Israeli startups make global plans after key role in war
TEL AVIV, Jan 31 (Reuters) - The drone that tracked Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and filmed him as he lay dying, opens new tab in footage beamed around the world last October was made by Israeli startup Xtend, according to media reports, one of many such firms to get a boost from Israel's war needs.
Xtend's co-founder and CEO Aviv Shapira declined to comment on the unsourced reports, but told Reuters his company provides indoor drones to the Israeli army, which has looked beyond just major manufacturers for a cutting edge in its assault on Gaza that followed Hamas' deadly attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
Xtend drones integrate artificial intelligence to conduct high-precision strikes, and can be operated from 9,000 kilometres (5,600 miles) away with minimal human intervention.
"We're actually re-learning how to fight with robots," Shapira said in an interview.
The Israeli Defence Force and Israeli defence ministry declined to comment on the equipment used to target Sinwar.
In Ukraine, startups making drones and other military technology and equipment have proliferated, and helped it hold off much larger Russian forces. Small, nimble companies with a focus on innovation have proved vital in a war where rapid solutions can trump years of design and product testing.
Startups are a "group of few people that can do something in weeks", and war creates an urgency for immediately usable technology, said military expert Isaac Ben-Israel.
Israel already had a thriving startup scene, meaning its companies may be better placed to capitalise on the wartime boom, with some already winning orders from abroad and aiming to shape the battlefield of the future.
In less than a year and a half of war, Xtend has signed a major contract with Israel's defence ministry, raised $40 million in its second funding round in August, and signed an $8.8 million contract with the U.S. government, Shapira said.
Sequoia Capital, a U.S. venture capital fund managing around $85 billion focusing on early-stage investment, returned to investing in Israel after the Oct. 7 attacks, having previously not invested in companies there since 2016.
"War gives people experience," Sequoia partner Shawn Mcguire told Reuters.
High-tech is Israel's economic engine, accounting for 16% of employment, more than half of exports, a third of income taxes, and 20% of overall economic output.
'NEW CAPABILITIES'
Xtend's Shapira was carrying his surfboard to the beach on Oct. 7 when he heard sirens warning of incoming rockets from Gaza. In less than 12 hours, he had dispatched a fleet of drones to help search and secure buildings, he said, in the kind of rapid response essential in emergencies.
Since the start of the war, Israel's defence ministry has been working with startups "to improve and deploy new capabilities for our forces in the field," Colonel Nir Weingold, head of planning, economics and IT at the ministry's Directorate of Defense Research & Development (DDR&D), told Reuters.
The ministry has a "green path" for selected startups under which it fast-tracks its licensing process, and said it awarded orders to 101 startups and small companies to support the war effort totalling 782 million shekels ($219 million) between Oct. 7, 2023, and the end of 2024.
More than 25 of those startups had transitioned from development to production due to the war, it said, adding around 50% of anti-drone technology used by Israel's military during the conflict came from startups.
This collaboration was on display at the first-ever Global DefenseTech conference organised by the DDR&D with the Blavatnik Cyber Research Center at Tel Aviv University that showcased dozens of startups, catching the eye of major multi-nationals.
"War is good for business and Israel has been a major partner," said Ayal Somech, head of growth and innovation at Boeing Israel, on a panel at the conference.
Anti-drone technology has been a particular challenge for Israeli forces as they have faced different hardware in attacks from Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Iran, and the Houthis in Yemen.
Lior Segal, the co-founder of Israel's Thirdeye Systems, which makes advanced warning systems for attack drones, told Reuters that its contacts with Israel's defence ministry went from development phase to winning "meaningful contracts" during the war.
The company, whose shares have risen about 50% since the start of the conflict, said it now had seven-to-eight product lines, compared with around three before the war.
On Tuesday, Thirdeye, whose customers include NATO countries as well as Israel, said it had sold a 30% stake to Emirati state-owned defence conglomerate EDGE for $10 million, in a rare public investment by an Emirati firm in Israel.
The investment will help Thirdeye expand into new markets, Segal said in a statement, though it is contingent on approval from Israel's defence ministry and other milestones.
($1 = 3.5765 shekels)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
15 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Tommy Robinson back in court for harassment – just nine days after he was released from prison
IN THE DOCK Tommy Robinson back in court for harassment – just nine days after he was released from prison TOMMY Robinson is back in court today for harassment - just days after he was released from prison. The far-Right activist - real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon - is accused of targeting two journalists. Advertisement 5 Tommy Robinson is back in court today Credit: Reuters 5 He was surrounded by supporters as he made his way into Westminster Magistrates' Court Credit: Reuters 5 It comes after he was released from jail nine days ago Credit: PA Robinson has arrived at Westminster Magistrates' Court for a hearing. The 42-year-old, who was clutching a microphone, was surrounded by supporters. He is charged with two counts of harassment causing fear of violence between August 5 and 7, 2024. It comes just nine days after Robinson was released from prison after a judge ruled he could be freed four months early. Advertisement He was locked up for 18 months in October for contempt of court. Robinson had made multiple breaches of an injunction in 2021, which barred him from repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him for libel. He was pictured leaving HMP Woodhill in Buckinghamshire sporting a full beard and rosary. He was filmed speaking on his X social media channel for around 20 minutes. Advertisement When asked how he was feeling, Robinson declared: "Unfortunately the country doesn't believe in free speech." He also said he would organise a free speech festival in London for supporters later in the year. Robinson is facing a separate trial in October next year over an accusation that he failed to provide the Pin for his mobile phone when stopped by Kent Police in Folkestone in July 2024. 5 Robinson appeared more clear-shaven today Credit: AFP Advertisement
The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
Ukraine's remarkable Operation Spiderweb shows how warfare has changed
While the real details remain scant of Ukraine's recent swarm drone strike across swathes of Russia all the way from the Arctic region to the Far East, enough is known for the world to sit up and take notice. Analysts might be split over their assessment of just how damaging Operation Spiderweb was on Russia's long-range strategic bomber fleet. On the 'optimistic' side the attack say some destroyed several scores of aircraft, while those a little more cautious with the estimates, insist it was perhaps only a dozen or so. In one sense the numbers don't really matter but other things certainly do. To begin with, when seen from Ukraine's perspective, the daring attack sent a clear message to the Kremlin that nowhere is untouchable in Russia. READ MORE: 'New low': SNP slam Labour over MP lobbying trip to Israel amid Gaza genocide Far from not having any 'cards to play' as US president told his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Kyiv has made it clear that not only does it still hold cards but plays them with great audacity and cunning as it has done from the moment Russia invaded Ukrainian territory. The operation has also delivered a morale as well as strategic boost at a time when many Ukrainians felt that their backs were to the wall like never before. Just to add to that boost, a few days later Ukraine released a video of another attack, this time on Russia's most important link to Crimea, the Kerch Bridge. The fact that it was recorded using Russia's own surveillance system, once again displayed the out-of-the-box thinking that has become the hallmark of Ukraine's military intelligence and special forces operations. Almost from day one, Russia has found Ukraine a formidable adversary and has been itself on the receiving end of a number of ignominious strikes including the loss of its Black Sea Fleet flagship, the Moskva, and much of the Black Sea Fleet itself at the hands of a country which effectively lacks a navy. But there are wider messages the world can take from Operation Spiderweb, too, the first being that this war has now moved well beyond the parameters of its early days. With every month that passes in the conflict, the capacity for it to escalate into a new dangerous realm intensifies. Russian military assets wherever they might be, are now fully in Ukraine's crosshairs. Ukraine's own civilian population meanwhile have never been off limits to Russian forces and Moscow appears hell-bent on doubling down on them at every turn. Every war has its tipping points, and you can't help but feel that it would only take one serious overstep or miscalculation between these two protagonists for this to move into the unthinkable and Russia's use of its nuclear capability which in turn could drag in Ukraine's allies in an unprecedented way. But there are other messages also to be taken from Operation Spiderweb. As The Economist magazine pointed out in its aftermath, the world must wake up to the fact that 'new technology, deployed inventively, can be disproportionately lethal. The other is that the battlefield now stretches deep behind the front line, overturning the assumptions of the past quarter century'. In all of the visits I've made to Ukraine since the Russian invasion in 2022, I've been struck by the hybrid or new methods of warfare coming out of the conflict. As I once described it to a friend, what you encounter is like a cross between the Battle of the Somme and something out of the movie Bladerunner. READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn brings in bill for public inquiry into UK complicity in Gaza genocide Or to put this another way, a war in which its protagonists live in a 'whites of their eyes' encounter one minute while at other times bringing injury or death to the enemy on a screen as you would in a computer video game. The power of drone warfare has been there for all to see and is causing a rethink of weapons priorities across the world. Russia and China have made drone technology a priority while the best that can be said for Europe is that it lags considerably behind. Which brings me to Britain's recent Strategic Defence Review, published curiously enough only the day after Operation Spiderweb. To hear Prime Minister Keir Starmer talk of making Britain a 'battle-ready, armour-clad nation' and moving to a state of 'warfighting readiness,' sent a chill down my spine. Listening also to UK Defence Secretary, John Healey, talk as if war with Russia was just around the corner was likewise enough to give anyone sleepless nights. God knows I'm no fan of this Labour Government – anything but – but when all is said and done it's impossible to get away from the fact that the world in which we live presents ever-increasing threats by the day. Those who would argue that by chucking more money and effort at preparedness and upgrading the UK's military might only make things worse do have a point. But only the most naive would assume that other nations, perhaps Russia or China, or even non-state actors, would not seek to take every advantage were Britain and its European allies to drop their guard. Some in fact might argue that for too long now that guard has been dropped and complacency set in hence the sudden realisation of vulnerability. Not being prepared for crises is not only stupid but a sign of poor government and whatever Starmer says there remains the glaring gap between ambition and money when it comes to defence. That said, the review is right in its warning that 'emerging technologies are already changing the character of warfare more profoundly than at any point in human history'. I'm sure we all wish it were otherwise. I'm sure too we would much prefer it were every single diplomatic effort made to reduce tensions across the globe to avoid the need to harness such technology for warfare. I wish the world was full of pacifists, but it's not, that is the inescapable evidence of history. After 40 years as a correspondent witnessing wars up close, I for one need no convincing of how much better it is to deter war than wage it.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump is right to protect American citizens. We should protect ours
Sometimes the best policies are the ones that produce the shrillest wails from the Left. Such may be the case with Trump's latest travel ban, which by rights should spark serious soul-searching in Britain. Overnight, the President announced restrictions on the citizens of 12 countries. This was a response to the recent terror attack on Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is alleged to have thrown firebombs and sprayed burning petrol at a Jewish vigil on Sunday in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Although Egypt is not on the list, Homeland Security officials said Mr Soliman was in the country illegally, having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022. So far, so Trumpian. (He took similar measures during his first term, after all, and they were repealed by Joe Biden who called them 'a stain on our national conscience'.) But then came the kicker. 'We will not let what happened in Europe happen in America,' Trump said. Ouch. If the months of Trump 2.0 have so far shifted the Overton window across the West, allowing even the likes of Sir Keir Starmer to contemplate – at least rhetorically – tackling immigration, then such a travel ban should be welcomed on these shores as well. Already, the usual suspects are accusing Trump of being 'racist'. But a glance at the range of countries on the list shows that this is not a question of race, or even religion. Rather, it is a question of homeland security, and that holds a stark lesson for Britain. A few months back, official data revealed that though foreigners comprise just 15 per cent of the population of our country, they commit 41 per cent of all crime and up to a quarter of sex crimes. In the first nine months of 2024, almost 14 per cent of grooming suspects were Pakistani, five times their share of the population. Two nationalities – Afghans and Eritreans – were more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual offence convictions than British citizens, according to the data. Overall, foreign nationals were 71 per cent more likely than Britons to be responsible for sex crime convictions. Based on convictions per 10,000 of the population, Afghans with 77 convictions topped the table with a rate of 59 per 10,000, 22.3 times that of Britons. They were followed by Eritreans, who accounted for 59 convictions at a rate of 53.6 per 10,000 of their population. In March 2025, data from the Ministry of Justice revealed that foreigners, who claim £1 billion a month in benefits, were also responsible for large proportions of violence, robbery, fraud and drug offences, between 2021 and 2023. There was no data for terrorism offences or acts of anti-Semitism. But does anybody want to hazard a guess? Which brings us to a fundamental question. Why? Why does Britain need to allow the criminals of the world to come to our shores to abuse women and girls, run criminal enterprises, foster terrorism and anti-Semitism, and claim benefits in the process? Obviously not all foreigners from these countries behave in this way. But facts aren't racist. Large numbers are pulling down our pants, spanking our buttocks and pulling them up again. In fact, the problem is not one of race but one of politics and culture. In my new book, Never Again? How the West Betrayed the Jews and Itself, which is coming out at the end of September, I look at groundbreaking research published in April by cognitive scientists Scott Barry Kaufman and Craig Neumann. They found that 'citizens in democratic countries have more benevolent traits, fewer malevolent traits, and greater well-being' than those living under autocratic regimes. Based on a study of 200,000 people from 75 countries, people living under autocracies were found to be much more likely to exhibit the 'Dark Triad' of negative personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. In democracies, by contrast, more people displayed the 'Light Triad' of humanism, faith in humanity and 'Kantianism', or treating people with dignity in their own right rather than viewing them as a means to an end. Obviously, this is not related to race. Russians are hardly black, but they hardly live in a democracy either. It is a case of cognitive development. The problem occurs when, in an age of global travel, 'Dark Triad' migrants who grew up in despotic regimes encounter gullible 'Light Triad' officials in the democracies, whose empathies are easily played upon. That is why we find British judges ruling that an Albanian convict should avoid deportation because his son had an aversion to foreign chicken nuggets, a Pakistani drug dealer could stay so he could teach his son about Islam, and a paedophile of the same nationality should not be sent home since it would be 'unduly harsh' on his own children. These real-life cases, reported by the Telegraph, provide a clear collision of the 'Dark Triad' traits in the criminals and the 'Light Triad' tendencies in the judges. It is a chemical reaction waiting to happen, and the vast majority of the population, wherever they are born, are suffering the consequences. In other words, we are being taken for fools. No foreign criminal has a God-given right to set up home in Britain just because he fancies it. This is our home, and although we are delighted to welcome strangers, that generosity should be withdrawn from those who nick our television and threaten our children – even if their own happen to like the chicken nuggets in our fridge. Trump has now thrown down the gauntlet. What is the British Government going to do to set our own house in order? Will it take an anti-Semitic outrage like the firebombing in Colorado before the Prime Minister takes action? Will he take action even then?
