logo
Leaked: Starmer's Brexit reset deal in full

Leaked: Starmer's Brexit reset deal in full

Yahoo19-05-2025

The freshly minted deal struck in the early hours of Monday is still being kept under lock and key.
It contains details of how Sir Keir Starmer has surrendered access to Britain's fishing waters for 12 years and agreed to rejoin the EU's Erasmus student exchange scheme.
But there are also sizeable wins allowing the Home Office access to EU fingerprint, DNA and criminal records databases to help fight crime.
In a world first, The Telegraph can publish the entire contents of the deal for you to read.
In view of the United Kingdom - European Union summit of 19 May 2025, the European Commission and the United Kingdom explored areas with the potential to strengthen bilateral cooperation between the European Union and the United Kingdom. This Common Understanding between the European Commission and the United Kingdom sets out the conclusions of those exploratory talks. We will proceed swiftly on the undertakings set out in this document, in accordance with our respective procedures and legal frameworks. We will respect each other's decision-making autonomy.
In order to strengthen the bilateral relationship, we stress the pivotal importance of the two main agreements that underpin our relationship: the Withdrawal Agreement, including the Windsor Framework, and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement. We reaffirm our commitment to their full, timely, and faithful implementation.
We note the political agreements leading to full reciprocal access to waters to fish until 30 June 2038 and extending energy cooperation on a continuous basis.
Security and defence
The European Commission and the United Kingdom share the view that it is in the mutual interest of the EU and the United Kingdom to strengthen their cooperation on security and defence.
The conclusion of the Security and Defence Partnership reflects this ambition. The Partnership represents a framework for dialogue and cooperation on security and defence. It will help the EU and the United Kingdom boost cooperation in areas such as: supporting Ukraine; security and defence initiatives, including on defence industry; mobility of military materiel and personnel; space security; regular high-level dialogues and strategic consultations; peacebuilding and crisis management; cyber issues; countering hybrid threats and resilience of critical infrastructure.
In view of the Security and Defence Partnership, the United Kingdom and the European Commission should swiftly explore any possibilities for mutually beneficial enhanced cooperation created by the SAFE instrument, once adopted, in accordance with their respective legal frameworks.
Cooperation on maritime security and safety
The European Commission and the United Kingdom will seek to enhance cooperation in the following areas relating to maritime security: ship and port facility security (in particular related to the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code), maritime cyber security, security aspects of maritime autonomous surface ships, International Maritime Organization maritime security initiatives and other relevant maritime security related topics.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will endeavour to deepen their cooperation in the area of maritime safety in relation to accident reporting, including mutual sharing of accident investigation reports. In addition, cooperation in the context of the International Maritime Organization should be intensified.
Development and disaster cooperation
The European Commission and the United Kingdom will establish a regular dialogue in the area of development cooperation.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will seek to enhance cooperation in the field of international disaster and humanitarian response.
Health Security
The European Commission and the United Kingdom will explore the potential to enable exchange and cooperation on health security, including the detection of, preparedness for, and response to emerging health threats, to prevent and mitigate against future pandemics and health crises, including within the framework of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement health security provisions to maximise cooperation on health security. Health security, biological and chemical security should be part of regular exchanges at all levels, in appropriate fora, with a view to protecting public health.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission share the view that it is in the mutual interest to deepen our people-to-people ties, particularly for the younger generation.
Therefore, the European Commission and the United Kingdom should work towards a balanced youth experience scheme on terms to be mutually agreed. The scheme should facilitate the participation of young people from the European Union and the United Kingdom in various activities, such as work, studies, au-pairing, volunteering, or simply travelling, for a limited period of time. It should provide a dedicated visa path and ensure that the overall number of participants is acceptable to both sides.
Furthermore, the United Kingdom and the European Commission should work towards the association of the United Kingdom to the European Union Erasmus+ programme. The specific terms of this association, including mutually agreed financial terms, should be determined as part of that process in order to ensure a fair balance as regards the contributions of and benefits to the United Kingdom. The association should be in accordance with the European Union Multiannual Financial Framework and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
The European Commission and the United Kingdom recognise the value of travel and cultural and artistic exchanges, including the activities of touring artists. They will continue their efforts to support travel and cultural exchange.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will continue their exchanges on smooth border management for the benefit of their citizens, including the potential use of eGates where appropriate. They note that European Union citizens can use eGates in the United Kingdom and that there will be no legal barriers to eGate use for British Nationals traveling to and from European Union Member States after the introduction of the European Union Entry/Exit System.
The European Commission and the United Kingdom share the view that it is in their interest to strengthen their economic relations and generate prosperity as follows:
Energy cooperation
Exploring the participation of the United Kingdom in the European Union's internal electricity market
The United Kingdom and the European Commission share the view that close cooperation on electricity is in the interest of both the European Union and the United Kingdom.
The European Commission and the United Kingdom should explore in detail the necessaryparameters for the United Kingdom's possible participation in the European Union's internal electricity market, including participation in the European Union's trading platforms in all timeframes. Meanwhile, the current electricity trading arrangements will continue to apply.
Regarding its territorial scope, any agreement should be appropriately articulated with the provisions of the Windsor Framework. Any agreement should be based on a balance of rights and obligations and ensure a level playing field. In this context, it should define the relationship between the United Kingdom and European Union rules on the electricity market, as well as on State aid, the promotion of renewables and the protection of the environment, in so far as they relate to the electricity sector.
Accordingly, any agreement should include dynamic alignment with European Union rules where relevant, giving due regard to the United Kingdom's constitutional and parliamentary procedures and respect the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union within an arbitration-based dispute resolution mechanism, and an appropriate United Kingdom contribution to decision-shaping.
New technologies
The United Kingdom and the European Commission welcome continued technical regulatory exchanges on new energy technologies such as hydrogen, carbon capture, utilisation and storage and biomethane.
Working towards a Common Sanitary and Phytosanitary Area
The European Commission and the United Kingdom share the view that a functioning sanitary and phytosanitary area would address many of the issues raised in respect of the movement of agri-food products.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission should work towards establishing a Common Sanitary and Phytosanitary Area by way of a European Union-United Kingdom Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement (hereafter 'SPS Agreement').
Regarding its territorial scope, the SPS Agreement should cover the European Union and the United Kingdom in respect of Great Britain. This would result in the vast majority of movements of animals, animal products, plants, and plant products between Great Britain and the European Union being undertaken without the certificates or controls that are currently required by the rules within the scope of the SPS Agreement for such movements. These same benefits would be extended to the movements between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, through the interplay of the Windsor Framework and the SPS Agreement, so long as the SPS Agreement is fully implemented. The continued application of the Windsor Framework would provide for Northern Ireland maintaining its privileged unique dual access to both the European Union Single Market and the United Kingdom internal market.
In terms of its material scope, the SPS Agreement should cover sanitary, phytosanitary, food safety and general consumer protection rules applicable to the production, distribution and consumption of agrifood products, the regulation of live animals and pesticides, the rules on organics as well as marketing standards applicable to certain sectors or products.
Within the scope defined above, the SPS Agreement should ensure the application of the same rules at all times by providing for timely dynamic alignment of the rules applicable to and in the United Kingdom acting in respect of Great Britain with all the relevant European Union rules, giving due regard to the United Kingdom's constitutional and parliamentary procedures; and where necessary to ensure the European Union's level of food, sanitary, and phytosanitary safety, through the immediate application of the relevant European Union rules.
The United Kingdom should be able to take targeted action to protect its biosecurity and public health, in the same way as Member States under European Union law. In addition, the SPS Agreement should include a short list of limited exceptions to dynamic alignment. An exception could only be agreed if: (i) it does not lead to lower standards as compared to European Union rules, (ii) it does not negatively affect European Union animals and goods being placed on the market in the United Kingdom in respect of Great Britain, and (iii) it respects the principle that only animals and goods compliant with European Union rules move into the European Union.
The SPS Agreement should be subject to a dispute resolution mechanism with an independent arbitration panel that ensures the Court of Justice of the European Union is the ultimate authority for all questions of European Union law.
To ensure that it can put forward its view, the United Kingdom should be involved at an early stage and contribute appropriately for a country that is not a member of the European Union to the decision-shaping process of European Union legal acts in the fields covered by the obligation to dynamically align. The European Commission should consult the Government of the United Kingdom at an early stage of policy-making. These rights would not extend to participation in the work of the Council or its preparatory bodies.
The United Kingdom should have appropriate access to relevant European Union agencies, systems and databases in the areas covered by the SPS Agreement.
The SPS Agreement should provide for an appropriate financial contribution from the United Kingdom to support the relevant costs associated with the European Union's work in this policy area.
The SPS Agreement should be subject to a joint governance mechanism.
Working towards linking Emission Trading Systems of the European Union and the United Kingdom
The European Commission and the United Kingdom share the view that a functioning link between carbon markets would address many of the issues raised in respect of trade and a level playing field and would give effect to Article 392(6) of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement. This link should not constrain the European Union and the United Kingdom from pursuing higher environmental ambition, consistent with their international obligations.
Therefore, the United Kingdom and the European Commission should work towards establishing a link between carbon markets by way of a European Union-United Kingdom agreement linking the United Kingdom Emission Trading Scheme (UK ETS) and the European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS).
Regarding its territorial scope, this agreement should be appropriately articulated with the provisions of the Windsor Framework.
The agreement to link the UK ETS and EU ETS should create the conditions for goods originating in our jurisdictions to benefit from mutual exemptions from the respective European Union and United Kingdom Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms subject to compliance with the relevant provisions of European Union and United Kingdom legislation.
In terms of material scope, the agreement should cover all aspects of the functioning of an ETS link.
The sectors falling in the scope of the ETS linking agreement should be clearly defined to avoid risks of carbon leakage and competitive distortions. Among others, this scope should include the sectors of electricity generation, industrial heat generation (excluding the individual heating of houses), industry, domestic and international maritime transport and domestic and international aviation. The agreement should provide for a procedure to further expand the list of sectors to be covered by the linking agreement.
Within that scope, the agreement should ensure the dynamic alignment of the United Kingdom with the relevant European Union rules underpinning the functioning of the ETS link, giving due regard to the United Kingdom's constitutional and parliamentary procedures.
The United Kingdom cap and the United Kingdom reduction pathway will be guided by the United Kingdom's Climate Change Act obligations and Nationally Determined Contributions. They should be at least as ambitious as the European Union cap and the European Union reduction pathway.
The agreement should provide for an appropriate financial contribution from the United Kingdom to support the relevant costs associated with the European Union's work in this policy area.
The agreement should be subject to a dispute resolution mechanism with an independent arbitration panel that ensures the Court of Justice of the European Union is the ultimate authority for all questions of European Union law.
To ensure that it can put forward its view, the United Kingdom should be involved at an early stage and contribute appropriately for a country that is not a member of the European Union to the decision-shaping process of European Union legal acts in the fields covered by the obligation to dynamically align. The European Commission should consult the United Kingdom at an early stage of policy-making. These rights would not extend to participation in the work of the Council or its preparatory bodies.
The agreement should be subject to a joint governance mechanism.
Provision of services through entry and temporary stay of natural persons for business purposes
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will set up dedicated dialogues on the implementation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, as regards entry and temporary stay of natural persons for business purposes, including the sponsorship scheme, and the recognition of professional qualifications.
Competition cooperation
The European Commission and the United Kingdom recognise the mutual benefit of cooperation in competition enforcement. In this context and in implementing the level playing field provisions of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, the European Commission and the United Kingdom welcome the successful conclusion of negotiations for a competition cooperation agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom.
Reinforced law enforcement and judicial cooperation in criminal matters
The United Kingdom and the European Commission recognise the importance of ongoing law enforcement and judicial cooperation in criminal matters between the European Union and the United Kingdom.
The European Commission and the United Kingdom believe that there is scope for reinforcing cooperation through quicker, better and deeper implementation of Part Three of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement and by fully exploiting and building on its potential. To improve this cooperation, the European Commission and the United Kingdom should intensify technical work in the Specialised Committee on Law Enforcement and Judicial Cooperation with the aim to further streamline the cooperation on mutual legal assistance. The European Commission and the United Kingdom will also explore opportunities to enhance the timeliness, efficiency and effectiveness of the provisions of Title VII of Part Three of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will take the necessary steps to ensure that the pending arrangements underpinning the cooperation between the United Kingdom and Europol under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement are finalised swiftly.
The European Commission and the United Kingdom will also encourage Europol and the United Kingdom's National Crime Agency, and their other competent law enforcement authorities, to further develop their cooperation including in the framework of analysis projects and operational action plans within the European Multidisciplinary Platform Against Criminal Threats.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will also consider how to increase operational cooperation between the United Kingdom and Europol under the applicable rules, for instance on mutually beneficial exchange of information related to terrorism and other serious crimes.
The European Commission and the United Kingdom will explore ways to reinforce mutual and reciprocal exchanges of data on fingerprints, DNA, and criminal records of third country nationals, in the light of technical developments; and acknowledge the requirement in the Trade and Cooperation Agreement to set up automated searching of vehicle registration data. They will also explore extending the exchange of data to facial images for the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences.
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will examine the difficulties for law enforcement and judicial authorities in one jurisdiction to obtain data from electronic communication and other relevant service providers offering services in the other jurisdiction, and potential solutions.
Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
The European Commission and the United Kingdom note the importance of the positive judicial cooperation in civil and commercial law, including family matters. In this context, they welcome that the Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters will enter into force for the United Kingdom on 1 July 2025.
Cooperation in relation to drugs risks and threats
The United Kingdom and the European Commission agree that the reciprocal exchange of information between the European Union Drugs Agency and the United Kingdom relevant authorities on drugs risks and threats would be beneficial for fulfilling their respective tasks. Therefore, they suggest that the European Union Drugs Agency and the relevant United Kingdom authorities could conclude a working arrangement to that end.
The European Commission and the United Kingdom underline their commitment to deepen co-operation on challenges posed by irregular migration – including action to tackle people smuggling and to deepen information sharing to control and manage migration at our respective external borders – while remaining committed to ensuring international protection for those who need it.
Upstream Migration
The United Kingdom and the European Commission will deepen cooperation on the external dimension of migration across key geographies, as part of a whole of route approach. They recognise the benefit of increased mutual sharing of information, country expertise and analysis enabling better coordination. They will also work more closely in multilateral fora, processes and dialogues, including the European Union's Global Alliance to Counter Migrant Smuggling, and through exploring United Kingdom participation in the Khartoum and Rabat Processes.
Working together on practical solutions and returns
The European Commission and the United Kingdom should work together on practical and innovative approaches to reduce irregular migration. This includes work to share best practices and operational information on key issues like returns to third countries, and to explore possible deterrence mechanisms and other innovative solutions, in line with national, European Union and international law. This would be underpinned by closer cooperation across key networks such as the European Migration Network and agencies, including the European Union Agency for Asylum and Frontex, and respective United Kingdom authorities. They should work together to prevent irregular Channel crossings.
Bolstering United Kingdom and European Union border security including through law enforcement cooperation
The United Kingdom and the European Commission should bolster their operational and strategic cooperation to tackle the challenges posed by irregular migration along key routes and at external borders, including through their agencies, law enforcement and judicial cooperation, and information sharing capabilities. This includes through enhanced cooperation with Europol and its European Migrant Smuggling Centre.
Addressing challenges and abuses of visa policy
In addition to these enhanced efforts, the European Commission and the United Kingdom will explore closer cooperation to address challenges related to visa policy such as exchanging analysis on visa abuse by third country nationals.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Council of EU plans to extend temporary protection for Ukrainians for another three years
Council of EU plans to extend temporary protection for Ukrainians for another three years

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Council of EU plans to extend temporary protection for Ukrainians for another three years

On 13 June, the Council of the European Union is expected to reach a political agreement on extending the temporary protection for Ukrainian citizens for another three years – until March 2027. Source: agenda of the EU Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting scheduled for 13 June, as reported by European Pravda Details: The EU Council will discuss extending temporary protection for Ukrainian citizens in the EU in connection with the war until March 2027, with the goal of reaching a political agreement on the matter. Final approval of the decision is expected in the coming weeks. In addition, ministers will discuss possible options for transitioning from temporary protection status to another type of status. Background: The European Commission recently stated it is preparing to extend temporary protection for Ukrainians until March 2027. It will issue recommendations to member states regarding further steps, including the possibility of granting a new status to those who are employed or studying in the EU. The Council of the EU previously extended temporary protection for Ukrainians until March 2026. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

A European Perspective: Why Digital Sovereignty Concerns Us All
A European Perspective: Why Digital Sovereignty Concerns Us All

Forbes

time39 minutes ago

  • Forbes

A European Perspective: Why Digital Sovereignty Concerns Us All

Prof. Dr. Dennis-Kenji Kipker is a cyber security expert and works as Scientific Director of the getty There are countless definitions of what constitutes digital sovereignty: Some define it politically, and others define it technically. Then, there are legal and sociocultural attempts to define it. And that makes sense, because digitalization affects all areas of life, society and the economy. That is why this article will not attempt to define the entire possible spectrum of digital sovereignty, because that would be boring. Instead, my aim is to identify specific reasons for the lack of digital sovereignty to date and consider how we can work together to find a way out of this dilemma. Here are just two examples of a lack of digital sovereignty: When President Donald Trump announced that he will make changes to the transatlantic data protection agreement between the EU and the United States—and we in the European Union had to consider what consequences this could have for our economy—I do not believe that is digital sovereignty. Or, when Vice President JD Vance stated in February 2025 that the European Union is digitally overregulated—and the EU Commission then considered reducing European data protection by reforming the GDPR—I do not believe that is digital sovereignty, either. To me, sovereignty therefore means being able to decide freely whether and how to digitize—so that the greatest possible added value can be achieved for everyone, regardless of foreign interference. And digital sovereignty is not just an abstract end in itself: It helps companies in the EU use the best possible IT products at an efficient business price. On the other hand, U.S. companies also benefit from EU digital sovereignty. In a free, sovereign market, it is also easier for startups and scale-ups abroad to build a business case in the EU. Unfortunately, we in the EU are still too far away from this ideal, at least at present. But why is this the case? It's a long story, because a lack of digital sovereignty didn't happen overnight or in just a few years. No, to answer this question, you have to go back almost 30 years in the history of European technology development. The best example of this for Germany is the mobile phone market. Immediately after the start of the cell phone boom in the 1990s, the country began to rely on outsourcing IT development. This ultimately resulted in the closure of Siemens Mobile, a formerly big-name mobile developer in the country. As a result, while companies were initially able to rely on suppliers from abroad, decades later, they became dependent on these same suppliers. And the consequences of this can be felt by everyone today: the European smartphone market has long since ceased to be dominated by European manufacturers, as was the case with cell phones just a few decades ago. This worked well for many years because the credo of the European digital economy and others was always that globalization is the way forward. In the last decade in particular, a lot has been digitized and networked with the expansion of mobile 5G connections, and more and more computing capacities have been outsourced to the global cloud without hesitation. However, the global turnaround that began with Covid-19 in 2020 and that has since continued with political unrest and tension have made this difficult. The insight is clear: While we trusted in digital globalization all those years ago, it is now a question of digital trust. Digitalization without trust is no longer sustainable in these times. Regionalization instead of globalization has therefore become the credo of our decade—and this also includes regaining the digital sovereignty we gave up. But that is, of course, easier said than done. We've had decades to lose our digital sovereignty, but we have been confronted with the global turnaround at such a rapid pace that it will be extremely difficult for us to establish digital sovereignty from now on. But this is where the circle must close. Digital sovereignty affects us all, and therefore, everyone can make a contribution. It's not just about us as the European Union investing more in the development of our own digital economy by supporting startups and scale-ups with targeted funding. It's even more important to get young people interested in training in STEM subjects. And ultimately, it's about how we as states, as individual companies and as individual consumers purchase IT. In this very concrete business context, in order to achieve digital sovereignty and technological resilience, it is first necessary to carry out a risk analysis. What technology do I use? In which areas do I most use it? To what extent are my processes dependent on it, and from which manufacturers does it come from? On the other hand, U.S. manufacturers, for example, should also ask themselves these questions, as the increasing regulatory requirements for cybersecurity as part of digital sovereignty also offer new business opportunities. Where EU-compliant products are offered, European companies can also integrate them more easily into their IT infrastructure. Because of this, ideally, digital sovereignty is a win-win situation for everyone. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

time44 minutes ago

British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees

LONDON -- The British government on Monday reversed its unpopular plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had signaled the u-turn last month after a loud outcry from the public and some members of his Labour Party who thought the relatively modest 1.5 billion-pound ($2 billion) savings were too politically costly. Treasury chief Rachel Reeves, who canceled the payment for home heating on all but the poorest retirees after Labour came to power last summer, said the benefit would be restored to 9 million people, or three-quarters of pensioners, in England and Wales whose incomes are below 35,000 pounds ($47,500). Reeves said the move was necessary last year because the previous Conservative government had left public finances in a dire state. 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government," Reeves said. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' The payments are worth between 200 and 300 pounds ($271 and $406) a year. The reversal will cost the government 1.25 billion, Reeve said. Canceling the payments for most people last winter was blamed for contributing to Starmer's swift decline in popularity after his party came to power in a landslide. He was blamed for punishing elderly people on limited incomes who struggled to make ends meet during a cost-of-living crisis. Labour fared poorly in local elections in England last month, with many party representatives blaming the removal of the winter fuel payment. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the main opposition Conservative Party, quickly pounced on Starmer's about-face. 'Keir Starmer has scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making," she said. 'This humiliating u-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The prime minister should now apologize for his terrible judgment.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store