PBS sues Trump White House over executive order to cut funding
PBS filed a federal lawsuit Friday asking a court to block the May 1 executive order by the Trump White House to cut off funding to public media, calling the move a violation of the 1st Amendment.
The suit from the service that airs "Sesame Street," Ken Burns documentaries and the "PBS NewsHour" for free to millions of American homes, said that Congress has repeatedly protected PBS from political interference by filtering its funds through the Corp. for Public Broadcasting, which is not a federal agency.
"The [executive order] makes no attempt to hide the fact that it is cutting off the flow of funds to PBS because of the content of PBS programming and out of a desire to alter the content of speech."
NPR, which also receives CPB funding, filed a suit on similar grounds on Tuesday.
Read more: PBS and NPR on edge over FCC letter and Trump budget scrutiny
The White House alleges that PBS has "zero tolerance for non-leftist viewpoints." Trump's order called for an end to government dollars for CPB, the taxpayer-backed entity that has provided funding to NPR and PBS for decades through Congress.
Trump called the public media outlets 'left wing propaganda.' The White House press release announcing the order — titled "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media" — contained 19 bullet points citing news coverage and other content by NPR and PBS that prompted the action.
The PBS suit says the data the White House cited to support that view are inaccurate and misrepresent the balanced range of viewpoints presented on PBS programs.
The White House has also asserted that government funding of broadcast media is no longer necessary in an era when consumers have a vast array of platforms for information and entertainment. PBS was founded when most of the country only had access to the three commercial broadcast networks and a handful of other TV stations.
PBS' suit also says that, regardless of any policy disagreements the administration may have over the role of public television, "our Constitution and laws forbid the President from serving as the arbiter of content of PBS's programming, including by attempting to defund PBS."
Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon is getting louder about his US debt worries
JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon is increasingly concerned that the US government's surging debt is going to cause problems for the bond market, prompting some pushback from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Last Friday, the boss of the biggest US bank predicted a "crack" in that market while speaking at the Reagan National Economic Forum in Simi Valley, Calif. "It is going to happen. And I tell this to my regulators, some of you who are in this room, I'm telling you it's going to happen, and you're going to panic." This past weekend, Bessent dismissed that prediction, saying Dimon has made it before. "I've known Jamie a long time and for his entire career he's made predictions like this. Fortunately, none of them have come true. That's why he's a banker, a great banker. He tries to look around the corner," Bessent said in an interview on CBS' "Face the Nation." Dimon emerged in 2025 as an influential voice when it comes to the policies of the new Trump administration — and as someone who apparently has President Trump's ear. The president even acknowledged listening to Dimon just hours before he announced a 90-day pause of his "Liberation Day" tariffs on April 9. Dimon repeated his warnings about the bond market in an interview with Fox Business Network's Maria Bartiromo that aired Monday, saying the surging US national debt may create a "tough time" for that market as spreads widen. "If people decide that the US dollar isn't the place to be, you could see credit spreads gap out; that would be quite a problem," Dimon said. "It hurts the people raising money. That includes small businesses, that includes loans to small businesses, includes high-yield debt, includes leveraged lending, includes real estate loans. That's why you should worry about volatility in the bond market." Long-term Treasury yields have been climbing in recent weeks, driven by growing concerns over the trajectory of US debt as President Trump's proposed tax legislation advances to the Senate after clearing the House. Read more: What is the 10-year Treasury note, and how does it affect your finances? New concerns emerged last week after a Manhattan-based trade court struck down a wide swath of Trump's tariffs, citing legal issues with how they were implemented. Although a federal appeals court paused that decision on Thursday, temporarily allowing the tariffs to remain in place, the legal back-and-forth has added to market uncertainty. Treasury yields initially spiked on Monday, with the 10-year (^TNX) climbing to 4.46% while the 30-year (^TYX) reached 4.99% by the end of the day. They briefly retreated on Tuesday, only to return to Monday levels, a threshold breached only a handful of times since 2007. Bessent told CBS this past weekend that the administration's work on getting down the deficit is underway. "The deficit this year is going to be lower than the deficit last year, and in two years it will be lower again," he said. "We are going to bring the deficit down slowly. We didn't get here in one year, and this has been a long process." The administration intends to "leave the country in great shape in 2028," he added. One area that would cushion a bond market tantrum that the Trump administration has clearly telegraphed is giving JPMorgan and other big banks a larger role as US Treasury holders, and possibly dealers. Bessent has repeatedly said he wants to adjust a bank capital requirement known as the supplemental leverage ratio (SLR) to make it easier for lenders in order to inject more liquidity into the market for US government debt. Dimon agrees that amending the SLR would help the market during times of stress, though he noted that he also wants to see reforms across lots of capital requirements. "The reason to change some of these things is so banks — the big market makers could intermediate more in the markets," Dimon told analysts in April. "If they do, spreads will come in, there'll be more active traders," Dimon said. "If they don't, the Fed will have to intermediate, which I think is just a bad policy idea that every time there's a kerfuffle in the markets, the Fed has to come in and intermediate." To prevent a bond market crack, Dimon said in the Fox News interview that aired Monday, "the real focus should be [economic] growth." He also named several places for improvement from regulatory, permitting, and education reforms to broader government efficiency efforts meant to stamp out waste and fraud in Medicare and Medicaid. Dimon gave Fox an update about his plans to leave the bank eventually, saying that his retirement is still "several years away" but that "it's up to God and the board," the 69-year-old CEO said. "I love what I do." On Tuesday, the bank announced in a memo that it was giving more responsibility to one of Dimon's potential successors, consumer bank boss Marianne Lake. Lake will also oversee strategic growth and the overseas consumer bank following Sanoke Viswanathan's departure to become CEO of data provider FactSet. David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
25 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Elon Musk Calls Trump Megabill a ‘Disgusting Abomination'
WASHINGTON—Former White House cost-cutting czar Elon Musk called President Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax and spending package a 'disgusting abomination,' stepping up his criticism just as the Senate is trying to quickly pass the measure and get it signed into law by July 4. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' said Musk, in comments on his X social-media platform. Musk, who left the administration last week, called the package a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.'
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge extends pause of order invalidating Trump's tariffs
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., extended a pause of his order invalidating the bulk of President Trump's tariffs until an appeals court can resolve the case. U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras had already agreed to put his ruling on hold for two weeks when he issued it, but Tuesday's extension lasts indefinitely until the appeals court rules. It's the latest development in what has been a whirlwind week for the legal battle surrounding Trump's tariffs. Two federal courts found Trump's use of an emergency law to justify tariffs unlawful, but neither ruling is currently in effect. In response to a lawsuit filed by two education businesses, Contreras on Thursday invalidated Trump's reciprocal 'Liberation Day' tariffs and those he recently imposed on China that cited fentanyl trafficking. The ruling landed hours after the U.S. Court of International Trade blocked those tariffs and ones Trump imposed on Canada and Mexico. That ruling came in response to suits filed by another group of businesses and a coalition of Democratic-led states. The Trump administration quickly brought the legal battle to the appeals courts and asked to immediately halt the injunctions, warning that allowing them to take effect would curtail Trump's leverage to make trade deals with other countries. The two appeals are taking place in separate courts. In the case decided by the trade court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit quickly agreed to pause the ruling until the next stage of the appeal. Contreras's ruling heads to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which has not yet intervened. But noting the Federal Circuit's pause, Contreras went ahead and put his decision on hold indefinitely. 'The Court acknowledged the national security and foreign policy concerns raised by Defendants but determined that those consequences would flow, if at all, from the' trade court's order, Contreras wrote. 'That order has now been stayed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. A stay in this action is therefore appropriate to protect the President's ability to identify and respond to threats to the U.S. economy and national security,' Contreras, an appointee of former President Obama, continued. The cases are just some of the legal challenges to Trump's tariffs. But federal judges in California, Montana and Florida have declined to consider other lawsuits filed in their courts, telling plaintiffs they instead need to bring their case before the trade court. U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Corley, an appointee of former President Biden who serves in San Francisco, did so on Tuesday and dismissed a lawsuit filed by California and Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).
