
Why your addictive personality is increasing your cancer risk
When we talk about addiction, it's usually smoking or drinking alcohol that comes to mind. Most of us are aware that these are behaviours that may rush us towards poor health and, potentially, a cancer diagnosis. The statistics speak for themselves: six million people smoke, 24 per cent have too much alcohol and two-thirds are overweight or obese and, since 1995, cancer cases have increased every year in England (with the exception of 2020, when the drop in diagnoses is widely considered a result of a pandemic-fuelled NHS disruption.)
But there are other lower-level addictions that go under the radar that can be just as damaging to our health. It's these lesser-known dependencies that are subtly increasing our risk of cancer that Dr Raphael Cuomo, a cancer epidemiologist and professor at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, wants to draw our attention to.
You might jokingly confess that you've got an 'addictive personality', you're 'addicted to crisps' or 'addicted to looking at your phone' – but Dr Cuomo wants us to take these addictive behaviours more seriously. In his new book, Crave: The Hidden Biology of Addiction and Cancer, he explores how our supposed addictions to sugar and excessive screen time could be reshaping our biology to make us more susceptible to cancer.
'These are the addictions that we may not appreciate as seriously – like the constant need to be on a phone and scrolling through social media, the constant need to snack on processed foods.' They might not be classed as cancer-causing by leading cancer authorities, but Dr Cuomo argues that these habits trigger cellular changes that are depleting our health and can make us more vulnerable to the disease.
'I want to raise awareness that these low-grade addictions are not just a negative thing in isolation but they have a bigger consequence on the long-term risk of disease,' Dr Cuomo says.
Screen addictions mess with your hormone production – and your health
'Even when you're just scrolling through your phone, you see something interesting and it gives you this low-grade high, this dopamine rush – and you want more,' Dr Cuomo says. This process, of exposure to engaging pictures and videos mixed in with less interesting content, is known as variable reinforcement, which he likens to playing on a slot machine.
'It keeps you scrolling and scrolling, hoping that you're going to get that dopamine hit,' he explains. 'We are hoping for the high of something interesting showing up on the newsfeed. The companies that make these products know about these mechanisms and they're manufactured with this in mind.'
While addiction to screens is not widely medically recognised, the NHS launched a National Centre for Gaming Disorders in 2019 amid a rising number of people seeking help for being unable to control their video game use.
Compulsive time spent scrolling through our devices causes spikes in the stress hormone, cortisol. 'The cortisol will prevent the relaxation needed in order to repair DNA breaks and it will also prevent our immune system from clearing out damaged cells,' Dr Cuomo argues.
'When you're looking at screens constantly, especially late at night, you get exposed to blue light which suppresses melatonin,' he says. This is a hormone that supports our body clock and has cancer-protective effects.
Being addicted to sugar compromises your immune system
In the UK, we're hooked on sugar, eating 18 teaspoons on average per day when a maximum of eight teaspoons is recommended – and Dr Cuomo believes we're addicted. Just last year, a collection of renowned experts gathered at the International Food Addiction Consensus Conference to get addiction to highly processed junk foods officially recognised as a condition by both WHO and leading psychiatry institutions.
'When we consume sugary or junk food, it tastes good and makes us feel good,' he says. Sugar triggers the release of the neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin, which are associated with pleasure. 'We eat this food and suddenly we're feeling better,' he says. This pattern causes us to seek out sugary, high-calorie food repeatedly, which Dr Cuomo believes is sugar addiction.
The problem is that when sugar enters our system, it spikes our insulin levels and stimulates insulin-like growth factor one (IGF-1), a hormone that promotes cell growth. In short bursts, these responses are normal, but when experienced repeatedly, cells begin to divide and multiply more rapidly, Dr Cuomo says. 'Repeatedly, over time, that will promote the development of tumours.'
The types of food that we're most likely to become hooked on – which are high in sugar, refined carbohydrates and additives – also trigger low-grade inflammation, which hampers our immune system and could make it less equipped to identify and eliminate abnormal cells, he says.
Three ways to tackle your addictive behaviours
'These addictive behaviours are not fixed,' Dr Cuomo notes. 'People can escape them and reverse the risk of cancer.' This is seen among smokers who quit as, after around 12 years of no longer using cigarettes, their risk of lung cancer is half that of someone who still smokes.
'Risk is fluid and, ideally, to keep risk minimal, we would engage in these behaviours not very much overall,' he adds. These are his tips on kicking your reliance on sugar and screens.
1. Tackle the root cause of your behaviours
We turn to addictive behaviours as a way of displacing stress and as a source of comfort. 'We're seeking a kind of distraction to prevent us from dealing with the bigger issues, from relaxing and allowing our bodies to sit and repair,' Dr Cuomo says.
It's uncomfortable to stop and think about what you're trying to escape from, but tackling the source of stress or trigger for reaching for food or your phone can help to replace it with healthier behaviours, he suggests.
2. Take an enforced break
'I would encourage people to attempt a reset,' Dr Cuomo says. 'I think that if you can achieve seven days without something, then you tend to start to break free from the addiction.'
This would mean going for a whole week without eating sugar or engaging with the screen-based activity you feel you're addicted to, such as social media. 'Then you can re-engage, but you shouldn't be dependent upon it.'
'Seven days is a very high bar for a lot of people,' he notes. If it seems like too much, then start with one-day breaks, building up until you reach seven.
'Create barriers,' Dr Cuomo recommends. These include not buying any sugary foods or putting them in a more awkward location to get to, such as the top shelf of a cupboard. To cut back on using certain apps, you can remove them from your phone. 'You want to make the habits you've developed an addiction to be more difficult to engage with.'
3. Stick to a sleep schedule
A regular sleeping pattern can help to regulate cortisol and melatonin levels, and it interrupts the loop of compulsive reward-seeking, better equipping you to steer clear of your unhealthy habits.
'Do the same thing every night before bed,' Dr Cuomo suggests. 'Go to sleep at the same time every night and wake up at the same time every morning, even on the weekend.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Northamptonshire addiction documentary premieres
A man who shared his lived experience of addiction in a new documentary said he did so to show others that "change is possible".David Sagar's story was one of nine in Breaking the Chains of Addiction, which premiered at Cineworld Rushden Lakes on Thursday film was commissioned by the Northamptonshire Combatting Drugs and Alcohol Partnership - a collaboration of local agencies including the police and Sagar, who has been sober for almost 10 years, said it was important show people "you can go on to other things". The 47-year-old from Desborough said he had experimented with substances from a young age and explained how he struggled to break his addiction because "I surrounded myself with people who wouldn't question [drug taking]."He said he had tried "many times" to "make changes" to his life, but said the turning point was when a doctor told him he would be dead in a matter of months if he did not break his habit."At that point I thought 'I'm not done with life yet' and I started to reach out and get more support," said Mr now works for Change Grow Live, a charity which supports people to move away from addiction and start afresh. The 28-minute documentary was produced by One to One Development Trust - which is an arts charity - and follows people from Northamptonshire from the beginnings of their addiction through to their Judi Alston said: "When people are in addiction, they're disconnected. "All the people that are in the film have been through a process of becoming connected back to themselves, their communities, their families, the world and their ambitions in a way."That's been very interesting and very powerful."She continued: "This is an invitation for people to get ready on their recovery journey."We're not here to judge what the pathway is that people take, we're just saying there are pathways."If life feels unmanageable then take a pathway and reach out." 'Addiction doesn't discriminate' Thursday's premiere was attended by representatives from north and west Northamptonshire councils and a range of support services across the Office for Improvement and Disparities, which is a government department, gave a grant to the Watkins, a partnership development manager for Change Grow Live, encouraged anyone suffering with addiction to reach out to its STAR Northamptonshire initiative to access support, treatment, advice and recovery."Addiction doesn't discriminate, it doesn't care about your postcode, pay grade or profession," she said."Even the people you don't think would be coming to addiction services can come to us."It's just harder for those with social standing to open up and say they need that help. It's free, confidential and there's no waiting lists."A list of organisations in the UK offering support and information with some of the issues in this story is available at BBC Action Line Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BreakingNews.ie
42 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Woman who sued Boots pharmacy settles High Court action
A woman who claimed she suffered a brain bleed and stroke after taking migraine medication she bought at a Boots pharmacy has settled a High Court action against the pharmacy giant. Ms Justice Denise Brett, on the third day of the action, was told the case had been settled. The settlement is without an admission of liability. Advertisement In the proceedings, it was claimed that the medication was allegedly inappropriately sold to Sigrid O'Meara, and there was an alleged failure to advise her that the migraine medication is contraindicated with an antidepressant drug she was taking. This is due to a significant interaction between the two medications, which it was claimed can lead to a significant increase in blood pressure and stroke. All of the claims were vehemently denied by Boots. It said it could not remember Ms O'Meara but said protocol dictates that anyone purchasing that €11.99 migraine medication is referred to a pharmacist. Sigrid O'Meara had taken the migraine medication when she woke with a terrible headache on March 26, 2020. She took two tablets she had purchased from a Longford Boots pharmacy the previous October. Advertisement It was further contended that she felt dizzy and collapsed and had to be brought by ambulance to hospital. A scan showed she had a brain bleed, and she was transferred to a Dublin hospital. She was discharged from hospital a month later and was recorded as having severe left leg weakness, difficulties with her left arm and had to go for rehabilitation. Sigrid O'Meara (63), from Ballincurry, Longford has sued Boots Retail (Ireland) Ltd with a registered address at Citywest Business Campus, Citywest, Dublin. She claims she bought the migraine medication at Boots Pharmacy, Ballymahon Street, Longford. It was claimed that Ms O'Meara was caused to suffer a haemorrhagic stroke in March 2020, which it was contended, was precipitated by her ingestion of a migraine medication which was allegedly inappropriately sold allegedly without the advice that it was contraindicated to a prescribed drug she was already on. Advertisement It was claimed that at the pharmacy, she was allegedly told that the migraine medication she required was no longer available in Ireland, and an alternative medication for migraines and cluster headaches was allegedly offered. Ms O'Meara purchased a blister pack of two tablets, and it was alleged that the pharmacist was not consulted. Boots disputed this and said while they did not remember Ms O'Meara, protocol requires that anybody buying the migraine medicine has to be referred to the pharmacist. In the proceedings it was claimed that a product which allegedly could impose a hazard to Ms O'Meara's health was supplied and there was an alleged failure by the pharmacy sales assistant at the time to ensure the pharmacist was advised that the supply of that particular migraine medication may be considered. Advertisement It was further claimed that there was an alleged failure by the pharmacist to ascertain that the woman's headache had never been diagnosed as migraine by a doctor. It was contended in such circumstances, the migraine medication she purchased should not have been supplied. All of the claims were denied, and Boots said that Ms O'Meara was aware that the medication purchased at the pharmacy had never been diagnosed as suitable for her and that she had a significant history of migraines as well as other medical issues, which Boots claims was her responsibility to notify and seek advice on. Boots said it had no other way of being aware Ms O'Meara was taking a form of medication which was likely to interact negatively with a variety of different medications. Ms O'Meara, Boots contended, was the author of her own misfortune, and it claimed there was alleged contributory negligence on her part in allegedly failing to disclose that she was taking another particular drug and allegedly failing to seek advice on the choice of medicines.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
This 'dream cream' is A-listers' secret to reducing cellulite and stretch marks - here's why everyone's obsessed
Those looking to lessen the appearance of stretch marks this summer are seeing improvements with one clinically-backed body cream. And users are 'hooked'. The Body Cream by Augustinus Bader is a multi-award-winning body cream, proven to intensely hydrate skin while reducing the appearance of imperfections, cellulite, and stretch marks. An industry-wide obsession and the secret to many an A-listers beauty regime, the rich cream has wowed users in just 12 weeks. Augustinus Bader The Body Cream, 200ml Augustinus Bader's multi-award-winning The Body Cream is proven to intensely hydrate, firm, tone, and smooth while reducing the appearance of imperfections, cellulite, and stretch marks. Powered by the brand's patented TFC8, the cream delivers targeted nutrients to support cellular renewal, leaving your skin looking and feeling its best. £155 Shop Founded by globally recognized biomedical scientist Augustinus Bader and backed by decades of research, Augustinus Bader has a devout following of users, including celebrities and beauty editors who all swear by the skin-smoothing benefits. Joining the brand's bestselling skincare line, including the cult The Rich Cream, is The Body Cream. Clinically proven to reduce the appearance of cellulite and stretch marks, the body cream wowed users in clinical trials, with over 90 per cent showing a reduction in cellulite, stretch marks, and pigmentation. When it comes to combating cellulite and stretch marks, Augustinus Bader The Body Cream stands out from the crowd. Powered by the brand's patented Trigger Factor Complex known as TFC8® technology, the cream delivers targeted nutrients to support cellular renewal, leaving your skin looking and feeling its best. And wait until you see the before and after's. 'I was looking for a cream that would lift and tighten' wrote one user. 'Using this cream once a day has done just that. The effect has been; my arms really do look ten years younger. Hard to believe but true. They are beautifully nourished and supple.' Composed of natural amino acids, high-grade vitamins and synthesised molecules naturally found in skin, the cream nourishes and protects the skin, providing the optimal environment for skin's renewal, addressing concerns such as the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles, redness, hyperpigmentation, cellulite and stretch marks. There has been a huge amount of fuss in the industry for The Body Cream, which counts Margot Robbie as a fan as well as winning over beauty experts with clinical trials testifying to the 'miracle' like results. And the clinical trails are impressive. In a 12 week stretch mark reduction study, 92 per cent agreed the product helped to reduce the appearance of cellulite and 98 per cent agreed skin felt firmer and more plump. Taking 10 years to develop, and costing £155 for 200ml, the multi-award winning cream is certainly an investment and should be used religiously to see results, but according to users it is well worth it. 'Dream Cream' raved one shopper. 'I've only been using it for a few weeks and already notice my skin is smoother and there's been some diminishing of cellulite in the back of my thighs. I use this cream every night.' Another added: 'The best body cream hands down. It's hydrating, firming, non greasy and goes on very smoothly on the skin. My skin tone has improved ever since I started using it and it even reduced the appearance of cellulite, wow. I highly recommend it.'