logo
Universities show there are two types of long-term thinking

Universities show there are two types of long-term thinking

Masaru Okawa said the Ainu community continues to campaign to restore their ancestor's "honour and dignity," having recovered remains from three continents in the past decade. A large part of the community's story of marginalisation is told by these and the many other scattered remains of Ainu individuals who were used as subjects of study in the 19th and 20th centuries and are still in exile around the world.
In 1913, Scottish anthropologist, physician, and Edinburgh graduate Dr Neil Gordon Munro donated three Ainu skulls to the University of Edinburgh. No records exist to say why, or how he came to possess them, although he lived among the Ainu as a doctor in his final years.
Whatever the initial circumstances, however, universities have different responsibilities in 2025.
Professor Sir Peter Mathieson, Mr Okawa Masaru, Executive Director, Ainu Association of Hokkaido and Mr Matsuura Katsumi, Director General and Head of the Comprehensive Ainu Policy Office, Cabinet Secretariat, signed the formal repatriation certificates before the skulls were officially returned to their community.(Image: Neil Hanna)
The University of Edinburgh has recently been in the spotlight as it looks to cut costs and stave off any potential financial crisis like what some other institutions are facing.
Union leaders have hit out at the university tobsay the cuts are unnecessary given the institution's financial health. The university contends that it is taking a long view: financial stability may deteriorate in only a few years and making decisions with an eye to the future could prevent bigger problems.
Having an eye for the future is one of the obligations a major institution needs to shoulder. But this week's repatriation serves as a reminder that responsible long-term thinking can also mean looking to the past.
'We can only imagine the feelings of our ancestors'
It was a reverent atmosphere in McEwan Hall on Wednesday as Masaru Okawa and the Ainu delegation took possesion of their ancestors' remains.
Principal and Vice-Chancellor Professor Sir Peter Mathieson, Masaru Okawa and representatives of the Japanese Government formalised the handover of the skulls.
The ceremony may have marked the culmination of the university's role in the story, but Masaru Okawa said the work for his association continues.
'We can only imagine the feelings of our ancestors who spent many years in foreign lands, but we believe they are pleased to return home.'
However, Masaru Okawa said that there are still unaccounted-for remains scattered across the globe and that the association will continue working to return them all to be interred with 'honour and dignity.'
'We don't know the exact figure of how many Ainu remains are still scattered around the world, but we do know that there are many.
'We sincerely hope that all of our ancestral remains, which have been scattered around the world for research purposes, will be brought back to the original places and original people where they belong.
'We are committed to continuing to honour the spirits of our ancestors with dignity, following the traditions handed down through generations. I hope other countries will follow the University of Edinburgh's actions so we can bring back all these remains from around the world.'
Ainu Association of Hokkaido representatives Katsuyoshi Uji, Okawa Masaru, Tetsuya Ogawa conducted a traditional ceremony and held a private viewing of the Ainu skulls prior to the official handover. (Image: Neil Hanna)
Prioritising the rights of humans
The University of Edinburgh has a long history as a leader in anatomical research. This reputation was particularly high in the 19th and 20th centuries, and contributed to many now-scrutinised acquisitions of remains and artefacts from around the world.
Its historic collections house roughly 13,000 anatomical artefacts. More than 1,800 of those are skulls, and many were brought to the university during the colonial period under the direction of William Turner, one of its former Principals and Professors of Anatomy.
Although it is likely that the Ainu skulls were donated for research purposes, the current Chair of Anatomy, Professor Tom Gillingwater, said that there are no records of how the three Ainu skulls first came into Dr Munro's possession or exactly why he sent them to the university.
Among the delegation from Japan were multiple news outlets, and reporters were particularly interested in what kind of research the skulls were part of. Prof Gillingwater said he could not point to any specific research or studies to which the Ainu skulls contributed.
In 2018, the university conducted an inquiry of its collection, cataloguing the remains it holds and where they originated. Following that, the university increased its efforts to repatriate remains where possible, building on work that began 75 years ago when Edinburgh carried out what some believe to be the first repatriation from Scotland.
Professor Sir Peter Mathieson hands over one of the Ainu skulls to Mr Okawa Masaru, Executive Director, Ainu Association of Hokkaido. (Image: Neil Hanna)
Prof Gillingwater has been helping lead the university's attempts to repatriate remains to their ancestral homes for years. He said the long-running project is a mixture of 'proactive and reactive' efforts to 'prioritise the rights of the humans that we are working with.'
'These are human remains. It is a human activity to care for, to look after them, and that is always the forefront. In this instance, it is really clear that the remains should be returned to their homeland and their community, and that trumps any research.
'An awful lot of repatriation activities need to remain private, particularly when the communities we speak to demand that that is the case. When we get to the point of a repatriation such as the one we are celebrating today, where the receiving community, the Ainu community, wish to have an open public awareness of that, we are delighted to share that.'
Balancing the weight of history
Edinburgh is one of many institutions across the UK currently grappling with its ties to colonialism and the Transatlantic slave trade.
Read more:
Prof Mathieson said he was 'proud' that the university has prioritised repatriation. When asked how much more valuable it is to build or repair relationships with communities like the Ainu than it is to keep remains for research purposes, he said universities must work to balance their teaching and moral responsibilities.
'The university takes its responsibilities as a centre of teaching and research very seriously. This is a 442-year-old university, so over the centuries we have much to be proud of in the way we increase knowledge and have transmitted that knowledge to other generations.
'But there does come a time, and a certain realisation, that in the modern era our responsibilities perhaps should be more shifted to indigenous populations and people who have the rightful claim on these remains.
'And so we are very responsive if we think there is a genuine need to return remains.
'We take our teaching responsibilities very seriously, but we also have a moral, cultural and historic responsibility to return these remains to their rightful place.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Falkirk Council has three times as many complaints as national average
Falkirk Council has three times as many complaints as national average

Daily Record

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Falkirk Council has three times as many complaints as national average

By far the biggest cause for complaint was 'ongoing or incomplete repair times' Falkirk Council has three times the number of complaints compared to the Scottish average, members of its Scrutiny committee heard today (Tuesday). The largest number related to 'ongoing or incomplete repairs' (1030), but in the top ten reasons were also complaints about waste collection (364), staff conduct (206) and housing repairs (188). ‌ Stage 1 complaints in Falkirk also included council tenant advice & support (144) and 131 for household waste assisted collections. ‌ But the report was keen to highlight that while the council receives a higher number of complaints, "it is quicker to respond and more successful at early resolution". In 2023/24, Falkirk Council received 34 complaints per 1000 of population, compared with the national average of 11.5. ‌ The average time it took to respond was six working days, three days quicker than the national average. For stage two complaints, it took on average 20 days, compared with the Scottish average of 22. Of the stage one complaints, in Falkirk ten per cent were fully upheld - compared with the Scottish average of 32 per cent. ‌ At the first stage, 30 per cent of complaints were resolved quickly, compared to the Scottish average of 14 per cent. Stage 2 outcomes saw eight per cent of Falkirk's complaints being fully upheld, compared to the Scottish average of 26 per cent. Of the 47 complaints that have gone to the Scottish Public Ombudsman Service, just one was upheld. ‌ Members were also cautioned that not all councils provide the same services so making direct comparisons is not always possible. Some local authorities do not have housing or building maintenance departments, while these are by far the most common areas for complaints to Falkirk Council. Last year, 1030 stage one complaints concerned 'ongoing or incomplete repairs'. ‌ Members heard that "a lot of activity" is ongoing to improve the repairs procedure, which has already led to a fall in complaints, from 1347 last year. Members were told that ongoing training to give the workforce "bolt-on skills" is expected to have a big impact on improving customer satisfaction, as will a recently introduced booking system for appointments. The Director of Place Services, Malcolm Bennie, added that it was important to see the figures in context. ‌ "Every year we carry out around 40.000 repairs so the 1300 complaints you see before is actually 2-3 per cent. "I'm not saying those complaints are not important. We will drive service improvement wherever we can but it's important when you see a large number like that you have to understand the context that tens of thousands of repairs are happening. "We do tenant satisfaction checks with tenants about how happy they are with the repairs that are carried out and typically the scores are very high. ‌ "The BMD service is actually working well, on an improvement journey, and we are looking forward to coming back to Scrutiny later this year with a full suite of information." With just one year's figures to compare, Councillor Gordon Forrest was concerned at the lack of data from previous years, which would allow them to "see the bigger picture". He was told it had not been retained due to data protection rules but anonymised data that has been collated will be kept from now on to make future comparison. ‌ Councillor Alf Kelly also wanted to fully understand why complaints were dropping, saying: "If we don't know why complaints are dropping, we don't know where we are succeeding." Councillor Lorna Binnie said she was particularly concerned to see 206 complaints about staff conduct and wanted to understand more about the reasons for these, and how many had been upheld. Director of communities, Karen Algie, assured members that all complaints about staff conduct are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated. The figures are reported to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) which says councils must have processes in place to learn from complaints and use this learning to improve service delivery.

Waters of Life: A story of hope for beavers but misses out some hard truths
Waters of Life: A story of hope for beavers but misses out some hard truths

Scotsman

time17 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Waters of Life: A story of hope for beavers but misses out some hard truths

Going for a swim. Waters of Life envisages a hopeful future for beavers in Scotland, but the book also seems to shy away from some hard truths, writes Katharine Hay Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Family is a running theme in Tom Bowser's new book Waters of Life: A Fight for Scotland's Beavers. The families of beavers on his land, his family's involvement with them and the conservation family he formed when bringing the rodents to his farm in Perthshire. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These personal references and relationships help deliver an emotive and raw account of the author's experience being the first landowner in Scotland to legally relocate beavers to spare some of the animals the bullet, which sounded desperately challenging at times. With Mr Bowser wanting the rodents on his suitable habitat, just a few kilometres from where they were causing upset in farming territory, you would think it be fairly straightforward to move them, especially given they would likely move there anyway. But no, not with the Scottish Government where, as many in the food production and conservation world know, the level of bureaucracy seems to know no bounds. Perhaps we need a few hypothetical dams in the never ending river of red tape to help trickle through clearer solutions. While a proportion of the book focuses on this lengthy legislative nightmare for what seemed like a pretty logical move with all the right people in place, the story also brings into sharp focus the dark underbelly of conservation on the ground with infighting that goes on. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Bowser's dedication to his cause is admirable, and his devotion to the rodents only seems to grow with every page, to the point where the book really becomes a eulogy to the beaver. The reputation of these animals being ecosystem engineers is brought to life with the author's almost fairy-tale-like descriptions of how his land transforms, boasting ponds teeming with insect life and birdsong filling the air above. The sense of wonder is added to with anecdotes of people's 'first beaver experiences' including his young daughter's. With the author being a former farmer, I was looking forward to there being a bit more of a measured voice in what is such a polarised debate about this heavily politicised animal. However, I was a little disappointed to find out that this was not the case - indeed, a fair chunk of the book plays to the predictable 'angry farmer' vs 'save the day conservationists' narrative. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Judging by the author's account, it certainly sounds as if these stereotypes played out in this case, from the disproportionately high cull numbers despite 'last resort' rules, to the fraught village hall meetings to the interviews with selected species reintroduction celebrities. But the sympathetic tone he deploys when talking about rewilder Derek Gow's 'f*** it' attitude when it comes to releasing wild animals, plus the absence of some voices from the farming community who are working hard on nature-friendly solutions, doesn't help encourage resolution. There are some sound ecological points made and Mr Bowser's story is certainly one of hope for the species to find a home in other parts of Scotland, with translocations to be a solution over culls. But there's an elephant in the room when you finish this book. What about when numbers increase? Which has happened elsewhere. When beavers were last in Britain before being driven to extinction, which the book also gives an interesting history lesson on, research shows there was a population of about 4 million people. Now, there are about 70 million of us on this island. Rural Scotland is also seeing a major industrial shift in the race for Net Zero with pylons, windfarms, hydro schemes, plans for hydrogen plants near rivers, commercial forestry, on top of the development that happened in the last industrial revolution and since. It's a very different world to the one beavers were initially pushed out of. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Bavaria is helpfully mentioned as a place for Scotland to look to for its beaver situation. But while the book mentions they have more than a thousand beaver officers to help with mitigation, which would be great here, the narrative appears to leave out discussions on how the German region culls about 8 per cent of the population every year, too. Mr Bowser's story seems to shy away from some of these hard truths.

Every plant banned in the UK and what to do if you spot them in your garden
Every plant banned in the UK and what to do if you spot them in your garden

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Every plant banned in the UK and what to do if you spot them in your garden

If you notice any of your garden plants growing out of control, make sure to check that they aren't any one of these six plants which can wreck ecosystems and damage your home Like weeds, some of the UK's most ferocious plants grow at a rapid rate, and failure to control any of the banned species in your garden could land you in trouble. Most of us think of plants as harmless – but some are actually banned in the UK for their ability to impact local wildlife and ability to even disrupt the foundation of a building. What's more alarming is that many of them don't look like anything especially odd, which means home-owners need to brush up on their ability to recognise them. ‌ Invasive plants are generally considered to be ones that grow extremely fast in the British climate and which risk monopolising vital resources like sunlight, nutrients, water and space. According to Environmental Controls, there are over 200 invasive plant species currently in the UK, and 36 are considered species of special concern – however some are more common and cause more damage than others. ‌ Crucially, not all are held under the same restrictions. Some are legally banned from being planted in the wild, while others are governed by laws that mean you cannot allow them to spread outside of your property. Meanwhile, some plants, like common ragwort, could land you in a legal battle if you don't show evidence of controlling the species. This is because you can be fined under the Weeds Act 1959. So, which common invasive species do you need to be on the lookout for? According to Environmental Controls, there are six banned plants that are considered 'common offenders'. These include the Japanese knotweed giant hogweed, himalayan balsam, three cornered garlic, rhododendron ponticum, and New Zealand pigmyweed – which is an aquatic plant. ‌ These plants all display invasive growth patterns and are therefore heavily regulated. They are all listed on Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981), which means it is an offence to plant or cause to grow these plants in the wild. Japanese knotweed has gained particular attention in the media for its destructive properties, and has been known to grow through walls, as well as break through underground drains. The reason why it spreads so fast is that it grows via an underground root system which can develop new shoots based on small fragments of the plant. In the UK, it also benefits from having few natural predators. What do you do if you spot them in your garden? Fortunately, there are several viable options for removing these destructive plants from your property. Environmental Controls write: 'If you have invasive plants on your land it's important that they are controlled, or if you want to get rid of them ensure they are treated or removed by a professional company, especially if they are required to be removed to a licensed landfill.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store