Seven charged in London after protest in support of Palestine Action group
FILE PHOTO: Police officers block a street as pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather in protest against Britain's Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's plans to proscribe the \"Palestine Action\" group in the coming weeks, in London, Britain, June 23, 2025. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy/File Photo
Seven charged in London after protest in support of Palestine Action group
LONDON - Seven people have been charged on Tuesday following a protest in London in support of Palestine Action, a campaign organisation the British government has proposed to ban under anti-terrorism laws.
The ban, which was announced on Monday and will be laid before parliament next week, would make it a criminal offence to belong to the group after its activists damaged two UK military planes in protest at London's support for Israel.
Palestine Action, which called the ban "an unhinged reaction", on Monday was forced to change the location of a planned protest to London's Trafalgar Square after police banned it from staging a demonstration outside parliament.
The Metropolitan Police said although the protest began peacefully, there were clashes between officers and people in the crowd, with 13 arrests made. Of those, seven people have been charged.
One was cautioned while the remainder were bailed or released under investigation to allow further enquiries to take place, the police said. Charges include assaulting emergency workers and a racially aggravated offence.
Palestine Action has regularly targeted British sites connected to Israeli defence firm Elbit Systems as well as other companies in Britain linked to Israel since the start of the conflict in Gaza in 2023.
In its latest and most high-profile action, two Palestine Action members entered a Royal Air Force base in central England on Friday.
The ban would put Palestine Action on a par with Hamas, al-Qaeda or ISIS under British law. Condemning the ban, Amnesty International UK said that "government embarrassment at security breaches is no excuse for interfering with human rights". REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
40 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Trump tells Congress that Iran had nuclear weapons programme, contradicting US spy agencies, World News
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump told Congress this week that the Iranian sites bombed by the US housed a "nuclear weapons development programme," even though US spy agencies have said no such programme existed. Trump's claim raised questions whether US intelligence backed up his decision to order the strikes on Iran on Sunday. The Republican president made the assertion in a letter dated Monday to House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson, a key ally, and it was posted on the White House's website. "United States forces conducted a precision strike against three nuclear facilities in Iran used by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its nuclear weapons development programme," Trump wrote. The most recent US assessment, presented to Congress in March by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, said Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had not ordered the restarting of a nuclear-weapons effort shuttered in 2003. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters last week that the March assessment had not changed. Iran insists that its nuclear programme is for peaceful uses. President George Bush justified the invasion of Iraq in 2003 by saying intelligence showed the country had weapons of mass destruction. This was later discredited and prompted a political backlash. Trump first cast doubt on intelligence about Iran's nuclear programme last week, when he repudiated the assessment that Gabbard delivered to Congress. "I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one," Trump told reporters, referring to a nuclear weapon. Gabbard herself on Friday disputed media accounts of her March testimony, saying on X that US intelligence showed Iran could make a nuclear weapon "in weeks to months" if it chose. According to unclassified US intelligence reports compiled before the strikes, Iran closed a nuclear weapons programme in 2003 — a conclusion shared by the UN nuclear watchdog — and has not mastered all of the technologies required. But Tehran does have the expertise to build a warhead at some point, according to the reports. The US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites — Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow — on Sunday. It hit deeply buried Fordow, where advanced centrifuges could produce low-enriched uranium for nuclear reactor fuel and highly enriched uranium for warheads, with "bunker busting" bombs. Trump and other top officials said the sites were obliterated. But a preliminary US intelligence assessment found the attack set back Tehran's programme by only months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters on Tuesday. A US official who read the assessment said it contained a number of caveats and a more refined report was expected in the coming days and weeks. [[nid:719454]]
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Why Iran faced Israel and the US alone as its friends stood by
Iran spent decades expanding its reach in the Middle East by building a network of partners that came to be known as the 'axis of resistance'. PHOTO: AFP Why Iran faced Israel and the US alone as its friends stood by Iran spent decades expanding its reach in the Middle East by building a network of partners that came to be known as the 'axis of resistance'. Yet it found itself standing alone to face the recent attacks by Israel, which the US joined by bombing three of the Islamic Republic's key nuclear facilities. A tentative ceasefire with Israel went into effect on June 24. The web of partnerships that Iran has funded and armed for years is struggling, and the country's state ally, the regime of Bashar Al-Assad in Syria, fell in December 2024. Nearly two years of war with Israel has weakened the Palestinian group Hamas and the Lebanese organisation Hezbollah. And while the Houthi militants in Yemen remain defiant, their capabilities have also been impaired by American strikes. Iran has been building ties elsewhere. It has shifted closer to Russia and China, and mended relations with its Gulf Arab rivals for regional power, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Hezbollah Hezbollah, Iran's main regional partner, stayed out of the latest conflict between Iran and Israel. The Shi'ite Muslim group, which is both a militia and a political party, is trying to figure out its own next steps. Hezbollah was formed in 1982 in response to Israel's invasion of southern Lebanon – a region Israel went on to occupy for 18 years. The group's leadership and capabilities have been weakened by Israeli strikes – a response to Hezbollah launching a rocket campaign on Israel in support of Gaza, following the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct 7, 2023. While Hezbollah still retains some fighting capacity, Israel says it has taken out 70 per cent of the group's arsenal, including rockets and missiles, a claim that is difficult to verify. Even if Hezbollah were better positioned to assist Iran, there's a question of motivation. There is resentment among some members over how Iran appeared to abandon them during the fight with Israel. In addition, there is war fatigue among Hezbollah's constituents. Areas under its control have borne the brunt of Israel's bombing of Lebanon and many people have lost their homes and possessions. While Iran gives Hezbollah free rein to make its own strategic calculations, it works closely with the group and has influence with it. At the same time, knowing how delicate the relationship is with Hezbollah now, authorities in Iran are likely to hesitate before calling on the group to join their battles. The Houthis The Houthis also stuck to the sidelines during the latest Israel-Iran flare-up, although they appeared more willing to get involved, if needed. The group first arose during Yemen's civil war in the 1990s and today controls approximately one-third of the country's territory, including the capital Sana'a. The Houthis targeted Israel with missiles and drones and launched a maritime campaign harassing ships in the Red Sea in support of the Palestinians after Oct 7, 2023. The group receives some help and support from Iran without taking direct orders from it. The Houthis have been hurt by US strikes on its targets, which escalated in March. While the group retains robust capabilities, some of its weapons, including those that allowed it to conduct cross-border and precision attacks, were taken out. There is also a question of incentive with them. The Houthis are a local group with local grievances that aims to be seen as an actor in its own right, rather than as an Iranian proxy. They view themselves as active in the fight for Gaza – and have popular support for this – but that does not necessarily extend to Iran. The Houthis also have their hands full with governance and economic challenges that have produced rising discontent in the areas they control. Hamas Hamas remains resolved to continue fighting Israel, but after almost two years of war, it lacks the capacity to pose a credible threat on Iran's behalf. Also, Hamas is not as close to Iran as other members of the axis of resistance. The group – which like Hezbollah and the Houthis is classified as a terrorist organisation by the US – receives funding and military assistance from Iran, as well as financial support from Qatar, but does not always follow orders or calls for restraint. The relationship between Hamas and Iran is more a marriage of convenience rather than a close partnership. Iraq's Shi'ite militias Iran has traditionally relied on Shi'ite militias in Iraq known as the Hashd al Shaabi, or Popular Mobilisation Forces, to confront the US presence there. The Hashd emerged in 2014 after the radical Sunni group Islamic State took over large swathes of Iraq, and the country's highest ranking Shi'ite cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani called on Shi'ites to join the security forces to push back against the threat. While the Hashd is no monolith – a wide array of views and relationships are represented – its components receive arms, money and close guidance from Iran. Iran-backed militias have periodically attacked US military personnel remaining in Iraq, who number some 2,500. But Hezbollah's recent experience of being battered and getting no help from Iran is a cautionary tale. When Iran on June 23 retaliated against the US attack on its nuclear facilities two days earlier, it chose a US base in Qatar as its main target, rather than Iraq. Syria Syria, under the Assad regime, became the state closest to Iran after its Islamic revolution in 1979. Assad's fall was a surprise to many, including the authorities in Iran. They took no measures to stop it and instead turned their back on Assad in the hope that they could build at least basic ties with the next government. But Syria's new leader Ahmed al-Sharaa appears to have other priorities, including strengthening ties with the US and its allies, and courting the Gulf Arab states in the pursuit of economic dividends to help him build his constituency and overcome his difficulty controlling all of Syria. In the pursuit of a 'no problems with neighbors' policy', he went so far as to barely respond to Israeli strikes on Syria and to allow Israel to use his country's airspace in its campaign against Iran. The Gulf Arab states While Iran has had good ties with the Gulf Arab states Oman and Qatar, its relations with Saudi Arabia and the UAE were tumultuous until recently. The latter two encouraged US President Donald Trump's efforts to exert 'maximum pressure' on Iran during his first term. But they were disappointed with what they perceived to be a US failure to react to attacks on Saudi oil installations in 2019 and on the UAE in 2022 that they ultimately held Iran responsible for. Afterward, they both began to pursue de-escalation with Iran, arguing that containment would only work if it was combined with engagement. In 2022 the UAE restored normal diplomatic relations with Iran, and Saudi Arabia followed the next year. But this olive branch from Saudi Arabia and the UAE will only extend so far given that good relations with the US, their main security guarantor, is also critical to them. In addition, some of the ruling elites in the two countries privately welcomed Israel's attacks on Iranian leaders, even if others were more fearful of what might come next. All in all, the only support Gulf Arab states gave Iran in the June conflict was strong words of condemnation for Israel, calls for a return to peace and offers to mediate. Russia and China Smarting from the West's ability to isolate it in the 2010s, Iran set out to build closer ties with both Russia and China, and succeeded. Russia's own fallout with the US and its allies over its full-scale invasion of Ukraine helped draw it closer to Iran, which supplied the Russian military with drones for the war. And, as part of its rivalry with the US, China tends to present itself as a defender of countries, such as Iran, that are in conflict with the other superpower. Both Russia and China strongly condemned the Israeli and US strikes on Iran, and Russia offered to mediate to de-escalate tensions. But neither country offered Iran tangible assistance. While Iran has a 20-year strategic partnership with Russia and a 25-year cooperation deal with China, these arrangements are not formal alliances. Officials in Russia, who are already mired in the war in Ukraine, made it clear that their agreement with Iran does not include mutual-defence obligations. China, which imports much of its oil from Iran, has cause to worry about the flow of energy from the region, and therefore an incentive to encourage an end to any hostilities that would disrupt its crude supply and prompt Iran to curb access to the Strait of Hormuz – a key shipping chokepoint located at the mouth of the Persian Gulf that handles about a quarter of the world's seaborne oil trade. However, for Russia, a major oil exporter, instability in the region leading to higher oil prices could be an economic boon. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Kenyans brace for protests one year after storming parliament
Pro-government counter-protesters and riot police officers disperse people protesting over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya/File Photo NAIROBI - Kenyans are expected to take to the streets in large numbers on Wednesday to mark the one-year anniversary of anti-government protests that culminated in the storming of parliament and several deaths as police opened fire on demonstrators. Although the protests eventually faded after President William Ruto withdrew proposed tax hikes that had initially sparked the rallies, public anger over the use of force by security agencies has not abated, with fresh demonstrations erupting this month over the death of a blogger in police custody. Six people, including three police officers, were charged with murder on Tuesday over the killing of 31-year-old blogger and teacher, Albert Ojwang. All have pleaded not guilty. The death of Ojwang has become a lightning rod for Kenyans still mourning the deaths of more than 60 people killed during last year's demonstrations and blaming security forces for the fatalities and dozens of unexplained abductions. Police sources told Reuters that a heavy security presence would be deployed around downtown Nairobi, particularly near the presidency, parliament and the central business district. The interior ministry in a post on X on Tuesday warned protesters not to "provoke police" or "attempt to breach protected areas". The unprecedented scenes on June 25, 2024, showing police firing at demonstrators as they broke through barriers to enter parliament, created the biggest crisis of Ruto's presidency and sparked alarm among Kenya's international allies. On Tuesday, the embassies of the United States, Britain, Canada, and other Western nations released a joint statement on X urging all involved to "facilitate peaceful demonstrations and to refrain from violence." "The use of plain clothed officers in unmarked vehicles erodes public trust," the statement said. Rights campaigners condemned the presence of unidentified police officers at protests last year. The embassies also said they were troubled by the use of hired "goons" to disrupt peaceful demonstrations, after Reuters reporters saw groups of men beating protesters with sticks and whips last week. The counter-protesters have defended their actions, telling Reuters that they are not goons but rather patriots protecting property from looters. Two police officers were arrested last week over the shooting of an unarmed civilian during a protest in Nairobi over the death of Ojwang, the blogger. Kenya's police chief initially implied that Ojwang had died by suicide but later apologised after an autopsy found that his wounds pointed to assault as the cause of death. President Ruto said that Ojwang had died "at the hands of the police", which he said was "heartbreaking and unacceptable". REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
