
Is Coors Light Canadian? Why finding a homegrown product can be tough
Social Sharing
As tariff news changes by the day, Canadians continue to look for homegrown alternatives to American products.
But what constitutes a Canadian product is not necessarily straightforward.
"The onus is on us as consumers to ask the questions, to do the research that's important to us and decide which parameters are important to us," said Michael von Massow, a food economics professor at the University of Guelph.
Von Massow said possible factors to consider include where the product is produced, where the ingredients come from, where it's packaged and the ownership of the company.
Consider beer.
Coors Light is an American brand. Molson Canadian is a Canadian one. But a can of either on the shelf in New Brunswick is produced in the same place: the MolsonCoors brewery in Moncton.
MolsonCoors is headquartered in Chicago, but, as a publicly traded company, it has shareholders around the world.
When N.B. Liquor began taking Kentucky bourbon and California wines off the shelf in their corporate stores, brands like Coors and Budweiser remained.
WATCH | What makes a beer Canadian?:
According to N.B. Liquor spokesperson Florence Gouton, the retailer considers "the country of production as our primary data point to identify what is considered an American product."
"Our goal is to ensure that we do not negatively impact companies that manufacture in Canada, with Canadian ingredients and Canadian employees," she said in an email.
MolsonCoors, Gouton said, "is an excellent example."
"This Canadian business division has five breweries in Canada, which produce all the domestic products sold here in New Brunswick; it also employs thousands of Canadian workers in its five breweries, its sales force, its logistics, etc."
The highest certification a food product can receive from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is "Product of Canada," where all, or nearly all, of the ingredients in a product are from Canada, and it is produced with Canadian labour.
Pretty much all beer on the shelf would fit into that category. Where it gets tricky is if the ownership of a given company matters.
"Are we worried about where the brand is from, where the ownership of the company is from, or are we worried about where it's made?" von Massow said.
Ultimately, he said, those looking for Canadian-owned options should turn to craft beer.
Lloyd Chambers, the president of the New Brunswick Craft Alcohol Producers Association, said consumers can feel comfortable knowing their dollars are staying in their communities.
"You're supporting jobs here," he said.
"Most of the craft producers invest most of the money back into hiring more people, expanding, buying equipment. So the money that you spend on craft alcohol, whether it's wine, spirits or beer or cider, most of it will stay in the province."
However, Chambers says he wouldn't want to see a boycott of macrobreweries. Just because they aren't necessarily Canadian-owned doesn't mean they don't contribute to the local economy.
One of the few macrobrewers that remain Canadian-owned is Saint John-based Moosehead. CEO Andrew Oland told Information Morning Saint John t he company is looking to lean into that distinction with its recent marketing.
"Consumers are saying 'We want Canadian products, we want true Canadian products," he said.
"So we are leaning into that very hard … we've adjusted out media campaigns to remind everyone that we are 100 per cent Canadian since 1867."
Oland admitted as well that basically all beer on the shelf in New Brunswick stores can be considered Canadian.
He also pointed out that many of the hops that many brewers rely on come from the U.S.
The integrated nature of the North American and, to an extent, global economy is part of why it's so difficult to determine what being a Canadian product means.
Even the production of beer cans involves moving product back and forth across the border multiple times.
Von Massow said there's a reason trade has become so integrated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
DND says F-35 review will be completed in the summer
Article content The Department of National Defence's review of its F-35 purchase will be completed sometime in the summer, but officials won't say exactly when or whether the report will be released to the public. Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney ordered a review of Canada's $19-billion F-35 purchase in mid-March in the wake of threats against Canadian sovereignty by U.S. President Donald Trump. The U.S. has become increasingly hostile to Canada, with the American president continuing with his economic efforts to punish Canada and push for this country to become the 51st state. Article content Article content Article content At this point, Canada has only financially committed to purchasing the first 16 jets from the U.S. government. The entire order was for 88 F-35s, which are manufactured by the American defence giant Lockheed Martin. Article content Department of National Defence spokeswoman Andrée-Anne Poulin stated in an email that the F-35 review is being led by the offices of the assistant deputy minister for review services and the assistant deputy minister for materiel. They are receiving input from other organizations such as the Royal Canadian Air Force. The assistant deputy minister for material and the RCAF played key roles in the original selection of the F-35 for Canada. Article content 'It is anticipated that this review will be finalized in Summer 2025,' the email from Poulin pointed out. Article content DND could not say which month the review would be completed. Article content Asked by the Ottawa Citizen if it would be accurate to state the review would be finished by the end of August, the DND responded that, 'Further information will be provided in due course.' Article content Article content Poulin had previously noted that, 'The review would take into account the work already done to replace Canada's current fighter jet fleet.' Article content Article content Former defence procurement chief Alan Williams and various defence analysts have warned that the F-35 represents a strategic vulnerability for Canada since the U.S. has total control over software upgrades and spare parts on the aircraft. Article content The Ottawa Citizen reported May 5 that the U.S. owns all parts for Canada's F-35s even when they are located at Canadian bases.


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call
LONDON (AP) — High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng is due to meet U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at an undisclosed location in the city. The talks are due to last at least a day. They follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The U.K. government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' the British government said in a statement.


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Finding what's missing in the Winnipeg housing market
Opinion Last week, Winnipeg city council spent several long days and late nights debating a sweeping set of zoning bylaw amendments that could fundamentally change how our city is built in the future. Like all Canadian cities that signed on to the federal government's Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF), Winnipeg is being asked to revamp its planning policies to allow greater density and more diverse housing types to be built in every neighbourhood across the city. The federal government recognizes that if we are going to build more housing supply in cities to balance market demand and create more affordability, it can't be accommodated by simply expanding outward in sprawling low-density suburbs. Brent Bellamy photo New rules for infill housing can invigorate Winnipeg neighbourhoods. The costs of infrastructure and municipal services can no longer be supported by low density growth, evidenced by increasing taxes, reduced services, and deteriorating infrastructure. The federal government is using the financial carrots of HAF to push cities into making uncomfortable changes to policies that regulate where housing can be built. The planning changes being implemented effectively eliminate single-family zoning, allowing at least a duplex to be built on almost any lot in the city. It will also allow up to threeplexes and fourplexes depending on lot size, location, and considerations like proximity to transit and existing street conditions. To speed up development, these new housing types will be allowed as-of-right, meaning that if they meet certain restrictions like height, lot coverage, and setbacks, they can be built without a public hearing. The need for cities to densify, combined with ever-rising land and construction costs, means that the future of housing will be less and less about single-family homes. Already only one-quarter of new homes built in Winnipeg each year are houses, with three-quarters being multi-family dwellings. This is an almost perfectly inverted ratio from 25 years ago. Current zoning policies effectively segregate densities, protecting single-family neighbourhoods and pushing most multi-family options into downtown high-rises or six-storey buildings on large streets. The new zoning changes will allow smaller multi-family developments to be peppered throughout neighbourhoods instead of being relegated to their fringes. Many people prefer the quality of life offered in a single-family home, and much of what is desirable in that lifestyle can be more affordably found in the types of housing these new zoning changes promote, commonly called 'missing middle housing.' Low-rise, multi-family housing types like townhouses, duplexes and fourplexes can offer more flexible and diverse living arrangements than a neighbourhood that is exclusively single-family, accommodating a wider range of household sizes, ages, and income levels. Missing middle housing can fit seamlessly into the character of walkable residential neighbourhoods, while still increasing density and providing a greater range of home sizes and affordability options. This housing diversity responds to the needs of people at different stages of life, whether it's a rental or starter home for a young person, a downsizing option for a senior ageing in their community, or a family home. A concern often raised about missing middle development is that it can mean the loss of smaller, older houses that are often affordable. Winnipeg is fortunate in some ways to have the oldest housing stock of any major city in Canada, with one in five houses being more than 80 years old, and one in 10 more than a century old. An old housing stock creates affordability, but it can't be relied on as a strategy to achieve that forever. We must allow our housing stock to be organically replenished in a way that will respond more specifically to the evolving needs of people today and in the future. Change will happen to our aging neighbourhoods whether we like it or not, but we can shape and guide this change by designing zoning regulations that push more multi-family housing towards smaller scale, neighbourhood focused developments that provide a more desirable lifestyle option for many. When a small bungalow is demolished for a fourplex, one house may be lost, but three more families are able to gain access to the neighbourhood. The new construction may not be as affordable immediately, but a neighbourhood's transition to higher density happens slowly, and as more and more older houses are lost over time, the infill will age and start a new cycle of affordability. In today's market, most new missing middle housing is built as rental properties, but 10 years ago it would likely have been condominiums. Market trends change, and by creating zoning regulations that promote this scale of development, more ownership options and home types will appear in the future. As this housing type becomes more prevalent and ages over time, it will replace the old bungalow as a common type of starter home that is the first step in the property ladder for young people. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. The idea of allowing different densities and housing types to sit on the same street is not a new one. Many of our most beloved older neighbourhoods have houses, townhouses, condominiums and apartment buildings sitting comfortably side-by-side. Higher-density neighbourhoods serve the greater good of reducing the cost of infrastructure and services needed to support new growth, helping to keep taxes down. It also improves support for local shops and amenities like libraries and community centres, while making public transit more effective, and improving walkability. New zoning bylaws that will create more missing middle housing over time will result in more diverse and livable communities that provide varied ownership models, home types and sizes. Missing middle housing will also allow broader access to good neighbourhoods, creating a more prosperous, affordable, and socially equitable city in the future. Brent Bellamy is creative director at Number Ten Architectural Group. Brent BellamyColumnist Brent Bellamy is creative director for Number Ten Architectural Group. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.