
Fairview Health Services opposed UMN, Essentia merger
Fairview Health Services told its employees in a Wednesday letter that it does not agree to a proposed merger with the University of Minnesota and Essentia Health as part of a new health care organization announced in January.
The U and Duluth-based Essentia Health in late January announced the partnership to develop a new nonprofit health care organization to include a $1 billion investment in the next five years.
In a proposition to Fairview on Feb 10, University and Essentia officials further suggested that they and Fairview combine into a single organization called Newco.
But, in the letter, Fairview CEO James Hereford and Board of Directors Chair John Heinmiller said that while the organization supports the University's endeavor to partner with Essentia, it would not agree to a merger.
'We have stated this clearly to the University: while we are open to a partnership, when it comes to a proposed merger between Fairview, the University, and Essentia — our answer is no,' the letter said.
Hereford and Heinmiller said in the letter that they believed maintaining Fairview's independence and commitment to its patients is essential over joining the proposed company called Newco.
'Additionally, we continue to support the University's — or NewCo's — purchase of the academic assets, as laid out in the University's original five-point plan and reiterated in the (letter of intent) we both signed early last year,' the letter stated.
If a new contract is not in place with the University by early 2027, Fairview would continue to own and operate the academic hospitals, and academic physicians would continue to practice there, according to the letter.
Fairview officials also emphasized in their letter that Essentia's willingness to support the University was a good development, calling Fairview's current level of financial support of the school 'unsustainable.'
With Fairview and the University's partnership set to expire in a couple years, a solution to sustain that commitment is urgently needed, said Chris Gade, University of Minnesota vice president for communications. But, when the University made an offer, Gade said, it received a negative response from Fairview and no counter-offer.
That's when University officials shared their plans with Fairview to begin exploring alternative options, leading to the proposed solution that included the three organizations, Gade said.
In the Feb. 10 proposal to combine the three organizations, the University laid out plans for a 22-member board that would initially include six appointees from each organization, board appointees and a non-voting Newco CEO.
'Newco will be the most comprehensive health care system serving Minnesota — the system with the broadest geographic coverage and reach, serving the most communities, and offering a complete range of care from basic primary care through the most complex, multispecialty care,' the Feb. 10 proposal states.
Gade said U officials would like an opportunity to more fully explore the proposal with Fairview.
'And now today, what we're hearing is that they have chosen to say no to that solution that we believe is in the best interest of Minnesota. And that's perplexing to us because we have not had the level of conversation that we believe is possible about that solution and we would just welcome the opportunity to explore it more fully,' Gade said. 'And what we're proposing is a solution that alleviates from Minnesota putting the University's medical school at risk. And without a solution, we don't believe we can successfully educate and train the workforce.'
The U medical center, which educates some 70% of the doctors and nurses in Minnesota, was sold to Fairview in 1997.
What the University is proposing closely aligns to feedback from stakeholders across the state, as well as the governor's task force, Gade said.
'And what we've heard back from Fairview is, 'We would not like to pursue a transformational solution. Instead, what we're proposing is a transactional relationship,' and actually even doing that at rates lower than what they're currently providing to the university. So I think the option for Minnesota is transformational solution or a transactional relationship,' Gade said.
Describing Fairview's level of investment made into the University as below average, Gade said that the health care provider's decision would not be good for patients or providers.
'And it's important for people to recognize that and to ask questions about it. Why has it been below average? I think that's a question that merits exploration and understanding. Our commitment at the University is to fulfill our commitment to the state of Minnesota and to our land grant mission and to patients and the healthcare workforce in Minnesota,' Gade said. 'And the other kind of important part of this is, this solution, as we proposed it, really will sustain existing patient relationships that patients have with their providers. What Fairview is saying, 'Let's break up those relationships.' And that's not good for patients, and that's also not good for the caregivers.'
Fairview is Minnesota's third largest employer with more than 34,000 employees, more than 1.2 million patients in Minnesota and more than $8 billion in revenue, according to the provider.
Fairview previously failed to persuade U officials to back a proposed merger with Sanford Health, based out of state in Sioux Falls, S.D. Sanford proposed combining their 58 hospitals, but announced in July 2023 that the deal failed after pushback from key stakeholders and regulators.
Since February 2024, the University and Fairview have been in conversations about a new model of care agreement, and the two signed a letter of intent at that time with plans for the University to purchase the four academic health facilities that make up the M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center, with the U assuming full ownership of the facilities by Dec. 31, 2027.
Essentia operates 14 hospitals and 80 clinics in Minnesota, including St. Mary's Medical Center in Duluth.
'Essentia Health's overriding goal has been and remains ensuring patients across Greater Minnesota and our entire service area have access to affordable, high-quality care – today and well into the future,' said an Essentia Health spokesperson in a statement Wednesday.
The University's Board of Regents is expected to discuss the proposal for the new healthcare organization during its Academic Health Committee meeting Thursday and its full board meeting on Friday.
Health | With federal money at risk, UMN, MNSCU stress high stakes of state budget debate
Health | Education Department rescinds Biden memo that threatened to upend college NIL payments
Health | Literary calendar for week of Feb. 9: Celebrations for 'Gatsby,' Kao Kalia Yang and more
Health | University of Minnesota, Essentia Health announce partnership, nonprofit
Health | Minnesota allocates funding to help U researchers monitor bird flu in wildlife

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's tech firms block AI access during high-stakes college entrance exams
China's tech giants disabled some AI functions during the national college entrance exam period. About 13.4 million students are sitting for the "gaokao" this year — China's high-stakes national exam. China may be pushing AI education, but it's drawing the line at students using it to cheat on tests. In China, one exam can decide your future, and this year, students weren't allowed any help from AI. As millions of high school seniors began sitting for China's notoriously grueling "gaokao" college entrance exam from Saturday, the country's biggest tech firms quietly pulled the plug on their AI tools. Apps from Tencent, ByteDance, and Moonshot AI disabled features like photo recognition and real-time question answering, a move aimed at preventing students from using chatbots to cheat during the high-stakes national exam. Last month, China's education ministry warned students not to rely on AI-generated answers for assignments or tests, even while promoting AI education from a young age. This year, about 13.4 million students are taking the "gaokao," which runs from Saturday to Tuesday, according to local media. Unlike the US college admissions process, which often considers essays, extracurriculars, various standardized exams, and school records, China's system leans almost entirely on this one test. For many students, especially those from rural or low-income backgrounds, the "gaokao" is a once-a-year shot at social mobility. That kind of pressure has fueled an arms race in test prep, from private tuition centers to after-school cram schools. But over the weekend and into this week, AI was off the table. Screenshots posted by users on the Chinese app Rednote showed that popular AI chatbots like Tencent's YuanBao, ByteDance's Doubao, and Moonshot AI's Kimi had disabled exam-relevant features during testing hours. In one post on Sunday, a user who goes by "DKK" attempted to upload what appeared to be a test paper to Doubao. The chatbot immediately shut it down: "The image content is not compliant and the upload failed." In another screenshot posted on Monday, user "Gemini0612" asked Doubao for help with a question. The chatbot responded with a notice: "We are very sorry. In order to ensure the fairness of the college entrance examination, Doubao's Q&A function will be temporarily closed during the examination period and will be restored after the examination at 6.45 p.m. this afternoon. Thank you for your understanding and support, and wish all candidates good luck in the college entrance examination." Tencent's YuanBao replied with a similar message in another screenshot posted Monday: "Dear users, to ensure fairness in the college entrance examination, this function is not available during the college entrance examination period. Tencent's Yuanbao wishes all candidates success in the exam." Tencent's chatbot offers users a choice between its in-house Hunyuan model and DeepSeek's R1. The Shenzhen-based tech giant has integrated both models across its vast ecosystem, including WeChat, China's biggest social media app used by nearly 1.4 billion people. Moonshot AI's chatbot Kimi also locked down its photo-recognition and question-answering functions. In a Rednote post on Sunday, a user who said he is a college student uploaded a photo of a question and asked Kimi for help. The chatbot responded with another canned message about ensuring fairness during the college entrance examination period. The user pushed back: "I am not a college entrance examination candidate. The college entrance examination does not test this." But Kimi didn't budge. Tencent, ByteDance, and Moonshot AI did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. China is all in on AI education. In China's capital, Beijing, AI education is compulsory for students, including elementary schoolers. Starting this fall, schools in the city must provide at least eight hours of AI instruction per academic year, the Beijing Municipal Education Commission said in March. While the country is racing to build an AI-literate generation, regulators are also drawing a hard line, saying AI is for learning, not for shortcuts. By pulling the plug during the "gaokao," tech firms reinforced the message: AI has no place in the exam hall. Read the original article on Business Insider


Business of Fashion
an hour ago
- Business of Fashion
The Independents Acquires Culinary Studio We Are Ona
Fashion communications conglomerate The Independents has acquired culinary studio We Are Ona. Founded in Paris in 2019 by chef and Noma alumnus Luca Pronzato, We Are Ona produces immersive dinners, including for Chanel, Balenciaga, Coperni, Alaïa and Saint Laurent. After working together on various projects for clients over the past few years, joining forces felt inevitable, said Independents co-founder and chief executive Isabelle Chouvet. 'We started to collaborate a lot and then it was natural that we had to officialise this union,' said Chouvet. '[Pronzato] is the only one doing what he's doing. He is able to push the boundaries of innovation, he is the only one who has the network of talents. He has the vision and understands the client's needs.' We Are Ona collaborates with artists like Willo Perron, who has staged shows for Beyoncé and Drake; Carsten Höller, known for his interactive installations; and Michelin-starred chefs including Dalad Kambhu and Mory Sacko. Beyond producing events for brands, the firm hosts pop-ups open to the public, most recently a restaurant experience featuring a dramatic, 100-feet-long sculptural lighting installation in New York's WSA Building with fashion show producer Alexandre de Betak (whose Bureau Betak was acquired by The Independents in 2021) in May. The set of a We Are Ona-produced dinner for Balenciaga. (Courtesy) Being under The Independents' umbrella will help We Are Ona continue expansion in the US (where it opened an office earlier this year), the Middle East and Asia, said Pronzato. This marks The Independents' first acquisition in the culinary space; it comes as foodie culture reaches a new zenith, and as food becomes an increasingly important tool fashion brands use to engage their customers. When it comes to food, fashion brands are raising the stakes — looking for high-production events that double as marketing moments: 'It's not only dinner to have a dinner, it's dinner to create a brand moment,' said Pronzato. 'These experiences can create an emotional link. When you sit at the table, the experience is different than when you buy a bag.' The acquisition is The Independents' third this year, and part of an ongoing spree that began in 2023 when it set its sights on doubling in size. In April, The Independents bought design studio 2x4 and in May, Paris-based documentary production company Terminal 9 Studios. Now, the company has over 20 agencies in its ranks and counts over 1,200 employees in offices across cities including Barcelona, Beijing, London, Los Angeles, Milan, New York, Seoul, Shanghai and Paris. Group revenue totalled $800 million in 2024, according to the company. Learn more: Why Food Is Everywhere in Fashion Advertising As foodie culture peaks and the cost of living rises, food is popping up more than ever in fashion imagery.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life." Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements" with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord, insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage. It's also removed cameras. At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates, something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman. Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___