A first American pope? Cardinal Robert Prevost's name comes up as a potential successor to Pope Francis
Who will be the next pope? Here are some potential candidates as the conclave begins
Vatican City — Of the 266 popes who have led the Catholic Church, not one of them has been from the United States. While the relative youth of the nation means fewer than 20 of those men served after the U.S. Declaration of Independence in 1776, one prominent U.S. bishop has a possible explanation for the lack of an American leader of the world's Catholics up until now.
Robert Barron, bishop of the Diocese of Winona–Rochester in Minnesota, was appointed less than a week ago by President Trump to the new White House Commission on Religious Liberty.
This week, however, he's at the Vatican with hundreds of other prelates as the cardinal electors gather for the conclave to choose a new pontiff to succeed Pope Francis.
Barron has spent days speaking with the cardinals — including the 133 cardinal electors tasked with electing the new pope — as they try to figure out among themselves who is best to lead the church next.
"Cardinal George of Chicago, of happy memory, was one of my great mentors, and he said: 'Look, until America goes into political decline, there won't be an American pope.' And his point was, if America is kind of running the world politically, culturally, economically, they don't want America running the world religiously. So, I think there's some truth to that, that we're such a superpower and so dominant, they don't wanna give us, also, control over the church."
That said, one American name has popped up repeatedly amid the gossip over leading contenders for the role of pontiff: Cardinal Robert Prevost.
He is undoubtedly qualified, as the only clear qualifications for the role of pontiff are that candidates be male and Roman Catholic. But emerging on top, with the necessary backing of just over two-thirds of the voting cardinal electors, will require far more than just eligibility.
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost leads rosary prayers for the health of Pope Francis in St Peter's Square on March 3, 2025 in Vatican City.
Getty
Originally from Chicago, Prevost is the head of the church's Dicastery for Bishops. The powerful position means he oversees the selection of new bishops.
For any cardinal electors who may be turned off by Prevost's American nationality, it's not his only one. He's a dual citizen, holding nationality in both the U.S. and Peru, where he served for many years.
While Prevost is seen overall as a centrist, on some key social issues he's viewed as progressive. He has long embraced marginalized groups, a lot like Francis, who championed migrants and the poor.
But, also like Pope Francis, the Illinois native opposes ordaining women as deacons, for instance, so on that point he's seen as conservative on church doctrine.
contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Sen. Padilla explains why he interrupted Noem's press conference
CNN's Erin Burnett speaks with Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) after he was forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security press conference in California.
E&E News
35 minutes ago
- E&E News
House approves cuts package
The House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package Thursday, a White House priority that would claw back more than half a billion dollars for international disaster aid and clean energy programs. The 'Rescissions Act of 2025,' H.R. 4, now heads across the Capitol, where senators say they want to amend it before voting on it later this summer. The upper chamber must act on the bill by July 18, or the funds in question will have to be spent. House leaders were able to pass the package Thursday despite reluctance from some moderate Republicans, who had expressed concerns about proposed cuts to the public broadcasting budget and a popular AIDS prevention program. The bill passed 214-212. Advertisement 'Today's House passage of this initial rescissions package marks a critical step toward a more responsible and transparent government that puts the interests of the American taxpayers first,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). The rescissions, requested by White House budget chief Russ Vought, are based on recommendations from the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. They target $8.3 billion in current funding for the State Department and $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which would mainly impact local PBS and NPR stations. 'Every dollar spent on woke foreign policy is not only a dollar wasted but is a dollar devoted to tarnish our own nation's image,' said Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), a senior appropriator, during a hearing on the bill earlier this week. Among the State Department cuts is a $496 million clawback for various international disaster assistance initiatives. The White House has said it would leave intact programs that the administration believes are 'life-saving or have a clear, direct nexus to U.S. national interests.' Officials have not specified which programs would be cut or spared. Additionally, the bill would repeal the United States' entire $125 million contribution to the international Clean Technology Fund for fiscal 2025. The White House Office of Management and Budget has said that the rescissions would cancel $6 million for 'net zero cities' in Mexico, $5 million for 'green transportation and logistics in Eurasia,' $2.1 million for 'climate resilience in Southeast Asia, Latin America [and] East Africa' and $500,000 for 'electric buses in Rwanda.' It's not clear how the rescissions request would target those specific initiatives. They are not explicitly named in Congress' explanatory statement for the fiscal 2024 State-Foreign Operations funding law, which was extended through fiscal 2025. And investments that countries receive for projects under the Clean Technology Fund are not directly tied to donor countries' contributions. A spokesperson for OMB did not respond to emailed questions before publication. OMB said in its rescission request to Congress that the repeal would be in line with President Donald Trump's executive order pulling the U.S. out of international climate agreements. It said the Clean Technology Fund 'invests in Green New Deal projects in developing countries that do not reflect America's values or put the American people first.' Other cuts would go after funding for programs meant to support democracy, global nutrition, LGBTQ people, AIDS prevention and contraception access, as well as the World Health Organization, the U.S. Institute of Peace and public radio broadcasters. More to come The package of cuts could be the first of multiple efforts by the White House and congressional Republicans to rescind funding that was already appropriated with bipartisan support in order to save taxpayer dollars and target Democratic priorities. Democrats say the effort could harm or kill people across the country and around the world. They have blasted it as a dangerous precedent and part of a broader effort to illegally impound, or withhold, funding approved by Congress. OMB said in a statement of administration policy this week that Trump has 'exercised his authority' under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to request the rescissions in the bill. The White House is claiming those same authorities to unilaterally freeze appropriated funds and may send Congress a spending deferral notice before the end of this Congress. 'These rescissions would eliminate programs that are antithetical to American interests and values, such as funding radical gender ideology, 'equity' programs, and policies that threaten our energy security,' the White House said in the statement. The public broadcasting cuts would mostly impact locally owned radio and television stations, which many Americans rely on for emergency alerts during and after natural disasters. Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-N.M.) noted during the bill's Rules Committee hearing this week that when Hurricane Helene hit the Southeast last year, 'people were relying on public radio because that's all that existed.' House Appropriations ranking member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said the cuts to international disaster aid would hurt farmers in Republican-led states whose crops help feed people around the world following extreme weather events.
Wall Street Journal
36 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Judge Questions Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles
SAN FRANCISCO—A federal judge on Thursday sharply questioned the Trump administration's justifications for mobilizing troops in Los Angeles in response to protests that have swept the city, promising to issue a decision soon in California's bid to stop the deployments. During the hourlong hearing before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco, a lawyer for the Justice Department argued that courts have no power to second-guess the president's decisions regarding the National Guard troops and Marines that President Trump has sent over the objections of state and local officials.
