Complaint alleges DOJ official Emil Bove said he was willing to violate court orders
A top Justice Department official nominated by President Donald Trump to fill a federal appeals court vacancy allegedly suggested the Trump administration should defy judicial orders that sought to restrict their aggressive efforts to deport undocumented immigrants earlier this year, according to a whistleblower complaint from a fired DOJ career official.
The 27-page complaint, provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Justice Department's top watchdog and obtained by ABC News, alleges that Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove and other top DOJ officials strategized how they could mislead courts regarding the administration's immigration enforcement efforts and potentially ignore judges' rulings outright.
The allegations from Erez Reuveni -- who was fired from the department in April after he appeared in federal court in Maryland and admitted to a judge that the government had mistakenly deported accused MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador -- were delivered to the Senate on the eve of a confirmation hearing for Bove to serve on the powerful 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
MORE: Trump taps controversial top DOJ official for federal circuit court vacancy
"Mr. Reuveni's disclosures detail violations of law, rules or regulations, and the abuse of authority by DOJ and White House personnel, as well as the creation of substantial and specific health and safety threats to noncitizens," Reuveni's attorneys said in the letter.
"These high-level governmental personnel knowingly and willfully defied court orders, directed their subordinate attorneys to make misrepresentations to courts, and engaged in a scheme to withhold relevant information from the court to advance the Administration's priority of deporting noncitizens," the letter said.
Reuveni's whistleblower complaint details several internal meetings where he alleges Bove and other officials debated over how they could evade legal scrutiny in implementing President Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th century wartime authority used to remove noncitizens with little-to-no due process. At a meeting on March 14, the complaint alleges that Bove said the department should consider saying "f--- you" to the courts and "ignore any such court order."
"Mr. Reuveni was stunned by Bove's statement because, to Mr. Reuveni's knowledge, no one in DOJ leadership -- in any Administration -- had ever suggested the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore court orders," the letter says, repeating the expletive. "Mr. Reuveni was in disbelief, because, on the contrary, the Department of Justice consistently advises its clients of their obligation to follow court orders, not to ignore them."
In a statement to The New York Times responding to the letter -- which was first reported by the paper -- Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche described Reuveni as a "disgruntled former employee" and said that his accusations about Bove and other DOJ leadership "are utterly false."
"I was at the meeting described in the [New York Times] article and at no time did anyone suggest a court order should not be followed," Blanche said.
The allegations by Reuveni fall at the center of an effort by D.C. District Chief Judge James Boasberg to potentially hold top administration officials in contempt for violating a March 15 order to turn a plane of undocumented immigrants deported under the Alien Enemies Act around before it arrived in El Salvador. That inquiry was put on a temporary hold by an appeals court panel in the D.C. Circuit in April.
Bove, according to Reuveni's account, made clear to officials the day before Boasberg's order that the planes carrying the deported individuals "needed to take off no matter what," and that is when he made the comment about potentially defying court orders.
Officials in the room "looked stunned" following Bove's alleged remarks, and those in the room left the meeting still "understanding that DOJ would tell DHS to follow all court orders," according to Reuveni.
In Reuveni's telling, the meeting was just one in a series of instances that demonstrated efforts by White House and DOJ leadership to defy court orders "through lack of candor, deliberate delay, and disinformation."
MORE: DOJ places senior lawyer on leave in case of mistakenly deported man
"Discouraging clients from engaging in illegal conduct is an important part of the role of a lawyer," the letter states. "Mr. Reuveni tried to do so and was thwarted, threatened, fired, and publicly disparaged for both doing his job and telling the truth to the court."
Senate Democrats are expected to highlight Reuveni's account at Bove's judicial confirmation hearing Wednesday to bolster their claims that Bove, who previously served as President Trump's personal defense attorney, has abused his position at DOJ to advance Trump's political agenda.
"These serious allegations, from a career Justice Department lawyer who defended the first Trump Administration's immigration policies, not only speak to Mr. Bove's failure to fulfill his ethical obligations as a lawyer, but demonstrate that his activities are part of a broader pattern by President Trump and his allies to undermine the Justice Department's commitment to the rule of law," Senate Judiciary ranking member Dick Durbin said in a statement reacting to Reuveni's letter.
"And I implore my Senate Republican colleagues: do not turn a blind eye to the dire consequences of confirming Mr. Bove to a lifetime position as a circuit court judge," Durbin said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail only to be taken into immigration custody
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail in Tennessee on Wednesday, only to be taken into immigration custody. The Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation became a flashpoint in the fight over President Donald Trump's immigration policies has been in jail since he was returned to the U.S. on June 7, facing two counts of human smuggling. On Sunday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail ahead of that trial. On Wednesday afternoon, she will set his conditions of release and allow him to go, according to her order. However, both his defense attorneys and prosecutors have said they expect him to be taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as soon as he is released on the criminal charges. In addition, federal prosecutors are appealing Holmes' release order. Among other things, they expressed concern in a motion filed on Sunday that Abrego Garcia could be deported before he faces trial. Holmes has said previously that she won't step between the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. It is up to them to decide whether they want to deport Abrego Garcia or prosecute him. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken deportation in March to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. At his detention hearing, Homeland Security Special Agent Peter Joseph testified that he did not begin investigating Abrego Garcia until April of this year. Holmes said in her Sunday ruling that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children. However, Holmes referred to her own ruling as 'little more than an academic exercise,' noting that ICE plans to detain him. It is less clear what will happen after that. Although he can't be deported to El Salvador — where an immigration judge found he faces a credible threat from gangs — he is still deportable to a third country as long as that country agrees to not send him to El Salvador.


Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Tax Relief Industry Plagued by High Costs, Low Success Rates, and Fraud — New Platform Gives Taxpayers Tools to Audit Their Tax Relief Status
Palo Alto, CA June 24, 2025 --( )-- The tax relief industry, marketed as a lifeline for Americans drowning in IRS debt, is now facing heightened scrutiny as more cases of fraud, abuse, and predatory sales tactics continue to emerge. While promising to reduce tax liabilities and settle debts for pennies on the dollar, many tax relief firms have been accused of charging thousands of dollars upfront while delivering little or no real results. Over the past several decades, several high-profile tax relief companies have been investigated, raided, or shut down by federal and state authorities. In 2021, the Justice Department filed lawsuits against one of the most visible firms in the space, alleging deceptive advertising and misleading consumers about likely outcomes. Before that a once publicly traded company collapsed after the Texas Attorney General secured a nearly $200 million judgment for fraudulent practices. Another major company was permanently shut down by the FTC in 2010 after being charged with taking millions of dollars from consumers while providing virtually no tax relief services. In 2022, IRS agents raided another tax relief firm in Chicago, adding to the growing list of enforcement actions targeting the industry. Despite these actions, hundreds of tax relief companies still operate nationally, many charging fees ranging from $3,000 to $10,000 upfront for services that may require little more than filing simple IRS petitions. a new online platform, aims to bring transparency to an industry that has long operated in the shadows. Unlike tax relief companies, does not sell tax resolution services, negotiate with the IRS, or charge fees based on 'settlement amounts.' Instead, it provides tax help through independent and detailed tax reports that verify exactly what taxpayers owe and what work has — or hasn't — been done by the firm they hired. 'Most taxpayers have no idea whether their tax relief company has filed the necessary paperwork with the IRS, whether their Offer in Compromise was submitted correctly, or even if their balances have been updated,' said a VerifiedProof spokesperson. 'We give consumers independent access to the facts so they can see exactly where their case stands.' In addition to monitoring IRS records and tax relief case status, also serves taxpayers who haven't yet hired any firm. The platform allows individuals to pull their IRS records, see what they owe, and better understand the programs available — including the IRS 'Offer in Compromise,' 'Installment Agreements,' 'Penalty Abatement' and other IRS relief or payment options — without needing to pay high consulting fees or risk falling prey to fraudulent companies. With so much outstanding IRS debt nationally, tax relief remains a massive and often misunderstood industry where desperate taxpayers are vulnerable to aggressive marketing tactics and misinformation. Platforms like give individuals a way to regain control of their tax situations without being dependent on firms whose financial interests are not always aligned with their clients. 'So many clients ask, ' how much do I owe the IRS?' and at the end of the day, we believe taxpayers deserve to know the truth,' the spokesperson added. ' puts that power back into their hands. They are tired of the lies from tax relief companies, they want the truth about what they owe the IRS. They want to trust the company they hired. We simply give them the insight so they don't have to worry. Even if the truth is not what they want to hear. Trusted tax companies use our service to provide the facts to their clients that the work is truly being fulfilled and we love the feedback from these taxpayers.' Contact Information: Verified, Inc. Joseph Prado 650-391-0034 Contact via Email Read the full story here: Tax Relief Industry Plagued by High Costs, Low Success Rates, and Fraud — New Platform Gives Taxpayers Tools to Audit Their Tax Relief Status Press Release Distributed by


Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail only to be taken into immigration custody
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Kilmar Abrego Garcia is expected to be released from jail in Tennessee on Wednesday, only to be taken into immigration custody. The Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation became a flashpoint in the fight over President Donald Trump's immigration policies has been in jail since he was returned to the U.S. on June 7, facing two counts of human smuggling . On Sunday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail ahead of that trial. On Wednesday afternoon, she will set his conditions of release and allow him to go, according to her order. However, both his defense attorneys and prosecutors have said they expect him to be taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as soon as he is released on the criminal charges. In addition, federal prosecutors are appealing Holmes' release order. Among other things, they expressed concern in a motion filed on Sunday that Abrego Garcia could be deported before he faces trial. Holmes has said previously that she won't step between the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security. It is up to them to decide whether they want to deport Abrego Garcia or prosecute him. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken deportation in March to a notorious prison in El Salvador . Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. At his detention hearing, Homeland Security Special Agent Peter Joseph testified that he did not begin investigating Abrego Garcia until April of this year. Holmes said in her Sunday ruling that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children. However, Holmes referred to her own ruling as 'little more than an academic exercise,' noting that ICE plans to detain him. It is less clear what will happen after that. Although he can't be deported to El Salvador — where an immigration judge found he faces a credible threat from gangs — he is still deportable to a third country as long as that country agrees to not send him to El Salvador. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .