logo
Zohran Mamdani spells doom for Democrats — and glee for the GOP

Zohran Mamdani spells doom for Democrats — and glee for the GOP

New York Post6 hours ago

The Democratic Party has created a monster it can't control.
November's presidential election should have been their warning: Major blue cities showed the rest of the country what unchecked Democrat power looks like — and voters really didn't like what they saw.
From Chicago's Brandon Johnson to Boston's Michelle Wu, the state of our deep blue cities shows what happens when the leftists gets everything they want.
Advertisement
Proving the Democratic Party can be trusted nationally begins with ensuring their political strongholds aren't insane asylums.
With their nomination of Zohran Mamdani for mayor, it's safe to say the Democrats didn't learn that lesson.
In choosing Mamdani, New York Democrats have decided to shed any remaining pretense of moderation or common sense, and just plow headlong into the abyss.
Advertisement
Bold move. How did it happen?
It's the kids — and they're not alright.
To put it plainly, the young left has gone insane.
Advertisement
They believe probably untrue things on everything from economics to history to foreign affairs, they're radical beyond any past generation, they're quick to excuse rioting and even murder, they have zero tolerance for dissent — and an ugly antisemitic streak runs through all of it.
Oh, and they feel very deeply that they should be in charge of everything, immediately.
Sound familiar? If you've been paying attention to activist politics in New York recently, you've surely noticed it in their attitudes on everything from bike lanes to zoning to Luigi Mangione to Palestine.
Advertisement
And Zohran is their perfect candidate: A 33-year-old trust-fund socialist with a liar's smile and demonstrated allegiance to every lunatic progressive totem you can name. He even has an accent he can turn on and off at will.
Party leaders know they have a problem. Ever wonder why top national Democrats are the same geriatric faces we've seen for decades now?
It's because they don't trust their own young people to take the reins — they're terrified of them.
During the recent LA riots, moderate Democrats on X were openly pleading with activists to scale back their violence — or at the very least, to wave American flags and soften the brutal optics that were being transmitted to every corner of the nation.
But those pleas were ignored: That's not who the leftists are, and they're not going to pretend otherwise anymore. And they wouldn't be caught dead with an American flag.
For decades now, Democrats have cultivated these increasingly radical shock troops.
College campuses became political training camps to serve left-wing interests, and our urban centers became breeding grounds for well-funded activists — backed by NGOs and nonprofits — ready to mobilize on demand.
Advertisement
For a while, this arrangement worked; Democrats were happy to corrupt our institutions so long it kept paying political dividends — electoral victories, fearful corporations, cultural cachet.
But they were playing with fire as each generation of young Democrats moved further left than the last.
Less tolerant of dissent or compromise. More insular and parochial. Increasingly detached from reality.
Like making a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy, eventually the image becomes unrecognizable. Liberal became progressive, progressive became woke — and woke blew up in their faces.
Advertisement
Now Democrats are out of power in all three branches of the federal government, with record-low approval ratings to match.
And the army of young people they empowered but can't command is the indelible face of their brand, politically toxic outside of affluent urban enclaves — yet on the verge of capturing the nation's largest and most important city.
National Democrats will have to reconcile this embarrassment to voters in the rest of the country looking on with horror and disbelief. Good luck to them.
Advertisement
How could the financial capital of the nation nominate for mayor a socialist who's never held a job?
How could a city struggling with crime and violence nominate a radical who wants to defund the police?
Democrats will struggle to answer those questions.
But the explanation is very simple — young urban progressives have completely lost the plot, yet they're the party's energy, the ones who get out and vote, the ones who get the clicks and views, the ones who volunteer and phone-bank and door-knock.
Advertisement
And they're going to relegate the Democratic Party to a permanent minority — with iron-fisted control over our deep blue cities, and very little beyond them.
Extremism isn't a great long-term strategy for a national party. It tends to play poorly with exactly the sort of voters Democrats need to win back.
And they're about to learn that lesson the hard way: Mamdani is a walking campaign advertisement for congressional Republicans in the midterms.
As Vice President JD Vance posted Tuesday night on Bluesky, 'Congratulations to the new leader of the Democratic Party @zohrankmamdani.'
Frankly, a general-election defeat would be the best-case scenario for Democrats now, sparing them years of embarrassment as Mamdani destroys this city.
As a New Yorker, I pray that's the outcome.
Vickie Paladino is a Republican City Council member representing the 19th district in northern Queens.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnesota faces federal lawsuit for offering illegal immigrants college tuition benefits denied to Americans
Minnesota faces federal lawsuit for offering illegal immigrants college tuition benefits denied to Americans

Fox News

time7 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Minnesota faces federal lawsuit for offering illegal immigrants college tuition benefits denied to Americans

The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint challenging laws in Minnesota that provide free and reduced in-state tuition to illegal aliens, claiming the laws are unconstitutional. Under federal law, higher education institutions are prohibited from providing benefits to illegal aliens not offered to U.S. citizens. According to the DOJ, Minnesota's laws unconstitutionally discriminate against U.S. citizens and are in direct conflict with federal law. "No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens," Attorney General Pam Bondi said. "The Department of Justice just won on this exact issue in Texas, and we look forward to taking this fight to Minnesota in order to protect the rights of American citizens first." By filing the lawsuit, the DOJ is demanding that Minnesota stop the enforcement of a law requiring public colleges and universities to provide in-state tuition rates and free tuition based on certain income circumstances to immigrants in the country illegally who maintain state residency. Federal law prohibits higher education facilities from providing education benefits to illegal immigrants, which are not offered to U.S. citizens. The lawsuit comes just weeks after the DOJ took actions against Texas for providing similar benefits to illegal immigrants. Both lawsuits have been filed in response to two executive orders signed by President Donald Trump since returning to the Oval Office in January. The executive orders were signed to ensure illegal immigrants cannot receive taxpayer benefits or preferential treatment. One of the orders, "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders," ordered all agencies to "ensure, to the maximum extent permitted by law, that no taxpayer-funded benefits go to unqualified aliens." The other order, "Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens," directs officials to "take appropriate action to stop the enforcement of State and local laws, regulations, policies, and practices favoring aliens over any groups of American citizens that are unlawful, preempted by Federal law, or otherwise unenforceable, including State laws that provide in-State higher education tuition to aliens but not to out-of-State American citizens." Ultimately, Texas complied with the DOJ and stopped enforcing the Texas Dream Act, which was originally introduced in February 2001. The legislation, signed by Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, June 16, 2001, removed federal immigration status as a factor in determining eligibility to pay in-state tuition at Texas public colleges and universities for students who graduate from a Texas high school and who meet the minimum residency, academic and registration criteria. While the state immediately stopped enforcement, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has since intervened. On Tuesday, the ACLU of Texas, alongside organizations like the Texas Civil Rights Project and Democracy Forward, filed a motion to intervene in the litigation to defend the constitutionality of the Texas Dream Act against the DOJ. The ACLU said the DOJ's order was agreed to by Texas without proper process and creates "sweeping uncertainty" for students and colleges. "As students prepare to attend school in the fall, the failure of neither the DOJ nor the attorney general to defend the Texas Dream Act threatens their ability to afford tuition – and suddenly threatens their dreams of pursuing higher education," the ACLU said in a press release. "By moving to intervene, these groups and individuals hope to challenge this abusive litigation strategy and defend the Texas Dream Act, which has enabled a generation of Texans to grow their careers and become leaders in our communities." Fox News Digital has reached out to Gov. Greg Abbott's office for comment on the matter.

Trump administration sues all 15 Maryland federal judges over order blocking removal of immigrants
Trump administration sues all 15 Maryland federal judges over order blocking removal of immigrants

CNN

time11 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump administration sues all 15 Maryland federal judges over order blocking removal of immigrants

The Trump administration on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against all 15 federal judges in Maryland over an order blocking the immediate deportation of migrants challenging their removals, ratcheting up a fight with the federal judiciary over President Donald Trump's executive powers. The remarkable action lays bare the administration's determination to exert its will over immigration enforcement as well as a growing exasperation with federal judges who have time and again turned aside executive branch actions they see as lawless and without legal merit. 'It's extraordinary,' Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School, said of the Justice Department's lawsuit. 'And it's escalating DOJ's effort to challenge federal judges.' At issue is an order signed by Chief Judge George L. Russell III and filed in May blocking the administration from immediately removing from the US any immigrants who file paperwork with the Maryland district court seeking a review of their detention. The order blocks the removal until 4 p.m. on the second business day after the habeas corpus petition is filed. The administration says the automatic pause on removals violates a Supreme Court ruling and impedes the president's authority to enforce immigration laws. The Trump administration has been locked for weeks in a growing showdown with the federal judiciary amid a barrage of legal challenges to the president's efforts to carry out key priorities around immigration and other matters. The Justice Department has grown increasingly frustrated by rulings blocking the president's agenda, accusing judges of improperly impeding the president's powers. 'President Trump's executive authority has been undermined since the first hours of his presidency by an endless barrage of injunctions designed to halt his agenda,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement Wednesday. 'The American people elected President Trump to carry out his policy agenda: this pattern of judicial overreach undermines the democratic process and cannot be allowed to stand.' A spokesman for the Maryland district court declined to comment. Democratic Rep. Glenn Ivey of Maryland slammed the lawsuit, writing in a post on X, 'This is absurd and an unprecedented attack on the federal judiciary in Maryland. The Trump Administration will stop at nothing to undermine judicial rulings and delegitimize the courts.' Trump has railed against unfavorable judicial rulings, and in one case called for the impeachment of a federal judge in Washington who ordered planeloads of deported immigrants to be turned around. That led to an extraordinary statement from Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who said, 'Impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.' Among the judges named in the lawsuit is Paula Xinis, who has called the administration's deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador illegal. Attorneys for Abrego Garcia have asked Xinis to impose fines against the administration for contempt, arguing that it ignored court orders for weeks to return him to the US. The order signed by Russell says it aims to maintain existing conditions and the potential jurisdiction of the court; ensure immigrant petitioners are able to participate in court proceedings and access attorneys; and give the government 'fulsome opportunity to brief and present arguments in its defense.' In an amended order, Russell said the court had received an influx of habeas petitions after hours that 'resulted in hurried and frustrating hearings in that obtaining clear and concrete information about the location and status of the petitioners is elusive.' The Trump administration has asked the Maryland judges to recuse themselves from the case. It wants a clerk to have a federal judge from another state hear it. James Sample, a constitutional law professor at Hofstra University, described the lawsuit as further erosion of legal norms by the administration. Normally when parties are on the losing side of an injunction, they appeal the order — not sue the court or judges, he said. On one hand, he said, the Justice Department has a point that injunctions should be considered extraordinary relief; it's unusual for them to be granted automatically in an entire class of cases. But, he added, it's the administration's own actions in repeatedly moving detainees to prevent them from obtaining writs of habeas corpus that prompted the court to issue the order. 'The judges here didn't ask to be put in this unenviable position,' Sample said. 'Faced with imperfect options, they have made an entirely reasonable, cautious choice to modestly check an executive branch that is determined to circumvent any semblance of impartial process.'

Carville calls socialist's victory in NYC mayoral primary a 'potentially damaging event' for Democratic Party
Carville calls socialist's victory in NYC mayoral primary a 'potentially damaging event' for Democratic Party

Fox News

time26 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Carville calls socialist's victory in NYC mayoral primary a 'potentially damaging event' for Democratic Party

Veteran strategist James Carville warned on Wednesday how democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani winning the New York City mayoral primary may be a burden for the Democratic Party. Mamdani, a Ugandan-born New York State Assemblyman from Queens, caused a major upset by defeating former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the race to become the Democratic Party's nominee for New York City mayor. Republicans and some Democrats have blasted Mamdani, warning he is a grim sign of America's political future. Carville, one of the most famous strategists in American politics, has been speaking about the Democratic Party's need to ditch far-left politics since well before the 2024 election. He spoke about Mamdani's surprising victory on his podcast, warning it may be yet another hurdle for struggling Democrats. The strategist noted that Mamdani "has not walked back" calls for "global infitada" [sic]. Carville was referencing how Mamdani refused to disavow the phrase "Globalize the intifada," which pro-Israeli supporters argue is a call for violence, and Israel opponents tout as a mere call to struggle against oppression. "Maybe he'll turn out to be a very skilled candidate that can skillfully navigate some of what I refer to as 'esoteric' positions," Carville said, appearing to refer to Mamdani's policy of government-run grocery stores, which bewildered the seasoned strategist. "There's a lot of baseball left here," Carville said of the mayoral election. "We've got a lot of baseball left to play." Hunt argued that New York City is not a reliable indicator for America at-large, citing how many of its most iconic mayors did not represent a larger political shift outside of their city. "However, I do believe that Republicans will jump on this," he said. He then appeared to refer to Rep. Elise Stefanik's, R-N.Y., comment where she warned about Mamdani being a "radical, Defund-the-Police, Communist, raging Antisemite." Hunt denied that Mamdani is a communist, but argued, "he does have some issues that the Republicans will love to talk about." "I can't imagine that any Democratic candidate anywhere in the country is going to be able to escape answering this question. I think the microphone's going to follow him around. I think that they're going to pound this home as hard as they possibly can," Carville agreed. A big part of the answer, Carville replied, is encouraging people to "look at our nominees in Virginia and New Jersey." However, he said, "Depending on who comes in a general election, there's a lot of Democrats that are going to have a hard go at this. I think it's a potentially damaging event." Both of the hosts drew parallels between former President Joe Biden and Cuomo being rejected as symbols of the Democratic Party's past in favor of something entirely new. "Sometimes the Democratic Party's attitude is 'take this and eat it, because you gotta eat it,' and people don't like that," Carville said, arguing that mentality was enforced on Democrats with Biden and then with Cuomo. The rejection of this, he said, goes beyond ideology and is a generational shift, one could either be positive or negative for the Democrats' future. "I think this guy creates probably more problems than opportunities for the Democrats," Hunt later argued after criticizing his grocery store proposal as "not realistic at all." Carville warned that opposition to Mamdani is going to "keep unearthing stuff" from his past. "I mean he's gotta give an umbrella answer for all of this," he said. "You know, Harris had the same problem."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store