Swiss watches see 18% shipping boom ahead of possible Trump tariffs
Swiss watch exports surged by almost a fifth in April, as shipments to the United States more than doubled ahead of potential expanded tariffs announced by President Donald Trump.
According to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, total exports rose 18% for the month, reaching 2.5 billion Swiss francs ($3 billion). Exports to the U.S.—the industry's single largest market—spiked by 149%.
'This is the result of early shipments prompted by the announcement of U.S. tariffs,' said Jean-Philippe Bertschy, an analyst at Vontobel. Watches made from precious metals, steel, and bimetallic materials—all targeted by Trump—saw the strongest growth.
In contrast, exports to the rest of the world declined by 6.4%, continuing a weak trend from earlier in the year. Bertschy added that the sharp U.S. increase was likely a one-time reaction from exporters looking to avoid higher tariffs, not a sign of long-term demand growth.
Trump imposed a 10% tariff on imports from Switzerland in early April and has since threatened a 31% surcharge if a new trade agreement is not reached. The deadline is currently set for July 9, although it may be extended. Any increase would have a significant impact on the watch industry.
Performance in Asian markets remained sluggish. April exports to Singapore declined 9%, fell 30% in China, and dropped 23% in Hong Kong.
During the most recent earnings season, major luxury groups including Richemont, LVMH and Hermès reported declines in watch sales.
'The rise of 'luxury fatigue,' a declining 'feel-good factor' from luxury purchases, and worsening consumer sentiment all contribute to a less optimistic outlook,' Bertschy noted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU trade chief to meet US counterpart in Paris amid tariff tensions
EU trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič will meet his US counterpart Ambassador Jamieson Greer on Wednesday on the sidelines of an OECD meeting in Paris following a high-level gathering of EU and US experts in Washington on Tuesday against rising tensions over US customs duties. The Commission is hoping to rekindle negotiation with the US a week after EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump spoke on the phone, despite Trump's subsequent decision on 30 May to slap 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium. 'The EU in good faith paused its countermeasures on 14 April, to create space for continued negotiations, and following the call between president Ursula von der Leyen and president Donald Trump both sides agreed to accelerate the pace of talks,' Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said on Monday, acknowledging however that Trump's last announcement on steel and aluminium undermined the Commission's 'ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution with the US'. The Commission has suspended until 14 July a list of countermeasures targeting US products after Trump decided on a 90-Day pause in the trade dispute he launched against his partners across the globe. But the Commission could decide to move forward with those countermeasures, it said. A second list of US product is also open to consultation from industry until 10 June, when EU member states will adopt them. 'If no mutually acceptable solution is reached, both the existing and the possible additional measures will automatically take effect on 14 July or earlier if circumstances require,' Gill said. Šefčovič has already travelled to Washington three times to meet with his US counterparts, but his efforts have so far failed to break the deadlock. The US and the EU exchanged proposals to begin negotiations, but both sides have dismissed the other's offers. It wasn't until EU and US leaders spoke by phone that talks were able to move forward—until President Trump announced new tariffs on steel and aluminium at the end of last week, putting the negotiations at risk once again. The US currently imposes 25% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and 10% on all EU imports. Several investigations in pharma, semiconductors or aircrafts could also lead to more US tariffs on EU goods. While Poland's president does not wield executive power to the extent of their counterpart in France, the election of Karol Nawrocki marks a significant political turning point, re-energising the right and focusing attention on the ideological gulf between the country's pro-EU Prime Minister Donald Tusk and the Eurosceptic president. His ascent to the presidency will reshape dynamics both within Poland and across the European stage. The election result is a substantial setback for Tusk. Despite holding executive authority, Tusk's position is now politically weakened. Many analysts interpret Rafał Trzaskowski's loss—his second after 2020—not as a vote for Nawrocki, but as a rejection of Tusk's liberal government. Calls for Tusk's resignation have already emerged, though such a move remains unlikely. However, internal government shifts are expected, possibly including high-profile resignations such as that of the Minister of Justice. Trzaskowski's defeat leaves only Radek Sikorski, the current foreign minister, as a credible figure from the pro-European camp with growing influence. Some insiders argue Sikorski, who lost the Civic Platform primary to Trzaskowski, would have had a better chance against Nawrocki. With his growing stature and independent profile, Sikorski could now challenge Tusk's leadership within the Civic Platform (PO), though his lack of a strong party base remains a constraint. Nawrocki's win also temporarily unites Poland's historically fragmented right-wing camp. He received broad support from other conservative and far-right candidates, including Sławomir Mentzen of the Confederation party. If this unity persists, it could lay the groundwork for a new conservative coalition ahead of the 2027 parliamentary elections. Nawrocki represents a Eurosceptic but not anti-EU stance. Unlike Trzaskowski, known for his alignment with Brussels, Nawrocki is critical of the EU's direction—especially the Green Deal, migration pact, and proposals for treaty reform and greater centralisation. Despite these critiques, Nawrocki does not advocate for Poland's exit from the EU. His position aligns with many in the Polish political spectrum: maintain membership, but resist further integration. As French centrist MEP Bernard Guetta warned, Nawrocki's presidency may not result in immediate diplomatic ruptures, but 'it will have damaging consequences for the long-term'. Guetta warned that with backing from Donald Trump, Nawrocki could lead an effort to detach Poland from the EU's political core and slow EU-wide integration projects such as joint weapons procurement under the new €150 billion SAFE initiative. Nawrocki is staunchly anti-Russian. A former director of the Institute of National Remembrance, his academic and professional work has focused on Soviet-era crimes against Poles. His support for the removal of Soviet monuments earned him a persona non grata status in Russia in 2022. On Ukraine, however, Nawrocki's stance is more cautious. While he supports Ukraine's fight against Russian aggression, he is sceptical of Ukraine's accession to the EU and NATO—primarily citing threats to Polish agriculture and unresolved historical grievances relating to World War II atrocities. He conditions his support for Ukraine's EU and NATO bids on symbolic and material concessions. Nawrocki is a committed trans Atlanticist, emphasising Poland's military partnership with the US, to which he travelled during the campaign, meeting US President Donald Trump and his allies. His campaign received vocal support from prominent American conservatives, including US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. For Nawrocki, a strong US military presence in Poland remains the primary pillar of national security, alongside modernisation of Poland's own armed forces. Poland has a history of cohabitation—when the president and government belong to opposing political camps. Relations between Lech Kaczyński (president, PiS) and Donald Tusk (prime minister, PO) from 2007–2010, saw a period marked by persistent institutional clashes, including over foreign policy and defence. After Bronisław Komorowski's victory in the 2010 to 2015 presidential elections, relations between the government and the president were without major conflicts, as they were between 2015 and 2023, when President Andrzej Duda came from the same camp as the government of Beata Szydło and then Mateusz Morawiecki. Friction emerged after Tusk became prime minister again at the end of 2023. One area of ongoing tension between the government and the presidency has been the nomination of ambassadors. Under Polish law, ambassadors are formally appointed by the president. After the 2023 elections, Tusk's government submitted a list proposing the dismissal of over 50 ambassadors. However, President Duda declined to approve several of these changes. As a result, key diplomatic posts—such as Bogdan Klich in Washington and others in cities like Rome—remain without officially appointed ambassadors, with appointees acting only as heads of mission. A similar institutional standoff is likely under President Nawrocki. He is expected to continue this assertive approach, potentially blocking or delaying nominations from Tusk's administration, further complicating Poland's foreign policy and weakening its diplomatic presence in critical international arenas. Nawrocki's victory energises European conservatives and the far right. He was congratulated by Trump, Hungarian PM Viktor Orbán and Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni. He also campaigned with Romanian nationalist leader George Simion, and his win is being interpreted by right-wing circles as part of a broader continental shift—with similar trends seen in Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands and Portugal. The consistent themes—rejection of the Green Deal, resistance to migration policy, and national sovereignty over EU integration—point to a common ideological framework. Nawrocki's presidency introduces a new axis in Polish and European politics. While he lacks full executive power, his victory redefines Poland's political narrative, shifts its diplomatic orientation, and could catalyse a realignment of the right both domestically and in Europe. His win also throws the 2027 parliamentary elections into sharp focus. With a weakened Tusk, a re-energised right, and growing transatlantic ties, Poland may become a central battlefield for the future of EU integration and transatlantic conservatism.
Fashion Network
6 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Bags brand Radley losses narrow, plans targeted US price rises due to tariffs
Radley — or more accurately parent company Laddie Topco — has filed its accounts for the year to the end of April 2024 and also said it's looking at price rises in the face of new US tariffs. Turnover at the bags and leather goods brand fell to £71.9 million from £77.3 million, although the operating loss narrowed to £1.6 million from £7.4 million a year earlier on the back of a favourable comparison as there had been a non-recurring item that dented income in the previous year. The loss before tax was £9.4 million, down from a loss of £14.3 million the year before and the net loss narrowed to £8.18 million from £14.3 million. The company also said group EBITDA before non-recurring items this time was a positive £2.7 million, although this was lower than the £4.3 million 12 months earlier. Clearly it was a challenging year but group CEO Nick Vance said there were some plus points. It saw 3.8% like-for-like growth in DTC sales, delivering rises in both the key markets of the UK and US. The UK market saw a 3.7% uplift and the US a 4.7% rise. The DTC share of total sales also increased to 79% from 73% and gross profit rose by 255 basis points. Digital sales were strong with a 10.3% overall rise while store sales saw a more modest increase but were still positive, rising 0.4%. So why the 7% total turnover decline and lower EBITDA? That was due to softness at wholesale partners globally. In fact, global wholesale declined by 30%, partly impacted by systems disruptions pre-peak, but also reflecting partnerships moving towards dropship and marketplace models. Licensing revenue was up 8% at £1.4 million though and remains an important growth area for the company in non-core categories such as watches, jewellery, eyewear and beauty (which was new for FY24). The company includes Radley+Co that manages the brand's UK, European and Asian DTC and wholesale ops, as well as Radley USA, which manages sales and distribution to North America. Looking in more detail at specific regions, Radley+Co sales fell 3% in the year due to those reductions in sales to wholesale partners and the aftermath of a ransomware attack in August 2023. It accounted for 83% of the group's total sales during the period. As for Radley USA, it made up 17% of all external group sales, although its sales were down 19% year on year. That said, the Radley USA website traded strongly and was up 50% in the year. The local sales fall overall was caused by the closure of three loss-making stores and the 'underperformance of a key wholesale partner'. Yet the company said the USA 'remains the key international growth market for the group'. But as many companies are finding at present, it remains a tough market to approach given the current tariffs situation. As mentioned earlier, price rises are on the cards as the company said new taxes on goods being imported from India could cost it between £0.5 million and £1.3 million. It will bring in 'carefully positioned' US price increases to offset higher costs and 'fully expects' rivals to take similar actions.
Fashion Network
7 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Bags brand Radley losses narrow, plans targeted US price rises due to tariffs
Radley — or more accurately parent company Laddie Topco — has filed its accounts for the year to the end of April 2024 and also said it's looking at price rises in the face of new US tariffs. Turnover at the bags and leather goods brand fell to £71.9 million from £77.3 million, although the operating loss narrowed to £1.6 million from £7.4 million a year earlier on the back of a favourable comparison as there had been a non-recurring item that dented income in the previous year. The loss before tax was £9.4 million, down from a loss of £14.3 million the year before and the net loss narrowed to £8.18 million from £14.3 million. The company also said group EBITDA before non-recurring items this time was a positive £2.7 million, although this was lower than the £4.3 million 12 months earlier. Clearly it was a challenging year but group CEO Nick Vance said there were some plus points. It saw 3.8% like-for-like growth in DTC sales, delivering rises in both the key markets of the UK and US. The UK market saw a 3.7% uplift and the US a 4.7% rise. The DTC share of total sales also increased to 79% from 73% and gross profit rose by 255 basis points. Digital sales were strong with a 10.3% overall rise while store sales saw a more modest increase but were still positive, rising 0.4%. So why the 7% total turnover decline and lower EBITDA? That was due to softness at wholesale partners globally. In fact, global wholesale declined by 30%, partly impacted by systems disruptions pre-peak, but also reflecting partnerships moving towards dropship and marketplace models. Licensing revenue was up 8% at £1.4 million though and remains an important growth area for the company in non-core categories such as watches, jewellery, eyewear and beauty (which was new for FY24). The company includes Radley+Co that manages the brand's UK, European and Asian DTC and wholesale ops, as well as Radley USA, which manages sales and distribution to North America. Looking in more detail at specific regions, Radley+Co sales fell 3% in the year due to those reductions in sales to wholesale partners and the aftermath of a ransomware attack in August 2023. It accounted for 83% of the group's total sales during the period. As for Radley USA, it made up 17% of all external group sales, although its sales were down 19% year on year. That said, the Radley USA website traded strongly and was up 50% in the year. The local sales fall overall was caused by the closure of three loss-making stores and the 'underperformance of a key wholesale partner'. Yet the company said the USA 'remains the key international growth market for the group'. But as many companies are finding at present, it remains a tough market to approach given the current tariffs situation. As mentioned earlier, price rises are on the cards as the company said new taxes on goods being imported from India could cost it between £0.5 million and £1.3 million. It will bring in 'carefully positioned' US price increases to offset higher costs and 'fully expects' rivals to take similar actions.
