logo
There is a cancer at the heart of the Catholic Church and Francis's successor must tackle it

There is a cancer at the heart of the Catholic Church and Francis's successor must tackle it

Telegraph27-04-2025

From his very first appearance greeting crowds in St Peter's Square in Rome on March 13 2013, Pope Francis made warmth, good humour and charisma his hallmarks as he bestrode the world stage. Only on a small handful of occasions over his dozen years as pontiff was that easy charm absent.
We all have off days, but one such unhappy encounter during his January 2018 visit to Chile is particularly significant, since it revealed his failure to adequately address one of the greatest scandals to engulf Catholicism in its long history – clerical sex abuse.
While in Chile, Francis had been publicly rebuked by victims of cleric abuse for appointing a priest, Juan Barros, as a bishop in the diocese of Osorno despite claims that he knew (from complaints by victims sent to the Vatican) of allegations that Barros had witnessed and covered-up what the Church itself had already formally judged to be sexual exploitation of young people by a popular priest, Fernando Karadima.
Francis's response to being challenged was angry and unmeasured. 'It is calumny,' he snapped. 'Is that clear?'
It prompted demonstrations in Chile by loyal Catholics who would otherwise have been out in the street celebrating a papal visit. Barros denied any wrongdoing, but even Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston, who heads the Commission for the Protection of Minors, set up by Francis in 2014 to take 'decisive action' on clerical sex abuse, publicly rebuked his boss. Francis's words, he said, 'abandon those who have suffered reprehensible criminal violations of their human dignity and relegate survivors to discredited exile'.
In fairness to Francis – and much more in keeping with that popular image of him as a pope who encouraged the Catholic Church to change entrenched teachings on sex and gender – he subsequently sent an envoy to Chile on a fact-finding mission, then summoned all 31 Chilean bishops to Rome for a ticking-off and finally sacked three of them.
He also met victims of Karadima to apologise, and reportedly told them, 'I was part of the problem'. He made a point of sitting down in private gatherings and listening to others who had been groomed and betrayed by clerics throughout his pontificate.
Yet in the years that followed, his promise to put the problem right did not translate into action. All experts advise that two changes are needed to ensure youngsters are safe around priests. The first is to agree to a wholly independent safeguarding process, rather than the current set-up where the Church acts as judge and jury. And the second – as recommended in 2017 by a Royal Commission on child abuse in Australia – is to introduce mandatory reporting of such abuse by any individual who sees or hears about it, including priests in the confessional. Francis refused to do either.
'The idea of Francis turning over a new leaf on all of this feels very hollow to victims and survivors,' the lawyer Richard Scorer told me in 2023. He has represented hundreds of victims of clerical sex abuse in the UK. 'The harm caused [to them] by abuse is lifelong. Closure is generally a very glib word. I'm not sure people get it. They struggle to achieve it.'
Francis, of course, was not the only pope to fail in this crucial area, where the numbers involved are extraordinary, covering between 1.5 and 5% of all ordained clergy over the past half century according to Vatican officials' own estimates. Indeed, he did considerably better than his two predecessors. But still not good enough.
John Paul II (pontiff from 1978 to 2005) simply ignored thousands of reports of abuse sent to him by victims, and allowed both the disgraced American cardinal Bernard Law, who covered-up such cases in his diocese, and the Mexican priest Marcial Maciel, a serial abuser, to escape justice by giving them sanctuary in the Vatican. Benedict XVI (2005-2013) did better – banning Maciel from taking services, but still not deporting him to face trial.
Yet to measure Francis against his pledge, soon after his election, to take 'decisive action' quickly is to see him fail. The Commission for the Protection of Minors was his structural answer, established in 2014 as part of the Vatican bureaucracy, known as the curia. It even included on its board victims of clerical abuse. But one of them, Marie Collins from Ireland, first publicly criticised it for lacking sufficient funding in 2015, and then resigned in 2017, alleging that the continued presence of 'men [at senior levels] in the Church who resist or hinder the work to protect children is just not acceptable.'
In 2023, she was followed by the highly regarded Jesuit priest Hans Zollner, who suggested the commission risked becoming an exercise in public relations, and cited 'lack of transparency, compliance and responsibility' as the reasons prompting his resignation. In an anonymous article published in the same year in the leading US paper, the National Catholic Reporter, a survivor of clerical abuse wrote: 'it seems to me like the gap between what top Catholic officials say about abuse and that they do about abuse has never been bigger'.
Francis's rhetoric on combatting clerical sexual abuse was certainly impressive. In 2018, in a letter to all Catholics, he acknowledged 'the heart-wrenching pain of victims' which had been 'long-ignored'. The next year he likened their suffering to child sacrifice in pagan rituals. But even that tailed off in more recent times. Instead, Francis began to react defensively, telling a visiting group of safeguarding experts in September 2023, for example, that abuse was a problem that isn't restricted to the Catholic Church.
'The abuses that have affected the Church are but a pale reflection of a sad reality that involves all of humanity and to which the necessary attention is not paid,' he said. That is true up to a point, but there are also few bodies that claim moral authority to protect the vulnerable so strongly as churches.
And it is not just victims who were disappointed by Francis's failure to match words with action. A report commissioned by the Catholic Bishops of England and Wales revealed a wider 'crisis of faith' causing the pews to empty, while those still there were felt they had 'to keep their faith private' in their everyday lives, the very opposite of the gospel imperative to spread the Good News.
There are, of course, many reasons for a decline in church-going in developed societies since the mid 20th century. Francis's legacy contains many attempts to tackle some of them, including putting more women in senior positions in the Church (though still refusing to ordain them) and undertaking a global exercise in asking Catholics their views. That culminated in two clumsily entitled Synods on Synodality in Rome in 2023 and 2024 that promised, but have yet to deliver, greater power for their laity in decision-making.
Next to something so horrific as priests sexually abusing children, and other priests covering it up, however, all the good he did undeniably struggles to cut through. It is the reason for lapsing that anecdotally comes up most. The English and Welsh bishops also acknowledged that it is also 'constantly raised by non-Catholics who see it as proof of the failure of the Church to live up to what Christ called us to be'.
On the other hand, though, recent figures suggest that in Britain at least, Catholicism is experiencing a resurgence: according to a study from the Bible Society, The Quiet Revival, Anglicans have been overtaken and are now outnumbered by Catholics by more than two to one among Generation Z and younger millennial churchgoers.
But that broader damage to the Church's reputation for answering to a higher set of God-given values has been gathering pace these past dozen years, ironically at the same time as Pope Francis used his global platform to speak out more powerfully and repeatedly than most pontiffs on important issues such as climate change, the evils of war, the scourge of poverty, the shortcomings of capitalism and the causes of migration.
There will be many issues in the in tray of Francis's successor, but until the clerical sex abuse scandal is addressed with real vigour, there will be more victims and the exodus from the pews in the West will continue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China gets new Catholic bishop, as Pope Leo continues deal over appointments
China gets new Catholic bishop, as Pope Leo continues deal over appointments

Reuters

time12 hours ago

  • Reuters

China gets new Catholic bishop, as Pope Leo continues deal over appointments

VATICAN CITY, June 11 (Reuters) - A new assistant Catholic bishop was installed on Wednesday for Fuzhou, the capital of China's southeastern Fujian province, signalling that the Vatican's accord with Beijing over Catholic bishop appointments will continue under Pope Leo. Bishop Joseph Lin Yuntuan, 73, was appointed by Leo within the framework of a diplomatic deal originally struck in 2018 that gives Chinese officials some input into papal appointments. Michel Chambon , an academic who has written extensively on the Chinese Church, said Wednesday's installation indicates that both parties want to continue with the accord. "It is a willingness to support reconciliation instead of antagonism," said Chambon, a research fellow at the Asia Research Institute in Singapore. Some conservative Catholics have criticized the Vatican-China deal, which was negotiated under the late Pope Francis. The critics say it gives too much influence to China's ruling communists, who have kept a tight rein on religious practice since taking power in 1949. The Vatican stresses that the pope retains final decision-making power and says the accord resolves a decades-long split between an underground church swearing loyalty to the Vatican and the state-supervised Catholic Patriotic Association. Yuntuan had previously been ordained a bishop in the underground church in 2017. The Vatican said in a brief statement that it had "learned with satisfaction" that his role had been officially recognised by the government. "This event constitutes another fruit of the dialogue between the Holy See and Chinese authorities and is a significant step," it said. As part of Wednesday's ceremony, Yuntuan swore to abide by Chinese laws and to safeguard social harmony, according to a report on social media provided by the Catholic Patriotic Association. Across China there are about 5 million Catholics in a total population of 1.4 billion, the Vatican estimates. The Vatican and China last renewed their accord in October 2024, for a further period of four years. The text of the deal has never been published, but only described by diplomatic officials.

Pope Leo XIV names first Chinese bishop, signalling he is continuing Vatican's controversial accord
Pope Leo XIV names first Chinese bishop, signalling he is continuing Vatican's controversial accord

The Independent

time13 hours ago

  • The Independent

Pope Leo XIV names first Chinese bishop, signalling he is continuing Vatican's controversial accord

Pope Leo XIV made his first appointment of a Chinese bishop under the Vatican's 2018 agreement with Beijing, signalling he is continuing one of Pope Francis' most controversial foreign policy decisions. The Vatican expressed satisfaction that Leo's June 5 nomination of Bishop Joseph Lin Yuntuan as auxiliary bishop of Fuzhou was recognized Wednesday by Chinese authorities. The Vatican said in a statement that Lin taking possession of the diocese and the civic recognition of his appointment 'constitutes a further fruit of the dialogue between the Holy See and the Chinese authorities and is a significant step in the diocese's communal journey.' Francis had riled conservatives when he approved a deal in 2018 over bishop nominations, which had been the most divisive issue in Vatican- China relations since diplomatic ties were severed when the Communists came to power. China had insisted on an exclusive right to name bishops as a matter of national sovereignty, while the Vatican asserted the pope's exclusive right to name the successors of the original Apostles. China's estimated 12 million Catholics have been divided between an official, state-controlled church that didn't recognize papal authority and an underground church that remained loyal to Rome through decades of persecution. The Vatican tried for decades to unify the flock and the 2018 deal was aimed at healing that division, regularizing the status of seven bishops who weren't recognized by Rome and thawing decades of estrangement between China and the Vatican. The details of the 2018 deal were never released, but it affords the state-controlled church a say in its church leaders, though Francis insisted he retained veto power over the ultimate choice. The deal has been criticized by some, especially on the Catholic right, for having caved to Beijing's demands and sold out the underground faithful in China. The Vatican has said it was the best deal it could get and has been renewed periodically since then. One of the big foreign policy questions facing Leo, history's first American pope, was whether he would continue renewing the accord or heed conservative demands and make some changes. There have been apparent violations on the Beijing side with some unilateral appointments that occurred without papal consent. The issue came to a head just before the conclave that elected Leo pope, when the Chinese church proceeded with the preliminary election of two bishops, a step that comes before official consecration. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

Tariffs on the table: how trade wars threaten the resilience of global food systems
Tariffs on the table: how trade wars threaten the resilience of global food systems

Economist

time20 hours ago

  • Economist

Tariffs on the table: how trade wars threaten the resilience of global food systems

People sometimes assume their breakfast is locally sourced. The eggs may come from a nearby farm, but the animal feed was probably imported. The fruit might be Chilean, the coffee Ethiopian and the wheat in the toast from Kansas or Ukraine. Like smartphones, the food we eat is a global product. Agriculture accounted for 8% of global merchandise trade in 2023, and it continues to play a central role in food access, affordability and stability. With trade wars and protectionist policies on the rise, the delicate balance of global food systems is increasingly at risk. Global trade is a key driver of a secure food system Global trade is fundamental to ensuring food reaches those who need it most. About 80% of the world's population live in countries that import more food than they export, relying on trade to supply basic staples, stabilise prices and provide year-round access. In times of crisis—whether due to conflict, climate events or economic shocks—this interconnected system plays a vital role in preventing shortages and curbing price spikes. For food-importing countries, the volatility of trade flows can mean the difference between stable prices and empty shelves. Global trade doesn't just move goods; it builds resilience, acts as a buffer against droughts and fills in seasonal gaps. When a bad harvest hits one part of the world, another can often pick up the slack—if the system is working. Consider the example of Ukraine. Before Russia's invasion in March 2022, Ukraine and Russia were together responsible for nearly 30% of global wheat and barley exports. The war halted shipments overnight, creating ripple effects in import-reliant countries like Egypt, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Lebanon. These countries, which are heavily dependent on wheat imports due to limited domestic supply, saw bread prices soar and protests follow. But a total food crisis was averted, because alternative suppliers such as Australia, Brazil, the EU, India and the United States were able to step in and fill the gap. That's what makes trade such a powerful stabiliser. It's not just about efficiency—it's about accessibility and resilience. Trade helps countries absorb shocks and maintain food supply when crises hit. Trade wars can create ripples far beyond their borders The United States is the world's largest agricultural exporter. In 2023, its agricultural exports accounted for nearly 7% of its total exports. It shipped $27bn-worth of soyabeans, $13bn of corn and $7bn of wheat around the world. China buys US soya to feed livestock, Mexico depends on US corn for tortillas and animal feed, and the EU and Japan rely on American grains for staples. However, export strength does not guarantee stability. During the 2018-20 US-China trade war, retaliatory tariffs on American soyabeans led to a sharp drop in exports. The resulting losses for the agriculture sector were estimated at $27bn and many farmers faced severe financial strain. Critically, the impact of trade disruptions between the United States and China didn't remain confined to these two markets. They rippled outward, impacting countries that are large exporters and those that rely on consistent imports. Many countries in Africa and Asia, such as South Africa and the Philippines, struggled to adapt due to limited diversification and weaker global integration, with their exports to both the United States and the rest of the world declining following the tariff increases. In Rwanda, soyabean prices rose by 25%—from $520 to $650 per tonne—after China imposed retaliatory tariffs on US soyabeans and turned to African suppliers, creating regional shortages. In 2025, similar patterns are emerging elsewhere: shrimp farmers in Mexico are facing rising feed costs, driven in part by the new US tariffs, forcing producers to seek alternatives as they grapple with falling shrimp prices and tight profit margins. Given the importance of US-China trade to global food systems, a good number of farm goods are likely to be affected. The most significant are shown in Table 1 below. Rethinking trade to strengthen food systems Whether it is geopolitical tensions or climate challenges, the risks facing our food system are only increasing. We need to make our food systems more resilient so they can adapt to external shocks without breaking. A good place to start is trade. Rethinking trade rules to safeguard food flows would help. Exempting critical farm goods from tariffs and export bans could steady supplies when tensions rise. Multilateral bodies such as the World Trade Organisation and the World Food Programme should defend these exemptions and mediate disputes, to stop food becoming collateral damage in trade wars. But shielding trade is not enough. Many countries—especially in the developing world—need to diversify their suppliers. Doing so would reduce their exposure to disruption and improve their bargaining position. Regional trade blocs can help. The EU, for instance, has shown that shorter supply chains and cross-border co-operation can support food security when global markets stumble. However, trade comes with costs. Shipping food across the world adds to greenhouse-gas emissions. Perishables require cold chains that consume energy. Transport accounts for almost a fifth of emissions from food systems. But that does not mean shutting borders. Smarter trade is the answer: shorten supply routes where possible, invest in greener logistics and grow more food closer to where it will be eaten, while keeping trade open where it matters most. Such changes depend on better infrastructure. Modern cold chains are essential to preserve food quality during delays or detours. Countries should invest in decentralised storage, efficient refrigeration and digital monitoring to keep food moving, fresh and safe, even when global trade falters. This isn't just about economics: it's about resilience History demonstrates that food insecurity breeds unrest. The 2007-08 global food-price crisis led to protests in many countries, while rising food costs fuelled protests during the Arab spring. As climate change, conflict and economic shocks increase, we are likely to see more of the same, unless we act now. Fundamentally, the world cannot afford to allow food to become collateral damage in trade wars. We need a food system that is resilient, inclusive and built to withstand 21st-century shocks. That means keeping trade going, but making it smarter, greener and fairer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store