AUB a pioneering model in education: Sheikh Nahyan
Sheikh Nahyan Bin Mubarak Al Nahyan, Minister of Tolerance and Coexistence, attended the annual gala dinner hosted by the American University of Beirut (AUB) at the InterContinental Hotel in the capital, Abu Dhabi.
The event was held in celebration of AUB alumni residing in the UAE and in recognition of the deep academic and cultural ties between the two brotherly nations.
The dinner was attended by Dr Paul Morcos, Minister of Information of the Republic of Lebanon; Dr Raymond Sawaya, Vice President for Medical Affairs and Dean of Faculty of Medicine; Fouad Dandan, Ambassador of Lebanon to the UAE; and Engineer Khalil Joudeh, President of the AUB Alumni Club - Abu Dhabi Chapter, in addition to a distinguished group of alumni and friends of the university.
In his opening speech, Sheikh Nahyan Bin Mubarak said, 'I greet you all and warmly welcome you to this renewed celebration here in the UAE of the American University of Beirut - a globally renowned institution that, nearly 160 years after its establishment, continues to stand strong and successful. Through its ongoing achievements, the university reflects the talent, determination, and global contributions of the Lebanese people.'
He emphasised that the occasion reflects the deep fraternal ties between the UAE and the Republic of Lebanon, stressing that these relations are built on mutual respect, goodwill, and sincere brotherhood.
He praised AUB as a pioneering model in education, scientific research, and healthcare, with an active role in engaging communities both locally and internationally.
He noted the high calibre of AUB alumni in the UAE, stating, 'We observe, here in the UAE, the capability and excellence of AUB graduates, and we greatly value their contributions to our nation's development. Under the wise leadership of President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, our country is firmly committed to maximising human potential, supporting innovation, and advancing research and development across all sectors.'
He further affirmed the UAE's commitment to supporting the mission of universities in Arab societies by promoting values of sustainable development, coexistence, peace, and understanding - values that are also embodied in the UAE's current celebration of the 'Year of Community.'
He described AUB as a beacon of excellence, producing highly regarded graduates and serving as a centre for innovation, knowledge, and community service.
Following that, Dr Paul Morcos delivered a speech emphasising the cultural bonds between the two peoples and the university's enlightening role in the region.
He expressed his gratitude for the invitation and stated that AUB is an institution its alumni take great pride in - one that has shaped leaders who have excelled in various fields and championed free speech and media freedom.
He added that the United Arab Emirates has always been, and will continue to be, a sincere and effective partner in supporting Lebanon.
He also noted that the Lebanese community in the UAE continues to enrich various sectors through its expertise and professionalism.
He explained that the Ministry of Information is currently working on a new media law aimed at transforming the sector by enhancing freedom of expression within a framework of responsibility and professionalism.
The ministry also seeks to revamp Tele Liban, strengthen public media, and combat fake news and disinformation in collaboration with local and international partners.
He concluded his remarks by saying, 'It is our collective responsibility to continue investing in human potential and to strengthen partnerships that build fairer, more stable, and more prosperous societies. We must also foster media and cultural cooperation with our Arab brothers, foremost among them the United Arab Emirates.'
The event reflected the mutual respect and appreciation between the Emirati and Lebanese peoples and highlighted the vital role that esteemed academic institutions like the American University of Beirut play in promoting cultural dialogue and societal advancement through education and knowledge.
This gathering comes in the context of enhancing academic and cultural collaboration between the UAE and Lebanon, through strategic partnerships that foster knowledge exchange, innovation, and tolerance.
WAM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Abu Dhabi to host 31st Arab Scout Conference and 6th Arab Scout Youth Forum in November
30 May 2025 14:27 ABU DHABI (ALETIHAD)Under the patronage of His Highness Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Chairman of the Abu Dhabi Executive Council, the 31st Arab Scout Conference and the 6th Arab Scout Youth Forum will be hosted in Abu Dhabi from November 9-21, Arab Scout Conference is held every three years to develop and review the general policies and strategic direction of the Arab Scout Region, which operates under the World Organization of the Scout Movement. The conference also includes the election of members to the Arab Scout Committee for the new term, the approval of financial statements and administrative reports, and the endorsement of the region's future activities and programmes. The Arab Scout Conference and the Arab Scout Youth Forum are the most prominent events organised by the Arab Scout Region, which includes 19 Arab member states. These events aim to adopt the regional three-year plan, outlining the priorities and activities of the Arab Scout Region for the upcoming period. The triennial plan focuses on six key priority areas: youth engagement, educational methods, diversity and inclusion, social impact, communications and external relations, and Salem Abdul Rahman Al Darmaki, Vice Chairman of the Arab Scout Committee and Chairman of the Emirates Scouts Association expressed his pride in hosting the Arab Scout Conference and Arab Scout Youth Forum under the patronage of His Highness Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Chairman of the Abu Dhabi Executive Council. Al Darmaki underscored the association's dedication to the success of the event, highlighting its role in empowering Arab youth to shape the future of Scouting and develop future leaders for the Arab Scout Rahma Ali, Secretary-General of the Emirates Scout Association, stated that hosting the 31st Arab Scout Conference in Abu Dhabi reflects the association's prominent standing at the regional, Arab, and international levels. He emphasised the association's commitment to strategic youth empowerment, fostering active participation in public life, and preparing a generation that understands national issues and contributes to society through volunteerism while reinforcing strong national identity and values among Emirati youth. Source: Aletihad - Abu Dhabi
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Why I support the UK taking a more nuanced position on Hamas
The reputation of Hamas sank to its lowest point after its attack on 7 October 2023, in which 1,200 Israelis and foreigners were killed and 251 taken hostage. In Israel, this attack provoked a tsunami of anger, strident calls for revenge, demands for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, and a national consensus in support of the total eradication of Hamas. The result has been the longest, deadliest and most ruinous war in the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Hamas is a social movement and political organisation with a military wing, al-Qassam Brigades. The military wing was proscribed by the British government as a terrorist organisation in March 2001, and in November 2021, former Home Secretary Priti Patel added the political organisation to the list of proscribed groups. This decision marked an abrupt reversal of the government's previous policy, which made a clear distinction between Hamas's political and military wings. Patel, a staunch supporter of Israel, argued, unconvincingly in my opinion, that the distinction between the two wings was no longer tenable. For its part, Israel has always denied that there is any difference between the two wings. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In August 2017, as secretary of state for international development, Patel went on a trip to Israel accompanied by Lord Polak, honorary president of Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and a major fund-raiser for the Tory party. She had previously served as an officer for CFI's parliamentary group between 2011 and 2014. While pretending to be on a private holiday, Patel held 12 secret meetings with high-ranking Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Upon her return, she asked her officials to explore the possibility of diverting some of the foreign aid budget to enable the Israeli army to carry out humanitarian work in the occupied Golan Heights. She was subsequently forced to resign for concealing the nature and purpose of her trip to Israel. Baseless argument In 2019, then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson rehabilitated Patel by appointing her as home secretary. Johnson shared her Manichean view of the Middle East struggle, in which Israel represents the forces of light and Palestinians the forces of darkness. The change of policy towards Hamas was announced not by the foreign secretary, but by the home secretary. Patel said that designating the whole of Hamas as a terrorist organisation should be seen through a domestic prism: it would help to protect Jews in this country. This argument is baseless. Hamas does not carry out operations outside Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, it has no presence in Britain, and it poses no threat to British Jews in this country. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Hamas's 2017 'Document of General Principles and Policies' (unlike the 1988 Hamas Charter) explicitly distinguishes between Judaism as a religion and Zionism as a political project. It affirms that Hamas's conflict with Israel is due to occupation, not religion, and states that it would accept the creation of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders without recognising Israel. Hamas has now instructed Riverway, a London law firm, to make an application to the home secretary to remove the government's designation of the movement as a proscribed terror group and recognise its legitimate role as a Palestinian resistance movement engaged in a struggle for self-determination and liberation. The application is made by Mousa Abu Marzouk, the former head of Hamas's political bureau. I am among 19 experts supporting this legal filing through reports on the history and context of Palestinian dispossession. My report describes the central role played by Britain in facilitating this dispossession, from the Balfour Declaration of 1917 up until the present. Why I wrote an expert report against the UK's classing Hamas as a terror group Read More » Western media outlets have relied heavily on the Israeli narrative of 7 October, including its countless false allegations and outright fabrications, such as the story of 40 decapitated babies, while under-reporting the Palestinian side of the story. One of Abu Marzouk's most significant correctives to the dominant narrative concerns the background to the Hamas-led 7 October attack. According to him, Hamas sought to achieve specific military objectives during the operation, with clear instructions not to target women, children and the elderly. Since deviations from these instructions admittedly occurred, Hamas is prepared to cooperate with the International Criminal Court and any other neutral third party in an independent and transparent investigation into the events of that day. This position stands in sharp contrast to Israel's denial of journalists' entry into Gaza, and its refusal to allow any independent investigation of the atrocities and war crimes committed by its forces. To explain Hamas's behaviour is not to justify it. Killing civilians is wrong, period. But here, as always, the context is all-important. The attack of 7 October did not occur in a vacuum. It occurred against the backdrop of decades of brutal and suffocating military occupation. Moreover, as a people living under unlawful military occupation, Palestinians have a right to resist, including the right to armed resistance. In effect, labelling Hamas's political leaders as terrorists pure and simple gives Israel a free pass to inflict death and destruction on Gaza without being held to account. The terrorist framing also stands in the way of a more balanced and nuanced understanding of the history, motives, policies and principles of Hamas. Crucial context The Hamas side of the story is hardly ever heard in the West, yet it makes a compelling reason for removing its political wing from the list of proscribed organisations. Here are some of the most relevant facts: in January 2006, Hamas won a clear victory in fair and free all-Palestine elections, and proceeded to form a government. Israel refused to recognise this government and resorted to a series of draconian measures to undermine it, supported by the United States and European Union. In March 2007, Hamas formed a unity government with its rival party Fatah, but Israel refused to negotiate with them. Instead, Israel and the US encouraged Fatah to stage a coup to drive Hamas out of power. Hamas pre-empted the Fatah coup by seizing power in Gaza, which led to Israel imposing a blockade on the enclave - a form of collective punishment proscribed by international law - which remained in force for 16 years before the Hamas attack on 7 October. The home secretary would do well to read the 700 pages of evidence that underpin this application for deproscription before making up her mind The distinction between the political and military wings of Hamas has always been crucial. Patel's decision to proscribe Hamas in its entirety was a politically motivated move that disregarded Hamas's democratic road to power and its growing political moderation once in power. Casting the whole of Hamas as a terrorist organisation also served to bolster Israel's hardline position, its refusal to negotiate, and its reliance on brute military force. Proscription by Britain and other western powers in effect endorsed Israel's refusal to put Hamas's willingness to compromise to the test. Israel's recurrent military offensives in Gaza since 2008 are chillingly described by its generals as 'mowing the lawn'. Under this grim rubric, the next war is always just around the corner. In the post-7-October military offensive, Israel has gone much, much further than ever before, committing the crime of crimes: genocide. As Abu Marzouk points out in his witness statement, Britain is not an innocent bystander in the genocide that is unfolding before our eyes in Gaza. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict was made in Britain. Britain was the colonial power that enabled the Zionist settler-colonial movement to embark on the systematic takeover of Palestine. The war in Gaza is the latest and cruellest phase in this long-term colonial effort to displace, dispossess and ethnically cleanse the Palestinian people. Hamas is a vital segment of Palestinian society and the vanguard of its resistance to Israel's illegal occupation. Deproscribing the political wing of Hamas would constitute a small step towards rectifying a monumental historical wrong. The home secretary would do well to read the 700 pages of evidence that underpin this application for deproscription before making up her mind. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye. The purpose of this article is to set out the author's reasons for supporting Abu Marzouk's application. Nothing in this article should be understood as inviting or otherwise encouraging readers to support, or express support for, Harakat al-Muqawamah al-Islamiyyah (Hamas).
Gulf Today
21 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Media must build, unite not destroy or divide, says Sheikh Mohammed
His Highness Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, said via the X platform: 'We were pleased to host 8,000 Arab media professionals in the UAE for the 23rd Arab Media Summit.' 'We always renew our call for a developmental Arab media that builds and does not destroy, unites and does not divide, creates hope and not despair, combats ignorance, backwardness and intellectual and cultural sickness and creates a more beautiful future for young Arab generations who possess the self-confidence to shape their own growth and future,' he added. The Summit aims to develop a clear vision for the future of the media sector, affirm its positive impact on creating an Arab renaissance, and mobilising efforts to shape a future of progress and prosperity for the region. Attended by approximately 8,000 professionals, the Summit continues to serve as the region's foremost platform for media thought leadership, policy dialogue, and the shaping of future narratives. The Summit also holds Arab Media Award. The Award continues to spotlight professional excellence and high editorial standards in a media landscape marked by rapid transformation. Organised by the Dubai Press Club, the Award remains the Arab world's foremost media recognition platform, celebrating innovative and impactful journalism that meets the evolving needs of the region. This year's edition attracted over 2,900 submissions from across the Arab world.
