits its law enforcement from inquiring about residents' immigration status or cooperating with federal immigration officials. Trump's 'Border czar' Tom Homan pledged just before the new administration took office that sanctuary cities like Chicago would be epicenters for Trump's promised crackdown on undocumented immigrants. But the city hasn't seen major unrest related to the raids so far, besides a June 4 clash between immigration authorities and advocates and some City Council members outside an ICE field office in the South Loop. About 40 people gathered with signs and drums Tuesday afternoon outside a different ICE office, located at 55 E. Monroe St. 'ICE belongs in our coffee, not in our communities,' one person's sign read. The group expanded to about 200 protesters, and briefly blocked traffic outside the office before marching down to a second ICE outpost, at the intersection of Ida B. Wells Drive and South Clark Street, but found the intersection taped off by the Chicago Police Department. They turned to march north and east through the Loop, carrying Mexican and Palestinian flags. 'No fear, no hate, no ICE in our state,' they chanted. Benjamin Milford commuted to the city from Wheaton to voice his opposition to deportations of families, particularly children of undocumented immigrants who were U.S. citizens and in need of medical care. Around 3:30 p.m., he was sitting on the sidewalk outside immigration court adjusting the rollerblades he'd worn to give him easier movement around the march. 'With ICE raids happening every day across the country, it needs to end,' said Milford, 30. 'I hope this sends a message to Trump and his administration that we won't put up with this in Chicago or across the country.' Then he got back on his feet and skated off into the chanting crowd.

Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, ‘secret police tactics'
Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, ‘secret police tactics'

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, ‘secret police tactics'

As widespread reports of immigration enforcement officers making arrests wearing masks and refusing to provide information about detainees spread fear in immigrant communities, Boston is trying to get more transparency from the federal government about these operations. In an executive order signed Tuesday morning, Mayor Michelle Wu committed to sending regular Freedom of Information Act requests to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security seeking information on who Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers are arresting, why and where they are being taken. At a news conference Tuesday, Wu accused ICE of using 'secret police tactics,' wearing masks, not identifying themselves and refusing to share information about people who have been detained. Read more: Why do ICE agents wear masks? 'In Boston, our officers wear badges. They do not routinely wear masks. ... It is our responsibility to make sure that communication between our residents and the city of Boston in every manner is designed to boost trust and boost collaboration,' Wu said. 'We expect the same standards from law enforcement operating in the city, no matter what agency they are from.' The mayor said she did not know how many people had been arrested by ICE in Boston since President Donald Trump took office in January. Though the federal government has made claims about how many people have been arrested, Wu said she had no way to verify those numbers, who is included in the count and how many are from Boston versus other communities. The executive order also requires city officials to be in close communication with consular offices of other countries in Boston, which are frequently a source of information for immigrant residents. Community activists who spoke at Tuesday's news conference said the executive order would help families of people who have been arrested by ICE. Lenita Reason, executive director of the Brazilian Worker Center, shared the story of a father who was arrested by ICE and brought to Texas two weeks ago, saying his wife only knew where her husband was being held because the community worked together to help her hire an attorney. While Wu had said the executive order was one small thing the city was doing to help immigrants, Reason said that for her community, it was 'huge.' 'We don't want to be waiting two weeks, three weeks, to find out where our fathers and mothers, members of our community, are,' she said. Because the city does not have power over the federal government, the executive order does not necessarily mean that ICE will cooperate with the city's requests. However, under the Freedom of Information Act, a federal law, government agencies are required to provide public records that are requested. If they ignore or refuse the request, the requester can appeal or sue to potentially have the court force the agency to fulfill the request. There are exemptions to records that must be provided under FOIA, including law enforcement records that could jeopardize an investigation if they are made public. 'The city government cannot overrule what they're doing, but it's still important to tell the truth, and it's still important to be clear about what we expect from our federal government,' Wu said. Last week, the mayor faced blowback from U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Leah Foley, who accused Wu of spreading 'false narratives' when she referred to ICE agents as 'secret police' at another event. Wu also announced Tuesday that Boston had won a victory over the Trump administration in court last week. The city sued the federal government last month after Trump officials cancelled $48 million in previously awarded funding to combat homelessness, and on Friday, Wu said, a judge sided with the city, saying Boston was entitled to the grants. Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.

Fort Smith human resources director retires amid internal auditor hiring controversy
Fort Smith human resources director retires amid internal auditor hiring controversy

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fort Smith human resources director retires amid internal auditor hiring controversy

FORT SMITH, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — The human resources director for Fort Smith, who has been recently involved in a controversy regarding the hiring and subsequent dismissal of an internal auditor, has retired. Rick Lolley has served as the city's Chief Human Resources Officer since 2018. The city announced on Saturday that Lolley's retirement was effective immediately. 'Rick Lolley has demonstrated considerable experience and instilled a level of professionalism in the city's Human Resources Department over his seven years as its department head,' Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman said in a news release. 'I wish Rick well as he moves on.' The announcement comes after the Board of Directors voted to hire Rebecca Cowan as internal auditor on April 22. Two days later, the board changed course after it was revealed that Cowan faced a felony stalking charge. Fort Smith-based attorneys Joey McCutchen and Stephen Napurano filed the lawsuit against the city on May 2 after claiming Fort Smith failed to provide all public records related to the hiring of Cowan. The City of Fort Smith told Talk Business & Politics, 'Human Resources produced the background check and relayed the information to Administration per City protocol.' Judge rules City of Fort Smith violated Freedom of Information Act following failed hire Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman, in an email to McCutchen, said, 'The background check information was delivered in hard copy. That record no longer exists. The Chief Human Resources Officer does not have a copy of the packet that was delivered. There is no hard copy.' An email from Dingman, not included in the city's FOIA response, was later obtained directly from a board member, according to the lawsuit. This email stated that Dingman 'did not believe a background check was performed.' The lawsuit also alleged the city failed to respond in a timely manner and may have withheld or destroyed public records. On June 3, the judge assigned to the lawsuit ruled in favor of McCutchen and Napurano during a hearing. An order, officially filed on June 5, said 'The Defendants' failure to timely respond, thefailure to provide clearly responsive records, the absence of any valid extension or waiver, and the troubling lack of transparency regarding the missing background check' were reasons as to why the city was ruled to have violated the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. 'The Court is troubled by the timeline of events, the lack of transparency demonstrated by the City of Fort Smith and City Administrator Jeff Dingman, and by the missing background check which, according to the testimony, was provided by Mr. Rick Lolley to Mr. Jeff Dingman but was neither preserved nor produced in response to the FOIA request,' the judge said in the order. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store