Why "Two Weeks" Is Donald Trump's Favourite Unit Of Time
New Delhi:
For US President Donald Trump, the phrase "two weeks" has emerged over time as a fixture in his speeches and policy-making. Its latest deployment came during a routine White House briefing this Thursday, where press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that Mr. Trump would determine "within the next two weeks" whether to launch a military strike on Iran.
"I have a message directly from the president, and I quote," Ms Leavitt said. "'Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'"
This is not the first time Mr Trump has used the "two weeks" timeframe.
When asked about his confidence in Russian President Vladimir Putin eight weeks ago, Mr Trump replied, "I'll let you know in about two weeks."
When questioned about the details of a new tax plan during his re-election campaign, the answer was: "Two weeks."
The timeline for a long-promised infrastructure package? "We're going to have something in two weeks."
From the situation in the Middle East to claims about election fraud evidence, all passed through the same timeframe: two weeks.
Over the past week, Israel has acknowledged strikes on Natanz, Isfahan, Karaj, and Tehran, describing the campaign as a preemptive measure to degrade Iran's nuclear capabilities and prevent any progress toward weaponisation. The ongoing crisis in the Middle East has put the entire region on edge, with all eyes focused on what Trump's move would be.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Trump's ‘two weeks' timeline for a decision on Iran is déjà vu for many
US President Donald Trump says he will be ready to make his decision about bombing Iran or not 'within the next two weeks'. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt offered this new timeline during her Thursday afternoon briefing, but some in the room couldn't help but feel a sense of déjà vu, as the phrase sounded more than a little familiar. 'I have a message directly from the president, and I quote,' Leavitt said. ''Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'' As The New York Times noted, 'two weeks' is one of Trump's most favoured and most ambiguous units of time. Sample this. Trump was asked eight weeks ago whether he could trust Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump replied: 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' Over the years, the same timeframe has been deployed for tax plans, health care policies, evidence of conspiracy theories, the fight against ISIS, the reopening of coal mines, and infrastructure announcements — all of which he promised to clarify 'in about two weeks.' As NYT puts it, 'It is a slippery thing, this two weeks — not a measurement of time so much as a placeholder. Two weeks for Trump can mean something, or nothing at all. It is both a yes and a no. It is delaying while at the same time scheduling. It is not an objective unit of time, it is a subjective unit of time. It is completely divorced from any sense of chronology. It simply means later. But later can also mean never. Sometimes.' The pressing question now is whether the US is going to bomb Iran? No one knows and we may have to wait two weeks to find an answer to that question. A reporter tried to pin down the timeline, reminding the press secretary of Trump's repeated 'two-week' promises, particularly in relation to Russia. 'How can we be sure he's going to stick to this one on making a decision on Iran?' Leavitt's answer? Essentially, that one situation can't be compared with another. As NYT says, 'This was really a question of metaphysics more than anything else.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
33 minutes ago
- First Post
'Accept our terms or face total surrender': Russia gives ultimatum to Ukraine
Russia has given an ultimatum to Ukraine: either accept Vladimir Putin's terms or be ready for full surrender. In Ukraine, however, there are barely any takers for Putin's maximalist terms as the terms mean the end of Ukraine as they have known it for generations. read more Russia's President Vladimir Putin meets with representatives of the Russian business circles in Moscow on May 26, 2025. (Photo: AFP) Russia has issued an ultimatum to Ukraine: either accept President Vladimir Putin's terms or be ready for full surrender. The ultimatum has come at a time when Russia has increased the pace of its offensive against Ukraine and the world is distracted by the ongoing war between Israel and Iran. Even as Ukraine has scored many substantial hits inside Russia in recent weeks, including the drone attack on June 1 in which it took down a third of Russian long-range bomber and surveillance fleets, Russia advance has picked up pace on the ground. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Amid such circumstances, Andrei Kelin, the Russian Ambassador to the United Kingdom, told CNN that Ukraine could either surrender now or 'we will continue this drive and Ukraine will have to surrender under much worse conditions'. Kelin said, 'We are now on the offensive and Ukraine is in retreat. In May alone, we took about 600 square kilometers (230 square miles) of Ukrainian territory and we continue to gain more ground. For Ukraine, there is a choice: either they will take our conditions right now, a permanent ceasefire and a comprehensive settlement of the situation, or we will continue this drive and Ukraine will have to surrender under much worse conditions." ALSO READ: Russia-Ukraine talks: What terms and conditions Putin and Zelenskyy want to apply to peace In the direct talks in Turkey, Russia had conveyed Putin's maximalist demands to Ukraine. If implemented, the demands would end the Ukrainian nation as generations have known it. The demands understandably have few takers in Ukraine. Putin seeks Ukraine's surrender, not peace With his maximalist demands conveyed in Turkey, Putin made it clear that he is seeking Ukraine's subjugation, not a peace deal. Putin has not just sought the recognition of Ukrainian territories that Russia has occupied since 2014, but has also sought Ukraine's surrender of all territories it claims but not currently occupies. In provisions similar to those imposed on defeated Germany after the World War I in the Treaty of Versailles, he has also sought restrictions on the size, deployment, and equipment of the post-war Ukrainian military. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD ALSO READ: Ukraine and beyond: 25 years on, Putin is still fighting Cold War In addition to complete occupation of five Ukrainian provinces (Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia) even beyond what Russia currently occupies, Putin has also sought the creation of a buffer zone of an unspecified length on the Ukrainian side of the new border. The buffer zone would essentially further reduce Ukraine's territory. In what break change the character of the Ukrainian nation, Putin has sought to insert the Russian language into formal business, restore the pro-Russia Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and ban so-called Ukrainian 'nationalist formations'.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ilie Bolojan named Romania's new Prime Minister amid political turmoil and budget crisis
Nicusor Dan (Photo: AP) Romanian President Nicusor Dan on Friday nominated Ilie Bolojan, leader of the pro-European National Liberal Party (PNL), as the country's next prime minister, ending weeks of political uncertainty following the annulled December presidential elections. Bolojan, 56, currently Senate president, is known for his reformist credentials and administrative discipline. His appointment comes at a critical moment, with Romania facing a record-high budget deficit of 9.3% and lingering fears over foreign interference in its democratic institutions. 'Ilie Bolojan is best suited to make the necessary adjustments in the Romanian state apparatus,' President Dan said in a televised address. Dan himself was elected in a May rerun, after the December vote was annulled amid allegations of Russian meddling. The nomination must now be approved by parliament, which remains fragmented. Bolojan is expected to navigate a divided legislature while pursuing difficult economic reforms. In a press conference last week, Bolojan acknowledged the challenges ahead. 'Romania is in a complicated situation. The new government will need to implement unpopular measures — including possible spending cuts and tax hikes.'
