Posting memes can get you jailed in Texas? All about the new HB 366 bill
A new bill has been passed in Texas by lawmakers aiming to mandate disclosures for political ads that use AI-altered images, audio, or video of candidates. With the passing of the HB 366 bill, it becomes a legal requirement for digitally altered media to be labeled such if it is used by any candidate or campaign group that spends any amount over $100 on political advertising. This bill, presented by Rep. Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont), passed the House with a 102-40 vote.
The main priority of the HB 366 bill is to counter misleading or deceptive media, amid the immense rise of artificial intelligence. According to the bill, the labeling of any AI-altered media is a must as otherwise it poses a threat to "election integrity". For example, the AI-aided ads must included disclaimers like, "did not occur in reality".
According to the bill that passed with a majority, anyone found in violation of the law will tend to face Class A misdemeanor charges. This would include punishment including a year in jail and a hefty $4,000 fine.
Meanwhile this legislation has been condemned within political circles, with state Representative Shelley Luther, saying, 'We're banning political memes and giving people up to a year in jail for failing to attach a disclosure to a cartoon.'
Luther, who is a Republican, posted a video on X with her reactions while saying, "Democrats, of course, are rallying around this bill. What a joke."
Meanwhile, Nate Schatzline, the State Representative of Texas House District 93 took to X to slam the bill. He said, 'Today, we fought against the anti-1st amendment bill (HB366), that will LOCK PEOPLE UP for one year for posting political memes or political speech.'
"I want to be clear, this bill is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, & will almost certainly be struck down in the courts," he continued.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama
Chiseling away at President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act. Rolling back the green energy tax breaks from President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. At its core, the Republican "big, beautiful bill" is more than just an extension of tax breaks approved during President Donald Trump 's first term at the White House . The package is an attempt by Republicans to undo, little by little, the signature domestic achievements of the past two Democratic presidents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Earn more with tax savings ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan Learn More Undo "We're going to do what we said we were going to do," Speaker Mike Johnson said after House passage last month. While the aim of the sprawling 1,000-page plus bill is to preserve an estimated $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would otherwise expire at year's end if Congress fails to act - and add some new ones, including no taxes on tips - the spending cuts pointed at the Democratic-led programs are causing the most political turmoil. Live Events The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said this week that 10.9 million fewer people would have health insurance under the GOP bill, including 1.4 million immigrants in the U.S. without legal status who are in state-funded programs. At the same time, lawmakers are being hounded by businesses in states across the nation who rely on the green energy tax breaks for their projects. As the package moves from the House to the Senate , the simmering unrest over curbing the Obama and Biden policies shows just how politically difficult it can be to slash government programs once they become part of civic life. "When he asked me, what do you think the prospects are for passage in the Senate? I said, good - if we don't cut Medicaid ," said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recounting his conversation last week with Trump. "And he said, I'm 100% supportive of that." Health care worries Not a single Republican in Congress voted for the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare , in 2010, or Biden's inflation act in 2022. Both were approved using the same budget reconciliation process now being employed by Republicans to steamroll Trump's bill past the opposition. Even still, sizable coalitions of GOP lawmakers are forming to protect aspects of both of those programs as they ripple into the lives of millions of Americans. Hawley, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and others are wary of changes to Medicaid and other provisions in the bill that would result in fewer people being able to access health care programs. At the same time, crossover groupings of House and Senate Republicans have launched an aggressive campaign to preserve, at least for some time, the green energy tax breaks that business interests in their states are relying on to develop solar, wind and other types of energy production. Murkowski said one area she's "worried about" is the House bill's provision that any project not under construction within 60 days of the bill becoming law may no longer be eligible for those credits. "These are some of the things we're working on," she said. The concerns are running in sometimes opposite directions and complicating the work of GOP leaders who have almost no votes to spare in the House and Senate as they try to hoist the package over Democratic opposition and onto the president's desk by the Fourth of July. While some Republicans are working to preserve the programs from cuts, the budget hawks want steeper reductions to stem the nation's debt load. The CBO said the package would add $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. After a robust private meeting with Trump at the White House this week, Republican senators said they were working to keep the bill on track as they amend it for their own priorities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the president "made the pitch and the argument for why we need to get the bill done." The disconnect is reminiscent of Trump's first term, when Republicans promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, only to see their effort collapse in dramatic fashion when the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, voted thumbs down for the bill on the House floor. Battle over Medicaid In the 15 years since Obamacare became law, access to health care has grown substantially. Some 80 million people are now enrolled in Medicaid, and the Kaiser Family Foundation reports 41 states have opted to expand their coverage. The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid to all adults with incomes up to about $21,500 for an individual, or almost $29,000 for a two-person household. While Republicans no longer campaign on ending Obamacare, advocates warn that the changes proposed in the big bill will trim back at access to health care. The bill proposes new 80 hours of monthly work or community service requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients, age 18 to 64, with some exceptions. It also imposes twice-a-year eligibility verification checks and other changes. Republicans argue that they want to right-size Medicaid to root out waste, fraud and abuse and ensure it's there for those who need it most, often citing women and children. "Medicaid was built to be a temporary safety net for people who genuinely need it - young, pregnant women, single mothers, the disabled, the elderly," Johnson told The Associated Press. "But when when they expanded under Obamacare, it not only thwarted the purpose of the program, it started draining resources." Initially, the House bill proposed starting the work requirements in January 2029, as Trump's term in the White House would be coming to a close. But conservatives from the House Freedom Caucus negotiated for a quicker start date, in December 2026, to start the spending reductions sooner. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has said the changes are an Obamacare rollback by another name. "It decimates our health care system, decimates our clean energy system," Schumer of New York said in an interview with the AP. The green energy tax breaks involve not only those used by buyers of electric vehicles, like Elon Musk's Tesla line, but also the production and investment tax credits for developers of renewables and other energy sources. The House bill had initially proposed a phaseout of those credits over the next several years. But again the conservative Freedom Caucus engineered the faster wind-down - within 60 days of the bill's passage. "Not a single Republican voted for the Green New Scam subsidies," wrote Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, on social media. "Not a single Republican should vote to keep them." "REPEAL THE GREEN NEW SCAM!" reposted Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, a Freedom Caucus leader.
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Elon Musk suggests forming his own political party after Trump feud
Austin, June 7 (UNI) After his falling out with US President Donald Trump over the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has now suggested forming his own political party, potentially further straining his ties with Trump. The multi-billionaire first floated the idea on Thursday on X/Twitter, while taking pot shots at the US President. Musk posted a poll on his account asking his 220 million followers if they think it's "time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle." Surprisingly, over 80% agreed with the poll. "The public has spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree. This is fate," he wrote, on Friday evening. Musk then endorsed a fan's suggestion that he name it the "America Party". The name bears a resemblance to America PAC (Political Action Committee), the political action committee founded by Musk last year that was his main vehicle for spending $239 million to help elect Trump and other Republican candidates in 2024, CBS News reported. However, forming a political party in the US is easier said than done, as the country's two major parties, the Democratic and the Republican party, along with several other big third parties such as the Libertarian, Constitution, and Alliance parties have made inroads into several major towns, municipalities, and cities, and have ballot access in every state. Even with Musk's enormous wealth, it is a very difficult task, and currently he is at the crossroads with his Republican allies, still musing on how to part from them – if he ever even will. Musk offered a pointed suggestion Thursday afternoon to congressional Republicans who may be unsure of whether to side with him or the president, writing on X: "Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years."
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Elon Musk deletes post claiming Donald Trump is named in Jeffrey Epstein files
Tech titan Elon Musk has deleted his X post, in which he dropped a bombshell, claiming that US President Donald Trump was named in files pertaining to the case of late sex offender Jeffrey move hints at a possible truce with Trump since the duo exchanged barbs on social media a few days month, the billionaire quit the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and has been at loggerheads with Trump over the "big, beautiful bill" (spending bill) and the sweeping tax On Thursday, Musk accused Trump of being named in the sealed Epstein files, suggesting that was the "real reason" they were never released."Time to drop the really big bomb. Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" he said in a now-deleted X post. Musk followed that with a second post, which he also deleted, saying, "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out."Trump said on Friday that he was "particularly not interested" in speaking to Musk, who, he claimed, had "lost his mind".Musk had bankrolled a large part of Trump's presidential campaign after the Republican's twin assassination attempts last EPSTEIN FILESadvertisementThe Epstein files - a collection of court documents, testimony, and sealed records related to the financier's sex trafficking ring - have long been the subject of speculation. While many prominent names have surfaced, others remain hidden behind court recent remarks about Trump's alleged ties to Epstein have reignited speculation among conspiracy theorists and online investigators. Many believe the administration is still withholding sensitive and potentially incriminating files related to the February, Attorney General Pam Bondi added fuel to the fire by promoting the release of documents from the Justice Department. However, much of what was made public at that time had already been available for years through court cases, public records, lawsuits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) a 2014 photo of Elon Musk with Ghislaine Maxwell resurfaced online. Maxwell, a longtime associate and former girlfriend of Epstein, was convicted in 2021 for aiding his trafficking of underage image, taken at a Hollywood party, has been widely circulated, though Musk previously dismissed the interaction as a mere 2018, Epstein reportedly told a New York Times reporter he had advised Musk, a claim Musk firmly denied, insisting he had no professional or personal ties to Epstein.(with inputs from Reuters)Tune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Donald Trump#Elon Musk
