UK to ban Palestine Action under terror laws after RAF base break-in
British Interior minister Yvette Cooper announced she will ban the campaign group Palestine Action under terrorism laws.
The group has committed multiple acts of vandalism against defence-related properties.
The ban will make it a criminal offense to belong to or support Palestine Action, with penalties of up to 14 years in prison.
British interior minister Yvette Cooper announced on Monday that she will ban campaign group Palestine Action, after its activists broke into the UK's largest air force base last week.
Cooper said the vandalism of two planes at RAF Brize Norton in southern England on Friday was "disgraceful" and the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage".
Her comments, made in a written statement, came as supporters of the group gathered in central London to protest her move, which had been widely reported would happen Monday.
"In several attacks, Palestine Action has committed acts of serious damage to property with the aim of progressing its political cause and influencing the government," Cooper said in the statement.
She said she would lay a draft order before parliament next Monday that, if passed, would proscribe the group under Britain's Terrorism Act of 2000.
Cooper listed attacks at Thales defence factory in Glasgow in 2022, and two last year against Instro Precision in Kent, southeast England, and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol, in the country's southwest.
The ban under terror laws will make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
"The UK's defence enterprise is vital to the nation's national security and this government will not tolerate those that put that security at risk," Cooper said.
She stressed that her decision "is specific to Palestine Action and does not affect lawful protest groups and other organisations campaigning on issues around Palestine or the Middle East".
Counter-terror police are investigating Friday's incident, in which two activists allegedly sprayed a plane with red paint while roaming the base on scooters.
Last month, Palestine Action claimed responsibility for vandalising a US military aircraft in Ireland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
37 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Man gets stuck in chimney while trying to get his dog out of a locked building
BRISTOL, Conn. — Firefighters had to rescue a man who got stuck in the chimney of a Connecticut parks building while trying to retrieve his dog from a bathroom when the doors automatically locked for the night. Police were called Sunday morning to Rockwell Park in Bristol for a burglary complaint and were told by parks employees that someone was in the chimney. Firefighters responded to the scene and got the man out after having to remove parts of the chimney and building, causing $5,000 to $10,000 worth of damage, police said. The Bristol man, who was not injured, was arrested and charged with burglary, trespassing and criminal mischief. He was released on bond and ordered to appear in court on July 7. A message seeking comment was sent to an email address listed in public records for the man. Phone numbers listed for him were not in service. Online court records did not list a lawyer for him. The man got stuck near the flue of the chimney of Mrs. Rockwell's Pavilion, a building named after a beneficiary of the park. Locks on the doors to the bathrooms are on new timers and automatically lock at 10 p.m. every night, said Erica Benoit, community engagement coordinator for Bristol Parks, Recreation, Youth and Community Services. It's not clear how the dog got stuck in the bathroom or how long the man was in the chimney. The doors can be opened from the inside after they are locked for the night. The dog was unharmed, police said. 'It is a bit of a crazy scenario,' Benoit said. 'Our parks staff is working with the police department and the fire department to make sure that doesn't happen again. If he had just contacted police in the first place, we might have been able to avoid the situation.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
GB News presenter claims he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist
A former GB News presenter has claimed he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist on air. Albie Amankona, who was dropped by the broadcaster last year, is taking the channel to an employment tribunal over a string of claims including racial discrimination and unfair dismissal. Mr Amankona, a Tory commentator who presented debate programme The Saturday Five, left the broadcaster shortly after stating that he believed Ms Braverman was 'a racist and a thoroughly bigoted woman'. GB News issued an apology to the former home secretary, saying the comments 'crossed a line between robust debate and causing unnecessary offence'. The broadcaster added that Ms Braverman was 'understandably upset'. Mr Amankona alleges that he was taken off air as a result of the comments. He is crowdfunding his claim, which also includes allegations of harassment and victimisation, through the Good Law Project, a legal campaign group founded by outspoken barrister Jo Maugham. Mr Amankona said: 'I regret that it has come to this, I have tried very hard to resolve matters privately and in good faith. Like so many fair-minded Britons I believe in free speech, fairness, the rule of law and I know right from wrong. GB News claims to stand for these values. 'My experience tells a different story. They must be held accountable, not only for cancelling me, but for seemingly treating non-white employees differently from white employees, and for abandoning the very values we Britons hold dear.' The Good Law Project said: 'GB News likes to brand itself as a champion of free speech and journalistic independence. But when one of its own presenters dared to call out racism and intolerance, the response was swift and severe: he was dropped instantly. 'It's a familiar pattern – when free speech aligns with their agenda, they celebrate it. But the moment it challenges their narrative, the mask slips.' GB News denies the claims. A spokesman said: 'Mr Amankona's claim is misconceived, without merit and being robustly defended. As the claim is ongoing we do not propose to comment further.' Mr Amankona is a broadcaster and activist who co-founded the Conservatives Against Racism For Equality group. He presented the GB News programme from March 2023 until August 2024, and has made regular appearances on other broadcasters including the BBC, LBC and Sky News. The legal challenge marks the latest twist in a turbulent few years for GB News, which has courted controversy since its launch in 2021 as a challenger to incumbents such as the BBC. Ofcom has found the channel in breach of broadcasting rules a dozen times over impartiality issues including its use of politicians as presenters. But in a major victory earlier this year, GB News successfully challenged Ofcom's decisions in the High Court, leading to several impartiality rulings being dropped. Nevertheless, the start-up is still locking horns with the watchdog, which is now consulting on plans to broaden its ban on politicians acting as news presenters. Angelos Frangopoulos, GB News chief executive, has accused Ofcom of having a 'jailer' mentality towards broadcasters, while co-owner Sir Paul Marshall last month claimed the regulator was unfairly punishing the channel under pressure from Left-wing activists. Ofcom has insisted it enforces its rules 'fairly and proportionately'. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
David Lammy has urged a Reform UK MP to 'get some help' because she is 'swallowing conspiracy theories'. Sarah Pochin had asked the Foreign Secretary whether the US felt unable to use the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, following the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands. Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'. The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said. He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?' Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.' The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action. Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?' Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?' Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.' SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not. 'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?' Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years. 'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'
