Met Police bans pro-Palestinian demonstration in front of Parliament
June 23 (UPI) -- Britain's Met police banned a pro-Palestinian protest in front of the Houses of Parliament in central London scheduled to take place on Monday to "prevent serious public order," property damage and disruption to elected representatives.
Met Commissioner Mark Rowley said in a statement Sunday that while he could not stop the demonstration going ahead, he was using powers under public order legislation to impose an exclusion zone preventing protestors from assembling in a roughly 0.5 square mile area around the Palace of Westminster and restrict the duration to between noon and 3 p.m. local time.
The We Are All Palestine protest was being organized by Palestine Action but backed by around 35 other groups, including the Stop the War Coalition, Cage and Muslim Engagement and Development.
Calling Palestine Action "an extremist criminal group" with members awaiting trial on serious charges, Rowley said he was frustrated that he lacked legal authority to ban the protest outright.
"The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest," he said.
Rowley added that criminal charges faced by Palestine Action members, including allegedly attacking a police officer with a sledgehammer and causing millions of dollars of damage, represented extremism of a type that the vast majority of the public found abhorrent.
Palestinian Action responded by moving the protest, telling supporters in a post on X early Monday that it would now go ahead in Trafalgar Square, which is just outside the northern edge of the exclusion zone.
"The Metropolitan police are trying to deter support from Palestine Action by banning the protest from taking place at the Houses of Parliament. Don't let them win! Make sure everyone is aware of the location change to Trafalgar Square, London. Mobilize from 12 p.m."
The move came as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper updated lawmakers on plans to proscribe Palestinian Action as a terrorist organization after members of the group claimed responsibility for damaging military aircraft Friday after breaking into an RAF base northwest of London.
They also allegedly damaged the offices of an insurance company, which the group claimed provided services to Elbit Systems, an Israel-based military technology company and defense contractor.
Activist Saeed Taji Farouky called the move to proscribe the group a ludicrous move that "rips apart the very basic concepts of British democracy and the rule of law."
"It's something everyone should be terrified about," he told the BBC.
Cooper said in a written statement to the House that she expected to bring a draft order amending the country's anti-terror legislation before Parliament next week. Proscribing Palestine Action would make membership or promotion of the group punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Palestinian Action, escalated from targeting arms producers to vandalizing the two Airbus refuelling tanker aircraft because Britain was, it claimed, deploying aircraft to its Akrotiri airbase on Cyprus from where it can "collect intelligence, refuel fighter jets and transport weapons to commit genocide in Gaza."
The attack at RAF Brize Norton, the British military's main hub for strategic air transport and refuelling, including flights to RAF Akrotiri, came the same day a British man appeared in a closed court in Cyprus on charges of planning an "imminent terrorist attack" on the island and espionage.
The suspect was arrested by Greek anti-terror officers on a tip-off from a foreign intelligence service claiming he'd had the RAF Akrotiri base under surveillance since April and had links with the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
He faces charges of terrorism, espionage, conspiracy to commit a felony and other related offences.
RAF Akrotiri is the U.K. military's largest base for the Middle East region and a key waypoint en route to its giant Diego Garcia base in the Chagos Islands, 3,800 miles to the southeast in the middle of the Indian Ocean.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
21 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Jewel-Osco pharmacy division argues National Labor Relations Act unconstitutional
Jewel-Osco's pharmacy division argued this month that the structure of the National Labor Relations Board, the body that enforces federal labor law in the U.S., is unconstitutional. The company joins a lengthy and growing list of employers including SpaceX, Amazon, Trader Joe's, the University of Southern California, the dating app Grindr and Oak Brook-based hot dog empire Portillo's that have made similar arguments, either during administrative proceedings overseen by the labor board itself or in federal lawsuits seeking to get the agency declared unconstitutional. Osco, which was acquired by Jewel in 1961, entered the fray after local labor board officials issued a complaint against it last month alleging it had refused to bargain in good faith with the union representing its pharmacists, Teamsters Local 727. The company responded to those allegations by arguing that the National Labor Relations Act, the law it is accused of violating, is unconstitutional. The NLRA, also known as the Wagner Act, was signed into law by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1935. It has governed the rights of American workers to form unions, bargain collectively and organize together without retaliation from their employers for the last 90 years. The National Labor Relations Board is the independent federal agency charged with enforcing the NLRA. In addition to arguing that the NLRA is unconstitutional, Osco denied specific allegations leveled against it, including that it had failed to provide the Teamsters with information related to various grievances the union had filed on behalf of its members. Jayna Brown, general counsel for Teamsters Local 727, described the company's constitutionality arguments as 'completely unmeritorious.' Osco's outside counsel, from the law firm Littler Mendelson, specifically argued that the NLRB's administrative law judges and its board members are either unconstitutionally appointed or unconstitutionally protected from firing, echoing arguments made by SpaceX in federal court. Early this year, President Donald Trump fired former NLRB board member Gwynne Wilcox in an unprecedented move that set up a legal test of the latter argument. Wilcox has since sued over her firing. Last month, the Supreme Court issued an order that bars Wilcox from returning to the board while her legal challenge is ongoing. The firing of Wilcox has left the labor board without a quorum, meaning it cannot issue rulings on cases appealed to it from lower levels of review at the NLRB. In its June filing, Osco also argued that because the board lacks a quorum, the agency's general counsel and its regional officials in Chicago also lack authority to enforce the law, such as by issuing a complaint against Osco. That argument echoes one made earlier this year by Whole Foods, which is owned by Amazon. The company's constitutional arguments are 'purely a tactic by management to skirt around their clear and undeniable legal obligations for their union-represented employees,' said Brown, the Teamsters' attorney. The local represents about 500 pharmacy workers in stores throughout Cook, DuPage, Lake and McHenry counties, Brown said. The pharmacists are working under a collective bargaining agreement that expires in 2028, she said. In a message sent to union members this month, the local's secretary-treasurer, John Coli, Jr., criticized what he described as the company's 'foolish choice to spend money on overpriced legal counsel instead of just doing … what is right by their hardworking employees.' Neither Jewel-Osco nor its parent company, Albertsons, responded to requests for comment. The first Jewel-Osco combination grocery-pharmacy stores opened in the 1960s. Osco's attorney has asked for the case against it to be dismissed in its entirety. A hearing in the case is set for early September.
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
F.B.I. Warns of Possible Retaliation by Iran After Bombing of Nuclear Sites
Federal officials are increasingly concerned about the possibility of Iran or its supporters retaliating on American soil after the bombing of nuclear sites in Iran by U.S. forces. In an internal email on Sunday, top officials at the F.B.I. cautioned that Iran and its proxies have 'historically targeted U.S. interests in response to geopolitical events, and they are likely to increase their efforts in the near term.' They urged field offices to monitor their collection platforms and stay in close contact with the Defense Department, including the National Guard, 'who may be targeted for retaliation' while 'specific attention should be paid to' U.S. military facilities connected to the strikes in Iran. In New York City, Mayor Eric Adams said that more police officers would be on duty around religious, cultural and diplomatic sites 'out of an abundance of caution,' given the situation in the Middle East. Iran, which the United States has designated as a state sponsor of terrorism, has long backed a network of militias across the Middle East in an attempt to extend its influence across the region and undermine Israel. Those militias include Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, who control parts of Yemen. Separately, the Department of Homeland Security issued a security bulletin stating that the 'ongoing Iran conflict' had elevated security concerns in the country and adding that cyberattacks by pro-Iranian hackers were likely. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran says its carried out 'mighty and successful' attack on US base - as Qatar air defences 'thwart assault'
Iran claims it has carried out a "mighty and successful response" to "America's aggression" after launching missile attacks on a US military base in Qatar and Iraq. The attack comes after the US on three key nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend. Iran's response this evening is the latest escalation in tensions in the volatile region. Qatar has said there are no casualties at the al Udeid base following the strikes and that its "air defences thwarted the attack and successfully intercepted the Iranian missiles". People in Qatar's capital, Doha, had stopped and gazed up at the sky as missiles flew and interceptors fired. Follow latest: Iran had announced on state television that it had attacked American forces stationed at the al Udeid airbase. A caption on screen called it "a mighty and successful response" to "America's aggression" as martial music played. Initial reports claimed Iran had also targeted a base housing US troops in western Iraq, but a US military official has now told Reuters news agency the attack in Qatar was the only one detected. A US government official has said the White House and US defence department is "closely monitoring" the potential threats to its base. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump is in the Situation Room in the White House with his team following the Iranian strikes. Read more: The attacks came shortly after Qatar closed its airspace as a precaution amid threats from Iran. Senior diplomatic sources in the region have told Sky News that some Gulf nations and the US were given prior warning before Iran launched its missiles. Just before the explosions, Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on the social platform X: "We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer." Kuwait, Bahrain and Iraq shut their airspaces after the attack, while the Abu Dhabi-based Etihad Airways said it is rerouting several routes today and tomorrow due to restrictions in parts of the Middle East.
