How does the protest vote work for San Diego's proposed trash fee?
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — This week, the city of San Diego began sending out protest vote mailers to the more than 200,000 single-family homeowners who could potentially begin paying a new fee for trash collection.
The vote is the last step in the process for the city before it can implement the proposed charge under California state law regulating how municipalities are able to impose fees on residents related to their property.
Could the city of San Diego lower its new trash collection fee even more?
Here's what homeowners should know about the vote is and how it works.
A protest vote, or a 'majority protest,' is a sort of referendum giving residents who oppose a new fee related to services for their property — in this case, trash collection — an opportunity to stop it from going into effect.
Under state law, if more than 50% of all property owners affected by a new charge present written opposition to a new fee, the municipality seeking to impose it would be barred from doing so.
In California, the bar for local governments to increase or add new fees on residents' properties is quite high to clear. That's because of a proposition passed by voters back in the 1970s, Proposition 13, that set off a series of reforms to limit how municipalities can levy taxes.
Prop 13 specifically targeted property taxes, capping how much cities could charge and when they could determine new tax rates for a given property. This, in effect, cut in half the revenue cities were bringing in from these taxes, forcing them to look at other sources to fund services.
By the 1990s, many cities turned to benefit-based assessment fees, as well other charges not subject to Prop 13's restrictions, as a way to close the gap. That practice inspired another measure, Proposition 218, to further limit how cities could raise revenue from taxes.
One of the many changes Prop 218 made was to impose a new public notice requirements and create a mechanism for those affected by any proposed fees to halt their implementation: the protest vote, officially called a 'majority protest.'
The protest vote part of a public hearing required before a fee is approved and goes into effect. A hearing notice and the protest ballot are required to be sent out a minimum of 45 days before the meeting to all property owners that would be impacted by the new charge.
Before the hearing, property owners opposed to the fee who would like to participate must full out the ballot with their name, address or parcel number, and signature to submit it for their protest to be counted.
The notice and ballot sent out to more than 230,000 homeowners in the city that would be impacted by the proposed waste collection fee can be found here.
H Barracks approved as 'safe sleeping' site
Property owners have until the end of the June 9 hearing to turn in the ballot to the San Diego City Clerk's office. This can be done either by dropping it off in person or by sending it via mail. Those sent by mail must be received prior to the hearing.
The public will also have the option to give oral comment on the fee at the 2 p.m. hearing, but it will not count towards the Prop 218 vote.
Once all the ballots have been collected, the city clerk will have several weeks to count them, weighing the total against the number of homeowners. If it is determined there is a majority against the fee when all have been tabulated, the fee effectively dies.
According to the city, the council will consider the protests — and whether to allow the fee to be collected using the county tax roll — at a final hearing on June 24.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
14 hours ago
- Politico
Who's scared of Newsom's money grabs?
BOXED OUT FROM BALLOT-BOX BUDGETING — In his effort to resolve differences in school funding formulas, state Sen. Dave Cortese is up against a lot: voter-approved measures that set the education budget, wealthy communities content with the status quo, and a Legislature newly ambivalent about making big decisions about money at a moment of economic uncertainty. Now the Bay Area Democrat faces one more hurdle: newfound uncertainty about whether successfully selling voters on the change would actually deliver any effect on policy. During this year's budget season, Gov. Gavin Newsom has repeatedly brushed aside the votes Californians cast last November, rerouting money from a climate bond, leaving an anti-crime initiative's policy changes unfunded, and disregarding a new health-care financing formula altogether. The willingness of Cortese and his Silicon Valley backers to take their cause to the ballot is turning into an early test of whether Sacramento decision-makers' disregard for voters' preferences will affect the willingness of deep-pocketed interests to invest in shaping policy through what political scientists call 'ballot-box budgeting.' Cortese has been focused on the budget gap between schools in low-tax and high-tax districts since serving as a San Jose city councilmember in the early 2000s. Disparities between high-tax districts and low-tax districts, he argued to Playbook, are the result of two separate statewide measures approved by voters. By capping property taxes, Prop 13 in 1978 shifted the burden of education spending to the state. Then, 20 later, Prop 98 amended the constitution to include a K-12 funding formula based on per capita income, attendance, and state revenue. 'All of that requires constitutional changes that are provocative — problematic to say the least,' Cortese said. He would create a reserve account, fed during surplus budget years, whose investment proceeds would go to schools otherwise receiving less money from the state under the Prop 98 formula. Cortese's SB 743, currently moving through the Legislature, establishes the reserve-account framework but would become active only through a constitutional amendment he plans to introduce in January. But now Cortese has reason to be uncertain that is even a viable route to his policy goal. In the past few months, Newsom has repeatedly treated last November's ballot measures as little more than nonbinding advisory votes from the electorate that could be ignored in the face of an unforeseen budget crunch. Prop 35 was supposed to lock down revenue from a health-insurance tax, but Newsom nevertheless swept the money up into the general fund. Prop 36 changed sentencing rules but has yet to send money to the counties expected to administer treatment programs for convicted criminals. The Prop 4 bond laid out long-term climate priorities, but Newsom grabbed millions from it to address wildfire needs he considered more urgent. It's enough precedent to wonder who would bother with ballot-box budgeting anymore — to convince either lawmakers or voters that it's worth the cost to create the reserve accounts if the governor could decide to redirect the money due for them toward another purpose. Cortese's SB 743 passed the Senate floor last week and now heads to the Assembly. Even Should the bill fail there, or be vetoed by the governor, Cortese could fold its provisions into the amendment he would take straight to voters. He says tech entrepreneur Dave House and the Silicon Valley Education Foundation, which produced the documentary Zip Code Red about funding disparities, stand at the ready to back a petition campaign. 'If we have polling in early 2026 that says go, I don't know why we would stop,' Cortese said. But last year's experience could sour his backers from lavishly spending at the ballot. A California Medical Association-led coalition spent $54 million only to see its meticulously drawn Medi-Cal formulas be treated in Sacramento as a dead letter. The Yes on 35 coalition has yet to sue the governor, or take any action beyond a few aghast press releases, to rectify the situation. 'That's flat-out false. Anyone pushing this narrative either hasn't read the measures or is counting on others not to,' said Newsom spokesperson Izzy Gardon. 'Prop 35 and Prop 36 are being implemented as the voters approved — full stop. And Prop 4 was designed specifically to fund wildfire-related projects.' Cortese said a recalcitrant governor may be the biggest hurdle he faces now, but is optimistic that by the time this could reach the ballot Newsom's priorities may shift in his direction. 'Maybe this is wishful thinking, but for a governor approaching the last year of his term would be a legacy move to leave an equalization bill behind,' said Cortese. 'He's not going to be the governor to lose his fiscal discretion.' — With help from Eric He NEWS BREAK: LA Mayor Karen Bass reduces downtown LA curfew hours to 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. … Man suspected of shooting two Minnesota lawmakers taken into custody … Southern California wildfire survivors file suit against State Farm. Welcome to Ballot Measure Weekly, a special edition of Playbook PM focused on California's lively realm of ballot measure campaigns. Drop us a line at eschultheis@ and wmccarthy@ or find us on X — @emilyrs and @wrmccart. TOP OF THE TICKET A highly subjective ranking of the ballot measures — past and future, certain and possible — getting our attention this week. 1. Pay for performance (San Jose, 2026?): San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan may need to return to a ballot measure to launch his pay-for-performance initiative, after the city council voted against adopting the proposal outright last week. 'It may be time to take this question directly to the voters, instead of leaving it to the political insiders,' he said. 2. Measures A and B (Huntington Beach, 2025): An alliance of bookworms and progressive activists prevailed, by unexpectedly wide margins, in its effort to wrest back control over Huntington Beach's public library system from a conservative city council that conceded the battle, if not the war. 'We now have an opportunity to grow from this, for greater future use, in ways we never could have grown through a victory at this moment in time,' councilmember Chad Williams wrote on social media. 3. California Forever (Solano County, 2026?): As Suisun City pushes forward with a reimbursement agreement to annex land that would keep California Forever from having to go to the ballot, county officials are increasingly concerned about getting left behind. Last week, Solano supervisors sent a letter to the financially struggling city, asking it to pause discussions with the would-be start-up city's developers until after the county updates its general plan. 4. SMART transit funding (Sonoma and Marin counties, 2026): Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit officially launched its campaign committee to renew a quarter-cent sales tax that will determine whether the North Bay commuter-rail system can keep running after the same measure failed in 2020. The campaign, which is aiming for the June 2026 ballot, boosts the support of a local luminary who suddenly has more time to spend on local ballot politics: outgoing Senate Pro Tem Mike McGuire. 5. Minimum wage referendum (Los Angeles City, 2025): Unions are fighting a travel-industry-backed referendum effort to overturn the city's new $30 minimum wage. LA-based Unite Here Local 11 filed a lawsuit late last week against what it said are signature-gatherers' misleading statements to voters, an allegation the Alliance for Tourism, Jobs and Progress campaign denies. 6. Voter ID (2026?): Assemblymember Carl DeMaio launched his campaign with a coastal tour through Santa Monica, Huntington Beach and San Diego, teaming up with fellow GOP lawmakers and MAGA-world activists like Scott Presler, who characterized the initiative as a tool for Republicans to flip Southern California Democratic-held congressional districts. 7. Parking lot development (Menlo Park, 2025?): Menlo Park's city council is preparing for a ballot fight over its contentious plans to turn city-owned downtown parking lots into housing. As local retailers aim to qualify a measure that would mandate voter approval for changes to the lots, the city has hired consulting firm Tripepi Smith to help sell the vision. ON OTHER BALLOTS After voters in Nebraska bucked the national trend on abortion-rights measures last year and voted for a constitutional amendment that banned abortions after the first trimester, the state's anti-abortion activists are launching a push to put a total abortion ban on the 2026 ballot … A group pursuing an abortion-rights constitutional amendment says the Idaho's Supreme Court's delay delivering a decision nearly two months after hearing arguments in a ballot-language dispute is putting their organizing efforts at a disadvantage … Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed legislation to refer two measures to the November 2026 ballot that would maintain or expand the state's existing free school lunch program, including through a cap on tax deductions from high-earners … A coalition of progressive education groups in Michigan is launching an initiative effort that would increase the income tax on those earning over $500,000 to help fund K-12 schools … Lawmakers in New York voted to place a constitutional amendment on the November 2025 statewide ballot that would allow the state to build Nordic skiing and biathlon trails on forest preserve land at the upstate Mount Van Hoevenberg Olympic Sports Complex in exchange for acquiring new forest land in the surrounding area … And tenants-union members in Duluth, Minnesota submitted signatures for a 'right to repair' measure that would allow residents paying for home repairs to deduct the cost from their rent. IN MEMORIAM A BAN ON FORCED PRISON LABOR: After a constitutional amendment to end forced prison labor in California failed at the statewide ballot in 2024, supporters had high hopes that a repeat attempt could yield a different outcome. For this year at least, the cause appears to be dead. In February, Assemblymember Lori Wilson introduced two pieces of legislation, ACA 6, a constitutional amendment to formally ban slavery in the state's founding document, as well as AB 475, a companion bill that would prohibit the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation from requiring inmates to work, and developing wage regulations for those who chose to do so. But there appears to be little momentum to move either bill forward soon. ACA 6 never even received a committee hearing, and AB 475 was held in appropriations at the end of May. Neither Wilson's office nor a representative of last year's campaign to pass Prop 6 responded to requests for comment. The effort to banish slavery from California's constitution is survived by a national anti-slavery movement working to put the issue on more than a dozen ballots in 2026 and 2028. POSTCARD FROM ... … NEVADA COUNTY: Few prominent political careers have been launched from the dry foothills of the Sierra Nevada. But local Republicans are looking to stop future members of the county board of supervisors — where chair Heidi Hall was just elected to her third term — from making a career out of it. The Nevada County Republican Party has begun a petition drive to place an initiative on the June 2026 ballot that would impose term limits under an authority clarified by the legislature in 2021. Restricting supervisors to two terms, argue the measure's boosters, will ensure fresh blood circulates through the county administration building in Nevada City. 'If you stay too long the ideas get a little too calcified,' said Nevada County Republican Party chair Mac Young. 'This wasn't designed to be punitive to anyone. It's just good, bi-partisan housekeeping.' Young points to 17 other California counties with such limits on its supervisors, including Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange. But he looked to another conservative, rural county closer to home for a template: Shasta County, where 76 percent of voters backed Measure C last March. It caps service at two four-year terms, but applies only to newly elected county supervisors. 'It's not a partisan thing, it's just something we think fits well with our county,' Young said. Last month the party launched a petition drive to qualify for next year's ballot. Nevada has one of the oldest populations among the state's counties, and Young says he is counting on an army of retirees active on his party's central committee to gather the 5,074 signatures due by November. Despite its partisan character, Young's campaign appears surprisingly unpolarizing, its good-government approach evoking a bygone age. He says the proposal was met with support or at least indifference from the current county leadership, perhaps because existing supervisors would not be directly affected. 'I'd love to tell you there's some miraculous timing to the whole thing,' he said. 'But really it's just an availability of time and resources.' THAT TIME VOTERS ... … WENT SHOPPING: Californians have seen ballot measures on a wide variety of questions related to shops, markets and boutiques including to: Require most stores to close on Sundays (1930, failed) … Create a definition for stores and require a state license to operate (1932, did not qualify) … Allow the Legislature to authorize the sale of liquor in its original packaging in retail stores where it is not being consumed (1932, did not qualify) … Set up a licensing system for stores, prohibit operating a store without a license, and limit the hours of labor in stores (1934, did not qualify) … Prohibit indoor smoking in businesses, restaurants and other establishments, except in specifically designated areas (1976, did not qualify) … Reduce criminal penalties for shoplifting, among other theft- and drug-related crimes (2014, passed) … Legalize recreational marijuana and require stores to get a state license in order to sell marijuana for recreational use (2016, passed) … And increase penalties for theft- and drug-related crimes, including shoplifting (2024, passed).
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voter registration deadline for District 1 supervisor runoff hours away
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — Monday is the final day for South County residents to register to vote in the runoff for the vacant District 1 seat on the Board of Supervisors. The race between Chula Vista Mayor John McCann and Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre will decide former Board of Supervisors Chair Nora Vargas' successor. Vargas abruptly resigned from office weeks after winning re-election for a second term. Whoever wins in the special election will serve out the remainder of the current term, which runs through January 2029. D1 Special Election: What to know | The Candidates | How to vote | More Stories Early voting in the special election began earlier this month with the Registrar of Voters' distribution of mail-in ballots to residents in District 1 whose voter registration is current. The registrar encourages anyone who wants to vote in the election but has not received a ballot yet to check their voter registration status on the county's website before the end of the day Monday, June 16. After Monday's registration deadline, South County residents not signed up to vote can participate by visiting a vote center to conditionally register and cast a provisional ballot. Below: FOX 5/KUSI video explaining conditional registration and provisional voting. The first seven polling centers will open in the district on Saturday, June 21. Until then, the only in-person option available for voters to participate or get help with casting a ballot is at the county Registrar of Voters' office in Kearny Mesa. The final day to vote in the runoff will be on Tuesday, July 1, when another dozen polling sites will open across the district. Maps of all the vote centers and drop box locations across South County available to collect completed ballots can be found on the Registrar of Voters' website. Since the race is at a district level, only residents who live within its boundaries will be eligible to cast a vote in the race. This includes neighborhoods in south San Diego, such as Barrio Logan, Chollas View, East Village and Golden Hill, as well as the whole of Chula Vista, Imperial Beach and National City. San Diegans can look up their supervisorial district on the Registrar of Voters website. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Protesters rally against ICE in Otay Mesa, Oceanside ahead of ‘No Kings' day
OTAY MESA, Calif. (FOX 5/KUSI) — Contingents of protesters gathered outside the Otay Mesa Detention Center and in Oceanside on Friday, calling for an end to recent U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Holding signs that read 'Immigrants make America great,' and 'ICE melts under pressure,' the demonstrators at both edges of the county marched in pedestrian pathways to voice their opposition to the ratcheted up immigration enforcement seen across the nation in recent weeks. In Otay Mesa, the demonstrators made their way to the main entrance road into the facility, where they strung together trash cans to block it off. Protesters were seen allowing what appeared to be civilian cars through the makeshift barricade. Connect with us: Free Streaming TV app | Newsletters | Mobile app | Latest stories The rallies are an amuse-bouche of sorts to Saturday's highly-anticipated 'No Kings' protests, in which hundreds of thousands of people across the country are expected to gather across the country to voice their opposition to President Donald Trump's policies. More than 1,500 cities in all 50 states are scheduled to have a demonstration as part of the movement, including one in almost every city in San Diego County. Organizers say the rallies are intended to contrast a planned military parade in Washington, D.C. on the same day, ostensibly to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army and Flag Day. Saturday is also Trump's 79th birthday. However, immigration is likely to be a focal point of the demonstrations, fueled by Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard and U.S. Marines to quell unrest in Los Angeles after a series of raids targeting undocumented immigrants at their jobs and on city streets. These immigration raids, which have led to the arrest of dozens, some of whom had legal residency or other documentation, were also motivation for the dozens of demonstrators in Oceanside and Otay Mesa Friday. Similar enforcement actions were carried out in the city of Oceanside, according to police, but details about what they entailed remain few. Oceanside Police won't assist immigration enforcement due to state law For many San Diegans, the immigration enforcement actions of recent weeks have been marked by a high-profile, militarized raid at the popular Italian restaurant, Buona Forchetta, in South Park late last month. At least two of the restaurant's workers were taken into ICE custody following the action, which federal officials said was taken based on a tip that the restaurant employed 19 people — or more than half its workforce — without proper documentation. 'I've got cousins, I've got brothers, I've got people that I don't even know where they're at right now. There's people missing, there's children missing,' one protester at the Otay Mesa Detention Facility told FOX 5/KUSI Friday. 'It's important that together as a people, we stand up.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.