
The uncomfortable truth about race and Englishness
'He's a brown Hindu, how is he English?' That's the moment, in a discussion about the former prime minister Rishi Sunak, which made a video clip from a YouTube show go viral.
The clip has racked up nearly 4 million views on X and its sentiment has been widely condemned, even by some surprising sources. But for black Britons like me, it has thrown up uncomfortable questions about race and nationality.
The prime movers in the video are Moscow-born British pundit Konstantin Kisin and Fraser Nelson, no stranger to controversy. In his old role as former editor of the Spectator , Nelson was happy to publish the work of Douglas Murray, the far right commentator who has been frequently accused of Islamophobia and who told the Dutch parliament in 2016: 'Conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board'.
After stepping down (or being pushed out in favour of Michael Gove) last year, Nelson was the driving force behind a much-criticised Channel 4 Dispatches show about sickness benefits. It will have come as a surprise to some then, that Nelson found himself sounding like a voice of reason when he appeared on Kisin's 'free speech YouTube show and podcast' TriggerNometry, which he co-hosts with Francis Foster, on February 16
Towards the end comes the viral moment, which then was turned into a 20-second clip titled 'Can Immigrants Become English?'. Millions of views followed, Nelson stoking the fire by retweeting it with the quote 'Unexpected controversy!'
In a longer interview full of far right talking points on migration, Kisin questions at what point England ceases to be English when the native population is significantly outnumbered – even though this is far from the case in the UK. He says, 'my relatives from Russia or Ukraine or Armenia or whatever, they come to Heathrow, and they go, 'is this still England right now?''
He adds: 'For the vast majority of people in this country, their sense is that when the country ceases to be visually the same as it was, at some point, there is a level when it ceases to be that country.'
But the moment that has caused all the fuss comes when Kisin goes on to say that he doesn't consider himself or his English-born son to be English. Nelson counters that rather than colour, nationality should be defined by birthplace and upbringing. He uses as an example the former prime minister, prompting Kisin's 'how is he English?' moment.
The pushback since the interview clip went viral has been spectacular. Kisin has been criticised by everyone from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants to the Mail On Sunday commentator Dan Hodges the far right agitator Laurence Fox. But the funny thing is that someone like me – I was born in London to a mother and father both born in Ghana and all British citizens – can understand why he thinks he and his son are not English.
The truth is that lots of black and Asian Britons don't see ourselves as English. Rishi Sunak might call himself English, and it's his right to do so. But I have never heard another black Briton, including my family, say they are English – only British.Why is this? I think immigrants and their descendants feel firstly 'British' because of the British Empire, which invited us here to prop up the NHS and other industries.But English? We don't fit into the way 'Englishness' looks and we have had years of being told – overtly or subliminally – that we don't qualify.
Racism is alive and well in the UK. I keep coming back to a report commissioned by the Guardian in 2018 that found 38% of people from minority ethnic backgrounds said they had been wrongly suspected of shoplifting in the last five years, compared with 14% of white people. Another 43% said they had been overlooked for a work promotion in a way that felt unfair in the last five years – more than twice the proportion of white people (18%) who reported the same experience.
As a Black Briton, I have privileges that my Ghanaian cousins do not. A passport pre-Brexit that allowed me entry to most countries with little or no fuss. A health service that I don't need private insurance for.
But as a black person, my Britishness also rubs up against institutional bias. The Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which built the British Nationality Act 1981, makes clear that as British citizens with parents or grandparents who were not born in England, we are subject to different rules than our white English peers.
Since 2006, the government has been able to withdraw citizenship from dual nationals who act in a manner deemed 'seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the UK'. In 2014, these powers were extended to foreign-born British citizens without dual nationality. The 2022 Act extended the powers still further.
In early December 2022, the New Statesman crunched the numbers and found that the Nationality and Borders Bill could potentially deprive half of British Asians and 39% of Black Britons of their citizenship rights without warning. Governnments might that stripping someone of their citizenship happens only in a very limited numbers of cases, but that is not the point. It is that this punishment exists for some Britons but not others.
The Act applies to Britons who have dual citizenship or a migrant background. That's pretty much every person who is not White English. It includes the Jewish community and even dual British-Russian citizens such as Kisin. I wonder if he is aware of this?
Not only are Black people, Asians and others not deemed to be English by, as Kisin says, 'millions and millions and millions and millions' of people, but we are also deemed second-class citizens by our own government.
Non-white Britons find themselves being pushed down a decidedly steep and slippery slope. We've been on it for years – it was as long ago as 1978 that Margaret Thatcher talked about how 'people are really rather afraid that this country might be rather swamped by people with a different culture… if there is any fear that it might be swamped people are going to react and be rather hostile to those coming in.'
That's why Kisin has stumbled on an uncomfortable and distressing truth, and why I'm forced to agree with him.
English as an ethnicity is seen as white and maybe there's nothing wrong with that.
But what happens when people born in England who consider themselves British are told with increasing volume that they are neither English or British? Unfortunately, it seems like we are about to find out.
Samantha Asumadu is an investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker. She has written for the Guardian, the Telegraph, Open Democracy, New Statesman.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
Farage's proposal is just the latest undermining of the Barnett system
This, according to senior criminologists and ex-police officers, is not just a failure of admin, it's the result of austerity-era cuts that stripped police forces of capacity, dismantled the state-run Forensic Science Service in 2012, and left fragmented, underfunded systems to cope with ballooning evidence demands. Austerity didn't just weaken institutions; it disassembled infrastructure. READ MORE: Nigel Farage could cut the Barnett Formula. Here's what devolution experts think of that While these failings may seem like an English and Welsh concern, they tell a broader UK-wide story. Because when public services are cut in England, the Barnett formula translates those cuts into reduced budget allocations for Holyrood, too. Scotland has long borne the dual burden of being denied full fiscal autonomy while also seeing its devolved budget squeezed by decisions made for entirely different priorities south of the Border. Cuts to police, criminal courts, housing, public health, and local government in England have systematically eroded the spending floor on which Scottish services rest. So when justice collapses in England, it affects Scotland financially – even if the governance is separate. And now, against this backdrop of UK-wide budgetary degradation, Nigel Farage has called for the scrapping of the Barnett formula entirely. It's a move that's politically convenient, historically illiterate, and economically reckless. But more than anything, it's a distillation of what's already happening by stealth. Successive UK governments have undermined the foundations of the Barnett system – and devolution itself – for more than a decade. READ MORE: Furious Anas Sarwar clashes with BBC journalist over Labour policies It's obvious to every Scot that Farage's view relies on a mischaracterisation of Barnett as a subsidy, when in fact it simply ensures Scotland receives a proportional share of changes to spending in England for devolved services. It doesn't calculate entitlement or need, it mirrors policy shifts at Westminster. If England increases education or health spending, Scotland sees a relative uplift. If England cuts deeply, Scotland's budget falls, even if demand remains or rises. This has led to an absurd and punitive dynamic where Scotland loses funding not by its own decisions, but because England spends less. And when Scotland chooses to maintain higher standards in public services, it must do so from a proportionately smaller pot. Perversely, it doesn't stop there, though. Since the 2016 Brexit vote, Westminster has begun bypassing devolved governments directly. Funds like the Levelling Up Fund and Shared Prosperity Fund are allocated by UK ministers to local authorities, often bypassing Holyrood entirely. Promises made in The Vow on the eve of the 2014 independence referendum to deliver near-federal powers and respect Scottish decision-making have unravelled. READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action' The Internal Market Act has overridden devolved laws under the banner of market 'consistency'. Powers that returned from Brussels in areas like food standards, procurement, and agriculture were supposed to go to Holyrood, but in many cases they were retained by Westminster. The Sewel Convention, once a safeguard of devolved consent, has been treated as optional. Farage's proposal to scrap Barnett isn't an outlier, it's the natural conclusion of a decade-long pattern: cut services in England, shrink the Barnett allocation, bypass devolved institutions, and then blame the devolved nations for 'taking more than their share'. There's no consideration of fairness, or implementation of a needs-based analysis, it's a strategy of erosion; one that gouges out the Union from the centre while draping itself in the flag. The failures of justice in England, catastrophic as they are, expose a deeper injustice: the systematic unravelling of the constitutional promises made to Scotland. Ron Lumiere via email


Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Declan Lynch: The BBC got us through endless Northern nights, Gerry Adams
The BBC is 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', but nobody calls it that except Gerry Adams. Again and again, very deliberately, as he savours his triumph in the recent libel action against 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', he gives it the full official title — almost as if the 'British' part has connotations of inherent badness. He claims that his purpose in taking the action was to 'put manners' on this British Broadcasting Corporation. There were even suggestions — later denied — that the BBC would consider blocking the transmission of its programmes in this country, rather than risk further exposure to our atrocious libel laws.


South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist
The First Minister was asked on the BBC Scotland's Sunday Show if those who backed Reform were 'gullible' or 'racist' – a term the SNP leader has previously used to describe the party. Mr Swinney said the 7,088 people who backed Reform – more than a quarter of the vote – in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse ballot were 'neither', but were instead 'angry at the cost-of-living crisis'. He added: 'I think that's what motivates the Reform vote. People have got poorer because of one central thing – Brexit, and the author of that is (Reform UK leader Nigel) Farage. 'I'm standing up to Farage. I'm going to make no apology for it.' He said the SNP is 'in the process of recovery' and he had come into office as First Minister a year ago 'inheriting some significant difficulties' within the party, and that it needs to get stronger before the Holyrood election in 2026. He said voters are 'having to work hard for less' and are concerned about public services, particularly the NHS. Mr Swinney was asked about comments he made prior to the vote saying 'Labour were not at the races' and claiming it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie. The First Minister said that since the general election campaign last year, people he has met have pledged never to vote Labour due to the winter fuel allowance being cut, while Reform's support increased. Mr Swinney said: 'People were telling us on the doorsteps, they were giving us reasons why they weren't supporting Labour. We could also see that Farage's support was rising dramatically and that's happening across the United Kingdom, it's not unique to Hamilton. 'I positioned the SNP to be strong enough to stop Farage, and that's what we were determined to do.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has branded the SNP's campaign 'dishonest and disgraceful' and said it had put the spotlight on Reform. Those comments were put to the First Minister, who said he had previously been allies with Mr Sarwar in a campaign to 'stand up to far-right thinking'. Mr Swinney said: 'That was months ago and then we found ourselves in the aftermath of the UK local authority elections, the English local authority elections where Farage surged to a leading position and won a by-election south of the border. 'So the dynamic of our politics change in front of us. 'I've been standing up to Farage for months, I've been warning about the dangers of Farage for months, and they crystallised in the rise of Farage during the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall by-election.'