
NASA and the defence department rely on SpaceX in so many ways
In 2006, a small, little-known company named Space Exploration Technologies Corp. --
SpaceX
, for short -- won a
NASA
contract to ferry cargo and supplies to the International Space Station.
At that moment, SpaceX had not yet launched anything to orbit and would not succeed until two years later with its tiny Falcon 1 rocket. But since then, the Elon Musk-founded company has become the linchpin of all American civilian and military spaceflight.
It started in 2010 with the launch of the first
Falcon 9
rocket. By 2012 the launcher was sending cargo to the space station.
NASA money helped finance the development of the Falcon 9, and SpaceX capitalized on the NASA seal of approval to entice companies to launch their satellites with SpaceX.
It became the Southwest Airlines of the rocket industry, selling launches and hauling satellites into orbit at a lower price than most other rockets then available.
Live Events
That story repeated during the Obama administration when SpaceX won a contract to take astronauts to the space station, which it did for the first time in May 2020 during the first administration of President Donald Trump.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
"Today the ground breaking partnership between NASA and SpaceX has given our nation the gift of an unmatched power a state-of-the-art spaceship to put our astronauts into orbit at a fraction of the cost of the space shuttle," Trump said in a speech at Kennedy Space Centre in Florida on May 30, 2020, after that flight, shortly after giving an ovation to Musk.
As SpaceX succeeded its competitors stumbled, and today Musk's company is the dominant player in the space industry.
The federal government now relies heavily on SpaceX -- and Musk, who founded the company in 2002 on a quixotic quest to send people to Mars one day. In the short term, the government has few other options for getting people and payloads to orbit and beyond.
SpaceX is NASA's only reliable ride to the ISS right now.
SpaceX
Crew Dragon
capsules carry astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station for NASA. If SpaceX were to decommission them, as
Elon Musk
initially threatened Thursday, the future of the beleaguered and aging space station would be in further doubt.
Musk appeared to walk back that threat later in the day. But if he followed through with it, it seems almost certain that SpaceX would at least bring back to the Earth the Crew Dragon currently docked at the space station, as well as the four astronauts relying on it for the trip home.
But it would have no way to send up the next set of astronauts.
NASA has few ready alternatives to get to the ISS.
NASA hired other companies to provide those services so that if something went wrong, it would have an alternative. However, Boeing, the other company NASA hired to take astronauts to orbit, has yet to complete fixes for its Starliner capsule after a test mission left two NASA astronauts, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, in orbit for nine months before they finally returned to Earth in a SpaceX Crew Dragon.
Boeing and NASA have not yet announced when the next Starliner will launch, but that is not expected before next year.
The aerospace company Northrop Grumman also has a contract to take cargo to the space station with its Cygnus spacecraft, but the most recent Cygnus had to be scrapped after it was damaged during shipment to Florida for launch.
NASA has hired a third company, Sierra Space of Louisville, Colorado, for cargo deliveries. But the company's Dream Chaser space plane has yet to make its first flight.
NASA would have to adjust its space station plans.
In the short term, the crew of the space station could be reduced to three -- the number of astronauts that can fit into a Russian Soyuz capsule. NASA could conceivably resume buying Soyuz seats from Russia, as it did between the retirement of the space shuttles and the beginning of Crew Dragon flights.
NASA has also hired SpaceX to build the spacecraft that is to push the space station back into the atmosphere so that it can safely burn up over the Pacific Ocean after it is retired in 2030.
Boots on the moon would likely have to wait.
Without SpaceX, the current plan to land NASA astronauts on the moon in a few years also falls apart. SpaceX has a contract to build a version of the new giant Starship rocket that is to take two NASA astronauts to the surface of the moon during the third mission in the
Artemis program
.
Blue Origin, the rocket company started by Jeff Bezos, also has a NASA contract for a lunar astronaut lander, but that is planned for years later, during the Artemis V mission.
"NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space," Bethany Stevens, NASA's press secretary, wrote on X late Thursday afternoon. "We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met."
Security satellites and space explorers would be stranded.
Canceling all of SpaceX's contracts, as Trump threatened, could leave many federal government payloads stranded on the ground. SpaceX has won contracts to launch NASA science missions like Dragonfly, a nuclear-powered drone that is to fly around Saturn's moon Titan. It also routinely launches classified U.S. military and intelligence satellites orbiting Earth.
The Department of Defense has also hired SpaceX to build a more secure version of its Starlink internet satellites for military communications.
There are emerging competitors to SpaceX's Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets for these government payloads.
The Vulcan rocket from United Launch Alliance launched for the first time last year, and the New Glenn rocket from Blue Origin launched for the first time earlier this year. But they lack the long success record of the SpaceX launchers, and they are more expensive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'
A day after Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump engaged in a 'fight' online, Wedbush Securities tech analyst and Tesla bull, Dan Ives, has advised investors to brace for further developments in the ongoing public dispute between the Tesla CEO and Trump, a conflict many experts had anticipated, a report has said. "Get the popcorn out," Ives told CNBC, suggesting the dispute is far from over. 'I don't think we're done here,' he added. Ives says the online feud between Musk and Trump is 'bad news' for market Ives expressed concern that Musk's strong reactions to Trump could jeopardise prospects for favourable regulatory outcomes for Tesla. In a research note on Thursday, Ives said the spat will be "jaw-dropping and a shock to the market." 'The quickly deteriorating friendship and now 'major beef' between Musk and Trump is jaw-dropping and a shock to the market,' Ives warned in a research note on Thursday, adding it is 'putting major fear for Tesla investors on what is ahead,' he said. However, Ives later moderated his stance following reports from Politico indicating that White House aides had contacted Musk in an attempt to de-escalate the situation. On Friday (June 6), Ives adjusted his assessment, writing that "Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons, and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares," subsequently labeling the stock as oversold. How Musk-Trump spat started The feud started soon after the introduction of the Trump administration's " One Big, Beautiful Bill ", which Musk publicly branded a "disgusting abomination." Trump later fired back saying he did not need Musk to win in Pennsylvania. Musk replied by saying that if he would have not been involved, Trump would have lost the elections.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla's space mission's schedule out: Check launch date, arrival time, and how to watch live
Axiom Mission 4, carrying ISRO astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla, is set to launch to the ISS on June 10. NASA, Axiom Space, and SpaceX are targeting a launch at 8:22 a.m. EDT. This mission marks the first time an Indian astronaut will visit the ISS as part of a collaboration between NASA and ISRO, fulfilling a commitment to advance space collaboration. Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein. More


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Trees Not Tesla': Australian city's protest ignites a war over environment- and Elon Musk
When two environmental activists began opposing Tesla's proposed battery recycling facility in Tonsley, a suburb south of Adelaide, they expected 's controversial reputation might sway local opinion. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now What they did not anticipate was the level of anti-Musk sentiment expressed globally, particularly outside the United States. The activists, who use pseudonyms Neon and Zane to shield themselves from potential harassment by Musk's supporters, founded a grassroots campaign called 'Trees Not Teslas.' Their aim was to protect approximately 60 trees located in one of the few remaining green spaces in Tonsley, a site that Tesla has proposed for the facility, as reported by CNN. Adelaide Tesla factory backlash as Marion locals revolt "We're struggling for designated green spaces … and it's just an insult to try and take away the one bit that's left within the Tonsley area," said Neon, a former Tonsley resident who now works nearby. The local council's community consultation revealed overwhelming public opposition to the plan, with 95 per cent of more than 900 submissions against it. Many responses cited hostility toward Musk himself, with a total of 229 mentions of the terms 'Nazi,' 'Nazism,' or related language recorded in the official consultation document. Musk's high-profile persona, polarising commentary, and visible online presence have made him a lightning rod for critics of Trump-era policies, even abroad. As the current head of Tesla and former leader of the US Department of Government Efficiency, Musk remains a controversial figure globally. One particularly scathing public submission read: "You and I both know it's getting torched every few months because of the Nazi implications. You really want that bought [sic] up every single meeting?" The backlash also references Musk's widely criticised hand gesture during Trump's January post-inauguration event, which some observers likened to fascist symbolism. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In response to the allegations, Musk posted on X: 'The 'everyone is Hitler' attack is sooo tired.' Despite the community opposition, the Marion Council has approved the proposal to advance to the state government for consideration. The plan's future now rests with South Australian authorities, even as resistance within the community continues to grow. The council voted 8-3 in favour of the proposal, with the mayor Hanna highlighting the potential creation of 100 jobs and additional local tax revenue that would help residents during the economic downturn. The mayor emphasised these benefits as crucial factors in the decision. "To have a substantial new factory come into the area is very significant, and it's adjacent to a high-tech manufacturing area, which we developed in the place of an old car plant. So, it actually fits in very well to have a factory that recycles electric batteries," Hanna said. Councillor Sarah Luscombe, who opposed the proposal, expressed concerns about disregarding community wishes for increased greenery. She noted that the council's strategic vision emphasises creating a "livable, sustainable community." "The people that I've spoken to in the community are just sick and tired of seeing their interests overshadowed by those of large corporations," Luscombe said. "More and more, we're seeing communities just saying, 'Well, hang on, I do want to have a say here, and I do want my views to be counted.'" Tesla has faced recent challenges globally, with vandalism targeting their showrooms and vehicles due to Musk's support of far-right European parties and various policies. Members of Extinction Rebellion demonstrated their opposition by spray-painting anti-DOGE messages on a Tesla showroom in New York City on April 22. Despite receiving hostile correspondence following the approval, Mayor Hanna remained unconcerned about potential violent reactions. He maintained his neutral stance, stating, "I'm speaking as a mayor, and I don't actually take any political or ideological stance. I just try and make life beautiful for the people in my area." South Australian Local Government Minister Joe Szakacs indicated he would follow standard procedures regarding land sale approval. "Our Government welcomes investment and job creation in South Australia and is proud of its commitment to deliver 100 per cent net renewables by 2027," he told CNN. Meanwhile in another development, Musk is currently ongoing feud with President , which has further amplified scrutiny. Their alliance was driven by shared disdain for 'wokeism' and traditional institutions, and shaped by Musk's admiration for hardline thinkers like Curtis Yarvin. For a while, it was mutual admiration- Trump praised SpaceX launches, Musk posted memes from the White House. But cracks began to show over issues like H-1B visas, tariffs, and above all, Trump's sweeping 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which slashed clean energy subsidies vital to Musk's businesses. By May 2025, Musk resigned from his government post. Then came the real rupture. Musk publicly opposed Trump's policies, floated alternate presidential picks, and hinted at forming a new political party. Trump, from his side, threatened Musk's government contracts, prompting Musk to escalate with wild insinuations- suggesting Trump's name appeared in the Epstein files.