LGBT ban victims take part in official VE Day celebrations for the first time
They'll take part in a service at Westminster Abbey, and in a concert in the evening on nearby Horse Guards Parade
Veterans affected by the ban on LGBT people in the military will take part in official VE Day Commemorations today for the first time.
They'll take part in a service at Westminster Abbey, and in a concert in the evening on nearby Horse Guards Parade.
They include Vito Ward, who was discharged in 1970 from the Women's Royal Naval Service for being gay.
She said: "This is a very special occasion for me as a newly reinstated veteran. If anyone had said to me I'd be included in official VE Day events - even ten years ago- I'd never have believed them."
It comes the day after Lord Etherton, the first openly gay High Court judge, who led the government's damning review into the ban, died aged 73.
As many as 20,000 armed forces personnel were jailed, dismissed for their sexuality or outed against their will before the rule on service was lifted in 2000.
Then-PM Rishi Sunak finally said sorry last July, in a victory for campaigners and the charity Fighting With Pride - with victims promised compensation.
Veterans affected by the ban are being urged to come forward to claim payouts of up to £70,000.
Ms Ward, now in her eighties, added: "I was devastated after being so unfairly kicked out of the career and military family I suited so well.
"So being part of today, recognised for what I did and could have continued to give to my country, is massive.
"I hope it will help others who suffered under the gay ban to come forward so they get the justice and money they're owed under the government's redress scheme."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Man jailed after stabbing and raping woman in Edinburgh flat
A man has been jailed for 10 and a half years after he repeatedly stabbed and raped a woman who refused to have sex with McKenna attacked the woman in the Gorgie area of Edinburgh after he locked her in a 25-year-old had recently been freed from prison on four separate bail orders by a the High Court in Edinburgh, McKenna was placed on the sex offenders' register indefinitely and Lord Scott made a non-harassment order prohibiting him from contacting the rape victim. Due to the serious charges as well as McKenna's criminal history and behaviour, the judge said he would impose an extended his prison sentence, McKenna will be under supervision for a further two-year period when he can be returned to prison if he breaches his license court heard how the attack had permanently scarred the woman who said it acted as a "daily reminder" of the rape. McKenna was convicted of abducting the woman, detaining her against her will, stabbing her with a knife, threatening to kill her and raping her to her injury and permanent disfigurement in the attack on 27 July was also convicted of attacking another woman after she turned down his sexual advances on 7 March 2023 at a flat in the Leith area of the 25-year-old threatened to stab her and another woman at the Leith flat, spat on her face, pulled her to the ground and repeatedly kicked her head. 'Victim blaming' Lord Scott said a social worker reported that both of McKenna's victims were vulnerable at the time of the judge said he had read a statement from the rape victim who had to give up her work in the aftermath of the attack in said: "She says she has never been so scared in her life."The woman said she had spoken out in a bid to ensure no one else suffered at the hands of McKenna, who is currently imprisoned in Scott said the offender had given an "almost entirely self-serving account of both incidents" to a social worker who was preparing a background said McKenna had made significant attempts at "victim blaming", adding: "You have shown no victim empathy." The court heard how McKenna had a lengthy criminal record which included violent crimes. He committed the Leith attack in March 2023 while he was subject to a community payback order as an alternative to solicitor advocate Iain McSporran KC said McKenna had clearly suffered adverse childhood experiences that impacted on his mental health and addiction Lord Scott said McKenna had carried out an escalating course of sexual offending and only a jail sentence was Sgt Craig Donnelly from Police Scotland said: "My thoughts are with the woman who showed immense strength in assisting our investigation. I hope this sentencing brings her some form of comfort."
Glasgow Times
19 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Sinn Fein minister urges BBC to ‘learn lessons' from Gerry Adams libel case
Stormont's Finance Minister John O'Dowd said he welcomed the outcome of the high-profile case. Former Sinn Fein leader Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. A jury at the High Court in Dublin awarded Mr Adams 100,000 euro (£84,000) when it found in his favour on Friday after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. It also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way. Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years. Mr Adams' legal team said the verdict of the jury was a 'full vindication' for their client while the BBC said it was 'disappointed' with the outcome, warning it could have 'profound implications and potentially 'hinder freedom of expression'. Following the jury's decision, Mr Adams said his case had been about 'putting manners' on the BBC. The veteran republican claimed the corporation upheld the ethos of the British state in Ireland and was 'out of sync' on many fronts in relation to the Good Friday peace agreement. The National Union of Journalists has described those remarks as 'chilling'. Seamus Dooley, Irish secretary of the NUJ, also said the case showed the need for reform of Ireland's defamation laws. Gerry Adams outside the High Court in Dublin after he was awarded 100,000 euro (£84,000) in damages after winning his libel action against the BBC (Brian Lawless/PA) However, Mr O'Dowd said the BBC reaction to the case indicated it was 'unwilling to learn lessons'. 'I welcome the judgment,' he told BBC Radio Ulster. 'I think it's a timely reminder that everyone has the right to defend their name in court. Gerry has been successful in his case and I think the BBC have lessons to learn, and they should instead of the knee-jerk reaction that we've heard thus far from them, I think they should take a time of reflection and reflect on that court judgment.' The minister was asked if Mr Adams' claims about the BBC upholding the ethos of the British state and being out of sync with the Good Friday Agreement reflected Sinn Fein's position on the broadcaster. 'I think it's a position that many in society hold,' he replied. 'There are many, many fine journalists from the BBC – there's no question about that. But I think the upper echelons of the BBC in the north and the reaction to the court judgment shows that they're unwilling to learn lessons. 'They're unwilling to reflect on their own role and responsibility. So, I think … this is a time for the BBC to reflect, and the upper echelons of the BBC to reflect, rather than some of the knee-jerk reactions we've seen from them thus far.'
Leader Live
19 hours ago
- Leader Live
Sinn Fein minister urges BBC to ‘learn lessons' from Gerry Adams libel case
Stormont's Finance Minister John O'Dowd said he welcomed the outcome of the high-profile case. Former Sinn Fein leader Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. A jury at the High Court in Dublin awarded Mr Adams 100,000 euro (£84,000) when it found in his favour on Friday after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. It also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way. Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years. Mr Adams' legal team said the verdict of the jury was a 'full vindication' for their client while the BBC said it was 'disappointed' with the outcome, warning it could have 'profound implications and potentially 'hinder freedom of expression'. Following the jury's decision, Mr Adams said his case had been about 'putting manners' on the BBC. The veteran republican claimed the corporation upheld the ethos of the British state in Ireland and was 'out of sync' on many fronts in relation to the Good Friday peace agreement. The National Union of Journalists has described those remarks as 'chilling'. Seamus Dooley, Irish secretary of the NUJ, also said the case showed the need for reform of Ireland's defamation laws. However, Mr O'Dowd said the BBC reaction to the case indicated it was 'unwilling to learn lessons'. 'I welcome the judgment,' he told BBC Radio Ulster. 'I think it's a timely reminder that everyone has the right to defend their name in court. Gerry has been successful in his case and I think the BBC have lessons to learn, and they should instead of the knee-jerk reaction that we've heard thus far from them, I think they should take a time of reflection and reflect on that court judgment.' The minister was asked if Mr Adams' claims about the BBC upholding the ethos of the British state and being out of sync with the Good Friday Agreement reflected Sinn Fein's position on the broadcaster. 'I think it's a position that many in society hold,' he replied. 'There are many, many fine journalists from the BBC – there's no question about that. But I think the upper echelons of the BBC in the north and the reaction to the court judgment shows that they're unwilling to learn lessons. 'They're unwilling to reflect on their own role and responsibility. So, I think … this is a time for the BBC to reflect, and the upper echelons of the BBC to reflect, rather than some of the knee-jerk reactions we've seen from them thus far.'
