logo
Here's what you should know before you vote in the 2025 federal election in WA

Here's what you should know before you vote in the 2025 federal election in WA

You can't blame West Australians for waking up with a sense of deja-vu this morning, as we prepare to vote in our second election in just eight weeks.
Those who haven't already voted, that is, either by post or at a pre-poll station — and more than 400,000 of us have taken that option.
In March, we voted to re-elect Labor to government in WA, with Premier Roger Cook winning a comfortable majority.
This time it's
the federal election
and the fate of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, also Labor, is on the line.
Where can I vote?
If you haven't visited a pre-polling station or lodged a postal vote, today is the day.
Polling stations will close at 6pm WST.
(
Supplied: WA Electoral Commission
)
You can find out where there's a polling station near you
Polling stations
open at 8am and close at 6pm
.
Do I need ID to vote?
No.
You just need to give your full name and address to the polling official who issues the ballot papers once you're asked.
You'll also be asked if you've already voted in the election.
Will WA votes matter?
Western Australia's votes were
crucial in propelling Anthony Albanese into the Lodge
in 2022, with Labor picking up four seats from the Liberals.
WA's emphatic support of Labor at the 2022 election handed Anthony Albanese the keys to The Lodge.
(
Supplied: AlboMP Facebook Page
)
It was a momentous election in which
five of WA's then 15 federal seats changed hands
.
The Liberals lost all of them, the remaining one falling to teal independent Kate Chaney in Curtin.
Kate Chaney holds the seat of Curtin by a slim margin.
(
ABC News: Keane Bourke
)
Whether WA's votes will have the same impact this time round depends on how the numbers are falling in the other states and territories, where polls close up to two hours earlier than ours.
While Labor has emerged as a narrow favourite to win, some polls are predicting a minority government — and WA's votes could once again prove crucial.
The 2025 election explained:
What are the seats to watch?
There are several seats that could change hands.
Both Kate Chaney in
Curtin
and Sam Lim (ALP) in
Tangney
won on preferences last time on slim margins.
Chaney holds a 1.3 per cent margin while Lim has a 2.8 per cent buffer.
Labor's Sam Lim won the previously safe Liberal seat of Tangney at the 2022 election.
(
ABC News: Courtney Withers
)
Chaney is facing off against Liberal hopeful and former Uber executive Tom White, while Lim's main competitor is Liberal Howarg Ong.
Election essentials:
Find out where your
Moore
is the Liberals' most marginal seat, held by just 0.9 per cent, and here's where it gets interesting.
Incumbent Ian Goodenough failed to win preselection for the party and is now running as an independent candidate against Liberal hopeful and former MP Vince Connelly.
The new seat of
Bullwinkel
is notionally Labor, but with its complicated mix of Wheatbelt farmers and suburban families, it's hard to know who will prevail.
Former Nationals WA leader Mia Davies is vying for the seat against the Liberals' Matt Moran and Labor's Trish Cook
Former Nationals WA leader Mia Davies is running for the seat of Bullwinkel .
(
ABC News: Matt Roberts
)
And outer suburban
Pearce
is another seat to watch, encompassing a number of areas that saw big swings against Labor at the recent state election.
Our electorates are HUGE
WA is divided into 16 electorates — two GINORMOUS ones, and the 14 much smaller ones centred in the Perth metro and South-West
Durack is by far the biggest constituency in Australia, covering a land mass of nearly 1.4 million square kilometres, and it takes up 54 per cent of the state.
The Kalumburu community in northern Western Australia is part of the vast Durack electorate.
(
ABC News: Erin Parke
)
It covers the entire north-west of the state, from the outer metropolitan fringe at Bullsbrook, all the way through to the northern tip of the state.
O'Connor is the other huge electorate and it's also more than a million square kilometres in area, stretching from the far northern Goldfields and remote desert communities of the Ngaanyatjarra Lands, through to tranquil Nannup and Bridgetown in the South-West.
Read more about the federal election:
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on
When will we know the election result?
That's a difficult question to answer.
In some years, the result has been known before we've even finished voting in the west, thanks to that two-hour time difference with the east coast.
That seems unlikely this time, and if it's closer than expected, the make-up of a potentially minority government could take days to determine.

Having trouble seeing this form? Try
Loading

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Richard Marles downplays Trump administration's review of AUKUS
Richard Marles downplays Trump administration's review of AUKUS

ABC News

time21 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Richard Marles downplays Trump administration's review of AUKUS

Defence Minister Richard Marles has downplayed concerns the United States will review the AUKUS agreement, insisting it is a "natural" step and will not threaten the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines. The Pentagon review of the security pact will assess its alignment with Donald Trump's "America-first" agenda and will be led by senior official Elbridge Colby, regarded as an AUKUS sceptic. It follows US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's public call for Australia to boost defence spending by tens of billions of dollars in the near term, which was brushed off by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. A defence official said the purpose of the review was to ensure "allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence". Mr Marles said he remained "very confident" AUKUS would be delivered and suggested an American review was no different to Australia's defence strategic review, which took AUKUS as a given, and a recent UK review. "It's something that it's perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do … It's exactly what we did," he told ABC Melbourne. "There is a plan here, we are sticking to it, and we're going to deliver it." The prime minister has yet to finalise arrangements for his first face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump on the sidelines of next week's G7 summit but has had two disagreements with his administration in recent days, also provoking its anger for sanctioning two Israeli ministers. But Mr Marles said Australia had been briefed in advance about the review and a spokesperson said the government remained confident of the Trump administration's "clear and consistent" support for AUKUS. "I'm very confident that this is going to happen, there's a treaty-level agreement between our three countries [and] it's an agreement that we have been pursuing at a pace," he said. The review has sparked concern in official circles and emboldened AUKUS critics. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who is avowedly anti-AUKUS, said it was "time to wake up" and renewed calls for Australia to hold its own review, accusing the major parties of a "denial of reality" about the prospects of the submarine deal. Greens senator David Shoebridge also repeated calls for an inquiry and said "every rational observer" would conclude that AUKUS was "sinking". Mr Colby, who is the Pentagon's undersecretary in charge of policy, last year labelled himself an AUKUS "agnostic", saying he supported the idea "in principle" but was "very sceptical in practice". Hours before news broke of the review, he tweeted comments from his superior, Mr Hegseth, calling for US allies in the Indo-Pacific to boost defence spending. Mr Colby was more ambivalent about AUKUS in his confirmation hearings, saying the US government should "do everything we can to make this work" and that it would be "great" to provide the submarines as planned. But he added it would be "a very difficult problem" for the US if it was not possible to make enough submarines to service both American and Australian needs. "We don't want our service men and women to be in a weaker position and more vulnerable and, God forbid, worse because [the submarines] are not in the right place in the right time," he said at the time. A US government source also told the ABC it was "crystal clear" the Trump administration was trying to link the review with its push to get Australia to lift defence spending. Joe Hockey, a former Australian ambassador to the US who is now a defence industry consultant, said he suspected Mr Colby had capitalised on the recent disagreement over defence spending to set up this review. "[Colby] is a bit of a sceptic … He would have seen that as an opportunity," he told ABC Radio National, adding the review was a reminder Australia needed to remain "vigilant". "I keep suggesting to the Australian government in various ways that you can't ignore the Trump administration. You need to deeply engage with it," he said. "Now, [current ambassador] Kevin Rudd has been doing that at various levels, but ultimately it is really important that the prime minister and the president, when they meet next week, have a detailed discussion." Mr Hockey said the deal was "all or nothing" for Australia. "If we do not get the Virginia-class submarines in 2032, we have no options left. We have no submarines … If you're not going to partner with the United States, who do you partner with?" Richard Spencer, a former secretary of the US Navy and now the chair of defence company Austal, told ABC Radio National he was confident the review would affirm the merits of AUKUS. "I have nothing but respect for Bridge Colby's ability to analyse complex situations … I am one of the believes that thinks AUKUS is one of the best bits of state-craftery in recent years," he said. "I think it's completely normal for the Trump administration to do a review … I actually welcome the review, because every time something is reviewed, questioned and answered, I believe it strengthens the actual precepts of the agreement itself." Angus Taylor, the Coalition's defence spokesperson, said the review was "deeply concerning" and added to "a growing list of issues in Australia's relationship with the United States". "If this review has been triggered by the Albanese government's refusal to commit to increased defence spending and its sanctioning of two Israeli ministers, then the government has very serious questions to answer," he said.

Moira Deeming offers ‘generous' ultimatum to John Pesutto
Moira Deeming offers ‘generous' ultimatum to John Pesutto

Sky News AU

time24 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Moira Deeming offers ‘generous' ultimatum to John Pesutto

Sky News host Peta Credlin discusses Moira Deeming's ultimatum to former Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto. Ms Credlin said Moira Deeming's 'generous' offer to John Pesutto was rejected. 'Two years she was willing to give John Pesutto to pay what he owes her, enabling him to avoid bankruptcy, enabling him to keep his seat in the parliament. 'Of course, that's also allowed in that deal to keep hers, that the party members are not forced to spend one dollar bailing out a bloke with judgment as appalling as his, that she gets the simple apology that she is surely owed, and that this never happens to another Liberal again.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store