logo
Houthis takes deadly revenge on Israel after Yemen's port attack

Houthis takes deadly revenge on Israel after Yemen's port attack

Time of India2 days ago

News

4 days ago
Manipur is once again gripped by unrest following the arrest of Kanan Singh, a key figure from the Arambai Tenggol group, by the CBI. His arrest, linked to the 2023 Manipur violence, sparked immediate and widespread protests across the Imphal Valley. Violent clashes between agitators and security forces have led to injuries, bus torching, and gunshots, pushing the state to the brink. Authorities have imposed Section 144 and implemented internet blackouts in five districts to curb the spread of misinformation and prevent further escalation. The situation remains highly volatile as Manipur's long-standing ethnic and political tensions resurface, with even threats of self-immolation highlighting the extreme sensitivity. Stay updated on the latest developments, government actions, and the impact on local communities as Manipur grapples with this critical moment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EPFO official arrested by CBI for taking Rs 10K bribe
EPFO official arrested by CBI for taking Rs 10K bribe

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

EPFO official arrested by CBI for taking Rs 10K bribe

Bhubaneswar: An official of the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) was arrested by the CBI for taking a bribe of Rs 10,000 from a chartered accountant for approving applications about two companies, an official said on Saturday. Anil Rath, Senior Social Security Assistant (SSSA), EPFO Regional Office, Berhampur, was allegedly harassing the complainant by delaying the approval, the official said. A case was registered by the CBI on June 12 against Rath on the basis of a complaint filed by Suraj Kumar Dash. He was booked for the offence of demanding undue advantage/bribe by a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act and criminal conspiracy under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Rath allegedly demanded a bribe of Rs 10,000 from the complainant to approve the Authorised Signatory Application of two employers -- Jai Jagannath Infratech and Uttam Padhi, on the EPFO Portal. Dash said the application was repeatedly rejected by Rath between March and May on the grounds of incomplete documentation. 'I visited the EPFO (Regional Office, Berhampur) again on June 11 to find out the reason why the application is under process where PRO Anil Rath demanded Rs 10,000 (for two employers at the rate of Rs 5,000 per company) to approve the Authorised Signatory Application,' said Dash in his complaint. After negotiation, the accused agreed to accept a bribe of Rs 10,000 from the complainant, the CBI said. On receiving a complaint from Dash, CBI, ACB, Bhubaneswar verified it on June 12.

CBI books Supertech directors over ‘ ₹126-cr bank fraud' case
CBI books Supertech directors over ‘ ₹126-cr bank fraud' case

Hindustan Times

time6 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

CBI books Supertech directors over ‘ ₹126-cr bank fraud' case

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Saturday raided five locations in Uttar Pradesh's Gautam Budh Nagar and Ghaziabad in connection with a case of alleged bank fraud involving over ₹126 crore. The case pertains to Noida-based construction firm Supertech Limited and its promoters and directors, who allegedly caused a wrongful loss of ₹126.07 crore to IDBI Bank Ltd, officials said. According to a CBI press release, search operations were conducted at the official and residential premises of the company's top executives. The raids led to the recovery of incriminating documents and ₹28.5 lakh in cash from one of the director's premises, the agency said. The searches were ongoing at the time of the statement, with more seizures likely, officials added. The raids were carried out after the agency registered a case based on a written complaint from IDBI Bank, which alleged that Supertech and its promoters conspired with unknown bank officials to secure loan funds fraudulently, officials said. The FIR names Supertech Limited, along with its promoter and managing director Ram Kishor Arora, and whole-time directors Sangita Arora, Mohit Arora, Parul Arora, Vikas Kansal, Pradeep Kumar, Anil Kumar Jain, and Anil Kumar Sharma. All except Sharma are residents of Gautam Budh Nagar; Sharma is based in Rajendra Nagar, Ghaziabad, officials said. In response to the allegation, Supertech chairman RK Arora said that the process to settle the matter with the bank is underway. 'The plan to deliver the housing projects and mode of payment to the IDBI Bank, has already been submitted to the Supreme Court in an ongoing case. Our one time settlement with the IDBI is already in process. We informed the CBI about the details that they sought from us. We are working out on plans to deliver the projects,' Arora told HT. According to the FIR, the accused allegedly submitted forged documents as genuine to IDBI Bank to obtain credit facilities. The loan account was later declared fraudulent and categorised as a wilful default, causing the bank a financial loss of ₹126.07 crore. 'The accused entered into a criminal conspiracy to cheat and misappropriate the funds sanctioned by the bank,' the CBI said, adding that the agency had received a complaint from the bank and then launched a preliminary inquiry before registering a formal case. CBI officials confirmed that coordinated raids were conducted across five premises linked to the accused, including company offices and directors' residences in Noida and Ghaziabad. (With inputs from Vinod Rajput)

Gurugram school murder: Cops summoned for ‘framing' bus conductor
Gurugram school murder: Cops summoned for ‘framing' bus conductor

Hindustan Times

time6 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Gurugram school murder: Cops summoned for ‘framing' bus conductor

Gurugram: A special CBI court in Panchkula has summoned four Haryana Police officers accused of tampering with evidence and falsely implicating a school bus conductor in the 2017 murder of a seven-year-old boy inside a school toilet in Gurugram's Bhondsi. The CBI court has directed all four accused — then DSP Birem Singh, inspector Narinder Singh Khatana, sub-inspector Shamsher Singh and executive sub-inspector Subhash Chand— to appear on July 15, officials aware of the matter said. Eight years after the murder of the child, the CBI court has summoned the four accused officers following a petition filed by the victim's father, highlighting the prolonged delay in action against them and urging swift judicial intervention. The four police officials face serious charges under IPC sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 166A (disobeying legal direction), 167 (framing incorrect document), 194 (fabricating evidence to procure conviction of a capital offence), 330 (torture to extort confession), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The order was passed by Special Judicial Magistrate Anil Kumar Yadav. The incident occurred on September 8, 2017, when the body of the Class II student—referred to as Prince to protect his identity— was discovered in a toilet in the school with his throat slit. Within hours, the Haryana Police arrested Ashok Kumar, a school bus conductor, claiming he had confessed to the crime. The arrest was met with massive public outrage, especially after glaring inconsistencies surfaced in the investigation. Days later, the probe was handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which later apprehended a Class XI student from the same school—referred to as Bholu—for the murder. Kumar was acquitted on February 28, 2018, by a special court. He recalled the trauma that continues to haunt him. 'I was tortured, beaten, hung upside down, and had my head submerged in water by the police just to force a confession,' he said. 'I was innocent, yet they paraded me before the media, ruined my reputation, and humiliated me in front of my family. Even now, I struggle to find work. I was framed to protect the real accused. I want to see all four officers behind bars,' he said. Kumar had earlier rejected a compensation of ₹1 lakh offered by the Gurugram Police in May 2019, calling it 'an insult' to the trauma he and his family endured. 'That money cannot erase what I went through. It was never about money—it is about dignity and accountability,' he said. The child's father, who moved the latest application leading to the summons, expressed satisfaction over the court's order. 'It is a step closer to truth and justice. Those who tried to bury the truth must face the law,' he said. The court also dismissed the Haryana home department's claim that sanction was needed to prosecute the officers, stating that acts like fabricating evidence to implicate an innocent man cannot be passed off as 'official duty' under Section 197 of the CrPC. The summons will be served using email and WhatsApp, to ensure the accused appear before the court without further delay. The court said there is incriminating material on the file collected by CBI and all the documents allegedly showing involvement of the conductor, have been fabricated with the intention of implicating him falsely. 'It becomes clear that these accused have misused their official position under the colour of their official duty and they have committed serious offences that is why CBI, the premier investigating agency of our country has filed a charge-sheet against these accused under section 120B read with section 166A, 167, 330 and 506 of IPC and substantive offences thereof,' read the order. Meanwhile, the victim's counsel Sushil Tekriwal said, 'The most brutish, barbaric, cruel and diabolic acts commissioned by the four senior police officers are prima facie construed to be extra-judicial acts. They will now face sentence up to life if convicted. The pedestal of substantial justice can never be denied though delayed. The acts of police force was also gruesome to the extent that they all jointly and collectively and knowingly were not only fabricating the evidence, preparing false and incorrect documents with an intention and knowledge to falsely implicate an innocent as an accused without any evidence but were planting evidence for the said purpose, and writing case documents and case diaries at the subsequent stage and without physical presence but in back date corroborated by CDR locations.' The development comes more than three years after the CBI filed its supplementary charge sheet on January 6, 2021, but the case remained stalled due to lack of prosecution sanction. The CBI had accused the officers of collusion and procedural misconduct during the initial investigation in 2017.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store