
Manitoba declined to follow through on urgent plans to review wildfire preparedness after NDP took power
Manitoba declined to follow through on urgent plans outlined in provincial documents to conduct an external review of wildfire preparedness after the NDP took power in 2023.
The minister in charge said the province conducted internal assessments of the wildfire service instead.
In a note prepared for the incoming government marked as an "urgent issue" in the fall of 2023, Manitoba's wildfire service said it wanted to review how prepared it was to respond to the next wildfire season, detect wildfires and make tactical decisions.
That note was part of a government-transition binder prepared for NDP officials following the provincial election in October 2023, in which the previous Progressive Conservative government was defeated. That binder was later published, with some redactions.
The service said in the note that it was "exploring opportunities" to hire a consultant to conduct a forensic examination of the 2023 wildfire season and assess the preparedness of the wildfire service for the next wildfire season.
"The focus of the study would be on identifying opportunities for improvement and addressing gaps," read the note, which listed assistant deputy minister Kristin Hayward as the official responsible.
The study would have examined how decisions were made both before and during the wildfire season, whether staff requested, collected and examined the right information to prepare for and manage wildfires, and whether the service had the right systems in in place to to support "safe, efficient and effective decision-making and operations," according to the note.
The study also would have looked at "whether the right information got to the people that needed it, both on a daily operational basis and during incidents," and whether existing policies and practices were followed, according to the note.
In addition, the study would have looked at whether key wildfire service personnel had the appropriate training and experience, the note said.
'Reviewed the options': province
Since the 2023 note, the government has not hired a consultant to assess Manitoba's wildfire preparedness, according to a statement from the province, which was not attributed to any official.
"The province reviewed the options but ultimately did not proceed with using an external consultant at that time," the statement said.
Ian Bushie, Manitoba's minister of natural resources and Indigenous futures, said in a statement the province conducted internal assessments of response times, protection and wildfire forecasting in 2024 and 2025.
Those assessments were led by the wildfire service, in collaboration with other departments and agencies, he said, with a focus on "building capacity within our public service" rather than outsourcing.
"Their deep knowledge and expertise provide strong internal capacity to identify what worked and where improvements are needed," Bushie said.
In an interview late Wednesday, Bushie said he could not say whether the internal assessments conducted over the past two years replicated the external review envisioned in 2023.
"Those things are a work in progress," the minister said. "As we go forward in each season, we learn from each season, we learn in real time to be able to assess.
"So I couldn't actually go back and refer to old documents and say, yes, we've checked this box."
Bushie also said he is not aware what transpired in 2023, when a PC government was in power, to warrant a forensic examination of wildfire preparedness.
Infrastructure and Transportation Minister Lisa Naylor said during a Monday news conference that wildfire officials were prepared for everything that has transpired during the 2025 wildfire season, the worst in recent memory.
A total of 9,022 square kilometres of the province have burned so far this year, displacing roughly 22,000 people. The burned area works out to 1.6 per cent of Manitoba's land mass.
Manitoba Progressive Conservative Leader Obby Khan questioned whether the province was in fact prepared for a wildfire season of this magnitude.
"The question becomes, was this government completely caught off guard by this?" Khan asked during an interview from Ottawa.
He questioned why Manitoba did not hire an external consultant to review wildfire preparedness.
"This recommendation was made to the NDP. The NDP chose not to take action," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

National Post
44 minutes ago
- National Post
UCP Needs to Listen to Albertans and Leave the Canada Pension Plan Alone: CUPE
Article content EDMONTON, Alberta — A survey of 93,000 Albertans conducted by the provincial government has a very clear message: don't touch the Canada Pension Plan (CPP). The results were released by the government after a lengthy request for information by the Edmonton Journal. Article content CUPE Alberta President Raj Uppal says she was not surprised the survey showed 63% opposition to leaving the CPP, and only 10% support for an Alberta plan. Article content Article content 'There is no case for leaving the CPP,' said Uppal. 'An Alberta plan would cost more, and deliver weaker investment returns and smaller pensions.' Article content Uppal called on the UCP government to abandon all plans to take Alberta out of the Canada Pension Plan. Article content 'I know Danielle Smith likes to flirt with separatists, but the Canada Pension Plan is one of the strongest reasons for Alberta to remain in Canada. The Premier needs to abandon this idea and stop threatening the retirement security of Albertans.' Article content Article content Article content


National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Jamie Sarkonak: Vancouver renaming street 'šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm' puts people at risk
The City of Vancouver describes its new name for Trutch Street, 'šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm Street,' as a gift, but it's more like a curse. Article content On Tuesday, city council unanimously voted for the change, condemning 100 or so residents to a lifetime of addressarial grief. Joining them in suffering will be countless drivers who make their way down the route, delivering, visiting and otherwise trying to get from A to B. Article content Article content The new name means 'Musqueamview' in Musqueam, but the city itself admits that nobody is likely to be able to read it in its letter-salad form: 'With no fluent speakers left, this street name is a landmark moment for hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓ revitalization,' notes a webpage about the change. (That word beginning in 'h' refers to the Musqueam's traditional language.) It will replace the name of Joseph Trutch (1826-1904), B.C.'s first Lieutenant Governor who, among other things, reduced the sizes of Indigenous reserves and denied the existence of some earlier treaties. Article content Article content That remark by the city contained an important admission: the purpose of changing the name of pronounceable Trutch Street into something indecipherable at 40 km/h is political. The goal is to involve the local population in a moral exercise at the cost of their comfort and safety. Indeed, not even the Musqueam (who insisted on this visual obstacle course, according to Deputy City Manager Armin Amrolia) are going to be capable of reading it. Beyond signalling solidarity against colonialism, impeding the passage of Vancouverites and offending the local Squamish Nation, it's a functionally useless sign. Article content Article content Emergency services have already expressed their concerns that the new name will get in the way of saving lives, largely because 911 callers might not be able to pronounce the name. Most people haven't learned linguistics to the point where they can pronounce Indigenous mainstays like the theta symbol, the tiny W, the 7 and the triangle. 'Help, I'm at Sixwomkeymasem Street' is the most we can reasonably expect from people. Article content Article content To address these concerns, the city has suggested a second set of unofficial signs that read 'Musqueamview St.' (though it's unclear whether that solution has been finalized). Emergency mapping systems will use the unofficial English name, but it won't appear in the bylaw, which will use the official name instead. Licenses will have to be redone, as will insurance and registration slips. Then, there are land titles, bank addresses, credit cards, etc. Article content Anyone sending or receiving mail by Canada Post is asked to write both official and unofficial street names if possible, but to use English if only one line is available (work is being done to accept these new letters, but 'most non-English lettering is not currently recognized' our letter service told me in an email this week). Other internal and external address and map systems — such as transit or B.C.'s insurance corporation — might be unable to digest these characters.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Trump delays the TikTok ban once again
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the U.S. for another 90 days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. It is the third time Trump has extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court — took effect. The second was in April when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with U.S. ownership that fell apart after China backed out following Trump's tariff announcement. It is not clear how many times Trump can — or will — keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges to fight them. Trump has amassed more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a 'warm spot for TikTok.' As the extensions continue, it appears less and less likely that TikTok will be banned in the U.S. any time soon. The decision to keep TikTok alive through an executive order has received some scrutiny, but it has not faced a legal challenge in court — unlike many of Trump's other executive orders. Jeremy Goldman, analyst at Emarketer, called TikTok's U.S situation a 'deadline purgatory.' The whole thing 'is starting to feel less like a ticking clock and more like a looped ringtone. This political Groundhog Day is starting to resemble the debt ceiling drama: a recurring threat with no real resolution.' For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the U.S., and tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to offer and support the app, on the promise that Trump's Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them. Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50 per cent in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren't sure. Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the Trump administration is once again 'flouting the law and ignoring its own national security findings about the risks' posed by a China-controlled TikTok. 'An executive order can't sidestep the law, but that's exactly what the president is trying to do,' Warner added. Barbara Ortutay, The Associated Press