logo
Man pleads to 2023 Haven Acres shooting

Man pleads to 2023 Haven Acres shooting

Yahoo21-05-2025

TUPELO – A Lee County man arrested nearly two years ago at the age of 16 and charged as an adult has pleaded guilty to shooting into an occupied Haven Acres house.
Quintaveon Armstrong, 18, of Jan Street, Verona, pleaded guilty to the charge of shooting into a dwelling in Lee County Circuit Court on May 19. Judge John White sentenced Armstrong to 10 years in prison but suspended seven years of that sentence. When he is through serving the three-year sentence, Armstrong will have to serve an additional five years of post-release supervision.
He must also pay $2,396.50 in court costs, a $1,000 fine and $500 in court fees.
Police were summoned to a house in the 2000 block of Beasley Drive on July 15, 2023, at around 1:45 a.m. According to officials with the Tupelo Police Department, responding officers located an occupied home with multiple bullet holes.
Multiple people were in the house at the time of the shooting, including children, but no one was physically injured. Police recovered ballistic evidence at the scene. One bullet was lodged in the house about 6 inches from where a baby was sleeping.
Shortly after the shooting, police located a black Infinity sedan trying to leave the area and made a traffic stop. The four occupants of the car were detained. According to police, a search of the car revealed two stolen firearms.
Armstrong, who said at the time he lived around the corner on Robert Kennedy Drive, was charged as an adult and initially held without bond.
After he was indicted by a grand jury and arraigned, he was released on a $100,000 bond.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cal Poly building vandalized by pro-Palestinian activists; 2 suspects in custody
Cal Poly building vandalized by pro-Palestinian activists; 2 suspects in custody

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Cal Poly building vandalized by pro-Palestinian activists; 2 suspects in custody

Cal Poly's Administration Building was vandalized by pro-Palestinian activists Wednesday afternoon. According to an email sent to the Cal Poly campus community from Cal Poly president Jeffrey Armstrong, a group of five individuals entered the university's Financial Aid and Student Accounts office in the Administration Building and spray-painted graffiti on walls, windows, furniture, computers, carpets and floors on Wednesday afternoon. 'Thankfully, no one was physically harmed in the incident, but it was traumatizing for numerous Cal Poly employees and students who were in the office at the time,' Armstrong's statement read. Cal Poly police arrived, causing the five individuals to flee the scene, though two suspects have been identified and are in custody for questioning, Armstrong said. In his statement, Armstrong said there is 'simply zero tolerance' for the individuals' behavior. 'Those participating in violence and criminal activity which endangers other s will be expelled (if they are students), arrested and held fully accountable,' Armstrong's statement read. 'Anyone who views this kind of shortsighted, disgusting and illegal activity as acceptable has no place at Cal Poly and will be rooted out.' Armstrong asked anyone with information related to the incident, including the identities of those responsible, photos, videos or otherwise, to contact the Cal Poly police at 805-756-2281.

Tennessee teenager sues Christian school after suspension following LGBTQ post
Tennessee teenager sues Christian school after suspension following LGBTQ post

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Tennessee teenager sues Christian school after suspension following LGBTQ post

A Tennessee high school student is suing a religious Tennessee private school after she was suspended in May following a post on social media in which she came out as gay. Morgan Armstrong, a graduating senior at Tennessee Christian Preparatory School, posted photos on social media of her girlfriend and herself in late April. Days later, the private Cleveland, Tennessee school suspended her for the rest of the school year, banned her from campus and campus events, including her final exams and high school graduation, and terminated Armstrong's student records, according to the lawsuit. The school accused her of slander and of violating the school's social media policy by posting 'a disparaging remark reflecting the people at Tennessee Christian,' on Instagram, according to her suspension letter included in the lawsuit. Included as evidence in the letter was a screenshot of a private Snapchat message that Morgan had sent to some of her friends asking them to 'like and comment' on her post, expressing fear over potential Facebook comments from people because she had some 'ruthless Trump supporting 'Jesus' (expletives) on there.' Nothing in her message referred to the school, or involved Instagram. 'She is not talking about the school,' said Daniel Horwitz, a prominent Nashville attorney representing Armstrong. 'It's about a family member. So what they have done is copied that message into this suspension letter, but it's paired with these assertions of fact that are not accurate.' The school did not respond to requests for comment and had not filed any legal response at the time of publication. While the school's handbook states its organizational opposition to 'sexual immorality,' including 'homosexual behavior, bisexual conduct' and more, calling it 'sinful and offensive to God,' it only explicitly requires employees to adhere to the beliefs, and is not cited in Armstrong's suspension letter. In the suspension letter, the school also demanded that Armstrong 'not comment about the school or people associated with the school,' and stated that 'If online slander continues, records of posts and messages will be forwarded to colleges and universities as part of a comprehensive student file.' "Private schools are not government agencies, so they can use school discipline to regulate student speech more strictly than the First Amendment permits at public schools,' said Robert Shibley, special counsel for campus advocacy at Foundation for Individual Rights and Free Expression. 'However, being a private school student does not strip you of your First Amendment protection against being unlawfully punished by the government for your speech, whether at school or elsewhere." The letter concluded stating that the school would withhold her diploma it if its demands 'are not adhered too.' A bulk of the lawsuit rests on the school's alleged breach of contract against Armstrong, with Horwitz stating that the school did not follow its own disciplinary policies that Armstrong contractually agreed too. A first-time offense like Armstrong's, according to the school handbook, should result in a one day in-school suspension. Armstrong's lawsuit seeks to have her suspension expunged, or at least changed to be a one-day suspension in accordance with the school's written policy for first-time social media violations, and that she be allowed to take her finals and receive her diploma without stipulation. 'This is her first claimed violation of the social media policy,' Horwitz said. 'It does not permit them to do what they have done here…she knows the underlying facts here. It's her (coming out) post. It was not about the school. The only post that that she put on Instagram was the one about 'the cat's out of the bag' with photos with her girlfriend. So it's pretty clear to everybody on our side of the fence what is actually going on here, which is that they did not want to be associated with her anymore. They did not like the fact that she was gay.' The USA TODAY Network - Tennessee's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Have a story to tell? Reach Angele Latham by email at alatham@ by phone at 931-623-9485, or follow her on Twitter at @angele_latham This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Tennessee teen sues Christian school after suspension following LGBTQ post

Mother who was ‘rammed' off e-bike sometimes supplied drugs, murder trial told
Mother who was ‘rammed' off e-bike sometimes supplied drugs, murder trial told

Yahoo

time30-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Mother who was ‘rammed' off e-bike sometimes supplied drugs, murder trial told

A young mother who died on a country road after she was allegedly chased and rammed off a bike by a 4×4 'sometimes' supplied cannabis while her boyfriend drove her around to deliver it, a murder trial has heard. Jurors at Derby Crown Court were told that 25-year-old Alana Armstrong bought the Sur-Ron off-road electric bike for her boyfriend, which is not legal for road use and is known to be a 'drug-dealing type' bike. Ms Armstrong, who had one child, could 'barely' fit on the back of the saddle and was not wearing a helmet when the Land Rover Discovery allegedly ploughed into her in Batley Lane, Pleasley, Derbyshire, just after 8pm on November 26 last year. Keaton Muldoon, 23, who the court was told was a drug dealer, denies her murder and causing grievous bodily harm with intent to Ms Armstrong's boyfriend Jordan Newton-Kay, whose right leg was amputated 15cm above the knee after the crash. The defendant, of Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, admitted causing death by dangerous driving and causing serious injury by dangerous driving before the trial, the jury was told by prosecutor Sally Howes KC. The court heard that Mr Newton-Kay was riding his black, orange and blue off-road bike with Ms Armstrong on the back that evening, while a friend was on another bike. The jury heard that the three stopped at a lay-by in Sampsons Lane, near Pleasley, where the Land Rover was parked, and no words were exchanged before the vehicle spun around and 'chased' them down the country lane. On Friday, Adrian Langdale KC, defending Muldoon, cross-examined Mr Newton-Kay, who said his girlfriend of four years 'sometimes' supplied cannabis which he drove her around to deliver. The court heard that before the fatal collision, Ms Armstrong, from Tibshelf, received a message asking if she was available for a 'drop off', but Mr Newton-Kay said he was 'unsure' if they were going to deliver cannabis that evening. Mr Newton-Kay denied that he thought the 4×4 parked in the field was a police vehicle. He also denied wearing a balaclava on the evening of the incident and told the court he had not been doing wheelies and pulling out on other drivers before the collision. Mr Newton-Kay admitted he had smoked cannabis that day, but denied that influenced his recollection of events. Mr Langdale asked the witness: 'If two people pull up on a dark lane on what appears to be drug-dealing bikes, dressed all in black with masks on – that might be scary for a young man who knows the association, do you agree?', to which Mr Newton-Kay replied: 'Yes.' Mr Langdale asked the witness, who gave evidence from behind a curtain, whether the bike is designed to carry two people, to which Mr Newton-Kay said: 'No.' The barrister continued: 'You don't have any helmets on, neither of you. You seemed to suggest to police you didn't, as a general policy, wear helmets. 'You also suggested to the police you would drive, wherever you went, at maximum speed. Forty-six miles an hour to be precise. 'You were suggesting, with no seatbelts, no helmets, no safety gear at all, no brake lights, you were travelling at that speed.' Mr Newton-Kay replied: 'Yes.' The barrister asked: 'Did you seriously think that was a safe way to travel?' to which the witness responded: 'No, but I went trail to trail. I was not on roads much.' Mr Langdale added: 'You have taken the restrictor off of it (the bike) which stops it going above the legal speed limit for that bike. When I say legal speed limit I mean the off-road limit, to make it go faster.' The jury heard that the 4×4 made five attempts to hit the bike and 'kept dropping back' before it came 'out of nowhere' and knocked the couple off the bike on the fifth try. Mr Langdale said: 'A two-tonne vehicle is making contact with you going, you say, 46 miles an hour four times and not once do you come off or lose control. 'You would be off and in a hedge is what I'm suggesting to you. Your account of there being four previous rammings… is simply not right, did not happen. 'You have no real memory of how you came off the bike. You undoubtedly came into contact with the car but it was not by him ramming you deliberately.' Mr Newton-Kay replied: 'He deliberately chased me, deliberately rammed me, and left us for dead.' The trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store