logo
Shoreline, Northshore Fire Departments to merge After voter approval

Shoreline, Northshore Fire Departments to merge After voter approval

Yahoo14-02-2025

Two fire departments in North King County are declaring victory, as it looks like voters have approved a measure to combine the departments into one body.
The Shoreline Fire Department and Northshore Fire Department – which serves Kenmore and Lake Forest Park – have worked hand-in-hand under a services contract since 2022.
And now, the departments are looking to solidify that collaboration as a Regional Fire Authority.
'This creates stability. We don't have to worry about the contracts for services expiring or being terminated if you get some kind of change in leadership,' said Shoreline firefighter Erik Ingraham, who helped lead the campaign in support of Prop 1.
The ballot measure was overwhelmingly supported by firefighters and city leaders, including Kenmore Mayor Nigel Herbig.
'Integrating them fully into each other, I think, we'll get some options out of it – we'll get some better response times, we'll have a safer city and I think we'll have a better department for it,' said Herbig.
Fire officials point out that, along with improved service and training, this will also save taxpayer dollars.
'The chief has done an analysis, and he's determined that 100% of homeowners and 98% of property owners are going to see the benefits on their tax statements from this regional fire authority,' said Ingraham.
The Regional Fire Authority is expected to take effect in May.
As of Thursday, two-thirds of voters were in support.
Shoreline Fire Chief Matt Cowan released a statement, saying, 'This decision reflects our communities' shared commitment to public safety, preparedness, and service excellence. I want to express my deepest gratitude to everyone who engaged in this process—those who asked questions, attended meetings, and voted. Your support strengthens our ability to serve you and protect our residents when it matters most.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Los Angeles business owner blasts ‘Baby Shark' on repeat to ward off homeless encampments
Los Angeles business owner blasts ‘Baby Shark' on repeat to ward off homeless encampments

New York Post

time19-05-2025

  • New York Post

Los Angeles business owner blasts ‘Baby Shark' on repeat to ward off homeless encampments

A Los Angeles business owner has found a novel way to keep homeless people from camping near his building: playing a children's song on an annoying loop. 'They played 'Baby Shark' all night long,' Tracy, a woman who lives in an encampment next door to the building at the corner of West 11th and Main streets, told NBC4 Los Angeles. 'They're doing everything they can to make us move or drive us crazy. But it's doing the latter. It's driving people crazy.' Advertisement The building owners began playing the song through a loudspeaker pointed directly at the encampment, which Tracy told the outlet had 'kept her and others up all night.' 'This is ridiculous. We can't get any sleep. We can't get housing. We can't eat,' she said. 'And now they're trying to drive us crazy with children's music.' Shalom Styles, who owns the barbershop Styles Barber Lounge, around the corner from the business playing 'Baby Shark' told the outlet that they aren't trying to be mean or insensitive to the homeless, but have businesses to run and are 'just trying to survive.' 'It's not always about being kind, because when people are taking away from business, and all the stores are going out of business,' Styles said. 'We're still here surviving, trying to put up for our family.' Advertisement 5 A loudspeaker pointed towards a homeless encampment hangs on the side of a business in Los Angeles. NBC4 5 The homeless encampment is set up on the sidewalk near the business. NBC4 California Gov. Gavin Newsom released details last week about his multi-billion-dollar plan to tackle the homeless crisis in the Golden State and is pushing cities and counties to take 'immediate action.' On Monday, Newsom shared a model ordinance for cities and counties to 'immediately address dangerous and unhealthy encampments and connect people experiencing homelessness with shelter and services.' Advertisement 'There's nothing compassionate about letting people die on the streets,' Newsom said in a news release. The ordinance is backed in part by $3.3 billion in new Prop 1 funding, Newsom's office announced, adding that the governor is 'calling on all local governments to act without delay.' 5 NBC4 5 Tracy, a resident of the encampment, speaks out against the 'Baby Shark' blasting building. NBC4 Advertisement Newsom is also encouraging local leaders to use their authority, affirmed by the US Supreme Court, to address homeless encampments. 'The Governor is calling on every local government to adopt and implement local policies without delay,' Newsom's office said. Newsom's office told Fox News Digital that the governor has 'actively held communities accountable who do not follow state law to address homelessness', sharing an example of when the state sued the City of Norwalk in 2024 for 'its unlawful ban on homeless shelters.' 5 Shalom Styles, who owns the barbershop Styles Barber Lounge, around the corner, says the owners aren't trying to be mean or insensitive to the homeless, but have businesses to run and are 'just trying to survive.' NBC4 The governor's office added that, while national homelessness went up by nearly 7% last year, California's increase was only 0.45% and was lower than those of 44 other states. 'Governor Newsom is the first governor to actively address this issue in our state, and he is reversing a crisis that was decades in the making,' Newsom's office said.

California wrestles with approach to homeless encampments
California wrestles with approach to homeless encampments

Yahoo

time16-05-2025

  • Yahoo

California wrestles with approach to homeless encampments

May 16 (UPI) -- California Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled his model ordinance to address homeless encampments with dignity this week but advocates say the approach ignores real solutions. Newsom's ordinance "Addressing Encampments with Urgency and Dignity" calls on local jurisdictions to immediately begin removing homeless encampments, giving 48 hours notice when possible. Jay Wierenga, deputy secretary of communications for the California Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency, told UPI the issue of addressing encampments is ultimately a local issue. "The governor's model ordinance is a template for them to address encampments with care, humanity and urgency," Wierenga said. "They can, and should, begin this work immediately. The governor's actions are reversing a crisis that is decades old, as the numbers show." Newsom and the state government have blunted the growth of the population of unhoused people who are completely without shelter, according to Jennifer Hanson, assistant deputy director of external affairs for Housing and Community Development. Unsheltered homelessness grew by 7% in the United States but only 0.45% in California. In the five years prior to Newsom being elected governor, unsheltered homelessness grew twice as fast, on average, than it has during Newsom's term, Hanson added. "This administration is the first to have made addressing homelessness a top priority and has provided local governments with unprecedented assistance to address it," Hanson told UPI in an email. "California is now reversing decades of inaction." The ordinance is backed, in part, by $3.3 billion in voter-approved Prop 1 funds. In the fall, the governor's office said the state invested $40 billion to create more housing and $27 billion to "help prevent and end homelessness." The California State Association of Counties pushed back on the claim that $27 billion has gone to address homelessness, Jeff Griffiths, president and Inyo County supervisor, told UPI. "Nearly half of that is for housing," Griffiths said. "It hasn't actually translated into units built on the ground that are sufficient enough to meet the scale of the problem." Griffiths agrees that county leaders would like to see encampments cleared but Newsom's ordinance lacks any assurance that there will be shelter or transitional or permanent housing for people. "The problem is clearing an encampment doesn't do anything if there's no place for those people to go," he said. "What we need are clearly delineated responsibilities of which level of government is responsible for which part of solving the homeless issue and then we need sustained funding." California currently allocates $1 billion annually toward counties to address homelessness. This sum is spread across the 58 counties in the state. Griffiths noted that this amount of funding is inadequate, and the short-term nature of providing funding annually makes it difficult for county governments to plan long-term solutions. CSAS has designed its own framework for addressing homelessness in California, the At Home plan. It calls for a clearer breakdown of the roles of different levels of government in addressing the issue, increasing and maintaining affordable housing units to meet a variety of needs and increased outreach programs and workforce to support those programs. The plan also calls for more social safety nets to prevent people from becoming homeless and the creation of programs and employment opportunities for people who are unhoused. "We will continue to work in good faith on all of the initiatives for having a comprehensive solution to homelessness," Griffiths said. "We believe the framework is there to make a significant impact on this problem. We just need to get buy-in and support from the state." Newsom's announcement of a model ordinance credits the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Grants Pass, Ore., vs. Johnson for clarifying state and local governments' rights when addressing homeless encampments. Since that decision, more than 150 jurisdictions across more than 30 states have passed ordinances allowing them to punish people for camping on public property. Jesse Rabinowitz, communications and campaign director for the National Homelessness Law Center, told UPI the broad attempt to criminalize homelessness is backed by the Cicero Institute. The Cicero Institute is a conservative think tank that advocates for a complete ban on street camping. It also proposes that people not be allowed to sleep, camp or take long-term shelter on federal lands such as national parks. In March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to remove all homeless encampments located in national parks in the District of Columbia. "California certainly has put money toward solutions to solve homelessness, like housing and support. It's not enough," Rabinowitz said. "This criminalization approach is going to dampen the effects of all the good work that service providers and activists on the ground have done in California." "If we want to solve homelessness in California, we need to focus exclusively on what works, which is housing services, and not waste resources and time by punishing people, by displacing people and by arresting people for sleeping outside when they have nowhere to go," he added.

California wrestles with approach to homeless encampments

UPI

time16-05-2025

  • UPI

California wrestles with approach to homeless encampments

1 of 2 | A homeless man stays warm next to a fire during a rain break in the Skid Row section of Los Angeles on Feb. 25, 2023. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo May 16 (UPI) -- California Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled his model ordinance to address homeless encampments with dignity this week but advocates say the approach ignores real solutions. Newsom's ordinance "Addressing Encampments with Urgency and Dignity" calls on local jurisdictions to immediately begin removing homeless encampments, giving 48 hours notice when possible. Jay Wierenga, deputy secretary of communications for the California Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency, told UPI the issue of addressing encampments is ultimately a local issue. "The governor's model ordinance is a template for them to address encampments with care, humanity and urgency," Wierenga said. "They can, and should, begin this work immediately. The governor's actions are reversing a crisis that is decades old, as the numbers show." Newsom and the state government have blunted the growth of the population of unhoused people who are completely without shelter, according to Jennifer Hanson, assistant deputy director of external affairs for Housing and Community Development. Unsheltered homelessness grew by 7% in the United States but only 0.45% in California. In the five years prior to Newsom being elected governor, unsheltered homelessness grew twice as fast, on average, than it has during Newsom's term, Hanson added. "This administration is the first to have made addressing homelessness a top priority and has provided local governments with unprecedented assistance to address it," Hanson told UPI in an email. "California is now reversing decades of inaction." The ordinance is backed, in part, by $3.3 billion in voter-approved Prop 1 funds. In the fall, the governor's office said the state invested $40 billion to create more housing and $27 billion to "help prevent and end homelessness." The California State Association of Counties pushed back on the claim that $27 billion has gone to address homelessness, Jeff Griffiths, president and Inyo County supervisor, told UPI. "Nearly half of that is for housing," Griffiths said. "It hasn't actually translated into units built on the ground that are sufficient enough to meet the scale of the problem." Griffiths agrees that county leaders would like to see encampments cleared but Newsom's ordinance lacks any assurance that there will be shelter or transitional or permanent housing for people. "The problem is clearing an encampment doesn't do anything if there's no place for those people to go," he said. "What we need are clearly delineated responsibilities of which level of government is responsible for which part of solving the homeless issue and then we need sustained funding." California currently allocates $1 billion annually toward counties to address homelessness. This sum is spread across the 58 counties in the state. Griffiths noted that this amount of funding is inadequate, and the short-term nature of providing funding annually makes it difficult for county governments to plan long-term solutions. CSAS has designed its own framework for addressing homelessness in California, the At Home plan. It calls for a clearer breakdown of the roles of different levels of government in addressing the issue, increasing and maintaining affordable housing units to meet a variety of needs and increased outreach programs and workforce to support those programs. The plan also calls for more social safety nets to prevent people from becoming homeless and the creation of programs and employment opportunities for people who are unhoused. "We will continue to work in good faith on all of the initiatives for having a comprehensive solution to homelessness," Griffiths said. "We believe the framework is there to make a significant impact on this problem. We just need to get buy-in and support from the state." Newsom's announcement of a model ordinance credits the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Grants Pass, Ore., vs. Johnson for clarifying state and local governments' rights when addressing homeless encampments. Since that decision, more than 150 jurisdictions across more than 30 states have passed ordinances allowing them to punish people for camping on public property. Jesse Rabinowitz, communications and campaign director for the National Homelessness Law Center, told UPI the broad attempt to criminalize homelessness is backed by the Cicero Institute. The Cicero Institute is a conservative think tank that advocates for a complete ban on street camping. It also proposes that people not be allowed to sleep, camp or take long-term shelter on federal lands such as national parks. In March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to remove all homeless encampments located in national parks in the District of Columbia. "California certainly has put money toward solutions to solve homelessness, like housing and support. It's not enough," Rabinowitz said. "This criminalization approach is going to dampen the effects of all the good work that service providers and activists on the ground have done in California." "If we want to solve homelessness in California, we need to focus exclusively on what works, which is housing services, and not waste resources and time by punishing people, by displacing people and by arresting people for sleeping outside when they have nowhere to go," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store