logo
Albanese flies into great unknown, with Trump G7 meeting up in air and Coalition ready to pounce

Albanese flies into great unknown, with Trump G7 meeting up in air and Coalition ready to pounce

The Guardiana day ago

When Anthony Albanese's official plane took off from Canberra's Fairbairn Air Force base in the icy cold of Friday morning, the prime minister and his advisers had little idea if his looming North American visit would be a success.
Despite weeks of preparation for the six-day trip to the US and the G7 summit in Canada, Albanese had yet to lock in his first meeting with Donald Trump. There were even doubts about whether Trump would show up in Kananaskis, Alberta at all.
But before the military grey jet hit cruise altitude for the first leg to Fiji, the urgency of the summit – and the question over Trump's presence – grew significantly.
Israel stoked global anxieties by launching bombing raids against Iran, after months of tensions over Tehran's nuclear program. In the tinderbox political reality of the Middle East, these 'preemptive strikes' could hardly be less welcome.
It soon emerged the chief of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and the second in command of the country's armed forces had been killed, along with at least two nuclear scientists.
The flashpoint could complicate Albanese's push to get his first face-to-face meeting with Trump.
The PM wants Trump to grant an exemption to his steel and aluminium tariffs and for reassurance about the newly announced review of the Aukus nuclear submarine plan, news which rattled the government and defence establishment this week.
The defence minister, Richard Marles, said he had known about the review for weeks, likely after discussions with his US counterpart Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore last month.
Marles' meeting with Hegseth revealed Trump's insistence that Australia should lift its defence spending to 3.5%.
Currently, defence spending sits about 2% of GDP. Any move to increase to 3.5% at the speed sought by the White House would amount to about $40bn extra a year from the federal budget – about the current federal aged care spend.
Risking Trump's ire, Albanese and Marles insisted Australia's military spending was a decision for the federal government alone, and would be decided on the basis of need, rather than arbitrary targets.
Trump, whose reputation as a skinflint is matched only by decades as one of America's great hucksters, has long believed the US is being ripped off by countries not spending enough to defend themselves.
He used his first term to play world leaders off against each other, manipulating them and undermining alliances across the globe. He dominated multilateral summits, confounding the leaders of countries long tied to the US, and prioritising ego-stroking over the real work of international diplomacy.
While Albanese is in Seattle at the weekend, Trump will be in Washington DC, overseeing a military parade to mark the 250th anniversary of the US army. The occasion, inspired by a similar show of force he witnessed in Paris during his first trip abroad as the US president back in 2017, just happens to fall on Trump's 79th birthday.
When they do meet, Albanese will push Trump to stick with the submarines agreement.
Signed by Scott Morrison in 2021, the deal will see the US sell Australia up to five secondhand Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines, with the first to be delivered in 2032. They will replace Australia's ageing Collins class diesel-electric submarines and stay in the water until Australia's own Aukus nuclear-powered submarines can be built, in partnership with the UK sometime in the late 2030s.
Australia's first home-built Aukus submarine is expected to be in the water early in the next decade. By the mid-2050s, Australia is expected to have spent as much as $370bn on the plan.
Part of the agreement sees Australia pumping huge subsidies to the industrial bases of both the US and UK. The federal government has already sent $800m to the US, a downpayment on about $5bn in promises.
Scepticism about the plan isn't new.
In the US, concern that shipbuilding can't match existing domestic demand, let alone provide subs to Australia, is real. Currently American shipyards are building subs at an average rate of 1.2 to 1.3 boats per year; the agreement aims to lift that two per year by 2028 and to 2.3 a year at some point after that.
No transfers will take place without the authorisation of the president of the day, meaning Australia's spending could be in vain even if the project survives the 30-day review.
If Aukus is abandoned or Trump snubs Albanese in Canada, the Coalition will pounce. But the irony is that plenty within Labor would prefer the nuclear submarines plan did not go ahead, or that the government would be bolder, including on the Middle East conflict.
Australia angered the US by placing sanctions on two rightwing Israeli ministers this week for their role in inflaming violence towards Palestinians in the West Bank – a long way short of what some Labor supporters and a few MPs wish the government would do in response to the unthinkable human suffering in Gaza.
Even if Trump doesn't show up at the G7, he will be there in spirit. Not least because the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, has won some political support at home for his deft management of the Trump relationship, while summit host Mark Carney and Albanese himself both won reelection in no small part due to voter dislike of the president.
While the politicians and the press gallery were consumed with news of the Aukus review on Thursday, security specialist Jennifer Parker told this column she wished more attention was being paid to the deteriorating situation around Iran.
Speaking before Israel started bombing, Parker, a 20-year veteran of defence, noted about one fifth of the world's oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, wedged between Iran and Oman.
Parker was right to worry. Some 15% of crude oil and close to a third of refined oil destined for Australia travels on those tankers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran's supreme leader facing fury from within
Iran's supreme leader facing fury from within

Telegraph

time16 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Iran's supreme leader facing fury from within

Iran's supreme leader is facing growing anger from within the regime's ruling inner circle following Israel's attacks on the country's nuclear infrastructure. Israel launched a wave of air strikes on Friday, killing top commanders and nuclear scientists, and bombing sites in an effort to stop Tehran building an atomic weapon. In response Tehran fired a salvo of missiles at Israel, which were largely intercepted. As hardliners continue to threaten vengeance against Israel and its allies in the wake of the strikes, there are signs of a deepening rift between Iran's extreme and moderate voices. It has mainly been left to the hardliners to articulate Iran's official response. The country's state-owned Fars News Agency, closely affiliated with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, quoted a senior military official warning that, apart from attacking Israel, 'the war will spread to all parts of Israel and American bases in the region in the coming days, and the aggressors will be targeted with a decisive and widespread response'. In an attempt to silence criticism of the regime's handling of the crisis, Mohseni Ejeie, Iran's chief judge cleric, issued a warning on Saturday that any Iranian citizen who posted comments on social media supporting Israel's attack would face sentences of up to six years in jail. Even so, as criticism of the regime's handling of the crisis begins to surface, it is likely to find itself under pressure to explain its inability to defend the nation from Israel's assault, despite the vast sums it claims to have spent upgrading the Iranian military. Private text messages shared with The New York Times reveal that some Iranian officials are questioning why Iran's air defences have not been more effective in repelling Israel's attacks, which hit its arsenal of ballistic missiles and assassinated senior figures in Tehran's military chain of command. 'Where is our air defence?' texted one official, while another asked: 'How can Israel come and attack anything it wants, kill our top commanders, and we are incapable of stopping it?' Hamid Hosseini, a member of Iran's Chamber of Commerce's energy committee, said: 'Israel's attack completely caught the leadership by surprise, especially the killing of the top military figures and nuclear scientists. It also exposed our lack of proper air defence and their ability to bombard our critical sites and military bases with no resistance.' Mr Hosseini also raised concerns about Israel's apparent infiltration of Iran's military and security forces, enabling it to conduct covert operations in Iran's armed forces and nuclear targets. In its response to Israel's attack, Iran was also only able to muster 200 missiles, despite an order from Ayatollah Khamenei to launch a barrage of 1,000 and reports that Iran was planning a response in the event of an Israeli attack for over a week. From the start of Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979, the battle between the regime's moderate faction, which seeks to adopt a less confrontational stance towards the West, and the ideological hardliners has been one of the regime's defining characteristics. While Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country's supreme leader, remains the hardliners' undisputed head, Masoud Pezeshkian, the country's recently elected president, is viewed as representing the regime's more moderate wing. To date, Mr Pezeshkian has kept a relatively low profile, condemning the Israeli attacks and calling for unity among the Iranian people, stating: 'Today, more than ever, the Iranian nation needs togetherness, trust, empathy, unity and consensus.' Mr Pezeshkian's electoral victory over conservative hardliner Saeed Jalil last was seen as indicative of Tehran's desire to adopt a more constructive approach with the West, especially in terms of alleviating the sanctions that have hit the Iranian economy hard. The regime's handling of the economy – where funds have been diverted to support military and terrorist operations instead of concentrating on domestic issues – has provoked mounting dissent throughout the country, and seen Khamenei under pressure to adopt a more conciliatory tone. During the election campaign, Mr Pezeshkian, a 71-year-old heart surgeon and member of the Iranian parliament, was highly critical of Iran's repressive morality police. He directly challenged the hardliners' approach by calling for 'unity and cohesion' in Iran, as well as calling for an end to Iran's 'isolation' from the outside world. Mr Pezeshkian also campaigned in favour of engaging in 'constructive negotiations' with Western powers to agree a new deal over the country's nuclear programme, which Iran agreed to kerb in return for an easing of Western sanctions. But while Mr Pezeshkian has tried hard to pursue a more moderate social and foreign policy since taking office, he has had to contend with the institutional resistance of the hardline faction, which regard any deal with the West concerning Iran's nuclear ambitions as tantamount to a sell-out. One indication of the ideological struggle at the heart of the Iranian regime came in March when Mohammad Javad Zarif, the country's moderate former foreign minister, was forced to resign from his position as vice-president. A close ally of Mr Pezeshkian, Mr Zarif's dismissal was said to be related to his opposition to Tehran's deepening alliance with Vladimir Putin, the leader of Russia, which he regarded as being counterproductive to Iran's diplomatic efforts to improve relations with the West. While Israel's military assault against Iran means there is little prospect of Tehran improving relations with the West in the near future, the eruption of hostilities will nevertheless focus attention on the regime's internal wrangling, which could ultimately result in the regime's collapse. For the moment, Iran's hardliners have taken charge of the country's military response to Israel's continuing offensive. But the longer Israel continues to attack key Iranian targets with impunity, the more pressure the hardliners will come under pressure to explain their abject failure to defend the country, a failing that ultimately could lead to their demise.

What to know about Trump's military parade
What to know about Trump's military parade

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

What to know about Trump's military parade

It was supposed to be a celebration - but it's also teasing America's military might. President Donald Trump 's massive parade marking the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army is expected to go ahead as planned Saturday evening, amid ongoing strikes between Israel and Iran - and looming fears of an escalation into World War III. What could stop it is the weather, as lightning in the area would push the Pentagon to delay the planned march down Constitution Avenue, which includes flyovers and parachute jumps. Saturday morning Trump insisted it was happening, despite thunderstorm concerns. 'OUR GREAT MILITARY PARADE IS ON, RAIN OR SHINE. REMEMBER, A RAINY DAY PERADE BRINGS GOOD LUCK. I'LL SEE YOU ALL IN D.C.' he wrote on Truth Social. He fixed the spelling of 'perade' in a second post. It will be the first time the streets of the capital have been swamped with soldiers in since a celebration of the end of the Gulf War in 1991. The celebration falls on Trump's 79th birthday, but he has denied accusations the event is to mark his own milestone. He will still be front-and-center. The president is expected to deliver remarks, receive a folded flag from a parachutist and perform an enlistment and reenlistment ceremony. Overall, the U.S. Army is bringing 6,700 troops to Washington, D.C. for the occasion, along with 150 vehicles and 50 aircraft, according to the Associated Press. During the daytime the Army is holding a festival on the National Mall that includes a fitness competition and appearances by NFL players and astronauts, among others The parade, which is expected to kick off at 6:30 p.m., will showcase the evolution of the Army, using period uniforms and vintage equipment, including a World War Two-era B-25 bomber. Bradley Fighting Vehicles, M1A2/Abrams tanks - which weigh approximately 68 tons - and Strykers are among those being showcased in the parade. Last week the Army Corps of Engineers started putting down metal plating on the street in the areas where the large vehicles would need to turn in order to preserve the District's streets. One special moment that's expected is when the 1st Cavalry Division walks in the parade. The Texas-based group brings along with them 14 horses, two mules and a two-year-old Blue Heeler named Private Doc Holliday. At its conclusion, the Army's Golden Knight parachutists will jump down to the Ellipse and hand to Trump the folded American flag. After that, MAGA crooner Lee Greenwood and others will perform onstage at the Ellipse - and to end the night, there will be a fireworks show over the National Mall. The Army says as many as 200,000 people could attend. The inspiration for the military parade dates back to the beginning of Trump's first term - when he was invited by French President Emmanuel Macron to the July 2017 Bastille Day celebrations, which also marked the U.S.'s 100th anniversary of entering World War I, which Allied forces won. The president pushed for a military parade during his first term, but was unsuccessful due to cost concerns - the federal government would be on the hook for repairing D.C.'s roadways from any damages the tanks would incur. He did the next best thing - he moved the annual Fourth of July celebration from the White House's South Lawn to the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. Tanks were used to decorate Trump's 2019 'Salute to America.' The Blue Angels, Air Force One and other military aircraft flew over the National Mall - which is usually restricted airspace. On the campaign trail leading up to the 2024 election, Trump promised supporters that he would plan a grand celebration for the country's 250th birthday - July 4, 2026. Saturday's parade marks the start of that celebration, as the U.S. Army was formed more than a year before the Declaration of Independence was signed. Ahead of the gathering, a Pentagon source confirmed that if there is lightning in the area the parade could be postponed of canceled. Sources wouldn't elaborate on contingency plans just yet. A White House spokesperson pressed that some show would go on. 'Any changes to the Army Birthday Parade will be announced by the Department of Defense of America 250 Commission. No matter what, a historic celebration of our military servicemembers will take place!' deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told the Daily Mail. Overall the cost of the parade is estimated to be between $25 and $45 million. Polling released Thursday from the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that about 6 in 10 Americans believe the parade is 'not a good use' of taxpayer dollars, however more U.S. adults approve than disapprove of Trump's decision to hold the festivities. The poll found that about 4 in 10 adults 'somewhat' or strongly' approved of the parade, while closer to 3 in 10 'somewhat' or 'strongly' disapproved. Days ahead of the parade, additional fencing was erected around the White House and the U.S. Capitol and along some of D.C.'s streets, with major road closures expected. Due to the military flyovers, Reagan Washington National Airport will shut down Saturday from 6 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. D.C.'s roadways are expected to be back to normal by Monday. In January a shocking crash occurred over the Potomac involving a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter and an American Airlines commuter jet trying to land at DCA - killing all 67 people on board both aircrafts. Protests are also a concern as a number of 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned for Saturday. Organizers, however, have pushed potential protesters to take part in other cities including Philadelphia and at events in the D.C. suburbs of Virginia and Maryland, due to the heavy security footprint surrounding the parade.

‘This moment was thrust upon him': Gavin Newsom steps up to parry Trump's executive overreach
‘This moment was thrust upon him': Gavin Newsom steps up to parry Trump's executive overreach

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘This moment was thrust upon him': Gavin Newsom steps up to parry Trump's executive overreach

When Donald Trump landed in Los Angeles to tour the ruins left by January's devastating wildfires, just days after being sworn in for a second term, California's governor, Gavin Newsom, was waiting on the tarmac to greet him. The surprisingly warm exchange between two longtime political rivals seemed to reflect a new reality: with a vengeful Trump back in the White House, fire-ravaged California – and its Democratic governor – had a great deal at stake. In the weeks that followed, Newsom met with Trump at the White House to lobby for federal disaster relief, then approved funding to strengthen the state's legal defenses against challenges from the Trump administration. He invited Maga-world fixtures on to his podcast, including Steve Bannon, and infuriated progressives, and even some allies, when he said that it was 'deeply unfair' for transgender athletes to compete in girls' sports – a wedge issue central to Trump's conservative agenda. All the while, his state was suing the Trump administration – over executive actions on immigration, federal funding and tariffs – at a rate of more than one lawsuit a week. Their fragile detente, already showing cracks, shattered spectacularly last week, when the president mobilized thousands of national guard troops and 700 marines – over the governor's objections – to quell protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids across the region. Newsom accused Trump of deliberately injecting chaos into a situation that local authorities had under control. Trump's actions, he declared, were 'madness' and marked an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'. Trump, in turn, called Newsom, whom he refers to as 'Newscum', grossly incompetent and suggested the governor should be arrested. 'Gavin likes the publicity,' the president mused, though he later played down the threat. With guards troops deployed in the streets of Los Angeles, the 57-year-old governor of the country's most populous state delivered a formal, state-of-the-union-style address warning that the president was taking a 'wrecking ball' to American democracy. 'Look, this isn't just about protests in LA,' Newsom said on Tuesday. 'This is about all of us. This is about you.' 'California may be first – but it clearly won't end here. Other states are next,' he said. 'Democracy is next.' For months, Democrats, anti-Trump Republicans and a growing number of alarmed Americans had been clamoring for leaders who grasp what they say is the urgency of Trump's assault on democratic norms and American institutions. When Trump activated California's national guard troops, Newsom stepped into the ring – and hasn't stopped swinging since. 'This moment was thrust upon him,' said Mike Madrid, a sharp critic of Trump and former political director of the California Republican party, 'and whether it was a battlefield conversion or a genuine moment, Gavin Newsom realized that the only way out of this was to fight.' In the week since the national guard's deployment to Los Angeles, Newsom has mounted an all-out offensive – battling Trump in the courts and in the court of public opinion. He has made himself ubiquitous: sitting for interviews with podcasters and YouTubers, national media and local media. On social media, he and his team are running a rapid response blitz – a stream of taunts, Star Wars memes and factchecks. Newsom sued to block the guard's deployment without his consent. California later filed an emergency order asking a judge to bar the guard from assisting with immigration enforcement. On Thursday, a federal judge sided with the state, finding that Trump's deployment of the guard was unlawful – though the victory was short-lived. Two hours later, the ninth US circuit court of appeals temporarily blocked the order. 'He is not a king and he should stop acting like one,' Newsom said on Thursday, at a press conference before the ruling was paused. The White House has responded in kind, with Trump hurling insults back at Newsom. When asked what crime Newsom might be charged with, Trump sniped: 'His primary crime is running for governor, because he's done such a bad job.' Trump, thanking the appeals court on Friday, said: 'If I didn't send the military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now' – a claim Newsom, city officials and local law enforcement strongly dispute. Tensions escalated further on Thursday, when a senator from California, Alex Padilla, was forcibly removed and handcuffed after trying to ask a question at a press conference held by the homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, amid the ongoing protests in Los Angeles. Newsom called the episode 'outrageous, dictatorial, and shameful'. 'This is a moment that tests the mettle of leaders,' said Brian Brokaw, a longtime political adviser to Newsom. He noted that Newsom's tenure was defined by crisis from the very start. The day after he was elected in 2018, a gunman killed 12 people at a country music bar in Thousand Oaks and as the Camp fire – the deadliest wildfire in state history – raged toward the town of Paradise. Since then, Newsom has faced a near-constant onslaught: more fires, more mass shootings, floods, mudslides, drought, a global pandemic, mass protests after the murder of George Floyd, and the wildfires that swept Los Angeles earlier this year. 'Newsom has pretty good instincts,' Brokaw said. 'He knows what a moment like this requires – and that's what you're seeing from him now.' The rapidly intensifying standoff between Trump and Newsom has rallied Democrats. Twenty-two Democratic governors signed a joint statement in support of California, calling Trump's troop deployment 'ineffective and dangerous'. The signatories spanned the ideological spectrum of the party and included several governors who are potential 2028 presidential contenders, such as JB Pritzker of Illinois, Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania and Andy Beshear of Kentucky. 'He has shown he's not going to be intimidated, and we're all for that,' Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, said earlier this week. Even some of his critics have been impressed. Ezra Levin, the co-founder of Indivisible, one of the groups behind Saturday's 'day of defiance' protests against Trump, said Newsom's pugilistic response to the president's 'bullying' has been 'spot on'. 'I think he's been one of the leading members of the 'roll over and play dead' faction, one of these dead-dog Democrats,' Levin said. 'But maybe – maybe – he is shifting sides, and I think it is very important that we welcome people and leaders when they do that.' The White House believes its maximalist response to unrest in California plays to its political advantage. Trump, who campaigned on a promise of mass deportations, has framed California's resistance as an obstruction to what he says is a popular mandate. Images of protesters waving Mexican flags near burning robotaxis feed the rightwing narrative of disorder in Democratic-run cities such as Los Angeles. 'To be very cynical about this, you can argue that this benefits both principals,' said Bill Whalen, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution thinktank at Stanford University. 'Donald Trump gets to swing at his favorite piñata, California, but Gavin Newsom doesn't mind taking the whacks because it plays pretty well with the Democratic base.' According to a YouGov flash poll, 45% of Americans disapprove of the Los Angeles protests, while 36% approve. Similar shares disapprove of Trump's deployment of the marines – 47% to 34% – and the national guard – 45% to 38%. Since Trump's 2024 victory, many Democrats have taken pains to show support for law enforcement and border security. Some say Newsom's approach offers a clear path forward. He has been unequivocal in condemning sporadic violence, vowing 'zero tolerance' for bad actors. At the same time, he has offered a full-throated defense of the city's immigrant communities, accusing Trump of tearing apart families and 'disappearing' neighbors. 'What's happening right now is very different than anything we've seen before,' Newsom said in his Tuesday address, accusing federal agents of indiscriminately targeting Latino neighborhoods. 'Trump is pulling a military dragnet across LA, well beyond his stated intent to just go after violent and serious criminals.' Conservatives say Newsom's posture is precisely what helped Trump make inroads in some of the bluest corners of the country last year. Steve Hilton, a former top adviser to former UK prime minister David Cameron now running for governor of California, accused Newsom of trying to 'gaslight us'. 'Do your job,' he said on Fox News, 'instead of pretending this is fine.' Newsom rose to prominence as the mayor of San Francisco, defying state law to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. He served as the state's lieutenant governor for eight years before being elected governor in the middle of Trump's first term, riding a wave of progressive anger. He survived a 2021 recall attempt, fueled in part by backlash to his handling of the pandemic, and was easily re-elected in 2022. He campaigned aggressively for Biden in 2024, even as some in the party hoped he'd run himself. When Biden dropped out, Newsom quickly endorsed his fellow Californian, 'fearless' Kamala Harris. Democrats' staggering losses in November left the party leaderless and without power in Washington. As Democrats grasped for answers – how to oppose an emboldened president whom voters chose over them – Newsom launched a podcast. Some speculated Newsom's moves – interviewing far-right figures on his podcast, cracking down on homeless encampments and moving to scale back health coverage for immigrants without legal status – were part of a calculated pivot toward the political center, in preparation for a 2028 presidential run. Asked recently at a press conference if he was trying to shed his liberal persona, Newsom said he had always been a 'hard-headed pragmatist'. 'I'm not an ideologue,' he added. California – the biggest blue state in the country – has long served as Trump's favorite foil. From homelessness and crime to immigration and climate policy, Trump has painted the state as a cautionary tale – a failed experiment in liberal governance now a 'symbol of our nation's decline'. This week, amid his clash with Newsom, Trump signed into law a measure blocking California's vehicle emissions rules and his administration announced plans to abolish two of the state's newest national monuments. 'If it's a day ending in Y, it's another day of Trump's war on California,' the governor's office tweeted. Steve Maviglio, a Democratic political consultant, said Newsom's 'guerrilla warfare' tactics may raise the governor's national profile – but at a cost. 'We know that the president doesn't respond well to being attacked,' Maviglio said, adding: 'It's likely going to result in a lot less federal dollars coming our way – which is about the last thing we need right now with a multibillion-dollar budget deficit.' Yet Newsom's attempt at conciliation yielded little protection. Earlier this month, the Trump administration warned it may pull billions in funding from California's long-delayed high-speed rail project. Trump has threatened to 'maybe permanently' strip federal funding if the state continues to allow transgender athletes to compete in girls' and women's sports. And California is still waiting for the disaster aid Newsom sought after the fires. Newsom has argued in recent interviews that Trump can't be placated. The governor suggested the state had leverage: it could withhold the billions in taxes its residents pay the federal government. (He has since tempered the idea, but said he urged his team to get 'creative' on how the state might push back on Trump's threats.) Newsom also suggested that growing public opposition to the immigration crackdown was working, after Trump conceded that his immigration tactics were hurting agriculture and hospitality. 'Turns out, chasing hardworking people through ranches and snatching women and children off the streets is not good policy,' Newsom shot back. Though protests have calmed, the situation remains volatile. With the appeals court decision, Trump remains in command of the national guard through at least next week. On Friday, US marines temporarily detained a man outside the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles – the first known detention of a civilian by active-duty troops deployed there by Trump. Speaking in Los Angeles, Noem pledged to 'liberate' Los Angeles and vowed that the Trump administration would continue its immigration operations across the region. Ahead of planned protests on Saturday, Newsom ordered the state to 'pre-deploy' additional resources to support law enforcement throughout the state. Organized as a show of defiance against Trump's military parade staged in the streets of Washington DC on Saturday to celebrate the US army's 250th anniversary and the president's 79th birthday, the events have multiplied since Trump deployed guard troops to Los Angeles. For Newsom, the stakes are bigger than California. He has framed this moment as a test of democratic resilience in the face of creeping authoritarianism. And for those who have long sounded the alarm, the governor is meeting it. 'He's become what Democrats nationally have been waiting for since the election,' Madrid said. 'He's the tip of the spear – the more strenuously he fights, the more aggressive he is, the more he uses Trump's tactics against him, the more he's going to be rewarded.' David Smith in Washington and Rachel Leingang contributed reporting

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store